A nationwide effort to use legislation to enforce helmet-wearing behavior for electric bicycle (e-bikes) riders had varying effects in different Chinese provinces. This study examines the determinants of e-bike riders’ switching behavior with regard to helmet wearing. The theoretical framework is based on the push-pull-mooring model, incorporating variables such as perceived legal norms and conformity tendencies. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is employed to analyze the data collected from 322 participants in Zhenjiang. A multi-group analysis (MGA) was conducted to understand the effect of experiencing punishment among e-bike riders. The results highlight that push, pull, and mooring effects significantly influence switching intentions. Furthermore, the MGA results reveal that the experience of punishment has a moderating effect in the relationship between pull effects and switching intention. This suggests personalized enforcement strategies could be more effective in promoting helmet wearing. The findings could help to develop strategies for traffic authorities to promote helmet usage and thus increase rates of helmet wearing.
ZhuJ. A.DaiS.ZhuX. Y.The Characteristics of Electric Bicycle Traffic Accident and the Countermeasure of Safety Improvement. Urban Traffic, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2018, p. 3.
2.
QianY.SunQ.FeiG.LiX.StallonesL.XiangH.ZhangX.Riding Behavior and Electric Bike Traffic Crashes: A Chinese Case-Control Study. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2020, pp. 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1696963
3.
ZhangX.CuiM.GuY.StallonesL.XiangH.Trends in Electric Bike–Related Injury in China, 2004–2010. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2015, pp. NP1819–NP1826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513496840
4.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Safety Technical Specification for Electric Bicycles. 2018. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/
5.
Zhang. Cause Analysis and Prevention of Electric Bicycle Accidents Based on Safety Check List. Science and Technology & Innovation, Vol. 7, 2021, pp. 37–39.
6.
Fallah ZavarehM.Mohamadi HezavehA.NordfjærnT.Intention to Use Bicycle Helmet as Explained by the Health Belief Model, Comparative Optimism and Risk Perception in an Iranian Sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 54, 2018, pp. 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.003
7.
KaushikR.KrischI. M.SchroederD. R.FlickR.NemergutM. E.Pediatric Bicycle-Related Head Injuries: A Population-Based Study in a County Without a Helmet Law. Injury Epidemiology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2015, p. 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-015-0048-1
8.
LeijdesdorffH. A.Van DijckJ. T. J. M.KrijnenP.Vleggeert-LankampC. L. A. M.SchipperI. B.On behalf of the Regional Trauma Center West-Netherlands’ Research Group. Injury Pattern, Hospital Triage, and Mortality of 1250 Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Caused by Road Traffic Accidents. Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2014, pp. 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3111
9.
MunivenkatappaA.DeviB. I.GregorT. I.BhatD. I.KumarsamyA. D.ShuklaD. P.Bicycle Accident Related Head Injuries in India. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2013, pp. 262–266. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.118764
10.
AmorosE.ChironM.MartinJ.-L.ThélotB.LaumonB.Bicycle Helmet Wearing and the Risk of Head, Face, and Neck Injury: A French Case–Control Study Based on a Road Trauma Registry. Injury Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2012, pp. 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2011.031815
11.
AttewellR. G.GlaseK.McFaddenM.Bicycle Helmet Efficacy: A Meta-Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2001, pp. 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00048-8
12.
FahlstedtM.HalldinP.KleivenS.The Protective Effect of a Helmet in Three Bicycle Accidents—A Finite Element Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 91, 2016, pp. 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.025
13.
ThompsonD. C.RivaraF.ThompsonR.Helmets for Preventing Head and Facial Injuries in Bicyclists. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 1999, 1999, p. CD001855. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001855
14.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
15.
SongY. N.MaW. W.ShenJ.ShenJ. G.An Analysis of the Relationship Between Helmet Wearing and Casualties of Electric Vehicle Drivers. Chinese Journal of Urban and Rural Enterprise Hygiene, Vol. 35, No. 12, 2020, pp. 7–9.
16.
BrijsK.BrijsT.SannS.TrinhT. A.WetsG.RuiterR. A. C.Psychological Determinants of Motorcycle Helmet Use Among Young Adults in Cambodia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 26, 2014, pp. 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.002
RitterN.VanceC.The Determinants of Bicycle Helmet Use: Evidence from Germany. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2011, pp. 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.016
19.
PopaI.FerraroO. E.OrsiC.MorandiA.MontomoliC.Bicycle Helmet Use Patterns in Italy. A Description and Analysis of Survey Data from an Italian Friends of Cycling Association. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 108, 2017, pp. 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.003
20.
