Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are key for the durability of transportation infrastructure. Fly ash (FA), the most used SCM in the U.S.A., is becoming scarce, creating issues for state departments of transportation. To address the FA shortage, reclaimed FA products are becoming available; however, this is only a temporary solution. A promising long-term solution is the use of calcined clay (CC) either in the form of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) or LC3-like systems, known as LC2, where Portland limestone cement (PLC) is simply blended with CC. This study examines the particle size, chemical composition, reactivity, strength activity, and effects on workability of two CCs (CC-1 and CC-2) from U.S. sources, and compares these to reclaimed FA and slag cement (SC). CC-1 was chosen for further studies in mortars because of its commercial availability in powder form. Mortar specimens with six binder systems (LC3, LC2-30% CC, LC2-50% CC, PLC, PLC-30% FA, and PLC-50% SC) and two water-to-binder ratios (0.4 and 0.45) were produced and systematically compared. Early- and long-term strength development, heat of hydration, bound water, calcium hydroxide content, and environmental impacts were evaluated. Results suggest that LC2 and LC3 systems are promising alternatives to alleviate the FA shortage, particularly because of their comparable or superior performance in key parameters such as strength development and environmental impact compared to the PLC system.
LiuJ. C.HossainM. U.XuanD.AliH. A.NgS. T.YeH.Mechanical and Durability Performance of Sustainable Concretes Containing Conventional and Emerging Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Developments in the Built Environment, Vol. 15, 2023, p. 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIBE.2023.100197
2.
NdahirwaD.ZmamouH.LenormandH.LeblancN.The Role of Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Hydration, Durability and Shrinkage of Cement-Based Materials, Their Environmental and Economic Benefits: A Review. Cleaner Materials, Vol. 5, 2022, p. 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLEMA.2022.100123
Diaz-LoyaI.JuengerM.SerajS.MinkaraR.Extending Supplementary Cementitious Material Resources: Reclaimed and Remediated Fly Ash and Natural Pozzolans. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2017.06.011
6.
AASHTO. AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials (SOM) 2016 Fly Ash Task Force Report. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2016.
7.
SubediS.ArceG. A.HassanM. M.HuangO.RadovicM.HossainZ.Evaluation of Alternative Sources of Supplementary Cementitious Materials for Concrete Materials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676(6): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221074373
8.
SunJ.ZuninoF.ScrivenerK.Hydration and Phase Assemblage of Limestone Calcined Clay Cements (LC3) with Clinker Content below 50%. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 177, 2024, p. 107417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2023.107417
9.
Federal Highway Administration. FHWA-HRT-24-057: Evaluating and Implementing CC-I-L Cement for the Next Generation of Concrete Bridge Construction. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2024.
10.
ScrivenerK. L.JohnV. M.GartnerE. M.Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 114, 2018, pp. 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2018.03.015
11.
IjazN.YeW. M.ur RehmanZ.IjazZ.JunaidM. F.Global Insights into Micro-Macro Mechanisms and Environmental Implications of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) for Sustainable Construction Applications. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 907, 2024, p. 167794. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2023.167794
12.
RuanY.JamilT.HuC.GautamB. P.YuJ.Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Sustainable Cementitious Materials with Ultra-High Substitution Level of Calcined Clay and Limestone Powder. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 314, 2022, p. 125416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125416
13.
DixitA.DuH.PangS. D.Performance of Mortar Incorporating Calcined Marine Clays with Varying Kaolinite Content. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 282, 2021, p. 124513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124513
14.
ShiZ.FerreiroS.LothenbachB.GeikerM. R.KuntherW.KaufmannJ.HerfortD.SkibstedJ.Sulfate Resistance of Calcined Clay – Limestone – Portland Cements. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 116, 2019, pp. 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2018.11.003
15.
SharmaM.BishnoiS.MartirenaF.ScrivenerK.Limestone Calcined Clay Cement and Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Review. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 149, 2021, p. 106564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106564
16.
DhandapaniY.SanthanamM.Assessment of Pore Structure Evolution in the Limestone Calcined Clay Cementitious System and Its Implications for Performance. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 84, 2017, pp. 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2017.08.012
17.
ASTM International. ASTM C778-21: Standard Specification for Standard Sand. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
18.
ASTM International. ASTM C1879-20: Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Reactivity of Supplementary Cementitious Materials by Isothermal Calorimetry and Bound Water Measurements. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
19.
ASTM International. ASTM C311/C311M-24: Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Coal Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2024.
20.
KalinaR. D.Al-ShmaisaniS.FerronR. D.JuengerM. C. G.False Positives in ASTM C618 Speci Cations for Natural Pozzolans Compressive Strength Testing. ACI Standards, Vol. 116, 2019, pp. 165–173.
21.
ASTM International. ASTM C 305-20: Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
22.
ASTM International. ASTM C1437-20: Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
23.
ASTM International. ASTM C109/109M-21: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or Cube Specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
24.
ASTM International. ASTM C1872-18e2: Standard Test Method for Thermogravimetric Analysis of Hydraulic Cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
25.
JainS.PradhanB.Effect of Cement Type on Hydration, Microstructure and Thermo-Gravimetric Behaviour of Chloride Admixed Self-Compacting Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 212, 2019, pp. 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.001
26.
BhattyJ. I.Hydration versus Strength in a Portland Cement Developed from Domestic Mineral Wastes - a Comparative Study. Thermochimica Acta, Vol. 106, No. C, 1986, pp. 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(86)85120-6
27.
SantosT.AlmeidaJ.SilvestreJ. D.FariaP.Life Cycle Assessment of Mortars: A Review on Technical Potential and Drawbacks. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 288, 2021, p. 123069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123069
28.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Framework. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
29.
BakerL.GuptaA.HrachF.Fly Ash Reclamation and Beneficiation Using a Triboelectric Belt Separator. Woca2019, St. Louis, MI, 2019.
HafezH.KurdaR.CheungW. M.NagaratnamB.Comparative Life Cycle Assessment between Imported and Recovered Fly Ash for Blended Cement Concrete in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 244, 2020, p. 118722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118722
32.
Slag Cement Association. An Industry Average Environmental Product Declaration for Slag Cement. Slag Cement Association, Farmington Hills, MI, 2021.
European Federation of Concrete Admixture Associations (EFCA). EFCA Environmental Declarations for Admixtures. European Federation of Concrete Admixture Associations, Brussels, Belguim, 2021.
35.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2024.
36.
National Ready Mixed Concrete Association. NRMCA Regional Benchmark Report: April 2020. National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, Alexandria, VA, 2020.
37.
ZhangY.ZhangS.ChenY.ÇopuroğluO.The Effect of Slag Chemistry on the Reactivity of Synthetic and Commercial Slags. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 335, 2022, p. 127493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127493
38.
RamanathanS.TuenM.SuraneniP.Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Material and Filler Fineness on Their Reactivity in Model Systems and Cementitious Pastes. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, Vol. 55, No. 5, 2022, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01980-2
39.
BenkeserD.HernandezK.LolliF.KurtisK.Influence of Calcined Clay Morphology on Flow in Blended Cementitious Systems. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 160, 2022, p. 106927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106927
40.
AvetF.ScrivenerK.Investigation of the Calcined Kaolinite Content on the Hydration of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 107, 2018, pp. 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.016
41.
KadriE. H.KenaiS.EzzianeK.SiddiqueR.De SchutterG.Influence of Metakaolin and Silica Fume on the Heat of Hydration and Compressive Strength Development of Mortar. Applied Clay Science, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2011, pp. 704–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLAY.2011.06.008
42.
ZuninoF.ScrivenerK.The Reaction between Metakaolin and Limestone and Its Effect in Porosity Refinement and Mechanical Properties. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 140, 2021, p. 106307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106307
43.
LinR. S.OhS.DuW.WangX. Y.Strengthening the Performance of Limestone-Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) Using Nano Silica. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 340, 2022, p. 127723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127723
LeeJ. M.YangH. J.JangI. Y.KimS. K.JungD. H.Comparison of Calcium Aluminate Cements on Hydration and Strength Development at Different Initial Curing Regimes. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, 2022, p. e01596. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01596
46.
NorraratP.TangchirapatW.SongpiriyakijS.JaturapitakkulC.Evaluation of Strengths from Cement Hydration and Slag Reaction of Mortars Containing High Volume of Ground River Sand and GGBF Slag. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2019, 2019, p. 4892015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4892015
47.
YuJ.WuH. L.MishraD. K.LiG.LeungC. K.Compressive Strength and Environmental Impact of Sustainable Blended Cement with High-Dosage Limestone and Calcined Clay (LC2). Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 278, 2021, p. 123616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123616
48.
BerodierE.ScrivenerK.Understanding the Filler Effect on the Nucleation and Growth of C-S-H. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 97, No. 12, 2014, pp. 3764–3773.
49.
BentzD. P.PeltzM. A.WinpiglerJ.Early-Age Properties of Cement-Based Materials. II: Influence of Water-to-Cement Ratio. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2010, pp. 512–517. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21
50.
ZuninoF.ScrivenerK.The Influence of the Filler Effect on the Sulfate Requirement of Blended Cements. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 126, 2019, p. 105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105918
HayR.CelikK.Effects of Water-to-Binder Ratios (w/b) and Superplasticizer on Physicochemical, Microstructural, and Mechanical Evolution of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 391, 2023, p. 131529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131529
53.
HayR.CelikK.Performance Enhancement and Characterization of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) Produced with Low-Reactivity Kaolinitic Clay. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 392, 2023, p. 131831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131831
54.
KimT.OlekJ.Effects of Sample Preparation and Interpretation of Thermogravimetric Curves on Calcium Hydroxide in Hydrated Pastes and Mortars. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2290: 10–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2290-02
55.
HetheringtonA. C.BorrionA. L.GriffithsO. G.McManusM. C.Use of LCA as a Development Tool within Early Research: Challenges and Issues across Different Sectors. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2014, pp. 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0627-8
56.
MartinezD. M.HorvathA.MonteiroP. J. M.Comparative Environmental Assessment of Limestone Calcined Clay Cements and Typical Blended Cements. Environmental Research Communications, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2023, p. 055002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acccd8
57.
Arruda JuniorE. S.de Sales BragaN. T.BarataM. S.Life Cycle Assessment to Produce LC3 Cements with Kaolinitic Waste from the Amazon Region, Brazil. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 18, 2023, p. e01729. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01729
58.
GettuR.PatelA.RathiV.PrakasanS.BasavarajA. S.PalaniappanS.MaityS.Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Sustainability Parameters of Cements and Concretes in the Indian Context. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1321-5
