This study examines the mobility constraints faced by marriage migrant women in rural South Korea, focusing on their experiences in Gongju-si. Transnational migration to South Korea has increased in recent decades, with over 80% of marriage migrants being women. These women often live in low-income, smallholder farming households, facing spatial and temporal limitations because of inadequate transport infrastructure and gendered household responsibilities. Through interviews with 23 marriage migrants, this study reveals how restricted mobility affects their social integration and autonomy. Findings reveal that rural South Korea’s autocentric infrastructure marginalizes non-drivers, disproportionately affecting women. Caregiving responsibilities and entrenched gender norms further restrict marriage migrant women’s mobility, limiting access to resources, employment, and social engagement. Despite these challenges, the migrants employ strategies such as learning to drive, building social support through smartphones, engaging in community advocacy, and utilizing their transnational moving experience. This research underscores the need for policy interventions addressing both spatial and temporal aspects of the mobility of migrant women, advocating for better mobility and digital connectivity in rural planning.
JungH.The Spatial Entrapment of Women?: On Mobility of Female Transnational Marriage Migrants. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2007, pp. 53–68.
2.
Statistics Korea. Immigration and Foreign Policy Statistics. Statistics Korea, Naju, 2019.
3.
LeeS.Family Farming Norms and Sexual Control as Principles of Rural Patriarchy: Focusing on the Settlement Process of Young Women Successor Farmer. Family and Culture, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2023, pp. 91–133. https://doi.org/10.21478/FAMILY.35.3.202309.004.
4.
JeongY.LeeY.Rethinking the Urban-Rural Dichotomy in the Modernization of South Korea: Focusing on the Gender and Race. The Association of Korean Cultural and Historical Geographers, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2022, pp. 50–66. https://doi.org/10.29349/JCHG.2022.34.3.50.
5.
BlumenbergE.Why Low-Income Women in the US Still Need Automobiles. Town Planning Review, Vol. 87, No. 5, 2016, pp. 525–545. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.34.
6.
LawR.Beyond ‘Women and Transport’: Towards New Geographies of Gender and Daily Mobility. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1999, pp. 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913299666161864.
7.
MasseyD. B.Space, Place, and Gender. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1994.
8.
LeeS.MaS.ChoiJ.Living Conditions of Young Women in Rural Areas. Publication 6–0007. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, 2022.
9.
KimY.SungJ.MinK.A Study On Rural Residents’ Transportation Service Usage And Improvement Tasks. Publication 166. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, 2018.
10.
KimK.-S.A Study on Improvement of Public Transportation and Road Systems in Rural Areas. Publication P168. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, 2012.
11.
Statistics Korea. Census of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Naju, 2020.
CresswellT.UtengT. P. Gendered Mobilities: Towards an Holistic Understanding. In Gendered Mobilities (T. P. Uteng and T. Cresswell, eds.), Ashgate, Aldershot, 2008, p. 12.
17.
RoseG.Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007.
18.
SchwanenT.KwanM.-P.RenF.How Fixed Is Fixed? Gendered Rigidity of Space–Time Constraints and Geographies of Everyday Activities. Geoforum, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2008, pp. 2109–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.002.
19.
Gil SoláA. Constructing Work Travel Inequalities: The Role of Household Gender Contracts. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 53, 2016, pp. 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.007.
20.
LoweK.MosbyK.The Conceptual Mismatch: A Qualitative Analysis of Transportation Costs and Stressors for Low-Income Adults. Transport Policy, Vol. 49, 2016, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.009.
21.
ShirgaokarM.Operationalizing Gendered Transportation Preferences: A Psychological Framework Incorporating Time Constraints and Risk Aversion. Transport Policy, Vol. 75, 2019, pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.010.
22.
ShirgaokarM.Lanyi-BennettK.I’ll Have to Drive There: How Daily Time Constraints Impact Women’s Car Use Differently than Men’s. Transportation, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1365–1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9969-1.
23.
MadariagaI. S. de. Mobility of Care: Introducing New Concepts in Urban Transport. In Fair Shared Cities (de MadariagaI. S., ed.), Routledge, London, p. 16.
24.
RavensbergenL.FournierJ.El-GeneidyA.Exploratory Analysis of Mobility of Care in Montreal, Canada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2677, No. 1, 2023, pp. 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221105070.
25.
SharmaS.In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics. Duke University Press, Durham, 2014.
26.
