A Female Leadership Trust Advantage in Times of Crisis: Under What Conditions?

Abstract

We examined differences in trust for men and women leaders who adopt relational behaviors during an organizational crisis. We addressed two important shortcomings of previous research. First, we independently manipulated leader gender and leader relational behaviors (interpersonal emotion management) to identify their separate and interacting influences on trust outcomes, which may lead to a leadership advantage for women. Second, we examined how uncertainty about crisis outcomes affects the strength of this advantage. We operationalized trust as both evaluative and behavioral (investment in a company led by the leader). We found support from two experiments with women and men (N = 412 and N = 400) for the idea of a female leadership trust advantage in times of crisis. And we showed that the advantage is uniquely attributable to female leaders’ use of relational behaviors and is manifested only when crisis consequences are known. We observed these effects for both evaluative trust (Studies 1 and 2) and behavioral trust (Study 2). We invite more research on the conditions that contribute to the female leadership advantage, the gendered nature of leadership behaviors during organizational crises, and the relational leadership qualities that help restore trust in organizations during uncertain times. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684319828292

Keywords

leadership trust gender gap contextual cues organizational crises online experiments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

K. J.

(2014). Modern misogyny: Anti-feminism in a post-feminist era. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199328178.001.0001

Belkin

L. Y.

Rothman

N. B.

(2017). Do I trust you? Depends on what you feel: Interpersonal effects of emotions on initial trust at zero-acquaintance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10, 3–27. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12088

Berg

Dickhaut

McCabe

(1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142. doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political analysis, 20, 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057

Binns

(2008). The ethics of relational leading: Gender matters. Gender, Work & Organization, 15, 600–620. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00418.x

Bordia

Hobman

Jones

Gallois

Callan

V. J.

(2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 507–532. doi:10.1023/B: JOBU.0000028449.99127.f7

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980

Buss

D. M.

(1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.50.3.164

Casler

Bickel

Hackett

(2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009

10.

Catalyst. (2019). Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 companies. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-sp-500-companies

11.

Chen

C. C.

Saparito

Belkin

(2011). Responding to trust breaches: The domain specificity of trust and the role of affect. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 85–106. doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.552438

12.

Chopra

Sodhi

(2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53–62.

13.

Cook

Glass

(2013). Glass cliffs and organizational saviors: Barriers to minority leadership in work organizations? Social Problems, 60, 168–187. doi:10.1525/sp.2013.60.2.168

14.

Cook

Glass

(2014). Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO? Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1080–1089. doi:10.1002/smj.2161

15.

Côté

Hideg

(2011). The ability to influence others via emotion displays: A new dimension of emotional intelligence. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 53–71. doi:10.1177/2041386610379257

16.

Cross

S. E.

Madson

(1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.122.1.5

17.

Cunliffe

A. L.

Eriksen

(2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425–1499. doi:10.1177/0018726711418388

18.

Duncan

R. B.

(1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313–327. doi:10.2307/2392145

19.

Dutton

J. E.

Dukerich

J. M.

(2006). The relational foundation of research: An underappreciated dimension of interesting research. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 21–26. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785497

20.

Eagly

A. H.

(2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x

21.

Eagly

A. H.

(2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance? Journal of Social Issues, 72, 199–222. doi:10.1111/josi.12163

22.

Eagly

A. H.

Carli

L. L.

(2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004

23.

Eagly

A. H.

Johannesen-Schmidt

M. C.

van Engen

M. L.

(2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

24.

Eagly

A. H.

Karau

S. J.

(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573

25.

Eagly

A. H.

Karau

S. J.

Makhijani

M. G.

(1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125

26.

Feland

(2008). Janet Ang: Guiding transitions. Leadership in Focus. Retrieved from https://www.leadershipinfocus.net/

27.

Fletcher

J. K.

(1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7, 163–186. doi:10.1177/105649269872012

28.

Fletcher

J. K.

(1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practices at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1108/wimr.2000.15.5_6.303.1

29.

Flynn

F. J.

Staw

B. M.

(2004). Lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 309–330. doi:10.1002/smj.377

30.

Garcia-Retamero

Lopez-Zafra

(2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51–61. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1

31.

Glaeser

E. L.

Laibson

D. I.

Scheinkman

J. A.

Soutter

C. L.

(2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811–846. doi:10.1162/003355300554926

32.

Gloor

J. L.

Morf

Paustian-Underdahl

Backes-Gellner

(2018). Fix the game, not the dame: Restoring equity in leadership evaluations. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3861-y

33.

Gosling

S. D.

Vazire

Srivastava

John

O. P.

(2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93

34.

Grant

A. M.

(2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351328

35.

Grant

(1988). Women as managers: What can they offer to organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 56–63. doi:1016/0090-2616(88)90036-8

36.

Gross

J. J.

John

O. P.

(2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

37.

Haddon

Loughlin

McNally

(2015). Leadership in a time of financial crisis: What do we want from our leaders? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36, 612–627. doi:10.1108/lodj-12-2013-0166

38.

Haines

E. L.

Deaux

Lofaro

(2016). The times they are a-changing…or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353–363. doi:10.1177/0361684316634081

39.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. doi:/10.1111/jedm.12050

40.

Hendricks

K. B.

Singhal

V. R.

(2008). The effect of product introduction delays on operating performance. Management Science, 54, 878–892. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0805

41.

Holmes

Marra

(2004). Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society, 33, 377–398. doi:10.1017/s0047404504043039

42.

Hoobler

J. M.

Masterson

C. R.

Nkomo

S. M.

Michel

E. J.

(2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44, 2473–2499. doi:10.5703/1288284316077

43.

Horton

J. J.

Rand

D. G.

Zeckhauser

R. J.

(2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399–425. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9

44.

