Exploring the impact of sexual objectification within romantic relationships is an emerging field of study. Previous work has typically associated sexual objectification by a romantic partner with adverse outcomes for both the individual and the relationship. Our research sought to build upon and advance this emerging body of literature by investigating the link between partner-sexual objectification and women's personal power. Personal power, defined as the perceived influence over a partner, is crucial for the quality of romantic relationships. Study 1 (N = 284) was an experimental study aimed at determining whether partner-sexual objectification affected women's sense of personal power. In Study 2 (N = 187), we tested theoretical assertions regarding the links among partner-sexual objectification, personal power, and relationship satisfaction using a cross-sectional design. Both studies were conducted in Italy. In Study 1, we found that participants who recounted experiences of partner-sexual objectification reported reduced personal power. This main finding was replicated in Study 2. Additionally, in the latter study, we found that partner-sexual objectification was directly associated with participants’ decreased satisfaction in the relationship, and this link was mediated by their diminished personal power. The theoretical implications of our results are further discussed.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
2.
AndersonJ. R.HollandE.HeldrethC.JohnsonS. P. (2018). Revisiting the Jezebel stereotype: The impact of target race on sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318791543
AvilésT. G.BurrissR. P.WeidmannR.BühlerJ. L.WünscheJ.GrobA. (2021). Committing to a romantic partner: Does attractiveness matter? A dyadic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110765
5.
BartkyS. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
6.
BentleyC. G.GalliherR. V.FergusonT. J. (2007). Associations among aspects of interpersonal power and relationship functioning in adolescent romantic couples. Sex Roles, 57, 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9280-7
7.
BirnbaumG. E.Kanat-MaymonY.ZholtackK.AvidanR.ReisH. T. (2024). The power to flirt: Power within romantic relationships and its contribution to expressions of extradyadic desire. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02997-0
8.
BrinkmanB. G.RickardK. M. (2009). College students’ descriptions of everyday gender prejudice. Sex Roles, 61(7–8), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9643-3
9.
BruhinE. (2003). Power, communication and condom use: Patterns of HIV-relevant sexual risk management in heterosexual relationships. AIDS Care, 15(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7139
10.
BugentalD. B.LewisJ. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen?Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00104
11.
CarrettaR. F.SzymanskiD. M. (2020). Stranger harassment and PTSD symptoms: Roles of self-blame, shame, fear, feminine norms, and feminism. Sex Roles, 82(9-10), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01073-5
12.
DavidsC. M.WatsonL. B.GereM. P. (2019). Objectification, masculinity, and muscularity: A test of objectification theory with heterosexual men. Sex Roles, 80, 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0940-6
13.
DunbarN. E.LaneB. L.AbraG. (2017). Power in close relationships: A dyadic power theory perspective. In SampJ. A. (Ed.), Communicating interpersonal conflict in close relationships: Contexts, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 75–92). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
14.
DvirM.KellyJ. R.TylerJ. M.WilliamsK. D. (2021). I’m up here! Sexual objectification leads to feeling ostracized. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 332. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000328
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
21.
HollandE.KovalP.StratemeyerM.ThomsonF.HaslamN. (2017). Sexual objectification in women’s daily lives: A smartphone ecological momentary assessment study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12152
22.
KörnerR.SchützA. (2021). Power in romantic relationships: How positional and experienced power are associated with relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(9), 2653–2677. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211017670
23.
KörnerR.SchützA.ZverlingE.Sha’kedA. (2022). Revisiting the power to forgive: A dyadic approach for determining the relations between power, self-esteem, and forgiveness in romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(7), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211056516
24.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
25.
LeyensJ. P.PaladinoP. M.Rodriguez-TorresR.VaesJ.DemoulinS.Rodriguez-PerezA.GauntR. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
26.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 55–68. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386119
27.
MacmillanR.NierobiszA.WelshS. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427800037003003
28.
MaharE. A.WebsterG. D.MarkeyP. M. (2020). Partner–objectification in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 27(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12303
29.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14716402.1996.tb00467.x
30.
MeltzerA. L. (2020). Women can benefit from sexual and physical valuation in the context of a romantic relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219854443
31.
MeltzerA. L.MakhanovaA.HicksL. L.FrenchJ. E.McNultyJ. K.BradburyT. N. (2017). Quantifying the sexual afterglow: The lingering benefits of sex and their implications for pair-bonded relationships. Psychological Science, 28(5), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617691361
32.