AndayaE.Pregnant at Work: Low-Wage Workers, Power, and Temporal Injustice. New York University Press, 2024.
27.
BeaujotR.AndersenR.Time-Crunch: Impact of Time Spent in Paid and Unpaid Work, and Its Division in Families. The Canadian Journal of Sociology [Cahiers canadiens de sociologie], Vol. 32, No. 3, 2007, pp. 295–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460645.
28.
WajcmanJ.DoddN., Eds. The Sociology of Speed: Digital, Organizational, and Social Temporalities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017.
29.
CrenshawK.Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 6, 1991, p. 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
30.
CrenshawK. W.Race, Gender, and Sexual Harassment. Southern California Law Review, Vol. 65, 1992, p. 1475.
31.
YuS.“I Am like a Deaf, Dumb and Blind Person”: Mobility and Immobility of Chinese (Im)Migrants in Flushing, Queens, New York City. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 54, 2016, pp. 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.004.
BlumenbergE.EvansA.Planning for Demographic Diversity: The Case of Immigrants and Public Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2010, pp. 23–45. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.13.2.2.
34.
DoodyB. J.Becoming ‘a Londoner’: Migrants’ Experiences and Habits of Everyday (Im)Mobilities over the Life Course. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102572.
35.
UtengT. P.Gendered Mobility: A Case Study of Non-Western Immigrant Women in Norway. In The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment (S. Bergmann and T. Sager, eds.), Routledge, London, 2008, p. 30.
36.
NicholsL.EtemadiT.TyyskäV.Time Poverty of Pakistani Immigrant Women in Toronto. South Asian Diaspora, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2018, pp. 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2017.1406978.
37.
HirooK.LeeC. W.International Marriage Migrants to Rural Areas in South Korea and Japan: A Comparative Analysis. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2009, pp. 60–67. https://doi.org/10.4157/geogrevjapanb.81.60.
38.
KaplanS.WrzesinskaD. K.PratoC. G.The Role of Culture and Needs in the Cycling Habits of Female Immigrants from a Driving-Oriented to a Cycling-Oriented Country. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2672, No. 3, 2018, pp. 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118793242.
39.
LanzendorfM.Key Events and Their Effect on Mobility Biographies: The Case of Childbirth. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2010, pp. 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310903145188.
40.
ScheinerJ.Holz-RauC.Gendered Travel Mode Choice: A Focus on Car Deficient Households. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.011.
41.
Hage. Waiting Out the Crisis: On Stuckedness and Governmentality. In Waiting (G. Hage, ed.), Melbourne University Press, Carlton, VIC, 2009, pp. 97–106.
42.
HageG.Afterword: The Ends of Nostalgia: Waiting for the Past-to-Come. In Ethnographies of Waiting: Doubt, Hope And Uncertainty (JanejaM. K.BandakA., eds.), Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, Plc, London, UK, 2018.
43.
BurrellJ.On Half-Built Assemblages: Waiting for a Data Center in Prineville, Oregon. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, Vol. 6, 2020, pp. 283–305. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.447.
44.
ConlonD.Waiting: Feminist Perspectives on the Spacings/Timings of Migrant (Im)Mobility. Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2011, pp. 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.566320.
45.
OldfieldS.GreylingS.Waiting for the State: A Politics of Housing in South Africa. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15592309.
CreswellJ. W.Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage, London, 2013.
49.
GiorgiA.Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985.
50.
ParkM.-E.Employment Experience of Female Marriage Migrants using Phenomenological Research Method. Journal of Social Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2012. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2012.10.23.4.213.
51.
KimJ.Between Assimilation and Empowerment: The Vietnamese Marriage Migrant Women in Korea. Seoul National University, 2007.
52.
LeeJ.-H.A Systematic Review of 10 years of Research on the Leisure of Marriage Migrant Women in Korea: Its Progress and Future Directions. Journal of Tourism Sciences, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2019, pp. 205–229. https://doi.org/10.17086/JTS.2019.43.1.205.229.
53.
LeeS.Mothering and Identity of Marriage Migrant Women in South Korea: Focusing on Oral History. Seoul National University, 2013.
54.
JeffreyC.Waiting. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2008, pp. 954–958. https://doi.org/10.1068/d2606ed.
55.
JeffreyC.Timepass: Youth, Class, and Time among Unemployed Young Men in India: Timepass. American Ethnologist, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2010, pp. 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01266.x.
