Gender gaps in pay and career advancement increase as people take on greater caregiving responsibilities, with large gaps persistent in high-level, time-intensive positions. Given extant research concerning gender roles, and job demands and resources, I hypothesized that temporal flexibility, in particular control over work hours, would positively affect promotion aspirations, especially for women. Moreover, this interaction effect would be mediated by anticipation of work–family conflict. Results from two studies—correlational and experimental—supported these predictions. In Study 1, using archival data from the General Social Survey, results revealed an interaction between gender and temporal flexibility on promotion aspirations. Among a sample of working parents with children, temporal flexibility was significantly and positively associated with promotion aspirations for women with the opposite pattern found for men. A subsequent experimental study, concerning a promotion to a time-intensive position with an online sample of parents, revealed that women reported lower aspirations for this type of promotion compared to men when the position was characterized as inflexible, but the gap disappeared when the position offered temporal flexibility. Anticipated work–family conflict explained this interaction effect. Highlighting flexibility and schedule control increased promotion aspirations among women, an important implication for employers looking to recruit and promote female employees. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/03616843211003070
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
5.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
6.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
7.
BakkerA. B.HakanenJ. J.DemeroutiE.XanthopoulouD. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
BearJ. B.GlickP. (2017). Breadwinner bonus and caregiver penalty in workplace rewards for men and women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616683016
10.
BerdahlJ. L.MoonS. H. (2013). Workplace mistreatment of middle class workers based on sex, parenthood, and caregiving. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12018
11.
BertrandM.GoldinC.KatzL. F. (2010). Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.3.228
12.
Blair-LoyM. (2001). Cultural constructions of family schemas: The case of women finance executives. Gender & Society, 15(5), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015005004
13.
Blair-LoyM. (2009). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Harvard University Press.
14.
Blair-LoyM.WhartonA. S. (2002). Employees’ use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80(3), 813–845. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0002
15.
BlauF. D.WinklerA. E. (2017). Women, work, and family [Working paper]. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23644
16.
BowlesH. R.ThomasonB.BearJ. B. (2019). Reconceptualizing what and how women negotiate career advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1645–1671. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1497
17.
BrescollV. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994
18.
BrownE. R.DiekmanA. B. (2010). What will I be? Exploring gender differences in near and distant possible selves. Sex Roles, 63(7-8), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9827-x
19.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Families with own children: Employment status of parents by age of youngest child and family type, 2017-2018 annual averages. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.t04.htm
CinamonR. G. (2006). Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background. Career Development Quarterly, 54(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00152.x
23.
CraigL. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children. Gender & Society, 20(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205285212
24.
CraigL.MullanK. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673
25.
CrawfordE. R.LePineJ. A.RichB. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364
26.
CroftA.SchmaderT.BlockK. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314564789
27.
CroftA.SchmaderT.BlockK. (2019). Life in the balance: Are women’s possible selves constrained by men’s domestic involvement?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5): 808–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218797294
28.
CroftA.SchmaderT.BlockK.BaronA. S. (2014). The second shift reflected in the second generation: Do parents’ gender roles at home predict children’s aspirations?Psychological Science, 25(7), 1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533968
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.369
31.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
32.
DemeroutiE.PeetersM. C.van der HeijdenB. I. (2012). Work–family interface from a life and career stage perspective: The role of demands and resources. International Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.699055
33.
DiehlA. B.DzubinskiL. M. (2016). Making the invisible visible: A cross-sector analysis of gender-based leadership barriers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21248
34.
DiRenzoM. S.GreenhausJ. H.WeerC. H. (2011). Job level, demands, and resources as antecedents of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.10.002
35.
DubbeltL.RispensS.DemeroutiE. (2016). Gender discrimination and job characteristics. Career Development International, 21(3), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-10-2015-0136
36.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Erlbaum.
37.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2019). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3): 301–315.
40.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage.
41.
EddlestonK. A.VeigaJ. F.PowellG. N. (2006). Explaining sex differences in managerial career satisfier preferences: The role of gender self-schema. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.437
42.
FetterolfJ. C.EaglyA. H. (2011). Do young women expect gender equality in their future lives? An answer from a possible selves experiment. Sex Roles, 65(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9981-9
43.
FilaM. J.PurlJ.GriffethR. W. (2017). Job demands, control and support: Meta-analyzing moderator effects of gender, nationality, and occupation. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.004
44.
FraserN. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, 100(99), 99–117.
45.
FromeP. M.AlfeldC. J.EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L. (2008). Is the desire for a family-flexible job keeping young women out of male-dominated occupations? In WattH. M. G.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 195–214). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11706-007
46.
FroneM. R.RussellM.CooperM. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65
47.
FroneM. R.YardleyJ. K.MarkelK. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work-family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2): 145–167.
GascoigneC.ParryE.BuchananD. (2015). Extreme work, gendered work? How extreme jobs and the discourse of ‘personal choice’ perpetuate gender inequality. Organization, 22(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415572511
GinoF.WilmuthC. A.BrooksA. W. (2015). Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12354–12359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502567112
52.
