Although the process of sexual objectification is theorized to occur within interpersonal interactions, we believe this is the first study to examine sexual objectification and self-objectification in actual (nonconfederate) interpersonal encounters. Men and women were brought into the laboratory and interacted in mixed-sex dyads. We used dyadic analysis to detect whether partners’ objectification of each other affected state self-objectification, and the resulting feelings of comfort and authenticity during the interaction. After the interaction, participants completed a cognitive performance task, a measure of career aspirations, and a measure of relationship agency. Results showed that for women only, being objectified by their male interaction partner was associated with an increase in state self-objectification, and state self-objectification led to perceptions that the interaction was less comfortable and less authentic. Furthermore, for women but not for men, having authentic interactions was found to relate positively to relationship agency, career aspirations, and cognitive performance. This research shows that self-objectification is not only a self-process but an interpersonal process heightened by the real-time sexual objectification of a male interaction partner. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available to PWQ subscribers on PWQ's website at http://pwq.sagepub.com/supplemental
ArbuckleJ. L. (2012). Amos 21 [Computer software]. Meadville, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
2.
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Exposure to sexually objectifying media and body self-perceptions among college women: An examination of the selective exposure hypothesis and the role of moderating variables. Sex Roles, 55, 159–172. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9070-7
3.
AubreyJ. S. (2007). The impact of sexually objectifying media exposure on negative body emotions and sexual self-perceptions: Investigating the mediating role of body self-consciousness. Mass Communication & Society, 10, 1–23. doi:10.1080/15205430709337002
4.
BreinesJ. G.CrockerJ.GarciaJ. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0146167207313727
5.
BuchananN. T.SettlesI. H.WoodsK. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes among black and white women by military rank: Double jeopardy, the jezebel, and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 347–361. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00450.x
6.
CalogeroR. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x
7.
CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (2011). Objectification theory: An introduction. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-001
8.
CivileC.ObhiS. S. (2016). Power, objectification, and recognition of sexualized women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 199–212. doi:10.1177/0361684315604820
9.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644
10.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
11.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369
12.
FairchildK.RudmanL. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
13.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
14.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.NollS. M.QuinnD. M.TwengeJ. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269
15.
GayR. K.CastanoE. (2010). My body or my mind: The impact of state and trait objectification on women’s cognitive resources. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 695–703.
16.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.AllenJ. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. doi:10.1177/0361684310386121
17.
GrayM. P.O’BrienK. M. (2007). Advancing the assessment of women’s career choices: The career aspiration scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 317–337. doi:10.1177/1069072707301211
18.
HartE. A.LearyM. R.RejeskiW. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 94–104.
19.
HeblM. R.DovidioJ. F. (2005). Promoting the “social” in the examination of social stigmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 156–182. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_4
20.
HeblM. R.KingE. B.LinJ. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331. doi:10.1177/0146167204264052
21.
HillM. S.FischerA. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual- and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745–776. doi:10.1177/0011000007301669
22.
ImpettE. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0
23.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LennonC. A.StewartA. L.LedermannT. (2013). The role of power in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 95–114. doi:10.1177/0265407512452990
25.
LogelC.WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J.IsermanE. C.von HippelW.BellA. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089–1103. doi:10.1037/a0015703
26.
MartinK. A.RejeskiW.LearyM. R.McAuleyE.BaneS. (1997). Is the Social Physique Anxiety Scale really multidimensional? Conceptual and statistical arguments for a unidimensional model. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 359–367.
27.
MartinsY.TiggemannM.KirkbrideA. (2007). Those speedos become them: The role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 634–647. doi:10.1177/0146167206297403
28.
McFarlinD. B.BlascovichJ. (1984). On the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as an alternative to illusory performance feedback: A methodological note. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 223–229. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0503_5
29.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
30.
NeffK. D.HarterS. (2002). The role of power and authenticity in relationship styles emphasizing autonomy, connectedness, or mutuality among adult couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 835–857. doi:10.1177/0265407502196006
31.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
32.
OlsenJ. A.KennyD. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11, 127–141. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127
33.
QuinnD. M.ChaudoirS. R.KallenR. W. (2011). Performance and flow: A review and integration of self-objectification research. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 119–138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-006
34.
QuinnD. M.KallenR. W.TwengeJ. M.FredricksonB. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x
35.
SadlerP.WoodyE. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.80
36.
SaguyT.QuinnD. M.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178–182. doi:10.1177/0956797609357751
37.
SanchezD. T.BroccoliT. L. (2008). The romance of self-objectification: Does priming romantic relationships induce states of self-objectification among women?Sex Roles, 59, 545–554. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9451-1
38.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2006). Interracial interactions: A relational approach. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 38, pp. 121–181). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3
39.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A.SalvatoreJ. (2005). Expecting to be the target of prejudice: Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1189–1202. doi:10.1177/0146167205274894
40.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 375–389. doi:10.1177/0361684314554606
41.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42.
StewartA. L. (2014). The Men’s Project: A sexual assault prevention program targeting college men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15, 481–485. doi:10.1037/a0033947
43.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification?Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
44.
SzymanskiD. M.FeltmanC. E. (2015). Linking sexually objectifying work environments among waitresses to psychological and job-related outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 390–404. doi:10.1177/0361684314565345
45.
TolmanD. L.ImpettE. A.TracyA. J.MichaelA. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 85–95. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00265.x
46.
WestT. V.PoppD.KennyD. A. (2008). A guide for the estimation of gender and sexual orientation effects in dyadic data: An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 321–336. doi:10.1177/0146167207311199
47.
ZurbriggenE. L.RamseyL. R.JaworskiB. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
