AgrawalAA.Corruption of journal impact factors. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(4):157.
2.
AhmedAli UReiberBMMTenHove JR. Journal impact factor and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: an empirical study [published online June4, 2017]. Langenbecks Arch Surg. doi:10.1007/s00423-017-1593-6.
3.
BensmanSJ.Garfield and the impact factor. Ann Rev Inform Sci Tech. 2007;41(1):93-155.
4.
BhandariMBusseJDevereauxPJ. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Can J Surg. 2007;50(2):119-123.
BozzoAOitmentCEvaniewNGhertM.The journal impact factor of orthopaedic journals does not predict individual paper citation rate. JAAOS: Global Res Rev. 2017;1(2):e007.
7.
BrembsBButtonKMunafoM.Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:291
8.
CallahamMWearsRLWeberE.Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002;287:2847-2850.
LeeKPSchotlandMBacchettiPBeroLA.Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2805-2808.
21.
LokkerCMcKibbonKAMcKinlayRJWilczynskiNLHaynesRB.Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336(7645):655-657.
22.
LozanoGALariviereVGingrasY.The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech. 2012;63(11):2140-2145.
Not-so-deep impact: research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 2005;435:1003.
26.
RossnerMVan EppsHHillE.Show me the data. J Cell Biol. 2007;179(6):1091-1092.
27.
SeglenPO.Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314(7079):498-502.
28.
SerenkoADohanM.Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: example from the field of artificial intelligence. J Informetrics. 2011;5:629-648.
29.
SmithR.Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. BMJ. 1997;314(7079):463.
30.
Van NoordenR. Impact factor gets heavyweight rival: CiteScore uses larger database and gets different results. Nature. 2016;540:325-326.
31.
WilhiteAWFongEA.Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science. 2012;335(6068):542-543.