Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated whether objectifying views of women, including objectifying stereotypes about Black women, are related to attitudes toward abortion access, and whether such links are mediated by benevolent and hostile sexism. Path analyses revealed that multiple indicators of objectification were associated with lower support for abortion access via benevolent and hostile sexist attitudes. Specifically, sexually objectifying behaviors, sexual double standards, and the “strong Black woman” stereotype were associated with lower support for abortion access indirectly through benevolent sexist attitudes. In addition, sexually objectifying behaviors, sexual double standards, and the “jezebel/sapphire Black woman” stereotype were associated with lower support for abortion access indirectly through hostile sexist attitudes. Rape myth acceptance did not have significant indirect relations with abortion attitudes via benevolent or hostile sexism. Above and beyond the direct and indirect relations in the models, the strong Black woman stereotype had an additional unique direct positive association with support for abortion access, suggesting a cross-over suppression effect. Taken together, the findings connect sexual objectification of women, including objectifying stereotypes about Black women, with opposition to abortion access via distinct roles of benevolent and hostile sexism.

Keywords

abortion ambivalent sexism Black woman stereotypes objectification reproductive justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2024, February). U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al. https://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/alliance-hippocratic-medicine

Anderson

J. R.

Holland

Heldreth

Johnson

S. P.

(2018). Revisiting the jezebel stereotype: The impact of target race on sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318791543

Angelone

D. J.

Cantor

Marcantonio

Joppa

(2021). Does sexism mediate the gender and rape myth acceptance relationship? Violence Against Women, 27(6–7), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220913632

Baker

M. R.

McClelland

S. I.

Jozkowski

K. N.

(2022). The role of racism and sexism in attitudes towards abortion among White, Latinx, and Black individuals. Sex Roles, 87(7), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01328-8

Baker

M. R.

Papp

L. J.

Crawford

B. L.

McClelland

S. I.

(2023). Abortion stigma: Imagined consequences for people seeking abortion care in the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221131544

Bareket

Fiske

S. T.

(2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11-12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400

Bartky

S. L.

(1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825259

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

St. Vil

N. M.

Ginn

H. G.

(2020). Young women’s sexuality in black and white: Racial differences in appraisals of sexually active young women. Journal of Sex Research, 57(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1636198

Beck

Seelman

Charania

Snyder

S. M.

Saffan

(2024). Reproductive justice, bodily autonomy, and state violence. Affilia, 39(3), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/088610992312252

10.

Black Reproductive Justice Policy Agenda. (2023). Re-Imagining Policy: In Pursuit of Black Reproductive Justice. In Our Own Voice: National Black Women’s Reproductive Justice Agenda. https://blackrj.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/RJPolicyAgenda2023.pdf

11.

Brown

Laverde

Barr-Walker

Steinauer

(2022). Understanding the role of race in abortion stigma in the United States: a systematic scoping review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2141972

12.

Calogero

R. M.

(2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574

13.

Chrisler

J. C.

(2013). A global approach to reproductive justice-psychological and legal aspects and implications. William and Mary Journal of Women and Law, 20(1), 1–24. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol20/iss1/2

14.

Cohen

(1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783

15.

Dietz

(2021). Normal parents: Trans pregnancy and the production of reproducers. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1-2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1834483

16.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

17.

Dyer

R. L.

Checkalski

O. R.

Gervais

S. J.

(2023). Abortion decisions as humanizing acts: The application of ambivalent sexism and objectification to women-centered anti-abortion rhetoric. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(4), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231173673

18.

Emmerink

P. M.

Van Den Eijnden

R. J.

Vanwesenbeeck

Ter Bogt

T. F.

(2016b). The relationship between endorsement of the sexual double standard and sexual cognitions and emotions. Sex Roles, 75(7), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0616-z

19.

Emmerink

P. M.

Vanwesenbeeck

van den Eijnden

R. J.

Ter Bogt

T. F.

(2016a). Psychosexual correlates of sexual double standard endorsement in adolescent sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1030720

20.

Fansher

A. K.

Zedaker

S. B.

(2022). The relationship between rape myth acceptance and sexual behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), NP903–NP924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520916831

21.

Fredrickson

B. L.

Roberts

T. A.

(1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

22.

Gervais

S. J.

Davidson

M. M.

Styck

Canivez

DiLillo

(2018). The development and psychometric properties of the interpersonal sexual objectification ScalePerpetration version. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000148

23.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

24.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). Ambivalent sexism. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Academic Press.

25.

Gothreau

C. M.

Schuessler

Alvarez

A. M.

(2024). Can exposure to sexual objectification impact policy attitudes? Evidence from two survey experiments. Politics and the Life Sciences, 43(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2024.5

26.

