Background: Osteochondral lesions of the ankle are a common injury after ankle sprains, especially in young and active patients. The Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System (OATS) is the only 1-step surgical technique designed to replace the entire osteochondral unit.
Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the OATS procedure for the talus and compare the results of patients who have had prior surgical interventions with patients for whom OATS represents the primary surgical treatment.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed 26 talus OATS procedures (25 patients) with an average follow-up of 84 months (range, 53-124 months); 9 patients had OATS as a second surgical intervention. The patients completed the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Tegner scores plus the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and at follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were conducted on a 1.5-T whole-body magnet that assessed transplant congruency, adjacent surface of the talus, the corresponding distal tibia, and joint effusion.
Results: The authors found significant increases for the AOFAS score (50 to 78 points, P < .01) and the Tegner score (3.1 to 3.7, P < .05) and a significant decrease for the VAS (7.8 to 1.5, P < .01) from preoperative to postoperative. Patients with normal integration or minor incongruity of the transplant on magnetic resonance imaging (81%) had significantly better AOFAS scores (P = .03). Other magnetic resonance imaging criteria did not predict clinical results. Patients for whom OATS represented a second procedure had significantly worse clinical AOFAS and Tegner scores plus a higher VAS.
Conclusion: Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after osteochondral transplantation are good and patients significantly benefit from this surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging should not be a routine control but appears to be indicated when clinical symptoms persist after osteochondral transplantation.
AbouzgiaMBJamesDF. Temperature rise during drilling through bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(3):342-353.
2.
AnsahPVogtSUeblackerPMartinekVWoertlerKImhoffAB. Osteochondral transplantation to treat osteochondral lesions in the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2188-2194.
3.
AssenmacherJAKelikianASGottlobCKodrosS. Arthroscopically assisted autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: an MRI and clinical follow-up study. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(7):544-551.
4.
AugustinGDavilaSUdiljakTVedrinaDSBagatinD. Determination of spatial distribution of increase in bone temperature during drilling by infrared thermography: preliminary report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(5):703-709.
5.
BaltzerAWArnoldJP. Bone-cartilage transplantation from the ipsilateral knee for chondral lesions of the talus. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(2):159-166.
6.
BrittbergMWinalskiCS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85Suppl 2:58-69.
7.
DavidsonSRJamesDF. Drilling in bone: modeling heat generation and temperature distribution. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125(3):305-314.
8.
ErikssonARAlbrektssonT. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(1):101-107.
9.
GautierEKolkerDJakobRP. Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(2):237-244.
10.
GobbiAFranciscoRALubowitzJHAllegraFCanataG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(10):1085-1092.
11.
HaasperCZelleBAKnoblochKJagodzinskiMCitakMLotzJKrettekCZeichenJ. No mid-term difference in mosaicplasty in previously treated versus previously untreated patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(5):499-504.
12.
HanSHLeeJWLeeDYKangES. Radiographic changes and clinical results of osteochondral defects of the talus with and without subchondral cysts. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1109-1114.
13.
HangodyLFeczkoPBarthaLBodoGKishG. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391Suppl:S328-336.
14.
HangodyLFulesP. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85Suppl 2:25-32.
KitaokaHBAlexanderIJAdelaarRSNunleyJAMyersonMSSandersM. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(7):349-353.
17.
KokkinakisMKafchitsasKRajeevAMortierJ. Is MRI useful in the early follow-up after autologous osteochondral transplantation?Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(5):636-642.
18.
KreuzPCSteinwachsMErggeletCLahmAHenlePNiemeyerP. Mosaicplasty with autogenous talar autograft for osteochondral lesions of the talus after failed primary arthroscopic management: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(1):55-63.
LinkTMMischungJWortlerKBurkartARummenyEJImhoffAB. Normal and pathological MR findings in osteochondral autografts with longitudinal follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(1):88-96.
21.
LinkTMStahlRWoertlerK. Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(5):1135-1146.
22.
LysholmJGillquistJ. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10(3):150-154.
23.
MartinekVAnsahPImhoffAB. Autologous osteochondral transplantation in the treatment of talar osteonecrosis. Arthroskopie. 2003;16(16):29-33.
24.
NakagawaYSuzukiTMatsusueYKurokiHMizunoYNakamuraT. Bony lesion recurrence after mosaicplasty for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(5):630.
25.
O’LoughlinPFHeyworthBEKennedyJG. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):392-404.
26.
PaulJBruckerPUVogtSImhoffAB. OATS and mega OATS: why, when and how. In: BrittbergMImhoffABMadryHMandelbaumB, eds. Cartilage Repair: Current Concepts. Surrey, UK: ESSKA, DJO Publications; 2010.
27.
PaulJSagstetterAKrinerMImhoffABSpangJHinterwimmerS. Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation for lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1683-1688.
28.
ReddySPedowitzDIParekhSGSennettBJOkerekeE. The morbidity associated with osteochondral harvest from asymptomatic knees for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(1):80-85.
29.
RoosEMBrandssonSKarlssonJ. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(10):788-794.
30.
SchottlePBOettlGMAgneskirchnerJDImhoffAB. Operative therapy of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous cartilage-bone transplantation [in German]. Orthopaede. 2001;30(1):53-58.
31.
ScrantonPEJrFreyCCFederKS. Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(5):614-619.
32.
TegnerYLysholmJ. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:43-49.
33.
TrattnigSMillingtonSASzomolanyiPMarlovitsS. MR imaging of osteochondral grafts and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(1):103-118.
34.
ValderrabanoVLeumannARaschHEgelhofTHintermannBPagenstertG. Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37Suppl 1:105S-111S.
35.
WewersMELoweNK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(4):227-236.
36.
ZengerinkMSzerbIHangodyLDopirakRMFerkelRDvan DijkCN. Current concepts: treatment of osteochondral ankle defects. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(2):331-359, vi.
