This study aims to measure and compare the situational awareness of pedestrians while crossing the road at unsignalized and signalized intersections in real-world conditions. The measurement of situational awareness employs Markov gaze entropy, and the obtained transition probability matrix is used to comprehend gaze transition behavior. This study conducted field experiments at an unsignalized and a signalized intersection with volunteer participants. Situational awareness of pedestrians was analyzed considering six areas of interest: Vehicles, Fellow Pedestrians, Near Path, Focus of Expansion, Road Infrastructure (RI), and Non-Traffic Relevant Objects (NTRO). Results of this study indicate that pedestrians at the signalized intersection exhibited lower situational awareness (i.e., higher entropy) than those at the unsignalized intersection. Additionally, higher crossing initiation times and pedestrian speed were associated with lower situational awareness at an unsignalized intersection. At the signalized intersection, pedestrians initiating crossing in 3 to 6 s exhibited least Markov Entropy, indicating high situational awareness. Furthermore, an increase in pedestrian speed was associated with increased situational awareness. Moreover, pedestrians at the unsignalized and signalized intersections exhibited more gaze transitions from NTRO to vehicles and from vehicles to NTRO. However, the highest average gaze transition probability (i.e., 49.6%) at the signalized intersection was observed between NTRO and vehicles, and the next highest probability (43.1%) was observed between RI and vehicles. Overall, these study findings can help gain insights into how pedestrians visually explore their surroundings and make decisions while crossing the road. This information can be valuable for designing safer and more efficient intersections, thus improving pedestrian safety.
AghabaykK.EsmailpourJ.JafariA.ShiwakotiN.Observational-Based Study to Explore Pedestrian Crossing Behaviors at Signalized and Unsignalized Crosswalks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 151, January2021, p. 105990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.105990.
2.
LeeM.LeeH.HwangS.ChoiM.Understanding the Impact of the Walking Environment on Pedestrian Perception and Comprehension of the Situation. Journal of Transport and Health, Vol. 23, July2021, p. 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101267.
3.
LinM. I. B.HuangY. P.The Impact of Walking While Using a Smartphone on Pedestrians’ Awareness of Roadside Events. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 101, 2017, pp. 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.005.
4.
JiangK.LingF.FengZ.MaC.KumferW.ShaoC.WangK.Effects of Mobile Phone Distraction on Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior and Visual Attention Allocation at a Signalized Intersection: An Outdoor Experimental Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 115, March2018, pp. 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.019.
5.
LiG.WangY.ZhuF.SuiX.WangN.QuX.GreenP.Drivers’ Visual Scanning Behavior at Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections: A Naturalistic Driving Study in China. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 71, 2019, pp. 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSR.2019.09.012.
6.
LiangG.FuH.WangB.YiZ.YangW.Evaluating the Influence of Approaching Vehicles on Pedestrian’s Visual Patterns and Crossing Behaviors at an Uncontrolled Crosswalk. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 88, 2022, pp. 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2022.05.026.
7.
KrishnaK. V.ChoudharyP.Does Listening to Music Impact Pedestrian Safety While Crossing the Road ? Investigating Using the VR Approach. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 111, May2025, pp. 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.001.
8.
AvinashC.JitenS.ArkatkarS.GaurangJ.ManoranjanP.Evaluation of Pedestrian Safety Margin at Mid-Block Crosswalks in India. Safety Science, Vol. 119, 2019, pp. 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.009.
9.
KadaliB. R.VedagiriP.Proactive Pedestrian Safety Evaluation at Unprotected Mid-Block Crosswalk Locations Under Mixed Traffic Conditions. Safety Science, Vol. 89, 2016, pp. 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.05.014.
10.
VedagiriP.KadaliB. R.Evaluation of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflict Severity at Unprotected Midblock Crosswalks in India. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2581, 2016, pp. 48–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2581-06.
11.
RidelD.RehderE.LauerM.StillerC.WolfD.A Literature Review on the Prediction of Pedestrian Behavior in Urban Scenarios. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 3105–3112.
12.
YadavA. K.VelagaN. R.A Systematic Review of Observational Studies Investigating the Influence of Mobile Phone Distraction on Road Crossing Behaviour of Pedestrians. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 91, 2022, pp. 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2022.10.008.
13.
DhokeA.ChoudharyP.Temporal and Spatial Compliance Behaviour of Pedestrians under the Influence of Time Pressure at Signalized Intersections: A Pedestrian Simulator Study. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 11, No. 1, 2024, pp. 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2023.04.010.
14.
DhokeA.ChoudharyP.Is There a Relationship between Time Pressure and Pedestrian Non-Compliance? A Systematic Review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 93, 2023, pp. 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2023.01.001.
15.
HaqueF.KidwaiF. A.ul HaqM. F.A Systematic Review of Proactive Approach for Pedestrian Safety at Intersections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 109, 2025, pp. 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2025.01.013.
16.
DhokeA.ChoudharyP.Pedestrian Behavior under Time Pressure: A VR-Based Study of Waiting Duration and Crashes at Signalized Intersection. Safety Science, Vol. 185, August 2024, 2025, p. 106807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106807.
17.
GhomiH.HusseinM.An Integrated Text Mining, Literature Review, and Meta-Analysis Approach to Investigate Pedestrian Violation Behaviours. Accident Analysis Prevention, Vol. 173, 2022, p. 106712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106712.
18.
