Three experiments were conducted in the United States and Germany to test whether women and men endorse sexist beliefs because they are unaware of the prevalence of different types of sexism in their personal lives. Study 1 (N = 120) and Study 2 (N = 83) used daily diaries as a method to encourage individuals “to see the unseen.” Results revealed that encouraging women to pay attention to sexism, in comparison to attention to other social interactions, led to a stronger rejection of Modern Sexist, Neosexist, and Benevolent Sexist beliefs (Studies 1 and 2) and to negative evaluations of Modern and Benevolent Sexist men described in profiles as well as to more engagement in collective action on behalf of women (Study 2). In contrast, for men, paying attention to sexism did not have these effects. Results from Study 2 suggest, and from Study 3 (N = 141) confirm, that men’s endorsement of Modern and Neosexist beliefs can be reduced if attention to sexism and emotional empathy for the target of discrimination is encouraged. Finally, a follow-up survey indicated that the attitude change in women and men was stable over time. The implications of these findings for interventions to reduce women’s versus men’s endorsement of sexist beliefs are discussed.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.
2.
BarretoM.RyanM. K.SchmittM. (2009). In The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
BatsonC. D.AhmadN. Y. (2009). Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3, 141–177.
4.
BatsonC. D.PolycarpouM. P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH. J.MitchenerE. C.BednarL. L.HighbergerL. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.
5.
BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0022615
6.
BoeckmannR. J.FeatherN. T. (2007). Gender, discrimination beliefs, group-based guilt, and responses to affirmative action for Australian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 290–304.
7.
BohnerG.AhlbornK.SteinerR. (2010). How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Sex Roles, 62, 568–582.
8.
CrandallC. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894.
9.
CrosbyF. (1984). The denial of discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.
10.
CrosbyF.ClaytonS.AlksnisO.HemkerK. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637–646.
11.
DardenneB.DumontM.BollierT. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.
12.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
13.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.
14.
EckesT.Six-MaternaI. (1998). Leugnung von Diskriminierung: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des Modernen Sexismus [Denial of discrimination: A scale measuring modern sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 224–238.
15.
EckesT.Six-MaternaI. (1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Skala zur Erfassung des Ambivalenten Sexismus [Hostility and benevolence: A scale measuring ambivalent sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211–228.
16.
FischerA. R.Bolton HolzK. (2010). Testing a model of women‘s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 297–310.
17.
FosterM. D. (2009). Perceiving pervasive discrimination over time: Implications for coping. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 172–183.
18.
FriedmanC.LeaperC. (2010). Sexual-minority college women’s experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 152–164.
19.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
20.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.López LópezW. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
21.
GrauI (1994). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Inventars zur Erfassung von Bindungsstilen in Partnerschaften [Development and validation of scale measuring attachment styles in couples] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Philipps-University Marburg, Germany.
22.
IyerA.RyanM. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 791–814.
23.
JackmanM. R. (1994). In The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
25.
KilianskiS. E.RudmanL. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?. Sex Roles, 39, 333–352.
26.
KlonisS. C.PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2005). Internal and external motivation to respond without sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1237–1249.
27.
McConahayJ. B. (1983). Modern racism and modern discrimination: The effects of race, racial attitudes, and context on simulated hiring decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 551–558.
28.
MoyaM.GlickP.ExpósitoF.de LemusS.HartJ. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s tolerance of paternalistic discrimination by intimate partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.
29.
OskampS. (Ed.). (2000). In Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
31.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832.
32.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2008). In The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.KappenD. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186.
34.
ShihM.WangE.Trahan BucherA.StotzerR. (2009). Perspective taking: Reducing prejudice towards general outgroups and specific individuals. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 565–577.
35.
StangorC.SwimJ. K.SechristG. B.DeCosterJ.Van AllenK. L.OttenbreitA. (2003). Ask, answer and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 277–311.
36.
StephanW. G.VogtW. P. (Eds.). (2004). In Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
SwimJ. K.AikinK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
38.
SwimJ. K.BeckerJ. C.DeCosterJ. (2010). Core dimensions of contemporary measures of sexist beliefs. Manuscript submitted for publication,
39.
SwimJ. K.BeckerJ.LeeE.PruittE. R. (2009). Sexism reloaded: Worldwide evidence for its endorsement, expression, and emergence in multiple contexts. In LandrineH.RussoN. (Eds.), Handbook of diversity in feminist psychology (pp. 137–172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
SwimJ. K.CohenL. L.HyersL. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In SwimJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 37–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (2009). Sexism. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 407–430). New York: Psychology Press.
42.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.
43.
SwimJ. K.MallettR.Russo-DevosaY.StangorC. (2005). Judgments of sexism. A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411.
44.
SwimJ. K.ScottE.SechristG. B.CampbellB.StangorC. (2003). The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 944–959.
45.
TougasF.BrownR.BeatonA. M.JolyS. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849.
VescioT. K.GervaisS.SnyderM.HooverA. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.
48.
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
