Global racism and colorism, the preference for fairer skin even within ethnic and racial groups, leads millions of women of African, Asian, and Latin descent to use products with chemical ingredients intended to lighten skin color. Drawing from literatures on the impact of chronic and situational disempowerment on behavioral risk-taking to enhance status, we hypothesized that activating feelings of disempowerment would increase women of color’s interest in stronger and riskier products meant to lighten skin tone quickly and effectively. In two experiments (Experiment 1: N = 253 women and 264 men; Experiment 2: replication study, N = 318 women) with distinct samples of Indian participants, we found that being in a state of psychological disempowerment (vs. empowerment) increased Indian women’s preference for stronger and riskier skin lightening products but not for milder products. Indian men’s interest in both types of products was unaffected by the same psychological disempowerment prime. Based on these findings, we recommend increased consideration among teaching faculty, research scholars, and clinicians on how feeling disempowered can lead women of color to take risks to lighten their skin as well as other issues of intersectionality and with respect to colorism. We also encourage the adoption of policies aimed at empowering women of color and minimizing access to harmful skin lightening products.
AgrawalS. S.SharmaP. (2017). Current status of mercury level in skin whitening creams. Current Medicine Research and Practice, 7(2), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmrp.2017.02.001
2.
BanerjeeA. V.DufloE.GhatakM.LafortuneJ. (2013). Marry for what? Caste and mate selection in modern India. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 33–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.5.2.33
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1086/338209
4.
Ben-ZeevA.DennehyT. C.GoodrichR. I.KolarikB. S.GeislerM. W. (2014). When an “educated” Black man becomes lighter in the mind’s eye: Evidence for a skin tone memory bias. Sage Open, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013516770
5.
BettacheK. (2020). A call to action: The need for a cultural psychological approach to discrimination on the basis of skin color in Asia. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 15(4), 1131–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904740
6.
BondS.CashT. F. (1992). Black beauty: Skin color and body images among African-American college women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(11), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00930.x
7.
BrinolP.PettyR. E.ValleC.RuckerD. D.BecerraA. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1040
8.
BuhrmesterM. D.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
9.
BuhrmesterM. D.TalaifarS.GoslingS. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516
CalogeroR. M.PinaA.ParkL. E.RahemtullaZ. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5
12.
ChaipraditkulN. (2013). Thailand: Beauty and globalized self-identity through cosmetic therapy and skin lightening. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 13(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00134
ChomaB. L.PrusaczykE. (2018). The effects of system justifying beliefs on skin-tone surveillance, skin-color dissatisfaction, and skin-bleaching behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317747845
15.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
16.
CortlandC. I.KiniasZ. (2019). Stereotype threat and women’s work satisfaction: The importance of role models. APA Archives of Scientific Psychology, Special Section: Advancing Gender Equality in the Workplace, 7(1): 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000056
17.
DanielS.BridgesS. K. (2010). The drive for muscularity in men: Media influences and objectification theory. Body Image, 7(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.08.003
18.
DanielS.BridgesS. K.MartensM. P. (2014). The development and validation of the Male Assessment of Self-Objectification (MASO). Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031518
19.
De WildeM.CasiniA.WollastR.DemoulinS. (2019). Sex is power belief and women’s mental health: The mediating roles of self-objectification and sexual subjectivity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(5), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2643
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x
22.
EberhardtJ. L.GoffP. A.PurdieV. J.DaviesP. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.876
23.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
24.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
25.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633
26.
GervaisS. J.BernardP.RiemerA. R. (2015). Who treats people as sex objects? Cultural orientation, social comparison, and sexual objectification perpetration. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28(1), 153–181.
27.
GlennE. N. (2008). Yearning for lightness: Transnational circuits in the marketing and consumption of skin lighteners. Gender & Society, 22(3), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208316089
28.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.2.109
HamiltonD.GoldsmithA. H.DarityW.Jr. (2009). Shedding “light” on marriage: The influence of skin shade on marriage for black females. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.024
33.
HarperK.ChomaB. L. (2019). Internalised White ideal, skin tone surveillance, and hair surveillance predict skin and hair dissatisfaction and skin bleaching among African American and Indian women. Sex Roles, 80, 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0966-9
34.
HeblM. R.WilliamsM. J.SundermannJ. M.KellH. J.DaviesP. G. (2012). Selectively friending: Racial stereotypicality and social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1329–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.019
HiemerJ.AbeleA. E. (2012). High power = motivation? Low power = situation? The impact of power, power stability and power motivation on risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.008
37.
HillM. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference?Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090169
38.
HillS. E.BussD. M. (2010). Risk and relative social rank: Positional concerns and risky shifts in probabilistic decision-making. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.01.002
KarnaniA. (2007). Doing well by doing good-case study: Fair & Lovely whitening cream. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.645
43.
KarnaniA. (2014). Is Unilever being socially responsible in marketing Fair & Lovely, a skin whitening cream? (pp. 1–429). William Davidson Institute Case.
44.
KeithV. M.HerringC. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 760–778. https://doi.org/10.1086/229819
KhannaT.PalepuK. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press.
48.
KiniasZ.KimH. S. (2012). Culture and gender inequality: Psychological consequences of perceiving gender inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211408940
49.
KotlerP.LeeN. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons.
50.
LammersJ.DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Ease of retrieval moderates the effects of power: Implications for the replicability of power recall effects. Social Cognition, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1
51.
LavineH.SweeneyD.WagnerS. H. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511012
52.
LiE. P.MinH. J.BelkR. W.KimuraJ.BahlS. (2008). Skin lightening and beauty in four Asian cultures. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 444–449.
