Sexual objectification (i.e., reducing a person to their appearance, body, or sex appeal and functions) is a significant risk factor for negative health outcomes. In the present investigation, we examined multiple manifestations of objectification (i.e., objectification of others, objectification of self, and objectification by others) in an interpersonal context. We merged objectification theory with attachment theory, one of the most prominent theories of close relationships, and propose that sexual objectification can shed light on attachment processes (and vice versa). To bolster this conceptual overlap, we tested this novel, integrated framework across two independent samples of women and men including (a) a sample of 813 undergraduate students—both partnered and single—who completed self-report questionnaires of attachment security and multiple forms of objectification and (b) a sample of 159 committed couples navigating pregnancy who were observed during naturalistic interactions to assess attachment security and completed self-report questionnaires of attachment security and objectification (including partner objectification). Results from both studies demonstrate the utility of our proposed conceptual framework linking attachment insecurity to increased risk for both enacting and experiencing objectification. The most compelling evidence emerged for (a) a link between attachment anxiety and self-objectification with moderate effect sizes across both samples, and (b) an association between a less secure base within the couple relationship during pregnancy and feeling more objectified by one's partner as well as less humanized (i.e., feeling that your partner values you more for your physical attributes and less for your non-physical attributes). Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ's website at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/03616843231165476.
AdamsK. E.TylerJ. M.CalogeroR.LeeJ. (2017). Exploring the relationship between appearance-contingent self-worth and self-esteem: The roles of self-objectification and appearance anxiety. Body Image, 23, 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.10.004
2.
AinsworthM. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40(4), 969–1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127008
3.
ArriagaX. B.KumashiroM.SimpsonJ. A.OverallN. C. (2018). Revising working models across time: Relationship situations that enhance attachment security. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317705257
4.
BartzJ. A.LydonJ. E. (2008). Relationship-specific attachment, risk regulation, and communal norm adherence in close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.003
5.
BeckerT. E.AtnicG.BreaughJ. A.CarlsonK. D.EdwardsJ. R.SpectorP. E. (2016). Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/job
6.
BirnieC.McClureM. J.LydonJ. E.HolmbergD. (2009). Attachment avoidance and commitment aversion: A script for relationship failure. Personal Relationships, 16(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01211.x
7.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base. Basic Books.
8.
BrassardA.Perron-LaplanteJ.LachapelleE.de PierrepontC.PéloquinK. (2018). Oversexualization among emerging adults: Preliminary associations with romantic attachment and intimacy. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2017-0031
9.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). The Guilford Press.
10.
BrockR. L.RamsdellE. L.SáezG.GervaisS. J. (2021). Perceived humanization by intimate partners during pregnancy is associated with fewer depressive symptoms, less body dissatisfaction, and greater sexual satisfaction through reduced self-objectification. Sex Roles, 84(5–6), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01166-6
11.
CalogeroR. M. (2011). Operationalizing self-objectification: Assessment and related methodological issues. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 23–49). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-002
12.
CalogeroR. M.DavisW. N.ThompsonJ. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52(1–2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1192-9
13.
CalogeroR. M.TylkaT. L.SiegelJ. A.PinaA.RobertsT. (2021). Smile pretty and watch your back: Personal safety anxiety and vigilance in objectification theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(6), 1195–1222. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000344
14.
ClarkM. S.JordanS. D. (2002). Adherence to communal norms: what it means, when it occurs, and some thoughts on how it develops. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.34
15.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy. In MashekD. J.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 163–187). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
16.
CrowellJ. A.TrebouxD.GaoY.PanH.WatersE.FyffeC. (2002). Secure base behavior in adulthood: Measurement, links to adult attachment representations, and relations to couples’ communication skills and self-reports. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.38.5.679
17.
CrowellJ. A.TrebouxD.PanH.WatersE.GaoY. (1998). Scales for scoring secure base use and support from couple problem-solving interactions [Unpublished manuscript]. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
18.
DanielsE. A.JeraldM. C.WardL. M. (2022). The woman in the (rearview) window: Viewers’ attitudes toward objectified car selfies of Black and White women. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000363
19.
