Background: There have been diverse results, even in the same Torg type classification, in cases with fifth metatarsal stress fracture.
Hypothesis: The “plantar gap” is correlated with the time for bone union and complications. It might be used for a prognostic factor.
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Seventy-five cases with a fifth metatarsal stress fracture treated with modified tension band wiring from January 2003 to December 2008 were evaluated retrospectively. This consecutive series of patients included 71 male and 2 female patients with a mean of 19.8 years of age at the time of surgery. All of the enrolled patients were elite-level athletes. Each case was classified according to Torg classification and the degree of plantar gap was also measured. After the surgery, bone union was determined by computed tomography findings. Statistical analysis of the Torg classification and time for bone union, as well as plantar gap and time for bone union, was performed.
Results: The mean time for bone union for each Torg type was 71.05 ± 21.77 days for type I, 104.48 ± 54.62 days for type II, and 122.92 ± 51.75 days for type III. There was a significant difference in the time for bone union among the 3 Torg types (P = .008). The mean time for bone union in group A (plantar gap <1 mm) was 71.21 ± 29.95 days and it was 126.4 ± 51.99 days for group B (plantar gap ≥1 mm) (significantly different; P < .001). In addition, there was a positive correlation of the time for bone union with the degree of plantar gap (ρ = .661, P < .001). In cases with Torg type II classification, there was a significant difference in the time for bone union between groups A and B (P < .001) In addition, there was a strong correlation between the time for bone union and the degree of plantar gap (ρ = .657, P < .001). There were 8 cases of nonunion in Torg type II, and 1 case in Torg III. With regard to the plantar gap, there was 1 case of nonunion in group A, and 8 cases in group B.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the plantar gap might be used for prognosis in cases with a fifth metatarsal stress fracture, even in patients with the same Torg classification.
ArangioG. Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal (Jones’ fracture): two cases treated by cross-pinning with review of 106 cases. Foot Ankle. 1983;3(5):293-296.
2.
CarpL. Fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone: with special reference to delayed union. Ann Surg. 1927;86(2):308-320.
3.
ClapperMFO’BrienTJLyonsPM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal: analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:238-241.
4.
DameronTBJr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(6):788-792.
5.
DameronTJr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3(2):110-114.
6.
DeLeeJCEvansJPJulianJ. Stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11(5):349-353.
7.
GlasgowMTNaranjaRJJrGlasgowSGTorgJS. Analysis of failed surgical management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: the Jones fracture. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(2):277.
8.
HamiltonWG. Sprained ankles in ballet dancers. Foot Ankle. 1982;3(2):99-102.
9.
JonesR. Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg. 1902;35(6):697-700.2.
10.
JosefssonPOKarlssonMRedlund-JohnellIWendebergB. Jones fracture: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:252-255.
11.
LarsonCMAlmekindersLCTaftTNGarrettWE. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(1):55-60.
12.
LawrenceSJBotteMJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(6):358-365.
13.
MindreboNShelbourneKDVan MeterCD. Outpatient percutaneous screw fixation of the acute Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(5):720-723.
14.
MologneTSLundeenJMClapperMFO’BrienTJ. Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(7):970-975.
QuillGEJr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26(2):353-361.
17.
RosenbergGSferraJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(5):332-338.
18.
SarimoJRantanenJOravaSAlanenJ. Tension-band wiring for fractures of the fifth metatarsal located in the junction of the proximal metaphysis and diaphysis. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):476-480.
19.
TorgJSBalduiniFCZelkoRRPavlovHPeffTCDasM. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(2):209-214.
20.
WrightRWFischerDAShivelyRAHeidtRSJrNuberGW. Refracture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):732-736.
21.
ZelkoRRTorgJSRachunA. Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal–treatment of the fractures and their complications in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7(2):95-101.
