In two multipart studies, we tested the effectiveness of an experiential learning-based intervention (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation–Academic [WAGES-Academic]) to reduce sexism endorsement. We randomly assigned undergraduates to either WAGES (n = 144) or one of two control conditions (n = 268): one where participants received the same information as WAGES but without experiential learning or another that included an experiential group activity but no gender equity information. WAGES participants (vs. both controls) reported less endorsement of sexist beliefs after completing the activity and/or at a follow-up 7–11 days later as measured by the Modern Sexism (Study 1), Neo-sexism (Study 2), Hostile Sexism (Study 2), and Gender-Specific System Justification (Studies 1 and 2) scales. Both studies demonstrated that these effects were attributable to WAGES providing more information, evoking less reactance, eliciting more empathy, and instilling more self-efficacy compared to the other conditions. Results suggest that programs to reduce sexist beliefs will be successful only insofar as they invite access to discussion in such a way that does not elicit defensive denial of the problem, create a context in which participants are readily able to empathize with other, and instill feelings of self-efficacy that one can address the problem.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
2.
BanduraA. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660
3.
BanduraA.LockeE. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:0022-3514/86
5.
BarretoM.RyanM. K.SchmittM. T. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11863-000
6.
BatsonC. D. (1975). Rational processing or rationalization? The effect of disconfirming information on a stated religious belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 276–184. doi:10.1037/h0076771
7.
BatsonC. D.PolycarpouM. P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH. J.MitchenerE. C.BednarL. L.…HighbergerL. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
8.
BeckerJ. C.SwimJ. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as a way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242. doi:10.1177/0361684310397509
9.
BeckerJ. C.SwimJ. K. (2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs. Social Psychology, 43, 127–137. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000091
10.
BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77. doi:10.1037/a0022615
11.
BeckerJ. C.ZawadzkiM. J.ShieldsS. A. (2013). Overview of research on confronting and reducing sexism. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
BenokraitisN. V.FeaginJ. R. (1995). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
BransfordJ.BrownA.CockingR. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, and experience & school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
BrehmS.BrehmJ. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
15.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
16.
CampbellB.SchellenbergE. G.SennC. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89–102. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00102.x
17.
CantorJ. A. (1997). Experiential learning in higher education. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
18.
CaseK. A. (2007). Raising male privilege awareness and reducing sexism: An evaluation of diversity courses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 426–435. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00391.x
19.
ChiangI. T.ShihR. C.LiuE.LeeA. (2011). Using game-based learning and interactive peer assessment to improve career goals and objectives for college students. In ChangM.HwangW.ChenM.MuellerW. (Eds.), Edutainment technologies (pp. 507–511). New York, NY: Springer.
20.
CokeJ. S.BatsonC. D.McDavisK. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752
21.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
22.
DeitchE. A.BarskyA.ButzR. M.ChanS.BriefA. P.BradleyJ. C. (2003). Subtle yet significant: The existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations, 56, 1299–1324. doi:10/1177/00187267035611002
23.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543–558. doi:10.1177/0146167289154008
24.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1–35). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1080/14792779543000002
25.
FloydD. L.Prentice-DunnS.RogersR. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–429. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x
26.
GintherD. K.HayesK. J. (2003). Gender differences in salary and promotion for faculty in the humanities, 1977-1995. The Journal of Human Resources, 38, 34–73. doi:10.3368/jhr.XXXVIII.1.34
27.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
28.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
29.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80005-8
30.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 530–535. doi:10.1177/0361684311414832
31.
GoodA.AbrahamC. (2011). Can the effectiveness of health promotion campaigns be improved using self-efficacy and self-affirmation interventions? An analysis of sun protection messages. Psychology & Health, 26, 799–818. doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.495157
32.
HageS. M. (2000). The role of counseling psychology in preventing male violence against female intimates. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 797–828. doi:10.1177/0011000000286003
33.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.afhayes.com/
34.
HongS.PageS. (1989). A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure, and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64, 1323–1326. doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323
35.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
JonesG. P.JacklinC. N. (1988). Changes in sexist attitudes toward women during introductory women’s and men’s studies courses. Sex Roles, 18, 611–622. doi:10.1007/BF00287964
37.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
38.
KilmartinC.SmithT.GreenA.HeinzenH.KuchlerM.KolarD. (2008). A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles, 59, 264–273. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9446-y
39.
KlonoffE. A.LandrineH. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439–472. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x
40.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 193–212. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
42.
LangfordT.MacKinnonN. J. (2000). The affective bases for the gendering of traits: Comparing the United States and Canada. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 34–48. doi:10.2307/2695879
43.
LeaperC.VanS. R. (2008). Masculinity ideology, covert sexism, and perceived gender typicality in relation to young men's academic motivation and choices in college. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 139–153. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.3.139
44.
MalkinC.StakeJ. E. (2004). Changes in attitudes and self-confidence in the women’s and gender studies classroom: The role of teacher alliance and student cohesion. Sex Roles, 50, 455–468. doi:10.1023/B: SERS.0000023066.79915.83
45.
Moyer-GuséE. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
46.
NSF ADVANCE. (n.d.). ADVANCE: Increasing the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineering careers. Retrieved fromwww.nsf.gov/advance
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
48.
PughM. D.WahrmanR. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men?American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762. doi:0002-9602/83/8804-0004
49.
RiosD.StewartA. J.WinterD. G. (2010). “Thinking she could be the next president”: Why identifying with the curriculum matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 328–338. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01578.x
50.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2008). The social psychology of gender. New York, NY: Guilford.
51.
SchmidtH. G.LoyensS. M.van GogT.PaasF. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 91–97. doi:10.1080/00461520701263350
52.
SchwartzJ. P.LindleyL. D. (2009). Impacting sexism through social justice prevention: Implications at the personal and environmental levels. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 27–41. doi:10.1007/s10935-008-0162-8
53.
SeveliusJ. M.StakeJ. E. (2003). The effects of prior attitudes and attitude importance on attitude change and class impact on women’s and gender studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2341–2353. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01888.x
54.
ShieldsS. A.ZawadzkiM. J.JohnsonR. N. (2011). The impact of the workshop activity for gender equity simulation in the academy (WAGES–Academic) in demonstrating cumulative effects of gender bias. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 120–129. doi:10.1037/a0022953
55.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SpringerL.StanneM. E.DonovanS. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
57.
StakeF.HoffmanJ. (2001). Women’s studies courses and college outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 411–436.
58.
StangorC.SwimJ. K.SechristG. G.DeCosterJ.Van AllenK. L.OttenbreitA. (2003). Ask, answer and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 277–311. doi:10.1080/10463280340000090
59.
StewartA.La Vague-MantyD.MalleyE. (2004). Recruiting female faculty members in science and engineering: Preliminary evaluation of one intervention model. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10, 361–375.
60.
SueD. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
61.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M.TorinoG. C.BucceriJ. M.HolderA. M. B.NadalK. L.…EsquilinM. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
62.
SwimJ. K.AikenK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
63.
SwimJ. K.CohenL. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x
64.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (2009). Sexism. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 407–430). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
65.
SwimJ. K.HayesL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200
66.
TougasF.BrownR.BeatonA. M.JolyS. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus qa change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01795.x
67.
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472. doi:10.1002/ejsp.163
68.
ZawadzkiM. J.DanubeC. L.ShieldsS. A. (2012). How to talk about gender inequity in the workplace: Using WAGES as an experiential learning tool to reduce reactance and promote self-efficacy. Sex Roles, 67, 605–616. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0181-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