Hahn

Harris

A. J. L.

(2014). What does it mean to be biased: Motivated reasoning and rationality. In Ross

B. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 41–102). Elsevier Academic Press.

27.

Helms

J. E.

Jernigan

Mascher

(2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.27

28.

Hill

(2004). The relationship between attitudes about abortion and cognitive complexity. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, 7, 1–6. https://www.uwlax.edu/globalassets/offices-services/urc/jur-online/pdf/2004/hill.pdf

29.

Hodson

Ganesh

Race

(2021). Double-pronged bias against black women: Sexism and racism (but not right-wing ideology) as unique predictors. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 53(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000227

30.

Hoffkling

Obedin-Maliver

Sevelius

(2017). From erasure to opportunity: A qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17(Suppl 2), 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1491-5

31.

Howell

F. M.

(2023). Resistance and gendered racism: Middle-class black women's experiences navigating reproductive health care systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231168113

32.

Huang

Davies

P. G.

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

(2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607

33.

Huang

Osborne

Sibley

C. G.

Davies

P. G.

(2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 71(11-12), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3

34.

Hyde

J. S.

(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

35.

In Our Own Voice. (n.d.). Reproductive Justice. In Our Own Voice: National Black Women's Reproductive Justice Agenda. https://blackrj.org/our-causes/reproductive-justice/

36.

Jamshed

Stewart

A. L.

Overstreet

N. M.

(2022). Social dominance, sexual double standards, and violence against women in tight and loose cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(9), 1145–1165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221104950

37.

Klem

(1995). Path analysis. In Grimm

L. G.

Yarnold

P. R.

(Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 65–97). American Psychological Association.

38.

Kumar

Hessini

Mitchell

E. M.

(2009). Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(6), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741

39.

Kunda

(1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

40.

Langton

(2009). Sexual solipsism: philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.001.0001

41.

Lei

Lomax

R. G.

(2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1

42.

Lowik

A. J.

(2019). Trans-inclusive abortion care: a manual for operationalizing trans-inclusive policies and practices in an abortion setting, United States. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cef632e66e9b80001f24e05/t/5e210e76c8ae141b3edf8c33/1579224713721/FQPN19-Manual-US-Web.pdf

43.

McMahon

Farmer

G. L.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71

44.

Mehra

Boyd

L. M.

Magriples

Kershaw

T. S.

Ickovics

J. R.

Keene

D. E.

(2020). Black pregnant women “get the most judgment”: A qualitative study of the experiences of black women at the intersection of race, gender, and pregnancy. Women's Health Issues, 30(6), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.08.001

45.

Mollen

Abbott

D. M.

(2022). Sexuality as a competency: Advancing training to serve the public. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 16(3), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000378

46.

Mollen

Hargons

Klann

E. M.

Mosley

D. V.

(2018). Abortion knowledge and attitudes among psychologists and graduate students. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(6), 738–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018795296

47.

Moore

(2019). Indignity in unwanted pregnancy: Denial of abortion as cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(6), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1592160

48.

Moradi

(2017). (Re)focusing intersectionality: From social identities back to systems of oppression and privilege. In DeBord

K. A.

Fischer

A. R.

Bieschke

K. J.

Perez

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of sexual orientation and gender diversity in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 105–127). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/15959-005

49.

Moradi

Grzanka

P. R.

(2017). Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(5), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000203

50.

Moradi

Parent

M. C.

Nusrath

S. F.

Falk

M. R.

(2023). Citation network analysis of its landscape and evolution. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221119972

51.

Morse

(2007). The sexual objectification scale: Continued development and psychometric evaluation (Publication No. 3278183) [Doctoral dissertation]. Southern Illinois University Carbondale] ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

52.

Moseson

Fix

Hastings

Stoeffler

Lunn

M. R.

Flentje

, … & Obedin-Maliver

(2021). Pregnancy intentions and outcomes among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people assigned female or intersex at birth in the United States: Results from a national, quantitative survey. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1–2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1841058

53.

Moseson

Fix

Ragosta

Forsberg

Hastings

Stoeffler

, … & Obedin-Maliver

(2021). Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 224(4), 376–3e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.035

54.

Mosley

A. J.

Bharj

Biernat

(2023). Shifting standards of sexuality: An intersectional account of men’s objectification of Black and White women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 89(9-10), 567–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01414-5

55.

Moss

Ward

L. M.

Overstreet

N. M.

(2022). Do objectification, gender beliefs, or racial stereotypes mediate associations between black adults’ media use and acceptance of intimate partner violence? Psychology of Violence, 12(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000412

56.