HammondJ. A.Assessing Bicycle Helmet Use in College-Aged Individuals Using the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change. 2017.
21.
KumphongJ.SatiennamT.SatiennamW.The Determinants of Motorcyclists Helmet Use: Urban Arterial Road in Khon Kaen City, Thailand. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 67, 2018, pp. 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.011
22.
RossL.The Theory of Planned Behavior and Helmet Use Among College Students. American Journal of Health Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2011, pp. 581–590. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.35.5.7
23.
Hangzhounet. (2020, December2). For the First Time, Zhejiang Released the Evaluation Results of Helmet Wearing Rate of Electric Bicycles (Motorcycles) on Urban Roads and Zebra Crossing Comity Rate. https://hznews.hangzhou.com.cn
24.
MaC.YangD.ZhouJ.FengZ.YuanQ.Risk Riding Behaviors of Urban E-Bikes: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 13, 2019, p. 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132308
25.
ZhouJ.GuoY.Y. WuY.DongS. Assessing Factors Related to E-Bike Crash and E-Bike License Plate Use. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 17, No. 03, 2017, pp. 229–234.
26.
TruongL. T.NguyenH. T. T.De GruyterC.Mobile Phone Use Among Motorcyclists and Electric Bike Riders: A Case Study of Hanoi, Vietnam. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 91, 2016, pp. 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.007
27.
HaworthN.DebnathA. K.How Similar are Two-Unit Bicycle and Motorcycle Crashes?Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 58, 2013, pp. 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.014
28.
LedesmaR. D.ShinarD.Valero-MoraP. M.HaworthN.FerraroO. E.MorandiA.PapadakakiM.De BruyneG.OtteD.SapliogluM.Psychosocial Factors Associated with Helmet Use by Adult Cyclists. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 65, 2019, pp. 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.003
29.
TangT.GuoY.WangH.LiX.AgrawalS.Determinants of Helmet Use Intention Among E-Bikers in China: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Health Belief Model, and the Locus of Control. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024. 2678(2): 753–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231176290
30.
ZhouJ.ZhengT.DongS.MaoX.MaC.Impact of Helmet-Wearing Policy on E-Bike Safety Riding Behavior: A Bivariate Ordered Probit Analysis in Ningbo, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2022, p. 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052830
31.
MaW.LiuZ.LiR.Effect of Helmet-Wearing Regulation on Electric-Bike Riders: A Case Study of Two Cities in China. Transportation Safety and Environment, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2024, p. tdad038. https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdad038
32.
YangY.BaigF.LeeJ.Exploring Young Individuals’ Intentions to Use Helmets of Shared E-Bike in China. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2024, p. 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kscej.2024.100074
33.
WangX.ChenJ.QuddusM.ZhouW.ShenM.Influence of Familiarity with Traffic Regulations on Delivery Riders’ E-Bike Crashes and Helmet Use: Two Mediator Ordered Logit Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 159, 2021, p. 106277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106277
KarkhanehM.Effectiveness of Bicycle Helmet Legislation to Increase Helmet Use: A Systematic Review. Injury Prevention, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2006, pp. 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.010942
36.
YangY.LiC.ChengK.HuS.Factors Affecting the Intention to Wear Helmets for E-Bike Riders: The Case of Chinese College Students. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2024, pp. 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2024.2349553
37.
World Health Organization. Helmets: A Road Safety Manual for Decision-Makers and Practitioners. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
38.
LiQ.AdetunjiO.PhamC. V.TranN. T.ChanE.BachaniA. M.Helmet Use Among Motorcycle Riders in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Results of a Five-Year Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105642
39.
XuJ.JiC.LiB.JiangP.QinK.NiZ.HuangX.ZhongR.FangL.ZhaoM.Riding Practices of E-Bike Riders After the Implementation of Electric Bike Management Regulations: An Observational Study in Hangzhou, China. Heliyon, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2024, p. e26263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26263
40.
Xu. Study on Electric Bicycle Traffic Safety Governance Problems and Countermeasures—Based on the Implementation of Jiangsu Electric Bicycle Management Regulations. Legality Vision, Vol. 1, 2021, pp. 174–175.
41.
Luo. Discussion on Local Legislation of Electric Bicycle Helmet Wearing in China. Road Traffic Management, Vol. 12, 2020, pp. 44–46.
42.
