The purpose of our study was to investigate African American women’s experiences with sexual objectification. Utilizing grounded theory methodology as well as Black feminist thought and objectification theory as the research lenses, the results of this study uncovered how racist, sexist, and classist ideologies contributed to sexual objectification experiences (SOEs) among African American women. Twenty African American female graduate students and others recruited from a campus community participated in semistructured interviews. Data revealed a number of different sociocultural factors that contributed to the sexual objectification of African American women (i.e., historical influence of slavery, sexualized views and images of African American women, and patriarchal social structure). These factors were observed to contribute to different forms of sexual objectification, ranging from comments and objectifying gazes to more extreme forms, such as sexual abuse. Participants described a number of effects of sexual objectification, including self-objectification, physical safety anxiety, eating concerns, psychological/emotional, and interpersonal. Participants also described how they coped with and grew from these experiences. Psychologists and mental health professionals are encouraged to consider how African American women’s SOEs are rooted in racism, sexism, and classism. Furthermore, these practitioners are urged to develop an awareness of how these oppressions intersect and contribute to the sexual objectification of African American women.
AndersonT. (2001). Nothing butt the truth. Essence, 32, 116.
2.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts eating: Does women’s age matter?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265. doi: 10.1037/a0014637
3.
BordoS. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
4.
Bounds LittlefieldM. (2008). The media as a system of racialization: Exploring images of African American women and the new racisim. The American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 675–685. doi:10.1177/0002764207307747
5.
Bryant-DavisT.UllmanS. E.TsongY.GobinR. (2011). Surviving the storm: The role of social support and religious coping in sexual assault recovery of African American women. Violence Against Women, 17, 1601–1618. doi:10.1177/1077801211436138
6.
BuchananT. S.FischerA. R.TokarD. M.YoderJ. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.gsu.edu/10.1177/0011000008316322
7.
CalogeroR. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x
8.
CalogeroR. M. (2009). Objectification processes and disordered eating in British women and men. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 394–402. doi:10.1177/1359105309102192
9.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA. (2011). Body guilt: Preliminary evidence for a further subjective experience of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 428–440. doi:10.1177/0361684311408564
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DavisA. Y. (1971). If they come in the morning: Voices of resistance. New York, NY: Third Press.
13.
DoddE. H.GuilianoT. A.BoutellJ. M.MoranB. E. (2001). Respected or rejected? Perceptions of women who confront sexist remarks?Sex Roles, 45, 567–577. doi:10.1023/A:1014866915741
14.
DonovanR. A. (2007). To blame or not to blame: The influences of target race and observer sex on rape attribution. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 722–736. doi:10.1177/0886260507300754
15.
FairchildK.RudmanL. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sanchezlab.com/pdfs/FredricksonRoberts.pdf
18.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
GreeneB. (1994). Lesbian women of color. In Comas-Díaz L.GreeneB. (Eds.), Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy (pp. 389–428). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20.
Heimerdinger-EdwardsS. R.VogelD. L.HammerJ. H. (2011). Extending sexual objectification theory and research to minority populations, coupes, and men. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 140–152. doi: 10.1177/0011000010383894
21.
Hill CollinsP. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black Feminist Thought. Social Problems, 33, S14–S32. doi:10.1525/sp.1986.33.6.03a00020
22.
Hill CollinsP. (1989). The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs, 14, 745–773. doi:10.1086/494543
23.
Hill CollinsP. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
hooksB. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End.
ImpettE. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0
27.
KellandL. (2011). Conceptually situating the harm of rape: An analysis of objectification. South African Journal of Philosophy, 30, 168–183. Retrieved fromwww.mendeley.com
28.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Early steps in analysis. In Miles M. B.HubermanA. M. (Ed.), Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (pp. 50–77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
MitchellK. S.MazzeoS. E. (2009). Evaluation of a structural model of objectification theory and eating disorder symptomatology among European American and African American undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 384–395. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01516.x
30.
MonroF.HuonG. (2005). Media-portrayed idealized images, body shame, and appearance anxiety. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 85–90. doi:10.1002/eat.20153
31.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420
32.
MoradiB.HuangY-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
33.
MorryM. M.StaskaS. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33, 269–279. doi:10.1037/h0087148
34.
MoynihanD. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
MuehlenkampJ. J.Saris-BaglamaR. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00076
36.
MuehlenkampJ. J.SwansonJ. D.BrauschA. M. (2005). Self-objectification, risk taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24–32. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00164.x
37.
MyersT. A.CrowtherJ. H. (2008). Is self-objectification related to interoceptive awareness? An examination of potential mediating pathways to disordered eating attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 172–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00421.x
38.
OgleJ. P.DamhorstM. L. (2004). Constructing and deconstructing the body malleable through mother-daughter interactions. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 180–209. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00086.x
39.
OverstreetN.QuinnD.AgochaV. (2010). Beyond thinness: The influence of a curvaceous body ideal on body dissatisfaction in Black and White women. Sex Roles, 63, 91–103. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9792-4
40.
PeatC. M.MuehlenkampJ. J. (2011). Self-objectification, disordered eating, and depression: A test of mediational pathways. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 441–450. doi:10.1177/0361684311400389
41.
RubinL. R.NemeroffC. J.RussoN. F. (2004). Exploring feminist women’s body consciousness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 27–37. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00120.x
42.
SenguptaR. (2006). Reading representations of Black, East Asian, and White women in magazines for adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 54, 799–808. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9047-6
43.
ShuttlesworthM. E.ZotterD. (2011). Disordered eating in African American and Caucasian women: The role of ethnic identity. Journal of Black Studies, 42, 906–922. doi:10.1177/0021934710396368
44.
SinclairS. L. (2006). Object lessons: A theoretical and empirical study of objectified body consciousness in women. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 28, 48–68. Retrieved fromhttp://amhca.metapress.com
45.
SlevecJ.TiggemanM. (2011). Media exposure, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in middle-aged women: A test of the sociocultural model of disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 617–627. doi:10.1177/0361684311420249
46.
StephensD. P.PhillipsL. D. (2003). Freaks, gold diggers, divas, and dykes: The sociohistorical development of adolescent African American women’s sexual scripts. Sexuality & Culture, 7, 3–49. doi:10.1007/BF03159848
47.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
SzymanskiD. M.CarrE. R. (2007, August). Roles of self-objectification and sexual victimization in women’s psychosexual adjustment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
49.
SzymanskiD. M.HenningS. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women's depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9147-3
50.
SzymanskiD. M.MoffittL. M.CarrE. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–39. doi:10.177/001100001037842
51.
TalleyrandR. M. (2006). Potential stressors contributing to eating disorder symptoms in African American Women: Implications for mental health counselors. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 28, 338–352. Retrieved fromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2006-20830-005
52.
TownsendT. G.NeilandsT. B.ThomasA. J.JacksonT. R. (2010). I’m no Jezebel; I am young, gifted, and Black: Identity, sexuality, and Black girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 273–285. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01574.x
53.
WilliamsC. B.WigginsM. I. (2010). Womanist spirituality as a response to the racism-sexism double bind in African American women. Counseling & Values, 54, 175–186. http://www.counseling.org/Publications/Journals.aspx
54.
WilliamsonL. (1998). Eating disorders and the cultural forces behind the drive for thinness: Are African American women really protected?Social Work in Health Care, 28, 71–73. doi:10.1300/J010v28n01_04
55.
WyattG. E. (2009). Enhancing cultural and contextual intervention strategies to reduce HIV/AIDS among African Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1941–1945. Retrieved fromwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19762666
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
