Current practice patterns for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury favor surgical reconstruction. However, long-term outcomes may not differ between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury. Differences in outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of patients in the United States is largely unknown, as are outcomes in long-term strength and performance measures.
Purpose:
To determine if differences exist in 5-year functional and radiographic outcomes between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury when both groups complete a progressive criterion-based rehabilitation protocol.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
From an original group of 144 athletes, 105 participants (mean ± SD age, 34.3 ± 11.4 years) with an acute ACL rupture completed functional testing (quadriceps strength, single-legged hop, and knee joint effusion testing; patient-reported outcomes) and knee radiographs 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation.
Results:
At 5 years, patients treated with ACL reconstruction versus rehabilitation alone did not differ in quadriceps strength (P = .817); performance on single-legged hop tests (P = .234-.955); activity level (P = .349-.400); subjective reports of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (P = .090-.941); or presence of knee osteoarthritis (P = .102-.978). When compared with patients treated nonoperatively, patients treated operatively did report greater global ratings of knee function (P = .001), and lower fear (P = .035) at 5 years but were more likely to possess knee joint effusion (P = .016).
Conclusion:
The current findings indicate that favorable outcomes can occur after both operative and nonoperative management approaches with the use of progressive criterion-based rehabilitation. Further study is needed to determine clinical algorithms for identifying the best candidates for surgical versus nonoperative care after ACL injury. These findings provide an opportunity to improve the educational process between patients and clinicians regarding the expected clinical course and long-term outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries.
AdamsDLogerstedtDSHunter-GiordanoAet al. Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(7):601-614.
2.
AhldenMSamuelssonKSernertNForssbladMKarlssonJKartusJ. The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2230-2235.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(21):1543-1552.
5.
BullerLTBestMJBaragaMGKaplanLD. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;3(1):2325967114563664.
6.
ChalmersPNMallNAMoricMet al. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history? A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(4):292-300.
7.
ChmielewskiTLJonesDDayTTillmanSMLentzTAGeorgeSZ. The association of pain and fear of movement/reinjury with function during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(12):746-753.
8.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates; 1988:567.
9.
CollinsNJMisraDFelsonDTCrossleyKMRoosEM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(suppl 1):S208-S228.
10.
DanielDMStoneMLDobsonBEFithianDCRossmanDJKaufmanKR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(5):632-644.
11.
EitzenIMoksnesHSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA. A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(11):705-721.
12.
FeuchtMJCoticMSaierTet al. Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(1):201-207.
13.
FitzgeraldGKAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(2):76-82.
14.
FitzgeraldGKAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. The efficacy of perturbation training in nonoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation programs for physical active individuals. Phys Ther. 2000;80(2):128-140.
15.
FosangAJRogersonFM. Identifying the human aggrecanase. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(9):1109-1116.
16.
FrobellRBRoosEMRoosHPRanstamJLohmanderLS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:331-342.
17.
FrobellRBRoosHPRoosEMRoemerFWRanstamJLohmanderLS. Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: five year outcome of randomised trial. BMJ. 2013;346:F232.
18.
GottlobCABakerCLPellissierJMColvinL. Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:272-282.
19.
GrananLPBahrRSteindalKFurnesOEngebretsenL. Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):308-315.
GrindemHEitzenIEngebretsenLSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA. Nonsurgical or surgical treatment of ACL injuries: knee function, sports participation, and knee reinjury. The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1233-1241.
22.
GrindemHEitzenIMoksnesHSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA. A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament–injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2509-2516.
23.
HartiganEAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Perturbation training prior to ACL reconstruction improves gait asymmetries in non-copers. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(6):724-729.
24.
HartiganEHAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Time line for noncopers to pass return-to-sports criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(3):141-154.
25.
HeftiFMullerWJakobRPStaubliHU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-234.
26.
HopperDMGohSCWentworthLAet al. Test-retest reliability of knee rating scales and functional hop tests one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport. 2002;3:10-18.
27.
HurdWJAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: part 1, outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(1):40-47.
