In this study, we evaluated whether objectifying views of women, including objectifying stereotypes about Black women, are related to attitudes toward abortion access, and whether such links are mediated by benevolent and hostile sexism. Path analyses revealed that multiple indicators of objectification were associated with lower support for abortion access via benevolent and hostile sexist attitudes. Specifically, sexually objectifying behaviors, sexual double standards, and the “strong Black woman” stereotype were associated with lower support for abortion access indirectly through benevolent sexist attitudes. In addition, sexually objectifying behaviors, sexual double standards, and the “jezebel/sapphire Black woman” stereotype were associated with lower support for abortion access indirectly through hostile sexist attitudes. Rape myth acceptance did not have significant indirect relations with abortion attitudes via benevolent or hostile sexism. Above and beyond the direct and indirect relations in the models, the strong Black woman stereotype had an additional unique direct positive association with support for abortion access, suggesting a cross-over suppression effect. Taken together, the findings connect sexual objectification of women, including objectifying stereotypes about Black women, with opposition to abortion access via distinct roles of benevolent and hostile sexism.
AndersonJ. R.HollandE.HeldrethC.JohnsonS. P. (2018). Revisiting the jezebel stereotype: The impact of target race on sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318791543
3.
AngeloneD. J.CantorN.MarcantonioT.JoppaM. (2021). Does sexism mediate the gender and rape myth acceptance relationship?Violence Against Women, 27(6–7), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220913632
4.
BakerM. R.McClellandS. I.JozkowskiK. N. (2022). The role of racism and sexism in attitudes towards abortion among White, Latinx, and Black individuals. Sex Roles, 87(7), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01328-8
5.
BakerM. R.PappL. J.CrawfordB. L.McClellandS. I. (2023). Abortion stigma: Imagined consequences for people seeking abortion care in the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221131544
6.
BareketO.FiskeS. T. (2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11-12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400
Bay-ChengL. Y.St. VilN. M.GinnH. G. (2020). Young women’s sexuality in black and white: Racial differences in appraisals of sexually active young women. Journal of Sex Research, 57(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1636198
9.
BeckE.SeelmanK.CharaniaM.SnyderS. M.SaffanS. (2024). Reproductive justice, bodily autonomy, and state violence. Affilia, 39(3), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/088610992312252
BrownK.LaverdeR.Barr-WalkerJ.SteinauerJ. (2022). Understanding the role of race in abortion stigma in the United States: a systematic scoping review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2141972
12.
CalogeroR. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574
13.
ChrislerJ. C. (2013). A global approach to reproductive justice-psychological and legal aspects and implications. William and Mary Journal of Women and Law, 20(1), 1–24. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol20/iss1/2
DietzE. (2021). Normal parents: Trans pregnancy and the production of reproducers. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1-2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1834483
DyerR. L.CheckalskiO. R.GervaisS. J. (2023). Abortion decisions as humanizing acts: The application of ambivalent sexism and objectification to women-centered anti-abortion rhetoric. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(4), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231173673
18.
EmmerinkP. M.Van Den EijndenR. J.VanwesenbeeckI.Ter BogtT. F. (2016b). The relationship between endorsement of the sexual double standard and sexual cognitions and emotions. Sex Roles, 75(7), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0616-z
19.
EmmerinkP. M.VanwesenbeeckI.van den EijndenR. J.Ter BogtT. F. (2016a). Psychosexual correlates of sexual double standard endorsement in adolescent sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1030720
20.
FansherA. K.ZedakerS. B. (2022). The relationship between rape myth acceptance and sexual behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), NP903–NP924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520916831
21.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
22.
GervaisS. J.DavidsonM. M.StyckK.CanivezG.DiLilloD. (2018). The development and psychometric properties of the interpersonal sexual objectification ScalePerpetration version. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000148
23.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Academic Press.
25.
GothreauC. M.SchuesslerJ.AlvarezA. M. (2024). Can exposure to sexual objectification impact policy attitudes? Evidence from two survey experiments. Politics and the Life Sciences, 43(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2024.5
26.
HahnU.HarrisA. J. L. (2014). What does it mean to be biased: Motivated reasoning and rationality. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 41–102). Elsevier Academic Press.
27.
HelmsJ. E.JerniganM.MascherJ. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.27
HodsonG.GaneshN.RaceT. (2021). Double-pronged bias against black women: Sexism and racism (but not right-wing ideology) as unique predictors. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 53(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000227
30.
HoffklingA.Obedin-MaliverJ.SeveliusJ. (2017). From erasure to opportunity: A qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17(Suppl 2), 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1491-5
31.
HowellF. M. (2023). Resistance and gendered racism: Middle-class black women's experiences navigating reproductive health care systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231168113
32.
HuangY.DaviesP. G.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607
33.
HuangY.OsborneD.SibleyC. G.DaviesP. G. (2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 71(11-12), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3
JamshedN.StewartA. L.OverstreetN. M. (2022). Social dominance, sexual double standards, and violence against women in tight and loose cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(9), 1145–1165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221104950
37.
KlemL. (1995). Path analysis. In GrimmL. G.YarnoldP. R. (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 65–97). American Psychological Association.
LeiM.LomaxR. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
44.
