The varying pier heights in long-span multi-span continuous-girder bridges create substructures with uneven stiffness distribution, which leads to non-uniform distribution of massive superstructure inertial forces among substructures. This paper investigates the internal force homogenization mechanism of seismic isolation systems in irregular long-span continuous bridges and quantitatively evaluates the homogenization effectiveness. Taking the irregular continuous-girder bridges in China’s Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Sea Crossing Project as engineering prototypes, finite element modeling incorporates soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects. Five distinct pier height parameters are considered to characterize height disparities. The isolation system is implemented using lead-rubber bearings, with nonlinear dynamic analyses conducted under five sets of bidirectional seismic excitations. Curvature ductility coefficients serve as damage indices to quantify the seismic performance of irregular continuous bridges with and without isolation systems under intense ground motions. Results demonstrate that the pier-bottom horizontally aligned configuration exhibits comparable shear response characteristics and torsional effects to the pier-top horizontally aligned configuration, rendering it recommended for shake table investigations of irregular bridge systems. The seismic isolation system effectively balances internal force imbalances induced by pier height discrepancies through flexible coordination mechanisms, concurrently mitigating asymmetric deformation and torsional instability risks, thereby enhancing global structural synergy. Under SSI conditions, the isolation layer demonstrates universal damping efficacy across diverse foundation conditions, with both isolated irregular and regular bridges maintaining intact pier columns under strong seismic excitations.
MitchellD.BruneauM.SaatciogluM.WilliamsM.AndersonD.SexsmithR.Performance of Bridges in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1995, pp. 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-050
2.
KawashimaK.UnjohS.HoshikumaJ. I.KosaK.Damage of Bridges Due to the 2010 Maule, Chile, Earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2011, pp. 1036–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.575531
3.
HanQ.DuX. L.LiuJ. B.LiZ. X.LiL. Y.ZhaoJ. F.Seismic Damage of Highway Bridges During the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2009, pp. 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-8162-0
4.
AkbariR.MaalekS.A Review on the Seismic Behaviour of Irregular Bridges. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, Vol. 171, No. 7, 2018, pp. 552–580. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00081
5.
CaoX.WangW.TanX.ZhangY.Seismic Behaviour of Pre-Damaged RC Columns Strengthened with CFRP Grid/Sprayed ECC Jackets Subjected to Horizontal Reversed Cyclic Loading and Constant Axial Force. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 20, 2024, p. e02948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02948
6.
WangY. D.IbarraL.PantelidesC.Effect of Incidence Angle on the Seismic Performance of Skewed Bridges Retrofitted with Buckling-Restrained Braces. Engineering Structures, Vol. 211, 2020, Article 110411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110411
7.
ElnashaiA. S.GencturkB.KwonO. S.HashashY. M.KimS. J.JeongS. H.Al-QadiA.LaFaveJ.MontgomeryD. R.O’ConnorJ. R.The Maule (Chile) Earthquake of February 27, 2010: Development of Hazard, Site-Specific Ground Motions and Back-Analysis of Structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 42, 2012, pp. 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.010
8.
KunC.YangZ.ChouwN.Seismic Performance of Skewed Bridges with Simultaneous Effects of Pounding and Supporting Soil. Engineering Structures, Vol. 174, 2018, pp. 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.051
9.
AkbariR.Cyclic Response of RC Continuous Span Bridges with Irregular Configuration in Longitudinal Direction. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2013, pp. 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.510528
10.
SaiidiM. S.VosooghiA.NelsonR. B.Shake-Table Studies of a Four-Span Reinforced Concrete Bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1352–1361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000790
11.
AbbasiM.ZakeriB.AmiriG. G.Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Multiframe Concrete Box-Girder Bridges with Unequal-Height Piers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2016, Article 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000753
12.
NooriH. Z.AmiriG. G.NekooeiM.ZakeriB.Seismic Fragility Assessment of Skewed MSSS-I Girder Concrete Bridges with Unequal Height Columns. Journal of Earthquakes and Tsunamis, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2016, Article 1550013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179343111550013X
13.
AASHTO. AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2011.
14.
Caltrans. Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria–Version 1.7. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2013.
LongX. H.MaY. T.ZhouQ. L.GuiS. H.Seismic Performance Assessment of Isolated Continuous Girder Bridge Using Endurance Time Analysis. Structures, Vol. 42, 2022, pp. 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.107
17.
ShiY.XiongL. J.QinH. G.HanJ. P.SunZ. G.Seismic Fragility Analysis of LRB-Isolated Bridges Considering the Uncertainty of Regional Temperatures Using BP Neural Networks. Structures, Vol. 44, 2022, pp. 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.035
18.
AminA. F.WiragunaS.BhuiyanA. R.OkuiY.Hyperelasticity Model for Finite Element Analysis of Natural and High Damping Rubbers in Compression and Shear. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 132, No. 1, 2006, pp. 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:1(54)
19.
MurotaN.SuzukiS.MoriT.WakishimaK.SadanB.TuzunC.YildizS.KocatürkR.ÖzakçaH.YakutA.Performance of High-Damping Rubber Bearings for Seismic Isolation of Residential Buildings in Turkey. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 143, 2021, Article 106620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106620
20.
