Background: Autologous osteochondral transplantation procedures provide hyaline cartilage to the site of cartilage repair. It remains unknown whether these procedures restore native contact mechanics of the ankle joint.
Purpose: This study was undertaken to characterize the regional and local contact mechanics after autologous osteochondral transplantation of the talus.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limb specimens were used for this study. Specimens were loaded using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm with 4.5 N·m of inversion and a 300-N axial compressive load in a neutral plantar/dorsiflexion. An osteochondral defect was created at the centromedial aspect of the talar dome and an autologous osteochondral graft from the ipsilateral knee was subsequently transplanted to the defect site. Regional contact mechanics were analyzed across the talar dome as a function of the defect and repair conditions and compared with those in the intact ankle. Local contact mechanics at the peripheral rim of the defect and at the graft site were also analyzed and compared with the intact condition. A 3-dimensional laser scanning system was used to determine the graft height differences relative to the native talus.
Results: The creation of an osteochondral defect caused a significant decrease in force, mean pressure, and peak pressure on the medial region of the talus (P = .037). Implanting an osteochondral graft restored the force, mean pressure, and peak pressure on the medial region of the talus to intact levels (P = .05). The anterior portion of the graft carried less force, while mean and peak pressures were decreased relative to intact (P = .05). The mean difference in graft height relative to the surrounding host cartilage for the overall population was −0.2 ± 0.3 mm (range, −1.00 to 0.40 mm). Under these conditions, there was no correlation between height and pressure when the graft was sunken, flush, or proud.
Conclusion/Clinical Relevance: Placement of the osteochondral graft in the most congruent position possible partially restored contact mechanics of the ankle joint. Persistent deficits in contact mechanics may be due to additional factors besides graft congruence, including structural differences in the donor cartilage when compared with the native tissue.
AktasSKocaogluBGereliANalbantodluUGuvenO. Incidence of chondral lesions of talar dome in ankle fracture types. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(3):287-292.
2.
AmendolaAPanarellaL. Osteochondral lesions: medial versus lateral, persistent pain, cartilage restoration options and indications. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;14(2):215-227.
3.
AndersonDDTochigiYRudertMJVaseenonTBrownTDAmendolaA. Effect of implantation accuracy on ankle contact mechanics with a metallic focal resurfacing implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(6):1490-1500.
4.
AteshianGASoslowskyLJMowVC. Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. J Biomech. 1991;24(8):761-776.
5.
AthanasiouKARosenwasserMPBuckwalterJAMalininTIMowVC. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res. 1991;9(3):330-340.
6.
BalduiniFCVegsoJJTorgJSTorgE. Management and rehabilitation of ligamentous injuries to the ankle. Sports Med. 1987;4(5):364-380.
7.
BecherCDriessenAHessTLongoUGMaffulliNThermannH. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):656-663.
8.
BischofJESpritzerCECaputoAM. In vivo cartilage contact strains in patients with lateral ankle instability. J Biomech. 2010;43(13):2561-2566.
BrownTDRudertMJGroslandNM. New methods for assessing cartilage contact stress after articular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:52-58.
11.
CalhounJHLiFLedbetterBRViegasSF. A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(3):125-133.
12.
ChenCTBhargavaMLinPMTorzilliPA. Time, stress, and location dependent chondrocyte death and collagen damage in cyclically loaded articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(5):888-898.
13.
ChuckpaiwongBBerksonEMTheodoreGH. Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):106-112.
14.
CohenZAMcCarthyDMKwakSD. Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7(1):95-109.
15.
DemirciSJubelAAndermahrJKoebkeJ. Chondral thickness and radii of curvature of the femoral condyles and talar trochlea. Int J Sports Med. 2008;29(4):327-330.
16.
EliasIRaikinSMSchweitzerMEBesserMPMorrisonWBZogaAC. Osteochondral lesions of the distal tibial plafond: localization and morphologic characteristics with an anatomical grid. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(6):524-529.
17.
FerkelRDZanottiRMKomendaGA. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1750-1762.
18.
GianniniSVanniniF. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(3):168-175.
HuangFSSimonianPTNormanAGClarkJM. Effects of small incongruities in a sheep model of osteochondral autografting. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1842-1848.
21.
KannusPRenstromP. Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(2):305-312.
22.
KarlssonJSanconeM. Management of acute ligament injuries of the ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(3):521-530.
23.
KohJLKowalskiALautenschlagerE. The effect of angled osteochondral grafting on contact pressure: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(1):116-119.
24.
KohJLWirsingKLautenschlagerEZhangLO. The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):317-320.
25.
LahmAErggeletCSteinwachsMReicheltA. Arthroscopic management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: results of drilling and usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging before and after treatment. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(3):299-304.
26.
LeeKBBaiLBYoonTRJungSTSeonJK. Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37Suppl 1:63S-70S.
27.
LeontaritisNHinojosaLPanchbhaviVK. Arthroscopically detected intra-articular lesions associated with acute ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(2):333-339.
28.
MillingtonSAGrabnerMWozelkaRAndersonDDHurwitzSRCrandallJR. Quantification of ankle articular cartilage topography and thickness using a high resolution stereophotography system. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(2):205-211.
29.
MundermannADyrbyCOD’LimaDDColwellCWJrAndriacchiTP. In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(9):1167-1172.
30.
MurawskiCDFooLFKennedyJG. A review of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation techniques of the talus: the good, the bad, and the causes for concern. Cartilage. 2010;1(2):137-144.
31.
PriskVRImhauserCWO’LoughlinPFKennedyJG. Lateral ligament repair and reconstruction restore neither contact mechanics of the ankle joint nor motion patterns of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(14):2375-2386.
32.
StaufferRNChaoEYBrewsterRC. Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;127:189-196.
33.
TerukinaMFujiokaHYoshiyaS. Analysis of the thickness and curvature of articular cartilage of the femoral condyle. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(9):969-973.
34.
ThomasBYeoJMSlaterGL. Chronic pain after ankle fracture: an arthroscopic assessment case series. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(12):1012-1016.
35.
TochigiYRudertMJSaltzmanCLAmendolaABrownTD. Contribution of articular surface geometry to ankle stabilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2704-2713.
36.
TorzilliPAGrigieneRHuangC. Characterization of cartilage metabolic response to static and dynamic stress using a mechanical explant test system. J Biomech. 1997;30(1):1-9.
37.
TreppoSKoeppHQuanECColeAAKuettnerKEGrodzinskyAJ. Comparison of biomechanical and biochemical properties of cartilage from human knee and ankle pairs. J Orthop Res. 2000;18(5):739-748.
38.
van BergenCJde LeeuwPAvan DijkCN. Treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94(8 Suppl):398-408.
39.
van DijkCNvan BergenCJ. Advancements in ankle arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(11):635-646.
40.
ZengerinkMStruijsPATolJLvan DijkCN. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(2):238-246.
