Most orthopaedic journals currently require reporting outcomes of surgical interventions for at least 2 postoperative years, but there have been no rigorous studies on this matter. Various patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) have been used to assess the status of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair (RCR).
Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that the mean shoulder-specific PROMs at 1 year improve substantially over baseline but that there is no clinically meaningful difference between the mean 1- and 2-year PROMs after RCR.
Study Design:
Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (level of evidence 1 and 2) reporting the shoulder-specific American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the Constant, or the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years after RCR. The methodologic quality of studies was assessed. Also, the random effects meta-analyses of changes in PROMs for each of the first and second postoperative years were conducted.
Results:
Fifteen studies (n = 11 RCTs; n = 4 cohort studies) with a total of 1371 patients were included. Studies were highly heterogeneous, but no visual evidence of major publication bias was observed. The weighted means of the baseline PROMs were 46.2 points for the ASES score, 46.4 points for the Constant score, and 38.8 points for the WORC Index. The first-year summary increments were 41.1 (95% CI, 36.0-46.2) points for the ASES score, 34.2 (95% CI, 28.8-39.6) points for the Constant score, and 42.9 (95% CI, 37.3-48.4) points for the WORC Index. In contrast, the second-year summary increments were 2.3 (95% CI, 1-3.6) points for the ASES score, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.9-4.4) points for the Constant score, and 2 (95% CI, -0.1 to 4) points for the WORC Index.
Conclusion:
All PROMs improved considerably from baseline to 1 year, but only very small gains that were below the minimal clinically important differences were observed between 1 year and 2 years after RCR. This study did not find any evidence for requiring a minimum of 2 years of follow-up for publication of PROs after RCR. Our results suggest that focusing on 1-year PROMs after RCR would foster more timely reporting, better control of selection bias, and better allocation of research resources.
AbramsGDGuptaAKHusseyKE, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without acromioplasty: randomized prospective trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1296-1303.
2.
AngstFSchwyzerHKAeschlimannASimmenBRGoldhahnJ.Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(suppl 11):S174-S188.
3.
AvanziPGiudiciLDCaponeA, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial for patch augmentation in rotator cuff repair: 24-month outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(10):1918-1927.
4.
BerglundDDKurowickiJGiveansMRHornBLevyJC.Comorbidity effect on speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. JSES Open Access. 2018;2(1):60-68.
5.
BoutronIMoherDTugwellP, et al. A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial was developed using consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(12):1233-1240.
6.
CaiYZZhangCJinRL, et al. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with graft augmentation of 3-dimensional biological collagen for moderate to large tears: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1424-1431.
7.
ChahalJVan ThielGSMallN, et al. The role of platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review with quantitative synthesis. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(11):1718-1727.
8.
CharoussetCGrimbergJDuranthonLDBellaicheLPetroverDKalraK.The time for functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: correlation with tendon healing controlled by computed tomography arthrography. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):25-33.
9.
CollinPBetzMHerveA, et al. Clinical and structural outcome 20 years after repair of massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(3):521-526.
10.
ColvinACEgorovaNHarrisonAKMoskowitzAFlatowEL.National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):227-233.
11.
CvetanovichGLGowdAKLiuJN, et al. Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(5):939-948.
12.
DettoriJR.Loss to follow-up. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011;2(1):7-10.
GagnierJJRobbinsCBediACarpenterJEMillerBS.Establishing minimally important differences for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(5):e160-e166.
15.
GulottaLVNhoSJDodsonCC, et al. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part I, functional outcomes and radiographic healing rates. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(6):934-940.
16.
HartungJKnappG.On tests of the overall treatment effect in a meta-analysis with normally distributed responses. Stat Med. 2001;20(12):1771-1782.
17.
HeubererPRPauzenbergerLGruberMS, et al. Delaminated rotator cuff tears showed lower short-term retear rates after arthroscopic double-layer repair versus bursal layer-only repair: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(3):689-696.
18.
HuangHGrantJAMillerBSMirzaFMGagnierJJ.A systematic review of the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with rotator cuff disease. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2572-2582.
19.
IannottiJPDeutschAGreenA, et al. Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(11):965-971.
20.
ImreyPB.Limitations of meta-analyses of studies with high heterogeneity. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919325.
21.
JoCHKimJEYoonKS, et al. Does platelet-rich plasma accelerate recovery after rotator cuff repair? A prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2082-2090.
22.