Howard

E. S.

Gardner

W. L.

Thompson

(2007). The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: Self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 614–631. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.614

45.

Huang

Murnighan

J. K.

(2010). What’s in a name? Subliminally activating trusting behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.10.002

46.

Humphrey

R. H.

(2002). The many faces of emotional leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 493–504. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00140-6

47.

Hyde

J. S.

(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

48.

Hyde

J. S.

Bigler

R. S.

Joel

Tate

C. C.

van Anders

S. M.

(2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/amp0000307

49.

Jeong

S. H.

Harrison

(2017). Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of females as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1219–1252. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0716

50.

Jolivet

(2013). Enquête sur les risques humains dans un departement R&D de l’industrie aéronautique [An investigation of human risk in a R&D department within the aeronautics industry] (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.

51.

Jones

G. R.

George

J. M.

(1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926625

52.

Kahn

W. A.

Barton

M. A.

Fellows

(2013). Organizational crises and the disturbance of relational systems. Academy of Management Review, 38, 377–396. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0363

53.

Kirkman

Porter

(2014). Toward a model of work team altruism. Academy of Management Review, 39, 541–565. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0160

54.

Kulich

Iacoviello

Lorenzi-Cioldi

(2018). Solving the crisis: When agency is the preferred leadership for implementing change. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 295–308. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.003

55.

Kulich

Lorenzi-Cioldi

Iacoviello

Faniko

Ryan

M. K.

(2015). Signaling change during a crisis: Refining conditions for the glass cliff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.002

56.

Landers

R. N.

Behrend

T. S.

(2015). An inconvenient truth: Arbitrary distinctions between organizational, Mechanical Turk, and other convenience samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 142–164. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.13

57.

Lawler

E. J.

(2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352. doi:10.1086/324071

58.

Lind

E. A.

(2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Greenberg

Cropanzano

(Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

59.

Little

L. M.

Gooty

Williams

(2016). The role of leader emotion management in leader–member exchange and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 85–97. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.007

60.

Little

L. M.

Kluemper

Nelson

D. L.

Gooty

(2012). Development and validation of the interpersonal emotion management scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 407–420. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02042.x

61.

Mayer

J. D.

Caruso

D. R.

Salovey

(2000). Selecting a measure of emotional intelligence: The case for ability scales. In Bar-On

Parker

J. D. A.

(Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 320–342). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

62.

Mayer

R. C.

Davis

J. H.

(1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123

63.

Mayer

R. C.

Davis

J. H.

Schoorman

F. D.

(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

64.

Milliken

F. J.

(1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12, 133–143. doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306502

65.

Mishra

A. K.

(1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In Kramer

R. M.

Tyler

T. R.

(Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n13

66.

Niven

Holman

Totterdell

(2012). How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: An investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships. Human Relations, 65, 777–805. doi:10.1177/0018726712439909

67.

Niven

Totterdell

Holman

(2009). A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion, 9, 498–509. doi:10.1037/a0015962

68.

Paustian-Underdahl

S. C.

Walker

L. S.

Woehr

D. J.

(2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1129–1145. doi:10.1037/a0036751

69.

Pearson

C. M.

Clair

J. A.

(1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 23, 59–76. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192960

70.

Post

(2015). When is female leadership an advantage? Coordination requirements, team cohesion, and team interaction norms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 1153–1175. doi:10.1002/job.2031

71.

Post

Byron

(2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1546–1571. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0319

72.

Powell

G. N.

Butterfield

D. A.

Bartol

K. M.

(2008). Leader evaluations: A new female advantage? Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23, 156–174. doi:10.1108/17542410810866926

73.

Rosener

J. B.

(1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68, 119–125.

74.

Rosette

A. S.

Tost

L. P.

(2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 221–235. doi:10.1037/a0018204

75.

Rudman

L. A.

Glick

(1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1004

76.

Rudman

L. A.

Glick

(2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239

77.

Rudman

L. A.

Glick

(2012). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

78.

Ryan

M. K.

Haslam

S. A.

Hersby

M. D.

Bongiorno

(2011). Think crisis–think female: The glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470–484. doi:10.1037/a0022133

79.

Ryan

M. K.

Haslam

S. A.

Morgenroth

Rink

Stoker

Peters

(2016). Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 446–455. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008

80.

Salovey

Mayer

J. D.

(1989). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. doi:10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg

81.

Slatter

Lovett

Barlow

(2011). Leading corporate turnaround: How leaders fix troubled companies. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

82.

Szulanski

Cappetta

Jensen

R. J.

(2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science, 15, 600–613. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0096

83.

Thiel

Griffith

Connelly

(2015). Leader–follower interpersonal emotion management: Managing stress by person-focused and emotion-focused emotion management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 5–20. doi:10.1177/1548051813515754

84.

Tooby

Cosmides

(1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-z

85.

Trivers

(1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell

(Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine. doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7

86.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

87.

Vecchio

R. P.

(2003). In search of gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 835–850. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.005

88.

Vongas

J. G.

Al Hajj

(2015). The evolution of empathy and women’s precarious leadership appointments. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1751. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01751

89.

Weick

K. E.

(1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 305–317. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x

90.

Weick

K. E.

(1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652. doi:10.2307/2393339

91.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

(2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

92.

Williams

H. M.

Parker

S. K.

Turner

(2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 569–597. doi:10.1177/1059601106293769

93.

Williams

(2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32, 595–621. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351867

94.

Wood

Eagly

A. H.

(2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.699

95.

Wooten

L. P.

James

E. H.

(2008). Linking crisis management and leadership competencies: The role of human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 352–379. doi:10.1177/1523422308316450

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB