Mothers are often held to unrealistic expectations that can create a significant amount of pressure. Guided by the status incongruity hypothesis and our conceptualization of motherhood as shaped by patriarchy, the present research proposes that women's pursuit of career success violates traditional gender norms, thereby eliciting backlash that undermines evaluations of their motherhood. Focusing on Chinese working mothers, we hypothesized that their advancement in the workplace would elicit negative motherhood evaluations and moral responses. Two experiments identified the existence of the backlash. Specifically, working mothers with higher ambition (Study 1, N = 396) or higher professional status (Study 2a, N = 400), but not working fathers (Study 2b, N = 260), were more likely to be judged as bad mothers and to elicit stronger moral emotions and blame than their lower-ambition or lower-status counterparts. In addition, as a mirror of social evaluations, new mothers’ fear of being evaluated as bad mothers was positively associated with their career ambition and work income (i.e., fear of backlash; Study 3, N = 200). By extending the status incongruity hypothesis to the domain of motherhood, this research contributes to the current understanding of how evaluations of motherhood help reinforce the gender-based hierarchy. Together, these findings highlight how patriarchy constructs a direct trade-off between career success and being a good mother, offering new insights into mothers’ work–family conflict.
AarntzenL.DerksB.Van SteenbergenE.RyanM.Van Der LippeT. (2019). Work-family guilt as a straightjacket. An interview and diary study on consequences of mothers’ work-family guilt. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103336
2.
AarntzenL.DerksB.van SteenbergenE.van der LippeT. (2023). When work–family guilt becomes a women’s issue: Internalized gender stereotypes predict high guilt in working mothers but low guilt in working fathers. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12575
3.
AarntzenL.Van Der LippeT.Van SteenbergenE.DerksB. (2021). How individual gender role beliefs, organizational gender norms, and national gender norms predict parents’ work-family guilt in Europe. Community, Work & Family, 24(2), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1816901
4.
AmanatullahE. T.MorrisM. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017094
5.
ArenaD. F.VolponeS. D.JonesK. P. (2023). (Overcoming) maternity bias in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Management, 49(1), 52–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221086243
6.
BallakrishnenS.Fielding-SinghP.MagliozziD. (2019). Intentional invisibility: Professional women and the navigation of workplace constraints. Sociological Perspectives, 62(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121418782185
BlochR. H. (1978). American Feminine ideals in transition: The rise of the moral mother, 1785–1815. Feminist Studies, 4(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177453
9.
BrescollV. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994
10.
BrescollV. L.OkimotoT. G.VialA. C. (2018). You’ve come a long way … maybe: How moral emotions trigger backlash against women leaders. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12261
11.
BurnettS. B.GatrellC. J.CooperC. L.SparrowP. (2013). Fathers at work: A ghost in the organizational machine. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(6), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12000
12.
CookS.DongX. (2011). Harsh choices: Chinese women’s paid work and unpaid care responsibilities under economic reform. Development and Change, 42(4), 947–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01721.x
13.
CorrellS. J.BenardS.PaikI. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
14.
Di BattistaS.SalvatiM.PellegriniV.PagliaroS. (2024). Perceptions of mothers’ competence and morality: The role of attribution of responsibility, gender role beliefs, and sexual prejudice. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 21(1), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00828-w
15.
DouglasS. J.MichaelsM. W. (2005). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined all women. Free Press.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605245-12
18.
EarecksonH. B.HeilmanM. E. (2024). Explaining penalties and rewards for gender norm violations: A unified theory. Sex Roles, 90(12), 1701–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01540-8
19.
GauntR.DeutschF. M. (2024). Mother’s instinct? Biological essentialism and parents’ involvement in work and childcare. Sex Roles, 90, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01451-8
20.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
HaidtJ.JosephC. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195332827.003.0019
25.
HainesE. L.StroessnerS. J. (2019). The role prioritization model: How communal men and agentic women can (sometimes) have it all. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(12), e12504. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12504
26.
HanserA.LiJ. (2017). The hard work of feeding the baby: Breastfeeding and intensive mothering in contemporary urban China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-017-0065-2
27.
HaysS. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
28.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
29.
HeilmanM. E.WallenA. S.FuchsD.TamkinsM. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
30.
HettingerV. E.HutchinsonD. M.BossonJ. K. (2014). Influence of professional status on perceptions of romantic relationship dynamics. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(4), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034034
31.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
32.
HuangY.DaviesP. G.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607
33.
HutchersonC. A.GrossJ. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408
34.
JiY.WuX.SunS.HeG. (2017). Unequal care, unequal work: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of gender inequality in post-reform urban China. Sex Roles, 77(11–12), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0751-1
35.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
36.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792282 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
37.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
38.
KaruM.TremblayD. G. (2018). Fathers on parental leave: An analysis of rights and take-up in 29 countries. Community, Work & Family, 21(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1346586
39.
KellandJ.LewisD.FisherV. (2022). Viewed with suspicion, considered idle and mocked-working caregiving fathers and fatherhood forfeits.Gender, Work & Organization, 29(5), 1578–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12850
40.
LedgerwoodA.LawsonK. M.KrausM. W.VollhardtJ. R.RemediosJ. D.WestbergD. W.UskulA. K.AdetulaA.LeachC. W.MartinezJ. E.NaumannL. P.ReddyG.Chucky TateC.ToddA. R.WeltzienK.BuchananN.GonzálezR.Montilla DobleL. J.Romero-CanyasR.ZouL. X. (2024). Disrupting racism and global exclusion in academic publishing: Recommendations and resources for authors, reviewers, and editors. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), 121394. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.121394
41.