53.
LoughnanS.Fernandez-CamposS.VaesJ.AnjumG.AzizM.HaradaC.HollandE.SinghI.PuviaE.TsuchiyaK. (2015). Exploring the role of culture in sexual objectification: A seven nations study. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/t53664-000
MaddoxK. B.GrayS. A. (2002). Cognitive representations of Black Americans: Reexploring the role of skin tone. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282010
56.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628
57.
MaheA.LyF.AymardG.DangouJ. M. (2003). Skin diseases associated with the cosmetic use of bleaching products in women from Dakar, Senegal. British Journal of Dermatology, 148(3), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05161.x
58.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 251–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80007-7
59.
MajorB.VickS. B. (2005). The psychological impact of prejudice. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 139–154). Blackwell.
MayF.MongaA. (2014). When time has a will of its own, the powerless don’t have the will to wait: Anthropomorphism of time can decrease patience. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.1086/673384
MoonA.ChenS. (2014). The power to control time: Power influences how much time (you think) you have. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.011
66.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
67.
NarayananJ.TaiK.KiniasZ. (2013). Power motivates interpersonal connection following social exclusion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.006
PeltzerK.PengpidS.JamesC. (2016). The globalization of whitening: Prevalence of skin lighteners (or bleachers) use and its social correlates among university students in 26 countries. International Journal of Dermatology, 55(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12860
70.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.
71.
PrusaczykE.ChomaB. L. (2018). Skin tone surveillance, depression, and life satisfaction in Indian women: Colour-blind racial ideology as a moderator. Body Image, 27, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.10.001
72.
ReinkaM. A.Pan-WeiszB.LawnerE. K.QuinnD. M. (2020). Cumulative consequences of stigma: Possessing multiple concealable stigmatized identities is associated with worse quality of life. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(4), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12656
73.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H. (2015). Where do we go from here? Toward an inclusive and intersectional literature of multiple stigmatization. Sex Roles, 73, 408–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0543-4
RidgewayC. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657301
76.
RolleroC.De PiccoliN. (2017). Self-objectification and personal values. An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01055
77.
RondillaJ. L.SpickardP. R. (2007). Is lighter better? Skin-tone discrimination among Asian Americans. Rowman & Littlefield.
78.
RosenthalL. (2016). Incorporating intersectionality into psychology: An opportunity to promote social justice and equity. American Psychologist, 71(6), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040323
79.
RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1086/588569
80.
RudmanL. A.McLeanM. C. (2016). The role of appearance stigma in implicit racial ingroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(3), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583152
81.
SchaererM.du PlessisC.GalinskyA. D. (2021). A dual-pathway model of power and risk-taking: Risk-taking as an affordance of power and pathway to power [Manuscript in preparation].
SharmaE.AlterA. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1086/664038
84.
ShroffH.DiedrichsP. C.CraddockN. (2018). Skin color, cultural capital, and beauty products: An investigation of the use of skin fairness products in Mumbai, India. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00365
85.
Smart RichmanL.BlodornA.MajorB. (2016). An identity-based motivational model of the effects of perceived discrimination on health-related behaviors. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216634192
86.
SmithP. K.TropeY. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
87.
StamkouE.van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.GalinskyA. D. (2016). How norm violations shape social hierarchies: Those who stand on top block norm violators from rising up. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 608–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641305
88.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification?Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
89.
SudhirK.PriesterJ.ShumM.AtkinD.FosterA.IyerG.JinG.KenistonD.KitayamaS.MobarakM.QianY. (2015). Research opportunities in emerging markets: An inter-disciplinary perspective from marketing, economics, and psychology. Customer Needs and Solutions, 2, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-015-0044-1
90.
SundieJ. M.KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.VohsK. D.BealD. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669
91.
TanC. S.Fuller-TyszkiewiczM.UtpalaR.YeungV. W. L.De PaoliT.LoughanS.KrugI. (2016). Western cultural identification explains variations in the objectification model for eating pathology across Australian Caucasians and Asian women. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1578), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01578
92.
TiceD. M.BratslavskyE.BaumeisterR. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.53
UzogaraE. E.LeeH.AbdouC. M.JacksonJ. S. (2014). A comparison of skin tone discrimination among African American men: 1995 and 2003. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033479
95.
VainioA.MäkiniemiJ. P.PaloniemiR. (2014). System justification and the perception of food risks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213503502
96.
Van LooK. J.RydellR. J. (2013). On the experience of feeling powerful: Perceived power moderates the effect of stereotype threat on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212475320
WaltersD. J.FernbachP. M.FoxC. R.SlomanS. A. (2016). Known unknowns: A critical determinant of confidence and calibration. Management Science, 63(12), 4298–4307. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2580
99.
WolfN. (1991). The beauty myth. Anchor.
100.
WollastR.PuviaE.BernardP.TevichapongP.KleinO. (2018). How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in Western and Eastern cultures. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 77(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000209
101.
WollastR.RiemerA. R.BernardP.LeysC.KotsouI.KleinO. (2019). How self-compassion moderates the effect of body surveillance on subjective happiness and depression among women. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(5), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12553
102.
WollastR.RiemerA. R.GervaisS. J.GrigoryanL.BernardP.KleinO. (2020). How cultural orientation and self-compassion shape objectified body consciousness for women from America, Belgium, Russia, and Thailand. Self and Identity, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1787220
ZotaA. R.ShamasunderB. (2017). The environmental injustice of beauty: Framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(4), 418.e1–418.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.020
