Background: Currently in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, the range of knee flexion angles that surgeons use for anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle graft fixation spans from 0° to 90° for both bundle grafts. Despite the recent popularity of this procedure, no consensus exists on an optimal set of AM and PL graft fixation angles.
Hypothesis: Graft fixation angles that simulate the native tensioning relationship of the AM and PL bundles will produce kinematic results similar to the intact knee, while graft fixation angles that do not simulate this relationship will under- or overconstrain the knee.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Twelve cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested in the intact state, ACL-sectioned state, and a randomized order of 7 double-bundle ACL reconstructed states at multiple graft fixation angle combinations. For each test state, data were collected for 88 N anterior tibial loads, 10 N·m valgus torques, 5 N·m internal rotation torques, and 2 simulated pivot shift loads consisting of a 5 N·m internal rotation torque coupled with either a 10 N·m valgus torque or an 88 N anterior tibial load at 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion.
Results: The AM and PL graft fixation angle combinations of 0°/0° (AM graft fixation angle/PL graft fixation angle), 60°/0°, 45°/15°, and 75°/15° restored normal laxity to the reconstructed knee in all of the biomechanical tests. The 30°/30°, 60°/60°, and 90°/90° graft fixation angle combinations significantly restricted knee laxity compared with the intact state in various biomechanical tests.
Conclusion: We found that as long as the PL bundle graft was fixed between 0° and 15°, the AM graft could be fixed up to 75° without restricting knee laxity. However, fixation of the PL graft at 30° of knee flexion and above significantly overconstrained the knee.
Clinical Relevance: This study provides a range of angles that can be used in double-bundle ACL reconstructions to restore normal knee stability without causing overconstraint.
AnKNJacobsenMCBerglundLJChaoEY. Application of a magnetic tracking device to kinesiologic studies. J Biomech. 1988;21(7):613-620.
2.
AndersenHNAmisAA. Review on tension in the natural and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(4):192-202.
3.
AsagumoHKimuraMKobayashiYTakiMTakagishiK. Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using double-bundle hamstring tendons: surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(6):602-609.
4.
BelisleALBicosJGeaneyL. Strain pattern comparison of double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques with the native anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(11):1210-1217.
CoobsBRLaPradeRFGriffithCJNelsonBJ. Biomechanical analysis of an isolated fibular (lateral) collateral ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1521-1527.
7.
CoobsBRWijdicksCAArmitageBM. An in vitro analysis of an anatomic medial knee reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):339-347.
8.
CrawfordCNylandJLandesS. Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(8):946-964.
9.
CuomoPRamaKRBullAMAmisAA. The effects of different tensioning strategies on knee laxity and graft tension after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2083-2090.
10.
DonahueTLGregersenCHullMLHowellSM. Comparison of viscoelastic, structural, and material properties of double-looped anterior cruciate ligament grafts made from bovine digital extensor and human hamstring tendons. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123(2):162-169.
11.
Espejo-BaenaASerrano-FernandezJMde la Torre-SolisFIrizar-JimenezS. Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with femoral cortical bone bridge support using hamstrings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(2):157-161.
12.
FerrettiAMonacoELabiancaLDe CarliAMaestriBConteducaF. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive kinematic study using navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(8):1548-1553.
13.
FerrettiMLevicoffEAMacphersonTAMorelandMSCohenMFuFH. The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):278-283.
14.
FuFHRanawatA. Tensioning in double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(9):1027-1028.
15.
FuFHShenWStarmanJSOkekeNIrrgangJJ. Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(7):1263-1274.
16.
GabrielMTWongEKWooSLYagiMDebskiRE. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):85-89.
17.
GirgisFGMarshallJLMonajemA. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;106:216-231.
18.
GriffithCJLaPradeRFJohansenSArmitageBWijdicksCEngebretsenL. Medial knee injury: Part 1: static function of the individual components of the main medial knee structures. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(9):1762-1770.
19.
HamadaMShinoKHoribeS. Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with EndoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(8):801-807.
20.
HoherJKanamoriAZeminskiJFuFHWooSL. The position of the tibia during graft fixation affects knee kinematics and graft forces for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):771-776.
21.
HosseiniAGillTJLiG. In vivo anterior cruciate ligament elongation in response to axial tibial loads. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(3):298-306.
22.
IshibashiYTsudaEYamamotoYTsukadaHTohS. Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important?Arthroscopy. 2009;25(5):488-495.
23.
JordanSSDeFrateLENhaKWPapannagariRGillTJLiG. The in vivo kinematics of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament during weightbearing knee flexion. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):547-554.
24.
KondoEYasudaKAzumaHTanabeYYagiT. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1675-1687.
25.
MarkolfKLParkSJacksonSRMcAllisterDR. Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):107-118.
26.
MiuraKWooSLBrinkleyRFuYCNooraniS. Effects of knee flexion angles for graft fixation on force distribution in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(4):577-585.
27.
MorimotoYFerrettiMEkdahlMSmolinskiPFuFH. Tibiofemoral joint contact area and pressure after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(1):62-69.
28.
MunetaTSekiyaIYagishitaKOgiuchiTYamamotoHShinomiyaK. Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with Endobuttons: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(6):618-624.
29.
NicholasSJD’AmatoMJMullaneyMJTylerTFKolstadKMcHughMP. A prospectively randomized double-blind study on the effect of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1881-1886.
30.
PetersenWTretowHWeimannA. Biomechanical evaluation of two techniques for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one tibial tunnel versus two tibial tunnels. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(2):228-234.
31.
PomboMWShenWFuFH. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we today?Arthroscopy. 2008;24(10):1168-1177.
32.
SakaneMFoxRJWooSLLivesayGALiGFuFH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(2):285-293.
33.
SalzmannGMSpangJTImhoffAB. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a skeletally immature adolescent athlete. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(3):321-324.
34.
ToritsukaYAmanoHKuwanoM. Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(5):456-463.
35.
TsaiAGWijdicksCAWalshMPLaPradeRF. Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):263-272.
36.
TsudaEIshibashiYFukudaATsukadaHTohS. Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):1042-1055.
37.
van KampenAWymengaABvan der HeideHJBakensHJ. The effect of different graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(8):845-850.
38.
VercilloFWooSLNooraniSYDedeO. Determination of a safe range of knee flexion angles for fixation of the grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1513-1520.
39.
WuCNooraniSVercilloFWooSL. Tension patterns of the anteromedial and posterolateral grafts in a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(7):879-884.
40.
YagiMWongEKKanamoriADebskiREFuFHWooSL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(5):660-666.
41.
YasudaKIchiyamaHKondoEMiyatakeSInoueMTanabeY. An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(3):276-284.
42.
YasudaKKondoEIchiyamaH. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(10):1015-1025.
43.
YasudaKKondoEIchiyamaHTanabeYTohyamaH. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(3):240-251.
44.
ZantopTDiermannNSchumacherTSchanzSFuFHPetersenW. Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(4):678-685.
45.
ZantopTHerbortMRaschkeMJFuFHPetersenW. The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(2):223-227.
46.
ZantopTKuboSPetersenWMusahlVFuFH. Current techniques in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(9):938-947.
