According to the spatial agency bias model, in Western cultures agentic targets are envisaged as facing and acting rightward, in line with writing direction. In four studies of Italian participants, we examined the symbolic association between agency and the rightward direction (Study 1, N = 96), its spontaneous activation when attributing agency to female and male targets (Study 2, N = 80) or when judging the authenticity of photographs of men and women (Study 3, N = 57), and its possible relation to stereotype endorsement (Study 4, N = 80). In Study 4, we used a conditioning paradigm in which participants learned a counterstereotypical new association; we developed a novel measure to assess the association between gender and spatial direction, namely, the spatial association task. Participants envisaged and cognitively processed male and female targets in line with the spatial agency bias model and reported lower benevolent sexism after learning a new counterstereotypical spatial association. Our findings raise awareness about the biased use of space (and its consequences) in the representation of women and men, so that all people, and especially communicators and policy makers, can actively intervene to promote gender equality. Additional online materials for this article are available to PWQ subscribers on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684316676045
AbeleA. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768
2.
AbeleA. E.UchronskiM.SuitnerC.WojciszkeB. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. doi:10.1002/ejsp.575
3.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
4.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800284 -1.00004-7
5.
AltermattT. W.DeWallC. N.LeskinenE. (2003). Agency and virtue: Dimensions underlying subgroups of women. Sex Roles, 49, 631–641. doi:10.1023/B: SERS.0000003133.90488.71
6.
ArcherD.IritaniB.KimesD. D.BarriosM. (1983). Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 725–735. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.725
7.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence. An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
8.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181–198. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.181
9.
BarsalouL. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149
10.
BarsalouL. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
11.
BeggI. M.AnasA.FarinacciS. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 446–458. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
12.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215
13.
BenjafieldJ.SegalowitzS. J. (1993). Left and right in Leonardo’s drawings of faces. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 25–32. doi:10.2190/4MNA-CJPP-452G-E2M5
14.
BradyN. (2004). My left brain and me: A dissociation in the perception of self and others. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1156–1161. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.007
15.
BryantD. J.TverskyB.FranklinN. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 74–98. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90006-J
16.
CarnaghiA.PiccoliV.BrambillaM.BianchiM. (2014). Gender hierarchy in the space: The role of gender status in shaping the spatial agency bias. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 105–114. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.863174
17.
CasasantoD.BoroditskyL. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
18.
CasasantoD.BottiniR. (2014). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143, 473–479. doi:10.1037/a0033297
19.
ChatterjeeA. (2002). Portrait profiles and the notion of agency. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 33–41. doi:10.2190/3WLF-AGTV-0AW7-R2CN
20.
CostaM.MenzaniM.BittiP. E. R. (2001). Head canting in paintings: An historical study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 63–73. doi:10.1023/A:1006737224617
21.
CoyneS. M.LinderJ. R.RasmussenE. E.NelsonD. A.BirkbeckV. (2016). Pretty as a princess: Longitudinal effects of engagement with Disney princesses on gender stereotypes, body esteem, and prosocial behavior in children. Child Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.12569
22.
DasguptaN.AsgariS. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
23.
DasguptaN.GreenwaldA. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800
24.
DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122, 371–396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
25.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
26.
De MauroT.ManciniF.VedovelliM.VogheraM. (1993). Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato (LIP) [Word frequency corpus of spoken Italian]. Milano, Etaslibri. Retrieved fromhttp://badip.uni-graz.at/it/
27.
DeWallC. N.AltermattT. W.ThompsonH. (2005). Understanding the structure of stereotypes of women: Virtue and agency as dimensions distinguishing female subgroups. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 396–405. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00239.x
28.
DiekmanA. B.GoodfriendW.GoodwinS. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201–215. doi:10.1023/B: SERS.0000015552.22775.44
29.
DryerM. S. (2005). The order of subject, object and verb. In HaspelmathM.DryerM. S.GilD.ComrieB. (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 330–333). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
31.
EgolfD. B.CorderL. E. (1991). Height differences of low and high job status, female and male corporate employees. Sex Roles, 24, 365–373. doi:10.1007/BF00288309
32.
EmersonK. T.MurphyM. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 508–520. doi:10.1037/a0035403
33.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
34.
GawronskiB.DeutschR.MbirkouS.SeibtB.StrackF. (2008). When “just say no” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370–377. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004
35.