ChenB. W.DaiJ. W.SongT. S.GuanQ. S.Research and Development of High-Performance High-Damping Rubber Materials for High-Damping Rubber Isolation Bearings: A Review. Polymers, Vol. 14, No. 12, 2022, Article 2427. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122427
21.
ShiY.WangD. S.HanJ. P.Application Status of Seismic Isolation for Bridges and Its Development Tendency. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2017, pp. 118–128. https://doi.org/10.13197/j.eeev.2017.05.118.shiy.014
22.
PriestleyM. J. N.SeibleF.CalviG. M.Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1996.
23.
CalviG. M.PaveseA.Conceptual Design of Isolation Systems for Bridge Structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1997, pp. 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962366
24.
KapposA. J.DimitrakopoulosE.Analysis and Assessment of a Seismically Isolated Bridge. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, Vol. 81, 2005, pp. 625–635.
25.
TubaldiE.Dall’AstaA.A Design Method for Seismically Isolated Bridges with Abutment Restraint. Engineering Structures, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2011, pp. 786–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.002
26.
JaraJ. M.VillanuevaD.JaraM.OlmosB. A.Isolation Parameters for Improving the Seismic Performance of Irregular Bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 11, 2013, pp. 63–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9398-z
27.
XiangN. L.LiJ. Z.Utilizing Yielding Steel Dampers to Mitigate Transverse Seismic Irregularity of a Multispan Continuous Bridge with Unequal Height Piers. Engineering Structures, Vol. 205, 2020, Article 110056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110056
28.
DizajE. A.SalamiM. R.KashaniM. M.Nonlinear Dynamic Behaviour and Seismic Fragility Analysis of Irregular Multi-Span RC Bridges. Structures, Vol. 44, 2022, pp. 1730–1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.112
29.
UwaomaU. D.StephensM. T.ThonstadT.Minimizing Superstructure Twist in Irregular Bridges through Optimization of Structural Parameters. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol., No. 7, 2023, Article 04023039. https://doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.Beeng-6050
30.
ShiY.WangJ.HanJ.QinH. G.CheC. Q.Direct Displacement-Based Design of Skewed Bridge Isolated with LRBs. Structures, Vol. 66, 2024, Article 106912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106912
31.
KrishnamoorthyA.Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction for a Building Isolated With FPS. Earthquakes and Structures, Vol. 4, 2013, pp. 285–297. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.3.285
32.
RaheemS. E. A.HayashikawaT.Soil-Structure Interaction Modeling Effects on Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridge Tower. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, Vol. 5, 2013, pp. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6695-5-8
33.
WangZ.Duenas-OsorioL.PadgettJ. E.Influence of Soil-Structure Interaction and Liquefaction on the Isolation Efficiency of a Typical Multispan Continuous Steel Girder Bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 19, 2014, pp. A4014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000526
34.
LucoJ. E.Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Base Isolation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 66, 2014, pp. 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.007
MylonakisG.GazetasG.Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction: Beneficial or Detrimental?Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 4, 2000, pp. 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460009350372
37.
WangZ.PadgettJ. E.Dueñas-OsorioL.Influence of Vertical Ground Motions on the Seismic Fragility Modeling of a Bridge-Soil-Foundation System. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 937–962. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000170
38.
BarbosaA. R.MasonH. B.RomneyK.HallM.SSI-Bridge: Soil–Bridge Interaction During Long-Duration Earthquake Motions. University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., 2014, p. 10. USDOT University Transportation Center for Federal Region.
39.
SoltaniehS.MemarpourM. M.KilaneheiF.Performance Assessment of Bridge-Soil-Foundation System with Irregular Configuration Considering Ground Motion Directionality Effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 118, 2019, pp. 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.006
40.
MazdaT.UnoH.YuzukiK.Evaluation on the Effect of Temperature Change to Dynamic Behaviors of Multi-Span Continuous Bridge During Earthquake. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 11, 2008, pp. 1081–1090.
41.
ManderJ.PanthakiF.KasalanatiA.Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Reinforcing Steel. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1994, pp. 453–468.
42.
BuckinghamE.On Physically Similar Systems. Physical Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1914, pp. 345–376.
HongJ. L.HuangX. Y.ChenR. B.ZhangY.LuJ. H.ZhouF. L.Investigating the Longitudinal Seismic Response and Deformation Mechanism of a Long Tunnel Under the Combined Action of the Traveling Wave Effect and Mutation of the Soil Layer. Structures, Vol. 63, 2024, Article 106377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106377
45.
MemarpourM. M.KimiaeiM.ShayanfarM.KhanzadiM.Cyclic Lateral Response of Pile Foundations in Offshore Platforms. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 42, 2012, pp. 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.12.007
46.
BoulangerR. W.CurrasC. J.KutterB. L.WilsonK. B.Seismic Soil–Pile–Structure Interaction Experiments and Analyses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 9, 1999, pp. 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750)
47.
HanniganP. J.GobleG. G.ThendeanG.LikinsG. E.RauscheF.Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundations. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, D.C., 1999.
48.
American Petroleum Institute (API). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms (API RP 2A-WSD). API, Washington, D.C., 2000.