GlassJ. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, 31(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888404266364
GoldinC.KatzL. F. (2011). The cost of workplace flexibility for high-powered professionals. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211414398
55.
GoldinC.KatzL. F. (2016). The most egalitarian of all professions: Pharmacy and the evolution of a family-friendly occupation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 705–745. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18410
56.
GrayM. P.O’BrienK. M. (2007). Advancing the assessment of women’s career choices: The career aspiration scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707301211
57.
GreenbergD.LandryE. M. (2011). Negotiating a flexible work arrangement: How women navigate the influence of power and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.750
58.
GreenhausJ. H.BeutellN. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1): 76–88.
59.
GreenhausJ. H.PowellG. N. (2017). Making work and family work: From hard choices to smart choices. Routledge.
HigginsC.DuxburyL.LeeC. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/585316
65.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.655
66.
KalenkoskiC. M.RibarD. C.StrattonL. S. (2005). Parental child care in single-parent, cohabiting, and married-couple families: Time-diary evidence from the United Kingdom. American Economic Review, 95(2), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670176
67.
KellyE. L.KalevA. (2006). Managing flexible work arrangements in US organizations: Formalized discretion or “a right to ask.” Socio-Economic Review, 4(3), 379–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl001
68.
KellyE. L.MoenP. (2020). Overload: How good jobs went bad and what we can do about it. Princeton University Press.
69.
KellyE. L.MoenP.TranbyE. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411400056
70.
KlevenH.LandaisC.SøgaardJ. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180010
71.
LambertA. D.MarlerJ. H.GueutalH. G. (2008). Individual differences: Factors affecting employee utilization of flexible work arrangements. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.02.004
72.
LareauA. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press.
73.
LeslieL. M.ManchesterC. F.ParkT.-Y.MehngS. A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties?Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1407–1428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0651
74.
LevineJ. A.PittinskyT. L. (1997). Working fathers: New strategies for balancing work and family. Addison-Wesley.
75.
LitzkyB.GreenhausJ. (2007). The relationship between gender and aspirations to senior management. Career Development International, 12(7), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710834404
LuchmanJ. N.González-MoralesM. G. (2013). Demands, control, and support: A meta-analytic review of work characteristics interrelationships. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030541
78.
LynessK. S.GornickJ. C.StoneP.GrottoA. R. (2012). It’s all about control: Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 1023–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412465331
79.
MunschC. L. (2016). Flexible work, flexible penalties: The effect of gender, childcare, and type of request on the flexibility bias. Social Forces, 94(4), 1567–1591. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov122
80.
NomaguchiK.FettroM. N. (2019). Childrearing stages and work–family conflict: The role of job demands and resources. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12521
81.
OfferS.SchneiderB. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 809–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411425170
82.
PadavicI.ElyR. J.ReidE. M. (2020). Explaining the persistence of gender inequality: The work–family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 61–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310
83.
PedullaD. S. (2016). Penalized or protected? Gender and the consequences of nonstandard and mismatched employment histories. American Sociological Review, 81(2), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416630982
84.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
85.
ReidE. (2015). Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organization Science, 26(4), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0975
86.
RousseauD. M. (2005). I-deals, idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. M. E. Sharpe.
87.
RudmanL. A.MescherK. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12017
88.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
89.
RuppannerL. (2013). Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9933-3
90.
SandbergS. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Random House.
91.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.Van RhenenW. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.595
ShockleyK. M.AllenT. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006
94.
SmithT. W.DavernM.FreeseJ.HoutM. (2018). General Social Surveys, 1972-2016 [Data set]. NORC at the University of Chicago. https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org
95.
StoneP. (2008). Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. University of California Press.
96.
StuhlmacherA. C.LinaberryE. (2013). Gender and negotiation: A social role analysis. In OlekalnsM.AdairW. (Eds.), Handbook of negotiation research (pp. 221–248). Edward Elgar.
97.
Ten BrummelhuisL. L.BakkerA. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
98.
VandelloJ. A.HettingerV. E.BossonJ. K.SiddiqiJ. (2013). When equal isn’t really equal: The masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12016
99.
VoydanoffP. (2004a). The Effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00028.x
100.
VoydanoffP. (2004b). Implications of work and community demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.4.275
101.
WattisL.StandingK.YerkesM. A. (2013). Mothers and work–life balance: Exploring the contradictions and complexities involved in work–family negotiation. Community, Work & Family, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2012.722008
102.
WayneJ. H.GrzywaczJ. G.CarlsonD. S.KacmarK. M. (2007). Work-family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63–76.
103.
WestringA. F.RyanA. M. (2011). Anticipated work–family conflict: A construct investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.004
104.
WilliamsJ. C. (2001). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford University Press.
105.
WilliamsJ. C.Blair-LoyM.BerdahlJ. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012
106.
WiswallM.ZafarB. (2017). Preference for the workplace, investment in human capital, and gender. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 457–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx035
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
