A prominent feature of mainstream television, especially reality programming, is a heterosexual script that outlines women’s and men’s traditional courtship roles. Although frequent media use is believed to produce greater acceptance of this script, existing analyses have not fully delineated contributions of scripted versus reality programming or tested these notions using a holistic heterosexual script scale. We addressed these limitations in two studies. In Study 1, 466 undergraduate women indicated their support of the heterosexual script and their consumption of popular reality programs, sitcoms, and dramas. Heavier viewing of reality programming predicted greater support for the heterosexual script, and heavier viewing of sitcoms predicted weaker support. In Study 2, we used longitudinal data to explore relations between viewing reality television, acceptance of the heterosexual script, and acceptance of sexualized aggression during undergraduate women’s first 2 years in college (N = 244). We found that reality television consumption was not a direct predictor of acceptance of sexualized aggression but was a significant, indirect predictor through endorsement of the heterosexual script. These studies contribute to our understanding of unique media contributions to endorsement of the heterosexual script and illuminate one process by which women may come to normalize sexual mistreatment. Campus educational programming on sexuality, sexual assault, and healthy relationships may be able to intervene in this normalization through critique of the heterosexual script and media portrayals of dating and relationships. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/03616843211044686
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL.SweeneyB. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483
2.
AubreyJ. S.YanK.TeránL.RobertsL. (2020). The heterosexual script on tween, teen, and young-adult television programs: A content analytic update and extension. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1699895
3.
BarnettM. D.HaleT. M.SligarK. B. (2017). Masculinity, femininity, sexual dysfunctional beliefs, and rape myth acceptance among heterosexual college men and women. Sexuality & Culture, 21(3), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9420-3
4.
BeckerS.TinklerJ. (2015). “Me getting plastered and her provoking my eyes”: Young people's attribution of blame for sexual aggression in public drinking spaces.Feminist Criminology, 10(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114541142
5.
Behm-MorawitzE.LewallenJ.MillerB. (2015). Real mean girls? Reality television viewing, social aggression, and gender-related beliefs among female emerging adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(4), 340–355. http://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000074
6.
BerkowitzA. (1992). College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: A review of recent research. Journal of American College Health, 40(4), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.1992.9936279
7.
BevensC. L.LoughnanS. (2019). Insights into men’s sexual aggression toward women: Dehumanization and objectification. Sex Roles, 81(11-12), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01024-0
CoyneS. M.Padilla-WalkerL. M.HowardE. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813479782
10.
DhoestA. (2017). Genre. In RösslerP.HoffnerC. A.van ZoonenL. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–8). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0211
11.
EatonA. A.MatamalaA. (2014). The relationship between heteronormative beliefs and verbal sexual coercion in college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1443–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0284-4
12.
EmmerinkP. M. J.van den EijndenR. J. J. M.VanwesenbeeckI.ter BogtT. F. M. (2016). The relationship between endorsement of the sexual double standard and sexual cognitions and emotions. Sex Roles, 75(7), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0616-z
13.
FedinaL.HolmesJ. L.BackesB. L. (2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129
14.
FerrisA. L.SmithS. W.GreenbergB. S.SmithS. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x
15.
FlynnM. A.ParkS.MorinD. T.StanaA. (2015). Anything but real: Body idealization and objectification of MTV docusoap characters. Sex Roles, 72(5-6), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0464-2
16.
GambleH. (2018). Acquiescing to the script: A panel study of college students’ sexual media habits, endorsement of heteronormative scripts, and their hesitance toward resisting unwanted hookups. Sex Roles, 80, 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0971-z
17.
GervaisS. J.DiLilloD.McChargueD. (2014). Understanding the link between men’s alcohol use and sexual violence perpetration: The mediating role of sexual objectification. Psychology of Violence, 4, 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033840
18.
GrahamK.BernardsS.AbbeyA.DumasT.WellsS. (2014). Young women’s risk of sexual aggression in bars: The roles of intoxication and peer social status. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12153
19.
GreeneK.FaulknerS. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53(3–4), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
20.
GrowerP.WardL. M.TrekelsJ. (2019). Expanding models testing media contributions to self-sexualization. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019848905
21.
GuoW.NathansonA. I. (2011). The effects of parental mediation of sexual content on the sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of adolescents in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 5, 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2011.587141
22.
HallA. (2009). Perceptions of media realism and reality TV. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 423–438). SAGE.
23.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
24.
HorneS.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2005). Female sexual subjectivity and well-being: Comparing late adolescents with different sexual experiences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2(3), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.3.25
25.
HustS.LeiM. (2008). Sexual objectification, sports programming, and music television. Media Report to Women, 36(1), 16–23.
26.
HustS. J. T.RodgersK. B.BaylyB. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12230
27.
JewellJ. A.BrownC. S. (2013). Sexting, catcalls, and butt slaps: How gender stereotypes and perceived group norms predict sexualized behavior. Sex Roles, 69(11–12), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0320-1
28.
KavanaughP. R. (2013). The continuum of sexual violence: Women’s accounts of victimization in urban nightlife. Feminist Criminology, 8(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085112442979.
29.
KellyL. (1987). The continuum of sexual violence. In HanmerJ.MaynardM. (Eds.), Women, violence and social control (pp. 46–60). Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
KellyL. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Polity Press.
31.
KellyL. (2011). Standing the test of time? Reflections on the concept of the continuum of violence. In BrownJ. M.WalklateS. L. (Eds.), Handbook on sexual violence (pp. xvii). Routledge.
32.
