Analysis of the Effect of Seat Rotation on Occupant Chest Injury in Autonomous Vehicles during Crashes

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of rotational seat protection on occupant chest injuries during crashes in SAE Level 4 and Level 5 autonomous vehicles. All seat rotations discussed are specifically about rotation around the vehicle’s z-axis (vertical axis). Three models were established: a conventional seatbelt multirigid body, a new seatbelt multirigid body, and a THUMS (Total HUman Model for Safety) chest skeleton finite element model. Eight typical z-axis seat-rotation crash scenarios were examined. Four indicators, including occupant kinematic response, combined thoracic index, chest injury risk, and chest stress, assessed the chest injuries. The experiments indicated that z-axis rotational seat protection for conventional seats led to higher chest injuries for occupants in the seat-rotation crash conditions. The new type of seat with leg baffles and foot support was found to effectively improve the occupant’s chest safety in the precrash stage, that is, the seat-rotation stage, and the protection afforded was not limited by the rotation direction or -angle; this met the requirements for autonomous vehicles, and is of great significance for the improvement of autonomous vehicle precrash safety.

Keywords

seat-rotation protection chest injury occupant seat type autonomous vehicle

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wang

Zhang

Huang

Zhao

Safety of Autonomous Vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8867757.

Nie

Gan

Chen

Zhou

Seating Preferences in Highly Automated Vehicles and Occupant Safety Awareness: A National Survey of Chinese Perceptions. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2020, pp. 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1738013.

Jorlöv

Bohman

Larsson

Seating Positions and Activities in Highly Automated Cars - A Qualitative Study of Future Automated Driving Scenarios. Proc., IRCOBI Conference, International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury, Antwerp, Belgium, 2017, pp. 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1738013.

Adient. Adient’s AI18 Concept Vehicle Showcases the Future of Automotive Seating. 2018. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/adients-ai18-concept-vehicle-showcases-the-future-of-automotive-seating-300582201.html. Accessed December 13, 2023.

Hou

Zhang

Injury Risk and Evasion Strategy of Occupants in Different Seating Orientations in Autonomous Vehicles. China Journal of Highway and Transport, Vol. 32, 2019, pp. 206–215. https://doi.org/10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2019.06.021.

Al-Koudmani

Darwish

Al-Kateb

Taifour

Chest Trauma Experience over Eleven-Year Period at Al-Mouassat University Teaching Hospital-Damascus: A Retrospective Review of 888 Cases. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vol. 7, 2012, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-7-35.

Lopez-Valdes

F. J.

Mroz

Eggers

Pipkorn

Muehlbauer

Schick

Peldschus

Chest Injuries of Elderly Postmortem Human Surrogates (PMHSs) Under Seat Belt and Airbag Loading in Frontal Sled Impacts: Comparison to Matching THOR Tests. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, 2018, pp. S55–S63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1542139.

Ekambaram

Frampton

Lenard

Factors Associated with Chest Injuries to Front Seat Occupants in Frontal Impacts. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, 2019, pp. S37–S42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1654606.

Malliaris

Hitchcock

Hedlund

A Search for Priorities in Crash Protection. SAE Technical Paper 820242. SAE International, 1982.

10.

Zhang

Reed

M. P.

Wang

J. T.

Neal

Lin

C. H.

Frontal Crash Simulations Using Parametric Human Models Representing a Diverse Population. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, Supplement 1, 2019, pp. S97–S105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1581926.

11.

Mizuno

Matsui

Ikari

Toritsuka

Seatbelt Effectiveness for Rear Seat Occupants in Full and Offset Frontal Crash Tests. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2011, pp. 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2010.514770.

12.

Matsui

Tanaka

Hosokawa

Comparison of Rear Seat Occupant Injuries in AM50 and AF05 in Frontal Crashes. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2011, pp. 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2011.554205.

13.

Hou

Shen

Yang

K. H.

Jin

Occupant Kinematics and Biomechanics During Frontal Collision in Autonomous Vehicles—Can Rotatable Seat Provides Additional Protection?

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 23, 2020, pp. 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2019.1710496.

14.

Kitagawa

Hayashi

Yamada

Gotoh

Occupant Kinematics in Simulated Autonomous Driving Vehicle Collisions: Influence of Seating Position, Direction and Angle. Stapp Car Crash Journal, Vol. 61, 2017, pp. 101–155. https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-22-0005.

15.

Cui

Wang

Liu

Chen

Zhang

Analysis on Child-Head Protection Effects of Energy-Absorbing Foam Filled in Safety Seat. Automotive Engineering, Vol. 42, 2020, pp. 228–233. https://doi.org/10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2020.02.013.

16.

Mizuno

FE Simulation of Frontal Crash Sled Test with ISOFIX Child Restraint System. Automotive Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2011, pp. 401–404.

17.

Croop

Lobo

Selecting Material Models for the Simulation of Foams in LS-DYNA. Proc., 7th European LS-DYNA Conference, Bordeaux, France, 2009.

18.

Jing

Chen

Shi

Research on Different Pretension Seatbelts for Frontal Driver Injuries. Science Technology and Engineering, Vol. 17, 2017, pp. 284–287.

19.

Qiu

Duan

Feng

Xie

Yin

Preliminary Injury Risk Estimation for Occupants Involved in Frontal Crashes by Combining Computer Simulations and Real Crashes. Science Progress, Vol. 103, 2020, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850420908750.

20.

Versace

A Review of the Severity Index. SAE Technical Paper 710881. SAE International, 1971.

21.

Gaewsky

J. P.

Weaver

A. A.

Koya

Stitzel

J. D.

Driver Injury Risk Variability in Finite Element Reconstructions of Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) Frontal Motor Vehicle Crashes. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, 2015, pp. S124–S131.

22.

López-García

E. H.

Carbajal-Romero

M. F.

Flores-Campos

J. A.

Torres-SanMiguel

C. R.

Numerical Assessment of a Safety System to Minimize Injuries during a Cyclist Run-Over, Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, Vol. 2021, 2021, pp. S1–S12.

23.

King

H. A.

Moe

J. H.

Bradford

D.S.

Winter

R. B.

The Selection of Fusion Levels in Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 65, No. 9, 1983, pp. 1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198365090-00012.

24.

Zhu

Vehicle Frontal Impact Acceleration and Occupant Injury Research. Proc., 2010 China International Conference on Automotive Safety Technology and the 13th Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Automotive Engineering on Automotive Safety Technology, China Society of Automotive Engineering, Beijing, China, 2020.

25.

Lin

Yao

Deng

Study on the Prevention Effect of Seatbelt for the Train Driver Collision Injury. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, Vol. 14, 2017, pp. 649–656.

26.

NHTSA. Final Regulatory Evaluation, Actions to Reduce the Adverse Effects of Air Bags, Depowering. Technical Report, FMVSS 208. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 1997.

27.

Kleinberger

Sun

Eppinger

Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems. NHTSA Docket. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59607-4_40.

28.

Chen

Liu

Zhao

Yang

Finite Element Models of Vehicle’s Occupant Ribs Based on the Inverse Method. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), Vol. 44, 2017, pp. 318–324. https://doi.org/10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201402007.