In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, overloading either 1 of the 2 grafts should be avoided to decrease the risk of graft failure.
Hypothesis
Overloading of the posterolateral graft may occur when it is fixed at 30 ° of knee flexion because the posterolateral bundle is elongated as the knee approaches extension.
Study Design
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods
Ten human cadaveric knees were tested at (1) intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament–deficient, (3) double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the anteromedial and posterolateral grafts fixed at 60 ° of flexion and full extension, respectively (fixation 60/FE), and (4) double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with both grafts fixed at 30 ° of flexion simultaneously (fixation 30/30). Two external loading conditions simulating clinical examinations were used: (1) 134-N anterior tibial load and (2) combined rotatory loads of 10 N·m valgus and 5 N·m internal tibial torques. Data on knee kinematics and in situ forces in the 2 bundles of the intact anterior cruciate ligament and the respective grafts were obtained.
Results
In response to 134-N anterior tibial load, knee kinematics and in situ force in the grafts were similar to the intact knee for both fixation protocols. The force in the anteromedial graft for fixation 60/FE was 34% higher, whereas the posterolateral graft for fixation 30/30 was 46% higher, compared with the intact anteromedial and posterolateral bundles, respectively. In response to combined rotatory loads, the posterolateral graft for fixation 30/30 carried 67% higher load than did the intact posterolateral bundle.
Conclusion
Fixation 30/30 overloaded the posterolateral graft, whereas fixation 60/FE overloaded the anteromedial graft.
Clinical Relevance
In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, even though overall forces in the graft are the same as intact anterior cruciate ligament, the force distributions may not be the same as the intact bundles, and overloading of 1 of the 2 grafts may occur.
AdachiN, OchiM, UchioY, IwasaJ, KuriwakaM, ItoY.Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:515–520.
2.
AgliettiP, BuzziR, GironF, SimeoneAJ, ZaccherottiG.Arthroscopicassisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon: a 5-8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:138–144.
3.
AmisAA, DawkinsGPC. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:260–267.
4.
AndersonAF, SnyderRB, LipscombABJr.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:272–279.
5.
BachBRJr, TradonskyS, BojchukJ, LevyME, Bush-JosephCA, KhanNH. Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:20–29.
6.
BachJM, HullML, PattersonHA. Direct measurement of strain in the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech. 1997;30:281–283.
BoylanD, GreisPE, WestJr, BachusKN, BurksRT. Effects of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:700–705.
9.
DonaldsonWFIII, WarrenRF, WickiewiczT.A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations: initial versus examination under anesthesia. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13:5–10.
10.
FujieH, LivesayGA, WooSL-Y, KashiwaguchiS, BlonstromG.The use of a universal force moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1995;117:1–7.
11.
FujieH, MabuchiK, WooSL-Y, LivesayGA, AraiS, TsukamotoY.The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:211–217.
12.
GabrielMT, WongEK, WooSL-Y, YagiM, DebskiRE. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:85–89.
13.
GirgisFG, MarshallJL, MonajemA.The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;106:216–231.
14.
HamadaM, ShinoK, HoribeS, et al. Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with EndoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:801–807.
15.
HoherJ, KanamoriA, ZeminskiJ, FuFH, WooSL. The position of the tibia during graft fixation affects knee kinematics and graft forces for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29: 771–776.
16.
HughstonJC, AndrewsJr, CrossMJ, MoschiA.Classification of knee ligament instabilities, I: the medial compartment and cruciate ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:159–172.
17.
JacksonDW, GasserSI. Tibial tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:124–131.
18.
JohnsonRJ, BeynnonBD, NicholsCE, RenstromPA. The treatment of injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:140–151.
19.
KanamoriA, WooSL-Y, MaCB, et al. The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: a human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:633–639.
20.
KanamoriA, ZeminskiJ, RudyTW, LiG, FuFH, WooSL. The effect of axial tibia torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:394–398.
21.
KimSJ, KimHK. Reliability of the anterior drawer test, the pivot shift test, and the Lachman test. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;317:237–242.
22.
KocherMS, SteadmanJr, BriggsK, ZurakowskiD, SterettWI, HawkinsRJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction withoutcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:1560–1572.
23.
LivesayGA, FujieH, KashiwaguchiS, MorrowDA, FuFH, WooSL. Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23:467–474.
24.
LohJC, FukudaY, TsudaE, SteadmanRJ, FuFH, WooSL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:297–304.
MunetaT, SekiyaI, YagishitaK, OgiuchiT, YamamotoH, ShinomiyaK.Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with EndoButtons: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:618–624.
27.
NielsenS, HelmigP.Instability of knees with ligament lesions: cadaver studies of the anterior cruciate ligament. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56: 426–429.
28.
RudyTW, LivesayGA, WooSL-Y, FuFH. A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech. 1996;29:1357–1360.
29.
SakaneM, FoxRJ, WooSL-Y, LivesayGA, LiG, FuFH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:285–293.
30.
ShelbourneKD, GrayT.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation: a two- to nine-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25: 786–795.
31.
SullivanD, LevyIM, SheskierS, TorzilliPA, WarrenRF. Medial restraints to anterior-posterior motion of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:930–936.
32.
TashmanS, CollonD, AndersonK, KolowichP, AnderstW.Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:975–983.
33.
ToritsukaY, ShinoK, HoribeS, et al. Second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with multistranded hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:287–293.
34.
TorzilliPA, GreenbergRL, InsallJ.An in vivo biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee: roentgenographic measurement technique, stress machine, and stable population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:960–968.
35.
TsudaE, FukudaY, LohJC, DebskiRE, FuFH, WooSL. The effect of soft-tissue graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on graft-tunnel motion under anterior tibial loading. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:960–967.
36.
WooSL-Y, DebskiRE, WithrowJD, JanaushekMA. Biomechanics of knee ligaments. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:533–543.
37.
WooSL-Y, KanamoriA, ZeminskiJ, YagiM, PapageorgiouC, FuFH. The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon: a cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84: 907–914.
38.
WooSL-Y, RuncoTJ, MorrowDA, et al. The use of robotics technology in knee ligament research. In: YangG, HayashiK, WooSL-Y, et al, eds. Proceedings of the Fourth China-Japan-USA-Singapore on Biomechanics (CJUSS '95). Beijing, China: International Academic Publishers; 1995:3–14.
39.
WooSL-Y, OrlandoCA, CampJF, AkesonWH. Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior. J Biomech. 1986;19: 399–404.
40.
YagiM, WongEK, KanamoriA, DebskiRE, FuFH, WooSL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:660–666.
41.
YamamotoY, Wei-HsiuHsu, WooSL-Y, Van ScyocAH, TakakuraY, DebskiRE. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1825–1832.
42.
YasudaK, KondoE, IchiyamaH, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:1015–1025.
43.
YasudaK, KondoE, IchiyamaH, et al. Surgical and biomechanical concepts of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15:96–102.
