BernsteinJ. Evidence-based medicine: appendix: ten rules for evaluating evidence. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:e1-e3.
3.
BorchersJRPedrozaAKaedingC. Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2362-2367.
4.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
5.
FisherRA. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd; 1935.
HillAB. The environment and disease: association or causation?Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295-300.
8.
HoffmannTBennettSDel MarC. Evidence-Based Practice Across the Health Professions. 2nd ed.Chatswood, Australia: Elsevier Australia; 2013.
9.
HolcombWL JrChaiworapongsaTLukeDABurgdorfKD. An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:685-688.
10.
IrrgangJJAndersonAFBolandAL; IKDC Committee. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1567-1573.
11.
MillerGA. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63:81-97.
12.
NormanGRSloanJAWyrwichKW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582-592.
13.
PerssonAFjeldsgaardKGjertsenJE. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:285-291.
14.
TejwaniSGChenJFunahashiTTLoveRMaletisGB. Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2696-2705.