KeenerJDGalatzLMStobbs-CucchiGPattonRYamaguchiK.Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial of immobilization compared with early motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(1):11-19.
KirschJMNathaniARobbinsCBGagnierJJBediAMillerBS.Is there an association between the “critical shoulder angle” and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair?Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(4):2325967117702126.
25.
KlugerRBockPMittlbockMKramplaWEngelA.Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2071-2081.
26.
KnappGHartungJ.Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Stat Med. 2003;22(17):2693-2710.
27.
KukkonenJKaukoTVahlbergTJoukainenAAärimaaV.Investigating minimal clinically important difference for the Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(12):1650-1655.
28.
LapnerPLSabriERakhraK, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(14):1249-1257.
29.
LegginBGMichenerLAShafferMABrennemanSKIannottiJPWilliamsGRJr.The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(3):138-151.
30.
MacDonaldPMcRaeSLeiterJMascarenhasRLapnerP.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(21):1953-1960.
31.
MakhniECHamamotoJTHigginsJD, et al. How comprehensive and efficient are patient-reported outcomes for rotator cuff tears?Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(3):2325967117693223.
32.
MalavoltaEAGracitelliMEFerreira NetoAAAssuncaoJHBordalo-RodriguesMde CamargoOP.Platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2446-2454.
33.
MillerBSDownieBKKohenRB, et al. When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10): 2064-2070.
34.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG; the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
35.
MoosmayerSLundGSeljomUS, et al. Tendon repair compared with physiotherapy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled study in 103 cases with a 5-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(18):1504-1514.
36.
MoosmayerSLundGSeljomUS, et al. At a 10-year follow-up, tendon repair is superior to physiotherapy in the treatment of small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(12):1050-1060.
37.
OME Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedics. Implementing a scientifically valid, cost-effective, and scalable data collection system at point of care: the Cleveland Clinic OME Cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(5):458-464.
38.
OME Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedics. Value in research: achieving validated outcome measurements while mitigating follow-up cost. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(5):419.
39.
PageMJMcKenzieJEGreenSE, et al. Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11): 1270-1281.
40.
PandeyVBandiAMadiS, et al. Does application of moderately concentrated platelet-rich plasma improve clinical and structural outcome after arthroscopic repair of medium-sized to large rotator cuff tear? A randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(8):1312-1322.
41.
PiperCCHughesAJMaYWangHNeviaserAS.Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(3):572-576.
42.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. [computer program]. Version 3.5. Vienna, Austria; 2020.
43.
RamkumarPNNavarroSMHaeberleHSNgMPiuzziNSSpindlerKP.No difference in outcomes 12 and 24 months after lower extremity total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2322-2329.
44.
RandelliPArrigoniPRagoneVAliprandiACabitzaP.Platelet rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective RCT study, 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(4):518-528.
45.
ReillyPMacleodIMacfarlaneRWindleyJEmeryRJ.Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88(2):116-121.
46.
RokitoASZuckermanJDGallagherMACuomoF.Strength after surgical repair of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5(1):12-17.
47.
SahooSMohrJStrnadGJ, et al. Validity and efficiency of a smartphone-based electronic data collection tool for operative data in rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(7):1249-1256.
48.
SahooSRicchettiETZajichekA, et al. Associations of preoperative patient mental health and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with baseline pain, function, and satisfaction in patients undergoing rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):432-443.
49.
SamuelssonKMagnussenRAAlentorn-GeliE, et al. Equivalent Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores 12 and 24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2085-2091.
50.
SidikKJonkmanJN.A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(21):3153-3159.
51.
SidikKJonkmanJN.A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(5):823-838.
52.
SidikKJonkmanJN.A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies. Stat Med. 2007;26(9):1964-1981.
53.
SomersonJSBartushKCShroffJBBhandariMZelleBA.Loss to follow-up in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2016;40(11):2213-2219.
54.
TariqMBJonesMHStrnadGSosicE; Cleveland Clinic OMESHSpindlerKP.A last-ditch effort and personalized surgeon letter improves PROMs follow-up rate in sports medicine patients: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Knee Surg. 2021;34(2):130-136.
55.
TashjianRZ.Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(4):589-604.
56.
ViechtbauerW.Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36(3):48.
57.
von AllmenRSWeissSTevaearaiHT, et al. Completeness of follow-up determines validity of study findings: results of a prospective repeated measures cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140817.
58.
WolfgangGL.Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: factors influencing the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(1): 14-26.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