NingP.ZongH.LiL.ChengP.SchwebelD. C.YangY.YangL.WuY.ZhaoM.HuG.Effectiveness of a Helmet Promotion Campaign, China. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 100, No. 5, 2022, p. 329. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.22.287914
43.
KimH.The Role of Legal and Moral Norms to Regulate the Behavior of Texting While Driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 52, 2018, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.004
44.
TangT.GuoY.ZhouX.LabiS.ZhuS.Understanding Electric Bike Riders’ Intention to Violate Traffic Rules and Accident Proneness in China. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 23, 2021, pp. 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.10.010
45.
MoonB.Paradigms in Migration Research: Exploring “Moorings” as a Schema. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1995, pp. 504–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259501900404
46.
HsiehJ.-K.HsiehY.-C.ChiuH.-C.FengY.-C.Post-Adoption Switching Behavior for Online Service Substitutes: A Perspective of the Push–Pull–Mooring Framework. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1912–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.010
47.
LaiJ.-Y.WangJ.Switching Attitudes of Taiwanese Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients Toward Cloud Healthcare Services: An Exploratory Study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 92, 2015, pp. 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.004
48.
SajjadA.ChuJ.AnwarM. A.AsmiF.Between Green and Gray: Smog Risk and Rationale Behind Vehicle Switching. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 244, 2020, p. 118674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118674
49.
SunY.LiuD.ChenS.WuX.ShenX.-L.ZhangX.Understanding Users’ Switching Behavior of Mobile Instant Messaging Applications: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Push-Pull-Mooring Framework. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 75, 2017, pp. 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.014
50.
ChinW. W.GopalA.SalisburyW. D.Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation. Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 321–422.
51.
HsuJ. S.-C.Understanding the Role of Satisfaction in the Formation of Perceived Switching Value. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 59, 2014, pp. 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.11.003
52.
WangS.WangJ.YangF.From Willingness to Action: Do Push-Pull-Mooring Factors Matter for Shifting to Green Transportation?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 79, 2020, p. 102242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102242
53.
Al-MashraieM.ChungS. H.JeonH. W.Customer Switching Behavior Analysis in the Telecommunication Industry via Push-Pull-Mooring Framework: A Machine Learning Approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 106476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106476
54.
YuanQ.YangH.HuangJ.KouS.LiY.TheofilatosA.What Factors Impact Injury Severity of Vehicle to Electric Bike Crashes in China?Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2017, p. 168781401770054. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017700546
55.
SchepersJ. P.FishmanE.Den HertogP.WoltK. K.SchwabA. L.The Safety of Electrically Assisted Bicycles Compared to Classic Bicycles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.010
56.
WeberT.ScaramuzzaG.SchmittK.-U.Evaluation of E-Bike Accidents in Switzerland. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.020
57.
HausteinS.MøllerM.E-Bike Safety: Individual-Level Factors and Incident Characteristics. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2016, pp. 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.001
58.
PoosH. P. A. M.LefarthT. L.HarbersJ. S.WendtK. W.El MoumniM.ReiningaI. H. F.E-Bikers are More Often Seriously Injured in Bicycle Accidents: Results from the Groningen Bicycle Accident Database. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde, Vol. 161, 2017, p. D1520.
59.
DuW.YangJ.PowisB.ZhengX.Ozanne-SmithJ.BilstonL.WuM.Understanding On-Road Practices of Electric Bike Riders: An Observational Study in a Developed City of China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.011
60.
China National People’s Congress. Road Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, Beijing, China, 2004.
61.
WangZ.NeitzelR. L.XueX.ZhengW.JiangG.Awareness, Riding Behaviors, and Legislative Attitudes Toward Electric Bikes Among Two Types of Road Users: An Investigation in Tianjin, a Municipality in China. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2019, pp. 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1511898
62.
YangJ.HuY.DuW.PowisB.Ozanne-SmithJ.LiaoY.LiN.WuM.Unsafe Riding Practice Among Electric Bikers in Suzhou, China: An Observational Study. BMJ Open, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014, p. e003902. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003902
63.
The Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China. The Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security Deploys the “One Helmet One Belt” Security Guard Operation. Traffic Management Bureau, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, China, 2020.
64.
KulanthayanK. C. M.TeowH. F.Tamil SelvanH. K.YellappanK.UlaganathanV.Determinants of Standard Motorcycle Safety Helmet Usage Among Child Pillion Riders. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 74, 2020, pp. 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.029
65.
JingP.WangW.JiangC.ZhaY.MingB.Determinants of Switching Behavior to Wear Helmets When Riding E-Bikes, A Two-Step SEM-ANFIS Approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2023, pp. 9135–9158.
