Background: Quantifying changes in meniscal volume in vivo before and after partial meniscectomy (PM) could help elucidate the mechanisms involved in osteoarthritis development after meniscal injury and its surgical treatment.
Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine whether quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) can detect the immediate reduction in meniscal volume created by PM, while ruling out changes in unresected structures. We hypothesized that qMRI would be reliable for determining meniscal volume within the repeated images of unresected menisci. Additionally, we expected no significant difference in volume between the uninjured menisci of the injured knees and the same menisci of the uninjured knees.
Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: Ten subjects with meniscal tears were evaluated with 3-T MRI before and after arthroscopic PM. Manual segmentation was used to create models of the menisci and to determine the preoperative and postoperative meniscal volumes for each subject. The responsiveness and reliability of qMRI for determining meniscal volume in vivo were evaluated using these measurements. We expected a decrease in volume of the resected menisci, but not in the uninjured menisci, after surgery.
Results: The mean preoperative volume of the injured menisci was significantly greater than the mean postoperative volume (2896 ± 277 vs 2480 ± 277 mm3; P = .000). There was no significant difference between the mean preoperative and postoperative volumes of the uninjured menisci (2687 ± 256 vs 2694 ± 256 mm3; P = 1.000).
Conclusion: Manual segmentation demonstrated a significant reduction in the volume of the surgically resected menisci after PM, but no significant change in the volume of unresected meniscal tissue, indicating that the manual segmentation method is responsive.
Clinical Relevance: This approach offers a novel, reliable method to study the relationship between the volume of meniscal tissue removed during PM and subsequent patient outcomes during long-term clinical studies.
AhmedAMBurkeDL. In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints: part I: tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:216-225.
2.
AllenPRDenhamRASwanAV. Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy: factors affecting the knee after operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(5):666-671.
3.
Andersson-MolinaHKarlssonHRockbornP. Arthroscopic partial and total meniscectomy: a long-term follow-up study with matched controls. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):183-189.
4.
AnderssonCGillquistJ. Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal plane laxity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;256:178-184.
5.
AndriacchiTPBriantPLBevillSLKooS. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:39-44.
6.
ArnoczkySPMcDevittCA. The meniscus: structure, function, repair, and replacement. In: BuckwalterJA, ed. Orthopaedic Basic Science. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2000:532-545.
BowersMETrinhNTungGACriscoJJKimiaBBFlemingBC. Quantitative MR imaging using “livewire” to measure tibiofemoral articular cartilage thickness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1167-1173.
9.
BowersMETungGAFlemingBCCriscoJJReyJ. Quantification of meniscal volume by segmentation of 3T magnetic resonance images. J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2811-2815.
10.
BowersMETungGATrinhN. Effects of ACL interference screws on articular cartilage volume and thickness measurements with 1.5 T and 3 T MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:572-578.
11.
BursteinDGrayM. New MRI techniques for imaging cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(suppl 2):70-77.
12.
ChatainFAdeleinePChambatPNeyretP. A comparative study of medial versus lateral arthroscopic meniscectomy on stable knees: 10-year minimum follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(8):842-849.
13.
ChatainFRobinsonAHNAdeleinePChambatPNeyretP. The natural history of the knee following arthroscopic medial meniscectomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(1):15-18.
14.
CicuttiniFMForbesAYuanyuanWRushGStuckeySL. Rate of knee cartilage loss after partial meniscectomy. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(9):1954-1956.
15.
EcksteinF. Noninvasive study of human cartilage structure by MRI. Methods Mol Med. 2004;101:191-217.
16.
EcksteinFGlaserC. Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Musculoskel Radiol. 2004;8(4):329-353.
17.
EnglundM. Meniscal tear: a feature of osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(suppl 312):8-45.
18.
EnglundMLohmanderLS. Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(9):2811-2819.
19.
EnglundMLohmanderLS. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis coexistent with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in a meniscectomy population. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(12):1721-1726.
20.
EnglundMParadowskiPTLohmanderLS. Association of radiographic hand osteoarthritis with radiographic knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(2):469-475.
21.
EnglundMRoosEMLohmanderLS. Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(8):2178-2187.
22.
EnglundMRoosEMRoosHPLohmanderLS. Patient-relevant outcomes fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of resection. Rheumatology. 2001;40:631-639.
23.
FairbankTJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948;30:664-670.
24.
FukudaYTakaiSYoshinoN. Impact load transmission of the knee joint: influence of leg alignment and the role of meniscus and articular cartilage. Clin Biomech. 2000;15(7):516-521.
Haut DonahueTLHullMLRashidMMJacobsCR. A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. J Biomech Eng. 2002;124(3):273-280.
HoserCFinkCBrownCReichkendlerMHacklWBartlettJ. Long-term results of arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy in knees without associated damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(4):513-516.
29.
HuletCHLockerGSchiltzDTexierATallierEVielpeauCH. Arthroscopic medial meniscectomy on stale knees: a 12-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(1):29-32.
30.
KooSGoldGEAndriacchiTP. Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(9):782-789.
31.
LeeSJAadalenKJMalaviyaP. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics after serial medial meniscectomies in the human cadaveric knee. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(8):1334-1344.
32.
McKinleyTOEnglishDKBayBK. Trabecular bone strain changes resulting from partial and complete meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:259-267.
33.
McNicholasMJRowleyDIMcGurtyD. Total meniscectomy in adolescence: a thirty year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:217-221.
34.
NeyretPDonellSTDejourH. Osteoarthritis of the knee following meniscectomy. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:267-268.
35.
PenaECalvoBMartinezMAPalancaDDoblareM. Finite element analysis of the effect of meniscal tears and meniscectomies on human knee biomechanics. Clin Biomech. 2005;20(5):498-507.
36.
RanggerCKathreinAKlestilTGlotzerW. Partial meniscectomy and osteoarthritis: implications for treatment of athletes. Sports Med. 1997;23(1):61-68.
37.
RanggerCKlestilTGloetzerWKemmlerGBenedettoKP. Osteoarthritis after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(2):240-244.
38.
RockbornPMessnerK. Long term results of meniscus repair and meniscectomy: a 13-year functional and radiographic follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:2-9.
39.
RoosEMOstenbergARoosHEkdahlCLohmanderLS. Long-term outcome of meniscectomy: symptoms, function, and performance tests in patients with or without radiographic osteoarthritis compared to matched controls. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9(4):316-324.
40.
RoosHAdalberthTDahlbergLLohmanderLS. Osteoarthritis of the knee after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus: the influence of time and age. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995;3(4):261-267.
41.
RoosHLaurenMAdalberthTRoosEMJonssonKLohmanderLS. Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(4):687-693.
42.
SekaranSVHullMLHowellSM. Nonanatomic location of the posterior horn of a medial meniscal autograft implanted in a cadaveric knee adversely affects the pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(1):74-82.
43.
StoneKRStollerDWIrvingSGElmquistCGildengorinG. 3D MRI volume sizing of knee meniscus cartilage. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(6):641-644.
44.
VoloshinASWoskJ. Shock absorption of meniscectomized and painful knees. J Biomed Eng. 1985;5:157-161.
45.
WilsonWvan RietbergenBvan DonkelaarCCHuiskesR. Pathways of load-induced cartilage damage causing cartilage degeneration in the knee after meniscectomy. J Biomech. 2003;36(6):845-851.
46.
ZielinskaBDonahueTL. 3D finite element model of meniscectomy: changes in joint contact behavior. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128:115-123.
