Within objectification theory research, sexual objectification is typically operationalized as interpersonal sexual objectification—being targets of body evaluation and unwanted sexual advances. We argue that women’s male partners’ pornography use could be integrated within objectification theory as another form of sexual objectification and negatively linked to women’s well-being. College women (N = 171) rated how often their current and previous male partners viewed pornography and whether pornography use bothered them. They also completed measures of objectification theory constructs, internalization of cultural beauty standards, relationship attachment, self-esteem, body appreciation, and negative affect. The extent to which women were bothered by partner pornography use was controlled in all analyses. Path analysis revealed that previous partners’ pornography use (a) directly predicted interpersonal sexual objectification, internalization, and eating disorder symptomatology and (b) indirectly predicted body surveillance and body shame through internalization. In hierarchical regressions, previous partners’ pornography use inversely predicted self-esteem and body appreciation and positively predicted relationship anxiety and negative affect. Current partners’ pornography use was not linked to any criterion. Researchers should more comprehensively examine partners’ pornography use in relation to women’s distress. Practitioners may consider exploring male partners’ pornography use in female clients’ relationship histories and its potential associations with their well-being when relevant to them. Additional online materials for this article are available to PWQ subscribers on PWQ's website at http://pwq.sagepub.com/supplemental.
AttwoodF. (2004). Pornography and objectification. Feminist Media Studies, 4, 7–19. doi:10.1080/14680770410001674617
2.
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x
3.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265. doi:10.1037/a0014637
4.
AvalosL. C.TylkaT. L.Wood-BarcalowN. (2005). The body appreciation scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 2, 285–297. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.06.002
5.
BanduraA. (1983). Psychological mechanisms of aggression. In GeenR. G.DonnersteinE. (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews (pp. 1–40). New York, NY: Academic Press.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
8.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–184. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
9.
BergnerR. M.BridgesA. J. (2002). The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 193–206.
10.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
BridgesA. J.BergnerR. M.Hesson-McInnisM. (2003). Romantic partner’s use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00926230390154790
12.
CalogeroR. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x
13.
CalogeroR. M. (2011). Operationalizing self-objectification: Assessment and related methodological issues. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 23–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
CarrollJ. S.Padilla-WalkerL. M.NelsonL. J.OlsenC. D.McNamara BarryC.MadsenS. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30. doi:10.1177/0743558407306348
CheckJ. V. P.MalamuthN. M. (1986). Pornography and sexual aggression: A social learning theory analysis. In McLaughlinM. L. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 181–213). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909. 112.1.155
18.
DanebackK.TræenB.MånssonS.-A. (2009). Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 746–753. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4
Engeln-MaddoxR.MillerS. A.DoyleD. M. (2011). Tests of objectification theory in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual community samples: Mixed evidence for proposed pathways. Sex Roles, 65, 518–532. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9958-8
21.
FestingerC. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
GarnerD. M.OlmstedM. P.BohrY.GarfinkelP. E. (1982). The eating attitudes test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871–878.
25.
HeinbergL. J.ThompsonJ. K.StormerS. (1995). Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(199501)17:1<81::AID-EAT2260170111>3.0.CO;2-Y
26.
HuL.BentlerP. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
27.
IannantuonoA. C.TylkaT. L. (2012). Interpersonal and intrapersonal links to body appreciation in college women: An exploratory model. Body Image, 9, 227–235. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.01.004
28.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1–2). New York, NY: Norton.
29.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x
31.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
32.
LevyA. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York, NY: Free Press.
33.
LopezF. G.GormleyB. (2002). Stability and change in adult attachment style over the first-year college transition: Relations to self-confidence, coping, and distress patterns. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 355–364.
34.
MallinckrodtB.WeiM. (2005). Attachment, social competencies, social support, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 358–367. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.358
35.
ManningJ. C. (2006). The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addition & Compulsivity, 13, 131–165. doi:10.1080/10720160600870711
36.
MazzeoS. E. (1999). Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 42–50. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.46.1.42
37.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
38.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420
39.
MoradiB.HuangY.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
40.
MorryM. M.StaskaS. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269–279. doi:10.1037/h0087148
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
42.
MyersT. A.CrowtherJ. H. (2007). Sociocultural pressures, thin-ideal internalization, self-objectification, and body dissatisfaction: Could feminist beliefs be a moderating factor?Body Image, 4, 296–308.
43.
O’ReillyS.KnoxD.ZusmanM. E. (2007). College student attitudes toward pornography use. College Student Journal, 41, 402–406.
44.
OwenP. R.Laurel-SellerE. (2000). Weight and shape ideals: Thin is dangerously in. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 979–990. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02506.x
45.
RichF. (2001). Naked capitalists. In StomblerM.BurgessE. O.DonnellyD.SimondsW. (Eds.), Sex matters: The sexuality and society reader (pp. 462–466). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
46.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. doi:10.1177/0146167201272002
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
SabinaC.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2008). The nature and dynamics of Internet pornography exposure for youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 691–693. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0179
50.
SackettP. R.LarsonJ. R.Jr (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 419–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
51.
SchneiderJ. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7, 31–58.
52.
SeifertT. (2005). Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: Trends towards slender figures over time. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, 271–274. doi:10.1002/eat.20086
53.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
54.
SiegelS. (1997). Applying social comparison theory to women’s body image and self-esteem: The effects of pornography(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA.
55.
StewartD. N.SzymanskiD. M. (2012). Young adult women’s reports of their male romantic partner’s pornography use as a correlate of their self-esteem, relationship quality, and sexual satisfaction. Sex Roles, 67, 257–271. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0164-0
56.
StragerS. (2003). What men watch when they watch pornography. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 7, 50–61. doi:10.1007/s12119-003-1007-5
57.
SvedinC. G.ÅkermanI.PriebeG. (2011). Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 779–788. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.010
58.
SypeckM. F.GrayJ. J.EtuS. F.AhrensA. H.MosimannJ. E.WisemanC. V. (2006). Cultural representations of thinness in women, redux: Playboy magazine’s depiction of beauty from 1979 to 1999. Body Image, 3, 229–235. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.07.001
59.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00007
60.
TylkaT. L. (2004). The relation between body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptomatology: An analysis of moderating variables. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 178–191. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.2.178
61.
TylkaT. L. (2006). Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of intuitive eating. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 226–240. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.226
62.
TylkaT. L. (2015). No harm in looking, right? Men’s pornography consumption, body image, and well-being. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16, 97–107.
63.
TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L. (2011). Fighting self-objectification in prevention and intervention contexts. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 187–214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
64.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2
65.
TylkaT. L.SubichL, M. (2004). Examining a multidimensional model of eating disorder symptomatology among college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 314–328. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.314
66.
WalshW. B.BetzN. E. (2001). Tests and assessment (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
67.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form(Unpublished manuscript). University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
68.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and evaluation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
69.
WearR. W.PratzO. (1987). Test-retest reliability for the eating disorder inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 767–769.
70.
ZitzmanS. T.ButlerM. H. (2005). Attachment, addiction, and recovery: Conjoint marital therapy for recovery from a sexual addiction. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 12, 311–337. doi:10.1080/10720160500362652
71.
ZitzmanS. T.ButlerM. H. (2009). Wives’ experience of husbands’ pornography use and concomitant deception as an attachment threat in the adult pair-bond relationship. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 16, 210–240. doi:10.1080/10720160903202679
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
