Background: The increase in anterior laxity and slippage is greater with metal interference screw fixation of a hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft than a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.
Hypothesis: When slippage-resistant fixation is used with a soft tissue graft, early recovery of function does not result in a clinically important increase in anterior laxity and slippage
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Nineteen subjects were treated with a single-tunnel, single-looped, tibialis allograft with slippage-resistant, cortical fixation. An examiner, different from the treating surgeon, used stereophotogrammetric analysis to compute the increase in anterior laxity at a 150 N anterior force and slippage between the day of surgery and each monthly follow-up interval, and determined recovery of function and motion.
Results: Anterior laxity did not increase between the day of surgery and 1 year (P = .23). Total slippage plateaued after 1 month, but increased 1.5 mm between the day of surgery and 1 month (P < .05). Extension and flexion plateaued after 2 months (P < .0001 and P < .02, respectively); activity level (Tegner score) plateaued after 3 months (P < .05), function (Lysholm score) plateaued after 4 months (P < .002), and subjective satisfaction (International Knee Documentation Committee score) plateaued after 6 months (P < .02).
Conclusion: Early recovery of function after ACL reconstruction with a soft tissue allograft did not result in a clinically important increase in anterior laxity and slippage at 1 year. We believe the avoidance of an increase in anterior laxity was related to the use of a transtibial technique designed to place the femoral and tibial tunnels without roof and posterior cruciate ligament impingement, the use of cortical fixation devices designed to resist slippage, the use of an aseptically harvested fresh-frozen tibialis allograft that was not irradiated or chemically processed, and the use of a self-administered rehabilitation program designed to encourage an early return of motion and function.
BriggsKKLysholmJTegnerYRodkeyWGKocherMSSteadmanJR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):890-897.
2.
BriggsKKSteadmanJRHayCJHinesSL. Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):898-901.
3.
ColeridgeSDAmisAA. A comparison of five tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12(5):391-397.
4.
ConnerCSPerezBAMorrisRPBucknerJWBufordWLJrIveyFM. Three femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of fixation on the lateral cortex versus the anterior cortex. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(6):796-807.
5.
DanielDMStoneMLSachsRMalcomL. Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(6):401-407.
6.
EagarPHullMLHowellSM. How the fixation method stiffness and initial tension affect anterior load-displacement of the knee and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts: a study in cadaveric knees using a double-loop hamstrings graft. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(3):613-624.
FlemingBCRenstromPAOhlenG. The gastrocnemius muscle is an antagonist of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(6):1178-1184.
9.
GossBCHullMLHowellSM. Contact pressure and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts subjected to roof impingement during passive extension. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(2):263-268.
10.
GrantJAMohtadiNGMaitlandMEZernickeRF. Comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(9):1288-1297.
11.
HamnerDLBrownCHJrSteinerMEHeckerATHayesWC. Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(4):549-557.
12.
Haut DonahueTLHowellSMHullMLGregersenC. A biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior tibialis tendons as suitable single-loop anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(6):589-597.
13.
HeftiFMullerWJakobRPStaubliHU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-234.
14.
HowellSMGittinsMEGottliebJETrainaSMZoellnerTM. The relationship between the angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane and loss of flexion and anterior laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):567-574.
15.
HowellSMHullML. Aggressive rehabilitation using hamstring tendons: graft construct, tibial tunnel placement, fixation properties, and clinical outcome. Am J Knee Surg. 1998;11(2):120-127.
16.
HowellSMHullML. Checkpoints for judging tunnel and anterior cruciate ligament graft placement. J Knee Surg. 2009;22(2):161-170.
17.
HowellSMLawhornKW. Gravity reduces the tibia when using a tibial guide that targets the intercondylar roof. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(7):1702-1710.
18.
HowellSMRoosPHullML. Compaction of a bone dowel in the tibial tunnel improves the fixation stiffness of a soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft—an in vitro study in calf tibia. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(5):719-725.
19.
HowellSMTaylorMA. Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(6):814-825.
20.
HowellSMTaylorMA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(7):1044-1055.