LeeJ. (2023). A critical review and theorization of workplace backlash: Looking back and moving forward through the lens of social dominance theory. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100900
42.
LissM.SchiffrinH. H.MackintoshV. H.Miles-McLeanH.ErchullM. J. (2013). Development and validation of a quantitative measure of intensive parenting attitudes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(5), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9616-y
43.
LiuH.YuD.WangH. (2020). A review of the development of maternity leave policy in China over the past 70 years. China Population and Development Studies, 3(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-019-00038-1
44.
LoyalD.SutterA. L.RascleN. (2017). Mothering ideology and work involvement in late pregnancy: A clustering approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(10), 2921–2935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0786-5
45.
MacleanE. I.AndrewB.EiversA. (2021). The motherload: Predicting experiences of work-interfering-with-family guilt in working mothers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01852-9
MeeussenL.Van LaarC. (2018). Feeling pressure to be a perfect mother relates to parental burnout and career ambitions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02113
49.
MichelJ. S.KotrbaL. M.MitchelsonJ. K.ClarkM. A.BaltesB. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.695
50.
MishraS.KrayL. J. (2022). The mitigating effect of desiring status on social backlash against ambitious women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 102, 104355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104355
51.
MorgenrothT.HeilmanM. E. (2017). Should I stay or should I go? Implications of maternity leave choice for perceptions of working mothers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.008
52.
Moss-RacusinC. A.RudmanL. A. (2010). Disruptions in women’s self-promotion: The backlash avoidance model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01561.x
OkimotoT. G.BrescollV. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949
55.
OkimotoT. G.HeilmanM. E. (2012). The “bad parent” assumption: How gender stereotypes affect reactions to working mothers. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 704–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01772.x
56.
OrgadS. (2019). Heading home: Motherhood, work, and the failed promise of equality. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/orga18472
57.
ParkB.BanchefskyS. (2019). Women and men, moms and dads: Leveraging social role change to promote gender equality. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 59, pp. 1–52). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.10.001
58.
PazhoohiF.LangM.XygalatasD.GrammerK. (2017). Religious veiling as a mate-guarding strategy: Effects of environmental pressures on cultural practices. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0079-z
59.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
60.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
61.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867
62.
Ramati-ZiberL.ShnabelN.GlickP. (2020). The beauty myth: Prescriptive beauty norms for women reflect hierarchy-enhancing motivations leading to discriminatory employment practices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000209
RichA. (1977). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Bantam Books.
65.
RozinP.LoweryL.ImadaS.HaidtJ. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.4.574
66.
RudmanL. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.629
67.
RudmanL. A.FairchildK. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
68.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239
69.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
70.
ScheinC.GrayK. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288
71.
SchmidtE.DécieuxF.ZartlerU.SchnorC. (2022). What makes a good mother? Two decades of research reflecting social norms of motherhood. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12488
72.
SczesnyS.NaterC.RudmanL.LohmoreA.MalayeriS.SakallıN.SaxlerF. M.Gustafsson SendénM. (2025). How women and men should (not) be: Gender rules and their alignment with status beliefs across nations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 49(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843251328263
73.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043
74.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2012). Social dominance theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 418–438). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n47
75.
SkewesL.FineC.HaslamN. (2018). Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash. PLOS ONE, 13(7), e0200921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200921
76.
SommetN.WeissmanD. L.CheutinN.ElliotA. J. (2023). How Many Participants Do I Need to Test an Interaction? Conducting an Appropriate Power Analysis and Achieving Sufficient Power to Detect an Interaction. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231178728
77.
SongS. (2011). Retreating back home willingly or being unwillingly sent home? Debates on “women-going-home” and the ideological transformation in the course of marketization in China. Journal of Chinese Women’s Studies, (4), 5–12. In Chinese.
78.
SonnenburgC.MillerY. D. (2021). Postnatal depression: The role of “good mother” ideals and maternal shame in a community sample of mothers in Australia. Sex Roles, 85(11–12), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01239-0
79.
SzekeresH.HalperinE.SaguyT. (2023). The mother of violations: Motherhood as the primary expectation of women. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(4), 1875–1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12661
80.
TanX.ZuoB.WenF.XieZ.SongS. (2021). Fear of backlash moderates female senior executives’ communion (but not agency) as compared to female lecturers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 520590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.520590
81.
Van VeldhovenM. J. P. M.BeijerS. E. (2012). Workload, work-to-family conflict, and health: Gender differences and the influence of private life context. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01770.x
82.
VerniersC.BonnotV.Assilaméhou-KunzY. (2022). Intensive mothering and the perpetuation of gender inequality: Evidence from a mixed methods research. Acta Psychologica, 227, 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103614
83.
WilliamsM. J.TiedensL. Z. (2016). The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000039
84.
Wysieńska-Di CarloK.KarpińskiZ. (2024). Status and just gender pay gaps: Results of a vignette study. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241227158
85.
XiaoV. L.LoweryB. S.StillwellA. (2023). Gender backlash and the moderating role of shared racial group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221074543
86.
YangK. (2018). Motherhood as educational agent: Changes in motherhood in the context of market orientation education. Journal of Chinese Women’s Studies, (2), 79–90. In Chinese.
87.
YuJ.XieY. (2018). Motherhood penalties and living arrangements in China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5), 1067–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12496
88.
ZagefkaH.HoustonD.DuffL.MoftizadehN. (2021). Combining motherhood and work: Effects of dual identity and identity conflict on well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(10), 2452–2460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02070-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