66.
JunJ.ArendtS. W.Understanding Healthy Eating Behaviors at Casual Dining Restaurants Using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 53, 2016, pp. 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.12.002
67.
ChihW.-H.WangK.-Y.HsuL.-C.ChengI.-S.From Disconfirmation to Switching: An Empirical Investigation of Switching Intentions After Service Failure and Recovery. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1305–1321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.531267
68.
HaJ.Jang (Shawn)S.Variety Seeking in Restaurant Choice and Its Drivers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 32, 2013, pp. 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.05.007
69.
HanH.HyunS. S.Image Congruence and Relationship Quality in Predicting Switching Intention: Conspicuousness of Product Use as a Moderator Variable. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2013, pp. 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348012436381
70.
ParkJ.-Y.Jang (Shawn)S.Why Do Customers Switch? More Satiated or Less Satisfied. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 37, 2014, pp. 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.11.007
71.
ChuangY.-F.TaiY.-F.Research on Customer Switching Behavior in the Service Industry. Management Research Review, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2016, pp. 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2015-0022
72.
BansalH. S.TaylorS. F.The Service Provider Switching Model (SPSM): A Model of Consumer Switching Behavior in the Services Industry. Journal of Service Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1999, pp. 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059922007
73.
BansalH. S.“Migrating” to New Service Providers: Toward a Unifying Framework of Consumers’ Switching Behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2005, pp. 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304267928
74.
LiC.-Y.KuY.-C.The Power of a Thumbs-Up: Will E-Commerce Switch to Social Commerce?Information & Management, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2018, pp. 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.001
75.
JungJ.HanH.OhM.Travelers’ Switching Behavior in the Airline Industry from the Perspective of the Push-Pull-Mooring Framework. Tourism Management, Vol. 59, 2017, pp. 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.018
76.
BossS. R.GallettaD. F.LowryP. B.MoodyG. D.PolakP.What Do Systems Users Have to Fear? Using Fear Appeals to Engender Threats and Fear That Motivate Protective Security Behaviors. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2015, pp. 837–864.
77.
LisjakM.LeeA. Y.The Bright Side of Impulse: Depletion Heightens Self-Protective Behavior in the Face of Danger. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2014, pp. 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/674975
78.
IbrahimH.Al-AjlouniM. M. Q.Sustainable Consumption: Insights from the Protection Motivation (PMT), Deontic Justice (DJT) and Construal Level (CLT) Theories. Management Decision, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2018, pp. 610–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2016-0323
79.
HarbeckE. L.GlendonA. I.HineT. J.Young Driver Perceived Risk and Risky Driving: A Theoretical Approach to the “Fatal Five.”Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 58, 2018, pp. 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.018
80.
ChenA.LuY.Protective Behavior in Ride-Sharing Through the Lens of Protection Motivation Theory and Usage Situation Theory. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 61, 2021, p. 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102402
81.
ClarkG. F.RaymondB.RiddleM. J.StarkJ. S.JohnstonE. L.Vulnerability of Antarctic Shallow Invertebrate-Dominated Ecosystems: Vulnerability of Antarctic Benthos. Austral Ecology, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2015, pp. 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12237
82.
RaymaekersP.FobéE.LerusseA.DhondtS.BransM.Driven by Head or Heart? Testing the Effect of Rational and Emotional Anti-Speeding Messages on Self-Reported Speeding Intentions. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 17, 2023, p. 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100726
83.
WangX.YuenK. F.ShiW.MaF.The Determinants of Passengers’ Safety Behaviour on Public Transport. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 18, 2020, p. 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100905
84.
MehrabianA.SteflC. A.Basic Temperament Components of Loneliness, Shyness, and Conformity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1995, pp. 253–263. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.3.253
85.
YangH.LiuX.SuF.CherryC.LiuY.LiY.Predicting E-Bike Users’ Intention to Run the Red Light: An Application and Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 58, 2018, pp. 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.027
86.
ZhouR.HorreyW. J.YuR.The Effect of Conformity Tendency on Pedestrians’ Road-Crossing Intentions in China: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.007
87.
ZhouR.HorreyW. J.Predicting Adolescent Pedestrians’ Behavioral Intentions to Follow the Masses in Risky Crossing Situations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2010, pp. 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.12.001
88.
JanmaimoolP.Application of Protection Motivation Theory to Investigate Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors. Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 7, 2017, p. 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071079
89.