DanielsE. A.ZurbriggenE. L.WardL. M. (2020). Becoming an object: A review of self-objectification in girls. Body Image, 33, 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.016
20.
DavidsonM. M.GervaisS. J.SherdL. W. (2015). The ripple effects of stranger harassment on objectification of self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313514371
21.
DavidsonM. M.ButchkoM. S.RobbinsK.SherdL. W.GervaisS. J. (2016). The mediating role of perceived safety on street harassment and anxiety. Psychology of Violence, 6(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039970
22.
DavidsonM. M.GervaisS. J.CanivezG. L.ColeB. P. (2013). A psychometric examination of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale among college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032075
23.
DeVilleD. C.EllmoF. I.HortonW. A.ErchullM. J. (2015). The role of romantic attachment in women’s experiences of body surveillance and body shame. Gender Issues, 32, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9136-3
24.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data anlaysis. Guilford Publications.
25.
FairchildK.RudmanL. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
26.
FeeneyJ. A. (2003). The systemic nature of couple relationships: An attachment perspective. In ErdmanP.CafferyT. (Eds.), Attachment and family systems: Conceptual, empirical, and therapeutic relatedness (pp. 139–163). Brunner-Routledge.
27.
FeeneyJ. A. (2016). Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.),Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 435–463). Guilford Publications.
28.
FeeneyJ. A.AlexanderR.NollerP.HohausL. (2003). Attachment insecurity, depression, and the transition to parenthood. Personal Relationships, 10(4), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-6811.2003.00061.x
29.
FeeneyJ. A.KarantzasG. C. (2017). Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.017
30.
FonagyP.SteeleH.SteeleM. (1991). Maternal representations of attachment during pregnancy predict the organization of infant–mother attachment at one year of age. Child Development, 62(5), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131141
31.
FraleyC. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2016)046
32.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
33.
GervaisS. J.DavidsonM. M. (2013). Objectification among college women in the context of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 28(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.28.1.36
34.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.AllenJ. (2012). When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02016.x
35.
GriffinD. W.BartholomewK. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 17–52). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
36.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111
37.
HarlowH. F.HarlowM. K. (1965). The affectional systems. In SchrierA. M.HarlowH. F.StollnitzF. (Eds.), Behavior of nonhuman primates (pp. 287–334). Academic Press.
HazanC.ZeifmanD. (1999). Pair bonds as attachments. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 336–354). The Guilford Press.
40.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
41.
HerbozoS.ThompsonJ. K. (2006). Development and validation of the verbal commentary on physical appearance scale: Considering both positive and negative commentary. Body Image, 3(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.10.001
42.
JiaoJ.TeránL.AubreyJ. S. (2022). Buffering an objectifying culture: Interpersonal sexual objectification, self-objectification, and attachment anxiety. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(4), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221115335
43.
JohnsonS. M. (2019). Attachment theory in practice: Emotionally focused therapy (EFT) with individuals, couples, and families. Guilford.
44.
KennyD. A. (2018). Reflections on the actor-partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 25(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12240
45.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
46.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
47.
KurdekL. A. (2002). On being insecure about the assessment of attachment styles. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(6), 811–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502196005
48.
LangtonR. (2009). Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. Oxford University Press.
49.
Lev-AriL.Baumgarten-KatzI.ZoharA. H. (2014). Show me your friends, and I shall show you who you are: The way attachment and social comparisons influence body dissatisfaction. European Eating Disorders Review, 22(6), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2325
50.
LiT.ChanD. K. S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1842
51.
LindnerD.Tantleff-DunnS.JentschF. (2012). Social comparison and the “circle of objectification.”Sex Roles, 67(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0175-x
52.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.MurnaneT.VaesJ.ReynoldsC.SuitnerC. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.755
53.
MaharE. A.WebsterG. D.MarkeyP. M. (2020). Partner–objectification in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 27(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12303
54.
MarvinR. S.BritnerP. A.RussellB. S. (2016). Normative development: The ontogeny of attachment. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 273–290). Guilford.
