The purpose of our study was to extend tenets of objectification theory to a sample of 278 undergraduate African American women. We hypothesized that internalized multiculturally inclusive racial identity attitudes would moderate the relationship between sexually objectifying experiences and internalized sociocultural standards of beauty, which would then correlate with less body surveillance. In turn, we predicted that less body surveillance would be associated with less body shame, appearance anxiety, and greater interoceptive awareness, which would likely be associated with decreased eating disordered behaviors. A moderated mediation analysis supported the overall model, suggesting that internalized multiculturally inclusive racial identity attitudes buffer against sexually objectifying experiences. When sexually objectifying experiences were high and internalized multiculturally inclusive racial identity attitudes were low, participants were more likely to internalize dominant standards of beauty, which was then associated with increased body surveillance, body shame, appearance anxiety, disordered eating, and poorer interoceptive awareness. Interventions aimed to assist African American women develop a positive race salience and challenge sociocultural standards of beauty seem warranted in order to diminish body image concerns and disordered eating.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265.
3.
BradfordJ. W.PetrieT. A. (2008). Sociocultural factors and the development of disordered eating: A longitudinal analysis of competing hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 246–262. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.246
4.
BrownT. A.CashT. F.MikulkaP. J. (1990). Attitudinal body-image assessment: Factor analysis of the Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 135–145.
5.
BuchananT. S.FischerA. R.TokarD. M.YoderJ. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718.
CrossW. E.Jr (1971). The Negro-to-Black conversion experience. Black World, 20, 13–27.
8.
CrossW. E.JrVandiverB. J. (2001). Nigrescence theory and measurement: Introducing the Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS). In PonterottoJ. G.CasasJ. M.SuzukiL. A.AlexanderC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (2nd ed., pp. 371–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DinsmoreB.MallinckrodtB. (1996). Emotional self-awareness, eating disorders, and racial identity attitudes in African American women. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 24, 267–277.
10.
DionK. L.DionK. K.KeelanP. J. (1990). Appearance anxiety as a dimension of social-evaluative anxiety: Exploring the ugly duckling syndrome. Contemporary Social Psychology, 14, 220–224.
11.
Engeln-MaddoxR. (2006). Buying a beauty standard or dreaming of a new life? Expectations associated with media ideals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 258–266.
12.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
GarnerD. M.OlmstedM. P.BohrY.GarfinkelP. E. (1982). The eating attitudes test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences, 12, 871–878. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700049163
15.
GarnerD. M.OlmstedM. P.PolivyJ.GarfinkelP. E. (1984). Comparison between weight-preoccupied women and anorexia nervosa. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 255–266.
16.
GilbertS. F.CrumpS.MadhereS.SchutzW. (2009). Internalization of the thin ideal as a predictor of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean female college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 23, 196–211.
17.
GordonK. H.CastroYSitnikovL.Holm-DenomaJ. M. (2010). Cultural body shape ideals and eating disorder symptoms among White, Latina, and Black college women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 135–143. doi: 10.1037/a0018671
18.
GrabeS.HydeJ. S. (2006). Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 633–640.
19.
HalliwellW.DittmarH. (2004). Does size matter? The impact of model’s body size on women’s body-focused anxiety and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 104–122.
20.
HarrisS. M. (1995). Family, self, and sociocultural contributions to body-image attitudes of African-American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 129–145.
21.
HeinbergL. J.ThompsonJ. K.StormerS. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89.
22.
HenricksonH. C.CrowtherJ. S.HarringtonE. F. (2010). Ethnic identity and maladaptive eating: Expectancies about eating and thinness in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 87–93.
23.
Hesse-BiberS.LivingstoneS.RamirezD.BarkoE.JohnsonA. (2010). Racial identity and body image among Black female college students attending predominantly White colleges. Sex Roles, 63, 697–711. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9862-7
24.
Hill CollinsP. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
JeffersonD. L.StakeJ. E. (2009). Appearance self-attitudes of African American and European American women: Media comparisons and internalization of beauty ideals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 396–409.
KesslerR. C.MickelsonK. D.WillamsD. R. (1999). The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Health and Social Behavior, 40, 208–230.
28.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
29.
KlonoffE. A.LandrineH. (1995). The schedule of sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439–473.
30.
KoskinaA.Van den EyndeF.MeiselS.CampbellI. C.SchmidtU. (2011). Social appearance anxiety and bulimia nervosa. Eating and Weight Disorders, 16, e142–e145.
31.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x
32.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
33.