KennettD. J.HumphreysT. P.BramleyJ. E. (2013). Sexual resourcefulness and gender roles as moderators of relationship satisfaction and consenting to unwanted sex in undergraduate women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.933
KimJ. L.Lynn SorsoliC.CollinsK.ZylbergoldB. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263660
35.
KuperbergA.PadgettJ. E. (2016). The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(8), 1070–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515616876
36.
KuhneR.OpreeS. (2020). From admiration to devotion? The longitudinal relation between adolescents’ involvement with and viewing frequency of reality TV. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 111–130. http://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1728688
37.
LefkowitzE. S.ShearerC. L.GillenM. M.Espinosa-HernandezG. (2014). How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sexuality & Culture, 18(4), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9225-6
38.
MalamuthN. M.CheckJ. V. P. (1981). The effects of mass media exposure on acceptance of violence against women: A field experiment. Journal of Research in Personality, 15(4), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(81)90040-4
39.
McDermottR. C.KilmartinC.McKelveyD. K.KridelM. M. (2015). College male sexual assault of women and the psychology of men: Past, present, and future directions for research. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(4), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039544
40.
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
41.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. Journal of Sex Research, 54(4-5), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014
42.
MurnenS. K.WrightC.KaluznyG. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46(11–12), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020488928736
43.
PaganiM.MirabelloA. (2011). The influence of personal and social-interactive engagement in social TV web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160203
44.
PappL. J.ErchullM. (2017). Objectification and system justification impact rape avoidance behaviors. Sex Roles, 76(1–2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0660-8
45.
PappL. J.McClellandS. I. (2020). Too common to count? “Mild” sexual assault and aggression among U.S. college women. Journal of Sex Research, 58, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1778620
46.
PappL. J.WardL. M.ReedL. A. (2021). Development and validation of the acceptance of sexualized aggression scale among U.S. undergraduate women. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
47.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of Its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
48.
PleckJ. H.SonensteinF. L.KuL. C. (1994). Attitudes toward male roles among adolescent males: A discriminant validity analysis. Sex Roles, 30(7/8), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420798
49.
RubinJ. D.ConleyT. D.KleinV.LiuJ.LehaneC. M.DammeyerJ. (2019). A cross-national examination of sexual desire: The roles of ‘gendered cultural scripts’ and ‘sexual pleasure’ in predicting heterosexual women’s desire for sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.07.012
50.
RudmanL. A.MescherK. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212436401
51.
SanchezD. T.FetterolfJ. C.RudmanL. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
52.
SchickV. R.ZuckerA. N.Bay-ChengL. Y. (2008). Safer, better sex through feminism: The role of feminist ideology in women’s sexual well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00431.x
53.
SeabrookR. C.WardL. M.CortinaL. M.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. R. (2017). Girl power or powerless girl? Television, sexual scripts, and sexual agency in sexually active young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316677028
54.
SeabrookR. C.WardL. M.GiaccardiS. (2019). Less than human? Media use, objectification of women, and men's acceptance of sexual aggression. Psychology of Violence, 9(5), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000198
55.
SeabrookR. C.WardL. M.ReedL.ManagoA.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815623686
56.
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In GeerJ. H.O’DonohueW. (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). Plenum Press.
57.
SnellW. E.Jr. (1998). The stereotypes about male sexuality scale. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BaurermanR.SchreerG.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures: A compendium (2nd ed., pp. 463–465). Sage.
58.
TetenA. L.HallG. C. N.PacificiC. (2005). Validation of acceptance of coercive sexual behavior (ACSB): A multimedia measure of adolescent dating attitudes. Assessment, 12(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105275042
59.
TinklerJ. E.BeckerS.ClaytonK. A. (2018). “Kind of natural, kind of wrong”: Young people’s beliefs about the morality, legality, and normalcy of sexual aggression in public drinking settings. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(1), 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12235
60.
TolmanD. L. (1999). Femininity as a barrier to positive sexual health for adolescent girls. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association (1972), 54, 133–138.
61.
TolmanD. L.KimJ. L.SchoolerD.SorsoliC. L. (2007). Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into focus. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 40(1), 84e9–84e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.002
62.
TolmanD. L.SpencerR.Rosen-ReynosoM.PorcheM. V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.t01-1-00010
63.
VangeelL.EggermontS.VandenboschL. (2020). Does adolescent media use predict sexual stereotypes in adolescence and emerging adulthood? Associations with music television and online pornography exposure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01677-z
64.
VasquezE. A.OsinnowoK.PinaA.BallL.BellC. (2017). The sexual objectification of girls and aggression towards them in gang and non-gang affiliated youth. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(5), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1269902
65.
WardL. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532
66.
WardL. M.EpsteinM.CaruthersA.MerriwetherA. (2011). Men’s media use, sexual cognitions, and sexual risk behavior: Testing a mediational model. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022669
67.
WardL. M.JeraldM.AveryL.ColeE. R. (2019). Following their lead? Connecting mainstream media use to black women’s gender beliefs and sexual agency. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1554741
68.
WardL. M.VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2015). The impact of men’s magazines on adolescent boys’ objectification and courtship beliefs. Journal of Adolescence, 39, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.12.004
69.
WoernerJ.AbbeyA. (2017). Positive feelings after casual sex: The role of gender and traditional gender-role beliefs. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(6), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1208801
70.
WrightP. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior assessing the claim for causality. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 343–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679121
71.
WrightP. J.TokunagaR. S. (2016). Men’s objectifying media consumption, objectification of women, and attitudes supportive of violence against women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0644-8
72.
ZurbriggenE. L.MorganE. M. (2006). Who wants to marry a millionaire? Reality dating television programs, attitudes toward sex, and sexual behaviors. Sex Roles, 54(1/2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8865-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