MehraR.BoydL. M.MagriplesU.KershawT. S.IckovicsJ. R.KeeneD. E. (2020). Black pregnant women “get the most judgment”: A qualitative study of the experiences of black women at the intersection of race, gender, and pregnancy. Women's Health Issues, 30(6), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.08.001
45.
MollenD.AbbottD. M. (2022). Sexuality as a competency: Advancing training to serve the public. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 16(3), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000378
46.
MollenD.HargonsC.KlannE. M.MosleyD. V. (2018). Abortion knowledge and attitudes among psychologists and graduate students. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(6), 738–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018795296
47.
MooreI. (2019). Indignity in unwanted pregnancy: Denial of abortion as cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(6), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1592160
48.
MoradiB. (2017). (Re)focusing intersectionality: From social identities back to systems of oppression and privilege. In DeBordK. A.FischerA. R.BieschkeK. J.PerezR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual orientation and gender diversity in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 105–127). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/15959-005
49.
MoradiB.GrzankaP. R. (2017). Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(5), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000203
50.
MoradiB.ParentM. C.NusrathS. F.FalkM. R. (2023). Citation network analysis of its landscape and evolution. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221119972
51.
MorseT. (2007). The sexual objectification scale: Continued development and psychometric evaluation (Publication No. 3278183) [Doctoral dissertation]. Southern Illinois University Carbondale] ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
52.
MosesonH.FixL.HastingsJ.StoefflerA.LunnM. R.FlentjeA., … & Obedin-MaliverJ. (2021). Pregnancy intentions and outcomes among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people assigned female or intersex at birth in the United States: Results from a national, quantitative survey. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1–2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1841058
53.
MosesonH.FixL.RagostaS.ForsbergH.HastingsJ.StoefflerA., … & Obedin-MaliverJ. (2021). Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 224(4), 376–3e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.035
54.
MosleyA. J.BharjN.BiernatM. (2023). Shifting standards of sexuality: An intersectional account of men’s objectification of Black and White women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 89(9-10), 567–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01414-5
55.
MossL.WardL. M.OverstreetN. M. (2022). Do objectification, gender beliefs, or racial stereotypes mediate associations between black adults’ media use and acceptance of intimate partner violence?Psychology of Violence, 12(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000412
56.
NolenE.SiegelJ. A.MendozaR. R.CubbinC.Vohra-GuptaS.DosanjhL. H.Lewis-SmithH. (2024). The impact of dobbs v. Jackson women's health organization on young women's experiences of objectification and sexual well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 48(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843241238174
OsborneD.DaviesP. G. (2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent Sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x
59.
OsborneD.HuangY.OverallN. C.SuttonR. M.PettersonA.DouglasK. M., … & SibleyC. G. (2022). Abortion attitudes: An overview of demographic and ideological differences. Political Psychology, 43(Suppl 1), 29–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12803
60.
OwensD. C. (2017). Medical bondage: Race, gender, and the origins of American gynecology. University of Georgia Press.
PacilliM. G.GiovannelliI.SpaccatiniF.VaesJ.BarbaranelliC. (2018). Elective abortion predicts the dehumanization of women and men through the mediation of moral outrage. Social Psychology, 49(5), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000351
63.
ParentM. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(4), 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176
64.
PaulhusD. L.RobinsR. W.TrzesniewskiK. H.TracyJ. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7
65.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
RobertsD. (2015). Reproductive justice, not just rights. Dissent, 62(4), 79–82. https://doi.org/https://dx.https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0073
69.
RosenthalL.LobelM. (2016). Stereotypes of black American women related to sexuality and motherhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315627459
70.
RosenthalL.LobelM. (2020). Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of black and Latina women. Ethnicity & Health, 25(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2018.1439896
71.
RosenthalL.OverstreetN. M.KhukhlovichA.BrownB. E.GodfreyC.-J.AlbrittonT. (2020). Content of, sources of, and responses to sexual stereotypes of Black and Latinx women and men in the United States: A qualitative intersectional exploration. Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12411
RossL.SolingerR. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
74.
RudmanL. A.FetterolfJ. C.SanchezD. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472375
75.
RussellK. J.HandC. J. (2017). Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and just world beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.008
76.
ShellenbergK. M.TsuiA. O. (2012). Correlates of perceived and internalized stigma among abortion patients in the USA: An exploration by race and Hispanic ethnicity. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 118(Suppl 2), S152–S159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60015-0
SuarezE.GadallaT. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503
79.
ThomasA. J.WitherspoonK. M.SpeightS. L. (2004). Toward the development of the stereotypic roles for black women scale. Journal of Black Psychology, 30(3), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798404266061
80.
TownsendT. G.ThomasA. J.NeilandsT. B.JacksonT. R. (2010). I'm no jezebel; I am young, gifted, and black: Identity, sexuality, and black girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01574.x
WalterN.MurphyS. T.RosenthalE. L. (2018). Narrative persuasion in a new media environment: The impact of binge-watching and second-screening. Communication Research Reports, 35(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1525348
85.
WardL. M.BridgewaterE. E.OverstreetN. M. (2023). Media use and black emerging adults’ acceptance of jezebel and sapphire stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology, 35(5), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000390
86.
WatsonL. B.HargonsC. N.MollenD. (2023). Rising up, pushing forward: Standing our ground in the face of injustice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(4), 439–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231197674
87.
WestonR.GoreP. A.Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
88.
YoderJ. D.KahnA. S. (2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00108