28.
HurdWJAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Influence of age, gender, and injury mechanism on the development of dynamic knee stability after acute ACL rupture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(2):36-41.
29.
IrrgangJJAndersonAFBolandALet al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):600-613.
30.
IrrgangJJAndersonAFBolandALet al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(10):1567-1573.
31.
IrrgangJJSnyder-MacklerLWainnerRSFuFHHarnerCD. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(8):1132-1145.
32.
KellgrenJHLawrenceJS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494-502.
33.
KocherMSSteadmanJRBriggsKZurakowskiDSterettWIHawkinsRJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(9):1560-1572.
34.
KvistJEkASporrstedtKGoodL. Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(5):393-397.
35.
KvistJOsterbergAGauffinHTagessonSWebsterKArdernC. Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL–Return to Sports After Injury questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(5):568-575.
36.
KwokCSHarrisonTServantC. The optimal timing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with respect to the risk of postoperative stiffness. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:556-565.
37.
LentzTATillmanSMIndelicatoPAMoserMWGeorgeSZChmielewskiTL. Factors associated with function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health. 2009;1:47-53.
38.
LogerstedtDGrindemHLynchAet al. Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2348-2356.
39.
LogerstedtDLynchAAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Symmetry restoration and functional recovery before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(4):859-868.
40.
LucBGribblePAPietrosimoneBG. Osteoarthritis prevalence following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and numbers-needed-to-treat analysis. J Athl Train. 2014;49(6):806-819.
41.
LynchADLogerstedtDSAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Quadriceps activation failure after anterior cruciate ligament rupture is not mediated by knee joint effusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(6):502-510.
42.
LynchADLogerstedtDSGrindemHet al. Consensus criteria for defining “successful outcome” after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):335-342.
43.
MagnussenRAGrananLPDunnWRet al. Cross-cultural comparison of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in the United States and Norway. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(1):98-105.
44.
MarxRGStumpTJJonesECWickiewiczTLWarrenRF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(2):213-218.
45.
MihelicRJurdanaHJotanovicZMadjarevicTTudorA. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1093-1097.
46.
MoksnesHRisbergMA. Performance-based functional evaluation of non-operative and operative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(3):345-355.
47.
MoksnesHSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA. Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee classified as noncopers may be candidates for nonsurgical rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(10):586-595.
48.
MosesBOrchardJOrchardJ. Systematic review: annual incidence of ACL injury and surgery in various populations. Res Sports Med. 2012;20(3-4):157-179.
49.
NaylorJMHayenADavidsonEet al. Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:235.
50.
ReidABirminghamTBStratfordPWAlcockGKGiffinJR. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2007;87(3):337-349.
51.
RobertsSEvansHWrightKet al. ADAMTS-4 activity in synovial fluid as a biomarker of inflammation and effusion. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(9):1622-1626.
52.
RoosEMRoosHPLohmanderLSEkdahlCBeynnonBD. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(2):88-96.
53.
RossMDLangfordBWhelanPJ. Test-retest reliability of 4 single-leg horizontal hop tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(4):617-622.
54.
SmithTOPostleKPennyFMcNamaraIMannCJV. Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment. Knee. 2014;21:462-470.
55.
Snyder-MacklerLDelittoAStralkaSWBaileySL. Use of electrical stimulation to enhance recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 1994;74(10):901-907.
SturgillLPSnyder-MacklerLManalTJAxeMJ. Interrater reliability of a clinical scale to assess knee joint effusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(12):845-849.
58.
van YperenDTReijmanMvan EsEMBierma-ZeinstraSMAMeuffelsDE. Twenty-year follow-up study comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(5):1129-1136.
59.
WebsterKEFellerJALambrosC. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport. 2008;9(1):9-15.
60.
WigginsAJGrandhiRKSchneiderDKStanfieldDWebsterKEMyerGD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1861-1876.
61.
WobySRRoachNKUrmstonMWatsonPJ. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain. 2005;117(1-2):137-144.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