LesterR.PetrieT. A. (1998). Physical, psychological, and societal correlates of bulimic symptomatology among African American college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 315–321.
34.
MazzeoS. E. (1999). Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 42–50.
35.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–216.
36.
MitchellK. S.MazzeoS. E. (2009). Evaluation of a structural model of objectification theory and eating disorder symptomatology among European American and African American undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 384–395.
37.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420
38.
MyersT. A.CrowtherJ. H. (2008). Is self-objectification related to interoceptive awareness? An examination of potential mediating pathways to disordered eating attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 172–180.
39.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
40.
OneyC.ColeE.SellersR. (2011). Racial identity and gender as moderators of the relationship between body image and self-esteem for African Americans. Sex Roles, 65, 619–631. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9962-z
41.
PhelpsLSapiaJ.NathansonD.NelsonL. (2000). An empirically supported eating disorder prevention program. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 443–453. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(200009)37:5<443::AID-PITS4>3.0.CO;2-8
42.
PoranM. (2002). Denying diversity: Perception of beauty and social comparison processes among Latina, Black, and White women. Sex Roles, 47, 65–81.
43.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
44.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediated hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
45.
RobertsA.CashT.FeingoldA.JohnsonB. T. (2006). Are Black-White differences in females’ body dissatisfaction decreasing? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1121–1131.
46.
Rogers WoodN. A.PetrieT. A. (2010). Body dissatisfaction, ethnic identity, and disordered dating among African American women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 141–153.
47.
RubinL. R.NemeroffC. J.RussoN. F. (2004). Exploring feminist women’s body consciousness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 27–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00120.x
48.
SabikN. J.TylkaT. L. (2006). Do feminist identity styles moderate the relation between perceived sexist events and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 77–84. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00264.x
49.
ShuttlesworthM. E.ZotterD. (2011). Disordered eating in African American and Caucasian women: The role of ethnic identity. Journal of Black Studies, 42, 906–922. doi:10.1177/0021934710396368
50.
SifneosP. E. (1973). The prevalence of alexithymic characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 22, 255–262.
51.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349. doi: 10.1023/A:1020232714705
52.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2010). Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 63, 42–49. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9794-2
53.
SzymanskiD. M.CarrE. R.MoffittL. B. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Clinical implications and training consideration. Counseling Psychologist, 39, 107–126.
54.
SzymanskiD. M.StewartD. N. (2010). Racism and sexism and correlates of African American women’s psychological distress. Sex Roles, 63, 226–238. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9788-0
55.
TaylorG. J.BagbyR. M.ParkerJ. D. A. (1991). The alexithymia construct: A potential paradigm for psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics, 32, 153–164.
56.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–74. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00007
57.
TiggemannM.WilliamsE. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75. doi: 10.1177/0361684311420250
58.
TylkaT. L. (2006). Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of intuitive eating. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 226–240. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.226
59.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.
60.
TylkaT. L.SubichL. M. (2004). Examining a multidimensional model of eating disorder symptomatology among college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 314–328. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.314
61.
VandiverB. J.CrossW. E.WorrellF. C.Fhagen-SmithP. E. (2002). Validating the Cross Racial Identity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 71–85. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.49.1.71
62.
WatsonL. B.MathenyK. B.GagneP.BrackG. L.AncisJ. R. (2012). A model linking diverse women’s child sexual abuse history with sexual risk taking. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/0361684312454535
63.
WatsonL. BRobinsonD.DispenzaF.NazariN. (2012). African American women’s sexual objectification experiences: A qualitative study. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advanced online publication. doi: 0.1177/0361684312454724
64.
WearR. W.PratzO. (1987). Test-retest reliability for the Eating Disorder Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 767–769.
65.
WestonR.GoreP. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. doi:10.1177/0011000006286345
66.
WisemanM. C.MoradiB. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0018937
67.
Woods-GiscombéC. L.LobelM. (2008). Race and gender matter: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing and measuring stress in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 173–182. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173
68.
WoolleyL. (2010). The relationship of yoga, self-objectification, disordered eating, and depressed mood in college-aged women(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 2010-99100-366 )
69.
WorrellF. C.VandiverB. J.CrossW. E.Jr (2004). Reliability and structural validity of Cross Racial Identity Scales Scores in a sample of African American adults. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 489–505.
70.
WorrellF. C.VandiverB. J.SchaeferB. A.CrossW. E.JrFhagen-SmithP. E. (2006). Generalizing nigrescence profiles: A cluster analysis of Cross Racial Identity (CRIS) scores in three independent samples. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 519–547.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