GiessnerS. R.RyanM. K.SchubertT. W.van QuaquebekeN. (2011). The power of pictures: Vertical picture angles in power pictures. Media Psychology, 14, 442–464. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.620541
36.
GiessnerS. R.SchubertT. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30–44. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001
37.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
38.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x
39.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
40.
GlickP.LameirasM.FiskeS. T.EckesT.MasserB.VolpatoC.…CastroY. R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713
41.
HegartyP.BuechelC. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA journals: 1965-2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377–389. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.377
42.
HegartyP.LemieuxA. F.McQueenG. (2010). Graphing the order of the sexes: Constructing, recalling, interpreting, and putting the self in gender difference graphs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 375–391. doi:10.1037/a0018590
43.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
44.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
45.
HouwerJ. D.BaeyensF.RandellT.EelenP.MeersmansT. (2005). Beyond evaluative conditioning? Searching for associative transfer of nonevaluative stimulus properties. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 283–306. doi:10.1080/02699930441000328
46.
HydeJ. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
47.
IjzermanH.KooleS. L. (2011). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches—Bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 355–361. doi:10.1037/a0022373
48.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
49.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL. J.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
50.
JudgeT. A.CableD. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428–441. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428
51.
KangM.-E. (1997). The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37, 979–997. doi:10.1007/BF02936350
52.
KawakamiK.DovidioJ. F.MollJ.HermsenS.RussinA. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871–888. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871
53.
KendonA.FerberA. (1973). A description of some human greetings. In MichaelP.CrookJ. H. (Eds.), Comparative ecology and behavior in primates (pp. 591–668). New York, NY: Academic Press.
54.
KerkhofI.VansteenwegenD.BaeyensF.HermansD. (2015). Counterconditioning: An effective technique for changing conditioned preferences. Experimental Psychology, 58, 31–38. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000063
55.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
57.
LanisK.CovellK. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32, 639–649. doi:10.1007/BF01544216
58.
LarsenK. S.LongE. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian?Sex Roles, 19, 1–12. doi:10.1007/BF00292459
59.
LaudannaA.ThorntonA. M.BrownG.BuraniC.MarconiL. (1995). Un corpus dell’italiano scritto contemporaneo dalla parte del ricevente [A corpus of contemporary written Italian from the receiver’s perspective]. In BolascoS.LebartL.SalemA. (Eds.), III Giornate internazionali di Analisi Statistica dei Dati Testuali [III International Days of Textual Data Statistical Analysis] (Vol. I, pp. 103–109). Roma, Italy: Cisu. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cisu.it/
60.
LeonardR. (1997). Theorizing the relationship between agency and communion. Theory & Psychology, 7, 823–835. doi:10.1177/0959354397076005
61.
LindnerK. (2004). Images of women in general interest and fashion magazine advertisements from 1955 to 2002. Sex Roles, 51, 409–421. doi:10.1023/B: SERS.0000049230.86869.4d
62.
LundqvistD.FlyktA.OehmanA. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF [CD ROM]. Stockholm, Sweden: Emotionlab.
63.
MaassA.PaganiD.BertaE. (2007). How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior. Social Cognition, 25, 833–852. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.833
64.
MaassA.RussoA. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture?Psychological Science, 14, 296–301. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14421
65.
MaassA.SuitnerC.FavarettoX.CignacchiM. (2009). Groups in space: Stereotypes and the spatial agency bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 496–504. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.004
66.
MaassA.SuitnerC.NadhmiF. (2014). What drives the spatial agency bias? An Italian-Malagasy-Arabic Comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143, 991–996. doi:10.1037/a0034989
67.
MahonB. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition?Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420–429. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.987791
68.
Manganelli RattazziA. M.VolpatoC.CanovaL. (2008). L’atteggiamento ambivalente verso donne e uomini. Un contributo alla validazione delle scale ASI e AMI [Ambivalent attitude toward women and men. A contribution to the validation of ASI and AMI scales]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 35, 217–243. Retrieved fromhttps://www.mulino.it/riviste/issn/0390-5349
69.
McMullenL. M.ConwayJ. B. (2002). Conventional metaphors for depression. In FussellS. (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 167–181). New York, NY: Routledge.
70.
MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
71.
NichollsM. E.ClodeD.WoodS. J.WoodA. G. (1999). Laterality of expression in portraiture: Putting your best cheek forward. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 266, 1517–1522. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0809
72.