ZitoG. A.CazzoliD.SchefflerL.JägerM.MüriR. M.MosimannU. P.NyffelerT.MastF. W.NefT.Street Crossing Behavior in Younger and Older Pedestrians: An Eye- and Head-Tracking Study. BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0175-0.
19.
AkbarG. H.WijayantoT.HartonoB.Situation Awareness of Distracted Walking Based on Eye-Tracking Study. Cognition, Technology and Work, Vol. 27, 2024, pp. 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-024-00786-2.
20.
LimJ.AmadoA.SheehanL.Van EmmerikR. E. A.Dual Task Interference During Walking: The Effects of Texting on Situational Awareness and Gait Stability. Gait and Posture, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2015, pp. 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.07.060.
21.
KrishnaK. V.ChoudharyP.Unravelling Situational Awareness of Multi-Tasking Pedestrians Through Average Gaze Fixation Durations: An Accelerated Failure Time Modelling Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 211, March2025, p. 107912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107912.
22.
LeeY.JungK. T.LeeH. C.Use of Gaze Entropy to Evaluate Situation Awareness in Emergency Accident Situations of Nuclear Power Plant. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2022, pp. 1261–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NET.2021.10.022.
23.
MoacdiehN. M.DevlinS. P.JundiH.RiggsS. L.Effects of Workload and Workload Transitions on Attention Allocation in a Dual-Task Environment: Evidence From Eye Tracking Metrics. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2020, pp. 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419892184.
24.
BiassoniF.BinaM.ConfalonieriF.CiceriR.Visual Exploration of Pedestrian Crossings by Adults and Children: Comparison of Strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 56, 2018, pp. 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.009.
25.
EganC.WillisA.NessH.StradlingS.Visual Gaze Behaviour of Adults and Older Adults at a Pedestrian Crossing, Perception, Vol. 37, 2008, p. 149.
26.
TapiroH.BorowskyA.Oron-GiladT.ParmetY.Where Do Older Pedestrians Glance before Deciding to Cross a Simulated Two-Lane Road? A Pedestrian Simulator Paradigm. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2016, pp. 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601003
27.
TapiroH.Oron-GiladT.ParmetY.Pedestrian Distraction: The Effects of Road Environment Complexity and Age on Pedestrian’s Visual Attention and Crossing Behavior. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 72, 2020, pp. 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.003.
28.
EganC.WillisA.WincenciakJ.The Effects of a Distractor on the Visual Gaze Behavior of Children at Signalized Road Crossings. Journal of Vision, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2010, pp. 371–371. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.8.371.
29.
TapiroH.MeirA.ParmetY.Oron-GiladT.Visual Search Strategies of Child-Pedestrians in Road Crossing Tasks. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2013, pp. 119–130.
30.
GrudenC.Ištoka OtkovićI.ŠramlM.Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts: Their Crossing and Glance Behavior in the Interaction with Vehicular Traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 159, 2021, p. 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2021.106290.
31.
GeruschatD. R.HassanS. E.TuranoK. A.Gaze Behavior While Crossing Complex Intersections. Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 80, No. 7, 2003, pp. 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200307000-00013.
32.
LévêqueL.RanchetM.DenielJ.BornardJ. C.BelletT.Where Do Pedestrians Look When Crossing? A State of the Art of the Eye-Tracking Studies. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 164833–164843. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021208.
33.
EismaY. B.van BergenS.ter BrakeS. M.HensenM. T. T.TempelaarW. J.de WinterJ. C. F.External Human-Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements. Information (Switzerland), Vol. 11, 2020, p. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010013.
34.
DeyD.WalkerF.MartensM.TerkenJ.Gaze Patterns in Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Towards Effective Design of External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles. Proc. 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019, September2019, pp. 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344523.
35.
KrishnaK. V.KapruwanR.ChoudharyP.Understanding Distracted Pedestrians ’ Risky Behaviour: The Role of Walking and Visual Characteristics through a Field Study. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 101, January2024, pp. 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.01.003.
36.
Lanini-MaggiS.RuginskiI. T.ShipleyT. F.HurterC.DuchowskiA. T.BriesemeisterB. B.LeeJ.FabrikantS. I.Assessing How Visual Search Entropy | Engagement Predict Performance in a Multiple-Objects Tracking Air Traffic Control Task. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol. 4, 2021, p. 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBR.2021.100127.
37.
ShiferawB.DowneyL.CrewtherD.A Review of Gaze Entropy as a Measure of Visual Scanning Efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 96, 2019, pp. 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2018.12.007.
38.
MuñozM.ReimerB.LeeJ.MehlerB.FridmanL.Distinguishing Patterns in Drivers’ Visual Attention Allocation Using Hidden Markov Models. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 43, 2016, pp. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2016.09.015.
Van ParidonK. N.LeiversH. K.RobertsonP. J.TimmisM. A.Visual Search Behaviour in Young Cyclists: A Naturalistic Experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 67, 2019, pp. 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.014.
HoogeI.CampsG.Scan Path Entropy and Arrow Plots: Capturing Scanning Behavior of Multiple Observers. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 4, December2013, p. 996. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2013.00996.
45.
AhmedS.HossainS.ShaikM. E.ShakikA.Evaluation of Speed Characteristics and Gap Acceptance Behavior of Pedestrians of Asian Countries: A Review. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 27, 2024, p. 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2024.101199.
