Piropos, a form of stranger harassment typical in Spain, consist of appearance-related comments that unknown men direct at women in public spaces, such as on the street. There is some controversy within Spanish society as to whether piropos should be rejected or accepted––at least a certain type of them. In this research, we analyzed how young Spanish women perceive piropos and tested whether women’s evaluation and emotional reactions to them depend on the type of piropo (“mild” or “lewd”) and participants’ ambivalent sexism. Women participants (N = 288) indicated their evaluation and emotional reactions to a mild or lewd piropo (having also a control condition where no piropo was presented) in a between-participants design. Results showed that the lewd piropo elicited lower happiness and feelings of power and greater anger-hostility than the mild piropo and the control condition. Similarly, the mild piropo also generated lower happiness and feelings of power and greater anger-hostility and anxiety than the control condition. We also conducted eight moderated mediation analyses, four each with participants’ hostile sexism scores and participants benevolent sexism scores as the predictor variable, using participants’ evaluation of the piropo as the mediator and the type of piropo (i.e., lewd or mild) as the moderator. The dependent variable on each analysis constituted the reactions of happiness, feelings of power, anger-hostility, and anxiety. Results revealed that relation between endorsing hostile sexism beliefs, while controlling for benevolent sexism beliefs, and emotional reactions to both types of piropos can be explained through participants’ evaluations of the piropos. In contrast, no indirect effect was found between benevolent sexism beliefs, when controlling for hostile sexism beliefs, and emotional reactions. Our results suggest that educating the public about the negative consequences of both types of piropos on women and reducing hostile sexism beliefs may help to eradicate street piropos. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website athttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/03616843221115339.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
2.
BaileyB. (2016). Piropo [amorous flattery] as a cultural term for talk in the Spanish-speaking world. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), The handbook of communication in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 195–297). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709321
3.
BeckerA.FordJ. V.ValshteinT. J. (2021). Confusing stalking for romance: Examining the labeling and acceptability of men’s (cyber)stalking of women. Sex Roles, 85, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01205-2
4.
BowmanC. G. (1993). Street harassment and the informal ghettoization of women. Harvard Law Review, 106(3), 517–580. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341656
5.
CalogeroR.HerbozoS.ThompsonK. (2009). Complimentary weightism: The potential costs of appearance-related commentary for women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01479.x
6.
CalogeroR. M.JostJ. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021864
7.
ChapleauK. M.OswaldD. L.RussellB. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men supports rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57(1-2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2
8.
DavidsonM. M.ButchkoM. S.RobbinsK.SherdL. W.GervaisS. J. (2016). The mediating role of perceived safety on street harassment and anxiety. Psychology of Violence, 6(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039970
9.
DavidsonM.GervaisS. J.SherdL. W. (2015). The ripple effects of stranger harassment on objectification of self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313514371
10.
DiosdadoE. (1996). Los mejores piropos [The best piropos]. Edicomunicación. “Eres maravillosa”, el piropo mejor recibido y el que más gusta a las españolas [“You’re wonderful”, the best received and most liked piropo among Spanish women]. (2009, January 29). 20 minutos. http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/348350/0/piropos/estudio/espana/#xtor=AD-15&xts=467263
11.
ExpósitoF.MoyaM.GlickP. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. [Ambivalent Sexism: Measurement and Correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347498760350641
12.
FairchildK.RudmanL. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
ForbesG. B.DoroszewiczK.CardK.Adams-CurtisL. (2004). Association of the thin body ideal, ambivalent sexism, and self-esteem with body acceptance and the preferred body size of college women in Poland and the United States. Sex Roles, 50(5-6), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000018889.14714.20
15.
ForbesG. B.CollinsworthL. L.JobeR. L.BraunK. D.WiseL. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs?Sex Roles, 56(5-6), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9161-5
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
18.
Giner-SorollaR., & RussellP. S. (2009). Anger, disgust and sexual crimes. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 45–473). Willan Publishing.
19.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.AdetounB.OsagieJ. E.AkandeA.AlaoA.AnnetjeB.WillemsenT. M.ChipetaK.DardenneB.DijksterhuisA.WigboldusD.EckesT.Six-MaternaI.ExpósitoF., … LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80005-810.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
22.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. Guilford.
23.
JohnsonM., & BennettE. (2015). Everyday sexism: Australian women’s experiences of street harassment. The Australia Institute.
LazarusR. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.44.1.1
26.
LeMaireK. L.OswaldD. LRussellB. L. (2016). Labeling sexual victimization experiences: The role of sexism, rape myth acceptance, and tolerance for sexual harassment. Violence and Victims31(2), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00148
27.
LissM.ErchullM.RamseyL. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386119
28.
MacmillanR.NierobiszA.WelshS. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427800037003003
29.
MahalikJ. R.MoorayE. B.Coonerty-FemianoA.LudlowL. H.SlatteryS. M.SmilerA. (2005). Development of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory. Sex Roles, 52(7-8), 417–435. https://doi.org/101007/s11199-005-3709-7
30.
MoffittL. B.SzymanskiD. M. (2011). Experiencing sexually objectifying environments: A qualitative study. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 67–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010364551
MoyaM.GlickP.ExpósitoF.De LemusS.HartJ. (2007). It's for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women's reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304790
33.
MoyaM.ExpósitoF.PadillaJ. L. (2006). Revisión de las propiedades psicométricas de las versiones larga y reducida de la Escala sobre Ideología de Género. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6(3), 709–727.
34.
Moya-GarófanoA., Rodríguez-BailónR., MegíasJ. L., & MoyaM. (2016). Frequency of harassing situations in a university sample. Unpublished raw data.
35.
Moya-GarófanoA.Rodríguez-BailónR.MoyaM.MegíasJ. L. (2021). Stranger harassment (“piropo”) and women's self-objectification: The role of anger, happiness and empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5-6), 2306–2326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760258
36.
NickersonA. B.AloeA. M.LivingstonJ. A.FeeleyT. H. (2014). Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. Journal of Adolescence, 37(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003
37.
NowatzkiJ.MorryM. M. (2009). Women's intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x
38.
PituchK. A., & StevensJ. P. (2015). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS (6th ed.). Routledge.
39.
Real Academia Española. (2014). Piropo [Piropo]. In Diccionario de la lengua española [Dictionary of the Spanish language] (23rd ed.). https://dle.rae.es/piropo
40.
RussellB. L.TriggK. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7-8), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000023075.32252.fd
41.
SanzJ. (2001). Un instrumento para evaluar la eficacia de los procedimientos de inducción de estado de ánimo: “La Escala de Valoración del Estado de Ánimo” (EVEA) [An instrument to assess the efficacy of mood induction procedures: The Scale for Mood Assessment (EVEA)]. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27(111), 71–110. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/37320/
42.
SanzJ.GutiérrezS.García-VeraM. P. (2014). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Valoración del Estado de Ánimo (EVEA): Una revisión [Psychometric properties of the Scale for Mood Assessment (EVEA): A revision]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 20(1), 27–49. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/58409/
43.
SaundersB. A.ScaturroC.GuarinoC.KellyE. (2017). Contending with catcalling: The role of system-justifying beliefs and ambivalent sexism in predicting women’s coping experiences with (and men’s attributions for) stranger harassment. Current Psychology, 36(2), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9421-7
TiggemannM.BoundyM. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women’s self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00453.x
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