NichollsM. E.OrrC. A.OkuboM.LoftusA. (2006). Satisfaction guaranteed: The effect of spatial biases on responses to Likert scales. Psychological Science, 17, 1027–1028.
73.
NichollsM. E.WolfgangB. J.ClodeD.LindellA. K. (2002). The effect of left and right poses on the expression of facial emotion. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1662–1665. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00024-6
74.
NiedentalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkelmanP.Krath-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 184–211. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
75.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.
76.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421–433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004
77.
ParishT. S.FleetwoodR. S. (1975). Amount of conditioning and subsequent change in racial attitudes of children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 79–86. doi:10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.79
78.
ParishT. S.FleetwoodR. S.LentzK. J. (1975). Effect of neutral conditioning on racial attitudes of children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 695–701. doi:10.2466/pms.1975.40.3.695
79.
ParishT. S.ShiraziA.LambertF. (1976). Conditioning away prejudicial attitudes in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 907–912. doi:10.2466/pms.1976.43.3.907
80.
ParkinsonC.WheatleyT. (2013). Old cortex, new contexts: Re-purposing spatial perception for social cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 645. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00645
81.
RamasubramanianS. (2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counterstereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38, 497–516. doi:10.1177/0093650210384854
82.
RosenbergS.NelsonC.VivekananthanP. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294. doi:10.1037/h0026086
83.
SagrestanoL. M. (1992). The use of power and influence in a gendered world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 439–447. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00267.x
84.
SchoelC.ZimmerK.StahlbergD. (2015). The Spatial Power Motivation Scale: A semi-implicit measure of situational power motivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 66–80. doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.914524
85.
SchubertT. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1
86.
SchubertT. W.WaldzusS.GiessnerS. R. (2009). Control over the association of power and size. Social Cognition, 27, 1–19. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.1
87.
SchwarzN.KurzE. (1989). What’s in a picture? The impact of face-ism on trait attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 311–316. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420190405
88.
SojoV. E.WoodR. E.GenatA. E. (2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 10–40. doi:10.1177/0361684315599346
89.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
90.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 137–149. doi:10.3758/BF03207704
91.
SuitnerC. (2009). Where to place social targets? Stereotyping and spatial agency bias (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Padova, Italy. Retrieved fromhttp://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it/1756/
92.
SuitnerC.MaassA. (2007). Positioning bias in portraits and self-portraits: Do female artists make different choices?Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 71–95. doi:10.2190/X458-8V17-5M35-5549
93.
SuitnerC.MaassA. (2008). The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1073–1082. doi:10.1002/ejsp.525
94.
SuitnerC.MaassA. (2011). Writing direction and gender stereotyping: An embodied connection. In SchubertT.MaassA. (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 303–323). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110254310.303
95.
SuitnerC.MaassA. (2016). Spatial agency bias: Representing people in space. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 245–301. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.004
96.
SuitnerC.McManusI. C. (2011). Aesthetic asymmetries, spatial agency, and art history: A social psychological perspective. In SchubertT.MaassA. (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 277–301). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110254310.277
97.
TomitaA.OnoderaR. (1994). The availability of information about lateral asymmetry of familiar faces. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 53, 48–57.
98.
VaidJ. (2011). Asymmetries in representational drawing: Alternatives to a laterality account. In SchubertT.MaassA. (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 231–255). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
99.
VikiG. T.AbramsD.HutchisonP. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533–537. doi:10.1023/A:1025888824749
100.
WalkerH. J.FeildH. S.BernerthJ. B.BectonJ. B. (2012). Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers’ information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 214–224. doi:10.1037/a0025847
101.
WhiteM. (2003). Metaphor and economics: The case of growth. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 131–151. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00006-6
102.
WilliamsL. E.BarghJ. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19, 302–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
103.
WolffW. (1933). The experimental study of forms of expression. Character and Person, 2, 168–173. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1933.tb02092.x
104.
YamakawaY.KanaiR.MatsumuraM.NaitoE. (2009). Social distance evaluation in human parietal cortex. PloS One, 4, e4360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004360
105.
YoderJ. D.KahnA. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 381–388. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00263.x
106.
ZaidelD. W.FitzgeraldP. (1994). Sex of the face in Western art: Left and right in portraits. Empirical Study of the Arts, 12, 9–18. doi:10.2190/1BAL-BE93-J5UD-2WDX
107.
ZaragozaM. S.MitchellK. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science, 7, 294–300. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00377.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
