As a supervisor, the author regularly witnesses the difficulty some educators have in being in touch with their vulnerability. They often do not know how to live with and embrace it as a serendipitous happenstance. This article offers reflections on the supervision relationship and what transactional analysis has to offer to support practitioners in taking into account and learning from their vulnerability. Case examples based on vulnerability in the educational context are easily transferable to any professional context. The author presents a new model of supervision that focuses on the importance of interconnectedness and fosters the development of resiliency and creativity in both the supervisor and the supervisee.
AjuriaguerraJ. (1970). Manuel de psychiatrie de l’enfant [Manual of child psychiatry]. Paris, France: Masson.
2.
AllenJ. (2008). Permission, protection and mentorship: Their roles in psychological resilience and positive emotions. In TudorK. (Ed.), The adult is parent to the child: Transactional analysis with children and young people (pp. 204–216). Lyme Regis, England: Russell House.
3.
BerneE. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York, NY: Grove Press.
BrownB. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York, NY: Gotham Books.
6.
BrownB. (2014). Le pouvoir de la vulnérabilité: La vulnérabilité est une force qui peut transformer votre vie [The power of vulnerability: Vulnerability is a force that can transform your life]. Paris, France: Guy Trédaniel éditeur.
7.
CapersH.GoodmanL. (1983). The survival process: Clarifications of the miniscript. Transactional Analysis Journal, 13, 142–148.
8.
ChoyA. (1990). The winner’s triangle. Transactional Analysis Journal, 20, 40–46.
9.
CochraneH.NewtonT. (2011). Supervision for coaches: A guide to thoughtful work. Ipswich, England: Supervision for Coaches Publishing.
10.
CrossmanP. (1966). Permission and protection. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 5(19), 152–154.
CyrulnikB. (2003). Le murmure des fantômes [The ghosts’ whisper]. Paris, France: Odile Jacob.
13.
ElkaïmM. (2004). L’expérience personnelle du psychothérapeute: Approche systémique et resonance [The psychotherapist’s personal experience: Systemic approach and resonance]. Psychothérapies, 3, 145–150.
14.
EnglishF. (1971). The substitution factor: Racket and real feelings. Part I. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(4), 27–32.
15.
FigleyC. R. (1995). Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
16.
HanusM. (2001). La résilience à quel prix? Survivre ou rebondir [Resilience at what price? Surviving and rebounding]. Paris, France: Maloine.
17.
HawkinsP.ShohetR. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
18.
HendersonP. (2009). A different wisdom: Reflections on supervision practice (Guide to supervision, Vol. 1). London, England: Karnac Books.
19.
JaouiG. (1988). Les permissions en AT [Permissions in transactional analysis] [Unpublished workshop material]. Paris, France.
20.
KahlerT.CapersH.). (1974). The miniscript. Transactional Analysis Journal, 4(1), 26–42.
21.
LahadM. (2000). Creative supervision: The use of expressive art methods in supervision and self-supervision. London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
NewtonT. (2011). Transactional analysis now: Gift or commodity?Transactional Analysis Journal, 41, 315–320.
25.
NewtonT. (2012). [Review of the book Being wrong: Adventures in the margin of error, by K. Schulz]. Transactional Analysis Journal, 42, 87–90.
26.
NewtonT. (2016). Turning to resilience and power: Metaphor and meaning in relational learning. In BarrowG.NewtonT. (Eds.), Educational transactional analysis: An international guide to theory and practice (pp. 29–38). London, England: Routledge.
PapauxE. (2016). Round and round the permission wheel: An early years perspective. In BarrowG.NewtonT. (Eds.), Educational transactional analysis: An international guide to theory and practice (pp. 98–110). London, England: Routledge.
29.
PiagetJ. (1956). La psychologie de l’intelligence [The psychology of intelligence] (4th ed.). Paris, France: Armand Colin.
30.
RyanS. (2004). Vital practice stories from the healing arts: The homeopathic and supervisory way. Portland, England: Sea Change.
31.
SchulzK. (2010). Being wrong: Adventures in the margin of error. London, England: Portobello.
32.
SteinerC. (2003). Emotional literacy: Intelligence with a heart. Fawnskin, CA: Personhood Press.
33.
StewartI.JoinesV. (1987). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham, England, and Chapel Hill, NY: Lifespace Publishing.
34.
TudorK. (2003). The neopsyche: The integrating adult ego state. In SillsC.HargadenH. (Eds.), Ego states (Key concepts in transactional analysis. Contemporary views) (pp. 201–231). London, England: Worth Publishing.
35.
TudorK. (2010). The state of the ego: Then and now. Transactional Analysis Journal, 40, 261–277.
36.
VerneyJ. (2009). Mindfulness and the adult ego state. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39, 247–255.
37.
VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