21.
HowellSMWallaceMPHullMLDeutschML. Evaluation of the single-incision arthroscopic technique for anterior cruciate ligament replacement: a study of tibial tunnel placement, intraoperative graft tension, and stability. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(3):284-293.
22.
JonssonHElmqvistLGKarrholmJFugl-MeyerA. Lengthening of anterior cruciate ligament graft: roentgen stereophotogrammetry of 32 cases 2 years after repair. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(6):587-592.
23.
JornLPFridenTRydLLindstrandA. Persistent stability 3 years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of 20 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68(5):427-429.
24.
KhanRKonyvesARamaKRThomasRAmisAA. RSA can measure ACL graft stretching and migration: development of a new method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:139-145.
25.
KrychAJJacksonJDHoskinTLDahmDL. A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(3):292-298.
26.
Liu-BarbaDHowellSMHullML. High-stiffness distal fixation restores anterior laxity and stiffness as well as joint line fixation with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2073-2082.
27.
MagenHEHowellSMHullML. Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(1):35-43.
28.
MarkolfKLGraff-RadfordAAmstutzHC. In vivo knee stability: a quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(5):664-674.
29.
MarkolfKLParkSJacksonSRMcAllisterDR. Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):107-118.
30.
MatsumotoAHowellSM. EZLoc: a simple, rigid, femoral fixation device for a soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft. Techn Orthop. 2005;20(3):238-244.
31.
MatsumotoAHowellSMLiu-BarbaD. Time-related changes in the cross-sectional area of the tibial tunnel after compaction of an autograft bone dowel alongside a hamstring graft. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(8):855-860.
32.
NurmiJTSievanenHKannusPJarvinenMJarvinenTLN. Porcine tibia is a poor substitute for human cadaver tibia for evaluating interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):765-771.
33.
RappeMHorodyskiMMeisterKIndelicatoPA. Nonirradiated versus irradiated Achilles allograft: in vivo failure comparison. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1653-1658.
34.
RoosPJHullMLHowellSM. Lengthening of double-looped tendon graft constructs in three regions after cyclic loading: a study using Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):839-846.
35.
RoosPJNeuCPHullMLHowellSM. A new tibial coordinate system improves the precision of anterior-posterior knee laxity measurements: a cadaveric study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(2):327-333.
36.
SeonJKGadikotaHRWuJLSuttonKGillTJLiG. Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(7):1359-1367.
37.
ShelbourneKDGrayTHaroM. Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(2):246-251.
38.
SimmonsRHowellSMHullML. Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(6):1018-1029.
39.
SinghatatWLawhornKWHowellSMHullML. How four weeks of implantation affect the strength and stiffness of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel: a study of two fixation devices in an extraarticular model in ovine. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):506-513.
40.
SmithCHowellSMHullML. Does graft construct lengthening at the fixations cause an increase in anterior laxity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in vivo?J Biomech Eng. 2010;132(8):081001.
41.
SmithCHullMLHowellSM. Can markers injected into a single-loop anterior cruciate ligament graft define the axes of the tibial and femoral tunnels? A cadaveric study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(4):044503-044504.
42.
SmithCHullMLHowellSM. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis methods for determining ten causes of lengthening of a soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft construct. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(4):041002-041010.
43.
SmithCK. Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis Determines Lengthening at the Sites of Fixation and the Increase in Anterior Laxity Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vivo Study. Davis, CA: Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis; 2009.
44.
SolomonowMBarattaRZhouBH. The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15(3):207-213.
45.
ToJTHowellSMHullML. Contributions of femoral fixation methods to the stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament replacements at implantation. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(4):379-387.
46.
ZachariasIHowellSMHullMLLawhornKW. In vivo calibration of a femoral fixation device transducer for measuring anterior cruciate ligament graft tension: a study in an ovine model. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123(4):355-361.
47.
ZantopTWeimannAWolleKMusahlVLangerMPetersenW. Initial and 6 weeks postoperative structural properties of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with cross-pin or interference screw fixation: an in vivo study in sheep. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(1):14-20.