MeltzerA. L.McNultyJ. K. (2014). “Tell me I’m sexy… and otherwise valuable”: Body valuation and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12018
33.
MeltzerA. L.McNultyJ. K.JacksonG. L.KarneyB. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034424
34.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1155
35.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
PeciniC.Di BernardoG. A.CrapolicchioE.StathiS.VezzaliL.AndrighettoL. (2022). Stop looking at me! Associations between men’s partner-objectification and women’s self-objectification, body shame and life satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2627
38.
PeciniC.GuizzoF.BonacheH.Borges-CastellsN.MoreraM. D.VaesJ. (2023). Sexual objectification: Advancements and avenues for future research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 50, 101261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101261
39.
PeciniC.RuzzanteD.ValtortaR. R.CrapolicchioE.CoccoV. M.AndrighettoL.Di BernardoG. A. (2023). Why might women justify dating violence? The role of men’s sexual objectification of their romantic partners within heterosexual relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(19-20), 10664–10685. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231175515
40.
RamseyL. R.HoytT. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314544679
41.
RamseyL. R.MarottaJ. A.HoytT. (2017). Sexualized, objectified, but not satisfied: Enjoying sexualization relates to lower relationship satisfaction through perceived partner-objectification. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(2), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516631157
42.
RiemerA. R.SáezG.BrockR.GervaisS. J. (2020). Self-fulfilling objectification in relationships: The effects of men’s objectifying expectations on women’s self-objectification during conflict in romantic relationships. Self and Identity, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1778518
43.
RobertsT.-A.CalogeroR. M.GervaisS. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W.RutherfordA.WilliamsW. S.CookS. L.WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 249–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-013
44.
SáezG.RiemerA. R.BrockR. L.GervaisS. J. (2019). Objectification in heterosexual romantic relationships: Examining relationship satisfaction of female objectification recipients and male objectifying perpetrators. Sex Roles, 81(5), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0990-9
45.
SáezG.RiemerA. R.Valor-SeguraI.ExpósitoF. (2021). “I’ll stop talking now”: Decreased interaction length in mixed-sex interpersonal interactions as response to objectification. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520958474
46.
SalkicevicS.StanicA. L.GrabovacM. T. (2014). Good mates retain us right: Investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(5), 1038–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200512
47.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
48.
SprecherS.FelmleeD. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025601423031
49.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification?Sex Roles, 52(9), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
50.
StrelanP.PagoudisS. (2018). Birds of a feather flock together: The interpersonal process of objectification within intimate heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 79(1–2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0851-y
51.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200
52.
SzymanskiD. M. (2020). Sexual objectification, internalization, and college women’s depression: The role of shame. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019878847
53.
SzymanskiD. M.MikorskiR. (2016). External and internalized heterosexism, meaning in life, and psychological distress. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(3), 265. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/sgd0000182
54.
SzymanskiD. M.Strauss SwansonC.CarrettaR. F. (2021). Interpersonal sexual objectification, fear of rape, and U.S. college women’s depression. Sex Roles, 84, 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01194-2
55.
VaesJ.PaladinoP.PuviaE. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/EJSP.824
56.
ValtortaR. R.BaldissarriC.RagusoG.D’EcclesiisG.VolpatoC. (2023). Gender stereotypes and sexualization in Italian children’s television advertisements. Sexuality & Culture, 27(5), 1625–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10081-3
57.
ValtortaR.SacinoA.BaldissarriC.VolpatoC. (2016). The eternal feminine. Gender stereotypes and sexualization in television advertisements. Psicologia Sociale, 11(2), 159–188. https://doi.org/https//doi.org/10.1482/84097
58.
VaughnM. J.Matyastik BaierM. E. (1999). Reliability and validity of the relationship assessment scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/019261899262023
59.
WangG.DjafarianK.EgedigweC. A.El HamdouchiA.OjiamboR.RamuthH.Wallner-LiebmannS. J.LacknerS.DioufA.SauciuvenaiteJ.HamblyC.VaanholtL. M.FariesM. D.SpeakmanJ. R. (2015). The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness. PeerJ, 3, e1155. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1155
WardL. M.DanielsE. A.ZurbriggenE. L.RosenscruggsD. (2023). The sources and consequences of sexual objectification. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(1–18). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00192-x
62.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
63.
WeisskirchR. S. (2013). Family relationships, self-esteem, and self-efficacy among language brokering Mexican American emerging adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 1147–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9678-x
64.
ZurbriggenE. L.RamseyL. R.JaworskiB. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64(7–8), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
