In contrast to European countries, individual states in the United States have enacted civil laws prohibiting cousin marriage. Currently, over sixty percent of the states have laws making first cousin marriage illegal. This development in the United States can be best understood by reference to a significant cultural development during the nineteenth century in this country. There was an acceptance of an evolutionary perspective in determining proper marriages that included cousin marriage being categorized as an early type of evolutionary institution: something to be avoided or discarded by so-called civilized peoples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonNancy Fix.1986. “Cousin Marriage in Victorian England.” Journal of Family History11:285–301.
2.
The Archbishop of Canterbury's Commission on Prohibited Degrees.1940. Kindred and Affinity as Impediments to Marriage. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
3.
BemissS. M.1858. “Report on the Influence of Marriages of Consanguinity upon Offspring.” Transactions of the American Medical Association11:319–425.
4.
BittlesA. H.MakovE.. 1988. Inbreeding in Human Populations: An Assessment of the Costs. In Human Mating Patterns, edited by Mascie-TaylorC. G. N.BoyceA. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ClarkeHelen I.1957. Social Legislation (2nd ed). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
6.
ChotinerRence D.1974. Marriage and the Supreme Court. The Law and Women Series, Number 2.
7.
Clericus. 1827. Reasons in Favour of the Erasure of the Law Which Forbids a Man to Marry his Deceased Wife's Sister: in a Second Letter to a Clergyman of the Reformed Dutch Church. New York: G. and C. Carvill.
8.
CookeParsons. 1842. The Marriage Question; or the Lawfulness of Marrying the Sister of a Deceased Wife, Considered. Boston: Samuel N. Dickinson.
9.
Domesticus. 1827. The Doctrine of Incest Stated, with an Examination of the Question, Whether a Man may Marry his Deceased Wife's Sister, in a Letter to a Clergyman of the Presbyterian Church. 2nd edition. New York: G. & C. Carvill.
10.
DugardSamuel1673. The Marriages of Cousins Germans Vindicated from the Censures of Unlawfulnes. Oxford: Thomas Bowman.
11.
EsmeinA.1968 (Original 1891). Le manage endroit canonique. New York: Burt Franklin.
12.
FarberBernard. 1968. Comparative Kinship Systems. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
13.
FryJohn. 1756. The Case of Marriages Between Near Kindred. London: J. Whiston and B. White.
14.
GoodyJack. 1983. The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GrossbergMichael. 1985. Governing the Hearth. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
16.
HowardG. E.1904. A History of Matrimonial Institutions, 3 Vols. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17.
HuthAlfred H.1875. The Marriage of Near Kin. London: J. and A. Churchill.
18.
KentJames. 1848. Commentaries on American Law, Volume II. New York: William Kent.
19.
Martindalc-Hubbell. 1987. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Volume VII. Summit, N.J.: Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.
20.
MorganLewis Henry.1958 (Original 1877). Ancient Society. Calcutta: J. C. Saha Roy.
21.
MurdockGeorge Peter.1967. Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
22.
NewmanRobert. 1869. Report of the Committee on the Result of Consanguineous Marriages. Albany: Weed, Parsons and Company.
23.
PasternakBurton. 1976. Introduction to Kinship and Social Organization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
24.
ReidRussell M.1988. “Church Membership, Consanguineous Marriage, and Migration in a Scotch-Irish Frontier Population.” Journal of Family History13:397–414.
25.
ResekCarl. 1960. Lewis Henry Morgan: American Scholar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26.
RosenbergCharles E.1976. No Other Gods. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
TrautmannThomas R.1987. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