Nolen

Siegel

J. A.

Mendoza

R. R.

Cubbin

Vohra-Gupta

Dosanjh

L. H.

Lewis-Smith

(2024). The impact of dobbs v. Jackson women's health organization on young women's experiences of objectification and sexual well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 48(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843241238174

57.

Nussbaum

M. C.

(1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(4), 249–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x

58.

Osborne

Davies

P. G.

(2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent Sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x

59.

Osborne

Huang

Overall

N. C.

Sutton

R. M.

Petterson

Douglas

K. M.

, … & Sibley

C. G.

(2022). Abortion attitudes: An overview of demographic and ideological differences. Political Psychology, 43(Suppl 1), 29–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12803

60.

Owens

D. C.

(2017). Medical bondage: Race, gender, and the origins of American gynecology. University of Georgia Press.

61.

Owens

D. C.

(2021). Listening to black women saves black lives. The Lancet, 397(10276), 788–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00367-6

62.

Pacilli

M. G.

Giovannelli

Spaccatini

Vaes

Barbaranelli

(2018). Elective abortion predicts the dehumanization of women and men through the mediation of moral outrage. Social Psychology, 49(5), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000351

63.

Parent

M. C.

(2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(4), 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176

64.

Paulhus

D. L.

Robins

R. W.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

Tracy

J. L.

(2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7

65.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

66.

Pew Research Center. (2024). Broad Public Support for Legal Abortion Persists 2 Years After Dobbs (No. 202.419.4372). https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PP_2024.5.13_abortion_REPORT.pdf

67.

Radi

(2020). Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1824318

68.

Roberts

(2015). Reproductive justice, not just rights. Dissent, 62(4), 79–82. https://doi.org/https://dx.https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0073

69.

Rosenthal

Lobel

(2016). Stereotypes of black American women related to sexuality and motherhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315627459

70.

Rosenthal

Lobel

(2020). Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of black and Latina women. Ethnicity & Health, 25(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2018.1439896

71.

Rosenthal

Overstreet

N. M.

Khukhlovich

Brown

B. E.

Godfrey

C.-J.

Albritton

(2020). Content of, sources of, and responses to sexual stereotypes of Black and Latinx women and men in the United States: A qualitative intersectional exploration. Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12411

72.

Ross

L. J.

(2017). Reproductive justice as intersectional feminist activism. Souls, 19(3), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2017.1389634

73.

Ross

Solinger

(2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction (Vol. 1). University of California Press.

74.

Rudman

L. A.

Fetterolf

J. C.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472375

75.

Russell

K. J.

Hand

C. J.

(2017). Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and just world beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.008

76.

Shellenberg

K. M.

Tsui

A. O.

(2012). Correlates of perceived and internalized stigma among abortion patients in the USA: An exploration by race and Hispanic ethnicity. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 118(Suppl 2), S152–S159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60015-0

77.

SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective. (n.d.). [About SisterSong]. https://www.sistersong.net/reproductive-justice/

78.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503

79.

Thomas

A. J.

Witherspoon

K. M.

Speight

S. L.

(2004). Toward the development of the stereotypic roles for black women scale. Journal of Black Psychology, 30(3), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798404266061

80.

Townsend

T. G.

Thomas

A. J.

Neilands

T. B.

Jackson

T. R.

(2010). I'm no jezebel; I am young, gifted, and black: Identity, sexuality, and black girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01574.x

81.

United Nations. (1995). Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, (A/CONF.171/13/Rev.l). https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/a_conf.171_13_rev.1.pdf

82.

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2020). Information Series on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: Abortion. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/SexualHealth/INFO_Abortion_WEB.pdf

83.

United Nations Working Group. (2017). Women’s autonomy, equality, and reproductive health in international human rights: Between recognition, backlash, and regressive trends. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Women/WG/WomensAutonomyEqualityReproductiveHealth.pdf

84.

Walter

Murphy

S. T.

Rosenthal

E. L.

(2018). Narrative persuasion in a new media environment: The impact of binge-watching and second-screening. Communication Research Reports, 35(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1525348

85.

Ward

L. M.

Bridgewater

E. E.

Overstreet

N. M.

(2023). Media use and black emerging adults’ acceptance of jezebel and sapphire stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology, 35(5), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000390

86.

Watson

L. B.

Hargons

C. N.

Mollen

(2023). Rising up, pushing forward: Standing our ground in the face of injustice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(4), 439–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231197674

87.

Weston

Gore

P. A.

Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345

88.

Yoder

J. D.

Kahn

A. S.

(2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00108

Objectification,Sexism,and Attitudes About Abortion Access

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References