55.
McKinleyN. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39(1/2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018834001203
MeltzerA. L. (2020). Women can benefit from sexual and physical valuation in the context of a romantic relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219854443
58.
MeltzerA. L.McNultyJ. K. (2014). Tell me I’m sexy … and otherwise valuable”: Body valuation and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12018
59.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2016). Adult attachment and emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.) Handbook of attachment, third edition: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 507–533). The Guilford Press.
60.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
61.
MoradiB.TebbeE. A.ConnellyK. E.LenzenA. L.FloresM. J. (2019). Objectification of sexual minority women: Responses, consequences, and resistance. Journal of Counseling Psychology,66(5), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1037.cou0000348
62.
MoradiB.VarnesJ. R. (2017). Structure of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Reevaluated 20 years later. Sex Roles, 77(5–6), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0731-x
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
NussbaumM. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford University Press.
68.
OrehekE.WeaverlingC. G. (2017). On the nature of objectification: Implications of considering people as means to goals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617691138
69.
PaschL. A.BradburyT. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.219
70.
PizziraniB.KarantzasG. C.MullinsE. R. (2019). The development and validation of a dehumanization measure within romantic relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02754
71.
RholesW. S.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.). (2004). Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications.Guilford.
72.
RobertsT.CalogeroR. M.GervaisS. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W.RutherfordA.WilliamsW. S.CookS. L.WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 249–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-013
73.
RubinL. R.SteinbergJ. R. (2011). Self-objectification and pregnancy: Are body functionality dimensions protective?Sex Roles, 65(7), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9955-y
74.
SáezG.RiemerA. R.BrockR. L.GervaisS. J. (2019). Objectification in heterosexual romantic relationships: Examining relationship satisfaction of female objectification recipients and male objectifying perpetrators. Sex Roles, 81(5–6), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0990-9
75.
Sagiv-ReissD. M.BirnbaumG. E.SafirM. P. (2012). Changes in sexual experiences and relationship quality during pregnancy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9839-9
76.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
77.
SiegelJ. A.HuellemannK. L.CalogeroR. M.RobertsT. (2021). Psychometric properties and validation of the Phenomenological Body Shame Scale-Revised (PBSS-R). Body Image, 39, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.06.001
78.
SimonH. L. M.DiPlacidoJ.ConwayJ. M. (2019). Attachment styles in college students and depression: The mediating role of self differentiation. Mental Health and Prevention, 13, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2019.01.011
79.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.CampbellL.WilsonC. L. (2003). Changes in attachment orientations across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00030-1
80.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2016). The influence of maternal self-objectification, materialism and parenting style on potentially sexualized “grown up” behaviours and appearance concerns in 5–8 year old girls. Eating Behaviors, 22, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.05.002
81.
SmolakL.MurnenS. K.MyersT. A. (2014). Sexualizing the self: What college women and men think about and do to be ‘“sexy.”’. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314524168
82.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification?Sex Roles, 52(9–10), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
83.
StrelanP.PagoudisS. (2018). Birds of a feather flock together: The interpersonal process of objectification within intimate heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 79(1–2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0851-y
84.
SzymanskiD. M.MoffitL. B.CarrE. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist,39(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402
85.
TeránL.JiaoJ.AubreyJ. S. (2021). The relational burden of objectification: Exploring how past experiences of interpersonal sexual objectification are related to relationship competencies. Sex Roles, 84(9), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01188-0
86.
WangX.ChenH.ChenZ.LuoS. (2022). An exchange orientation results in an instrumental approach in intimate relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(4), 1114–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12530
87.
WattA. D.KonnertC. A. (2020). Body satisfaction and self-esteem among middle-aged and older women: The mediating roles of social and temporal comparisons and self-objectification. Aging and Mental Health24(5), 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1544222
88.
WilliamsonG. M.ClarkM. S. (1989). The communal/exchange distinction and some implications for understanding justice in families. Social Justice Research, 3(2), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048060
89.
ZurbriggenE. L.RamseyL. R.JaworskiB. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64(7–8), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