ChamroonsawasdiK.ChottanapundS.PamungkasR. A.TunyasitthisundhornP.SornpaisarnB.NumpaisanO.Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Intention of Healthy Eating and Sufficient Physical Activity to Prevent Diabetes Mellitus in Thai Population: A Path Analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2021, pp. 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.017
90.
TullochH.ReidaR.D’AngeloaM. S.PlotnikoffR. C.MorrinaL.BeatonaL.PapadakisaS.PipeA.Predicting Short and Long-Term Exercise Intentions and Behaviour in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory. Psychology & Health, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2009, pp. 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701805390
91.
AjzenI.From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control (KuhlJ.BeckmannJ., eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985, pp. 11–39.
92.
ZengZ.LiS.LianJ.-W.LiJ.ChenT.LiY.Switching Behavior in the Adoption of a Land Information System in China: A Perspective of the Push–Pull–Mooring Framework. Land Use Policy, Vol. 109, 2021, p. 105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105629
93.
GhasemzadehS.BabazadehT.AllahverdipourH.Sadeghi-BazarganiH.KouzekananiK.Cognitive-Behavioral Determinants of Using Helmet by Motorcyclists in a Rural Community. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 6, 2017, pp. 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.007
94.
WarnerH. W.ÖzkanT.LajunenT.TzamaloukaG.Cross-Cultural Comparison of Drivers’ Tendency to Commit Different Aberrant Driving Behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2011, pp. 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.006
95.
MoradiA.MotevalianS. A.MirkoohiM.McKayM. P.Rahimi-MovagharV.Exceeding the Speed Limit: Prevalence and Determinants in Iran. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2013, pp. 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2012.692693
96.
AliM.SaeedM. M. S.AliM. M.HaidarN.Determinants of Helmet Use Behaviour Among Employed Motorcycle Riders in Yazd, Iran Based on Theory of Planned Behaviour. Injury, Vol. 42, No. 9, 2011, pp. 864–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.030
97.
Molina-GarcíaJ.QueraltA.García BengoecheaE.MooreA.MandicS.Would New Zealand Adolescents Cycle to School More if Allowed to Cycle Without a Helmet?Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 11, 2018, pp. 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.10.001
98.
NguyenM. H.Nguyen-PhuocD. Q.JohnsonL. W.Why Do Parents Intend to Permit Their Children to Ride E-Bikes? Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 32, 2023, p. 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100586
99.
BorhanM. N.IbrahimA. N. H.MiskeenM. A. A.RahmatR. A. O. K.AlhodairiA. M.Predicting Car Drivers’ Intention to Use Low Cost Airlines for Intercity Travel in Libya. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 65, 2017, pp. 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.09.004
100.
ChengS.LeeS.-J.ChoiB.An Empirical Investigation of Users’ Voluntary Switching Intention for Mobile Personal Cloud Storage Services Based on the Push-Pull-Mooring Framework. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 92, 2019, pp. 198–215.
101.
BarbarossaC.De PelsmackerP.Positive and Negative Antecedents of Purchasing Eco-Friendly Products: A Comparison Between Green and Non-Green Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 134, No. 2, 2016, pp. 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z
102.
HungD. V.StevensonM. R.IversR. Q.Barriers to, and Factors Associated, with Observed Motorcycle Helmet Use in Vietnam. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1627–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.002
103.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM.Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2001, pp. 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
104.
ShafieiA.MaleksaeidiH.Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Students: Application of Protection Motivation Theory. Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 22, 2020, p. e00908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908
105.
RobertsP.PriestH.TraynorM.Reliability and Validity in Research. Nursing Standard, Vol. 20, 2006, pp. 41–45.
106.
RortveitA. W.OlsenS. O.Combining the Role of Convenience and Consideration Set Size in Explaining Fish Consumption in Norway. Appetite, Vol 52, No. 2, 2009, pp. 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.001
107.
RabailR.SaleemJ.TanveerZ.PatchingS. G.KhalidA. R.SultanM. T.AadilR. M., et al. Nutritional and Lifestyle Changes Required for Minimizing the Recovery Period in Home Quarantined COVID-19 Patients of Punjab, Pakistan. Food Science & Nutrition, Vol. 9, No. 9, 2021, pp. 5036–5059.
Ministry of Public Security Traffic Management Science Research Center, Beijing Polytechnic University, and Tongji University. 2022 Urban Electric Bicycle Riding Survey Report. Ministry of Public Security Traffic Management Science Research Center, Wuxi, China, 2022.
110.
CrocettaC.AntonucciL.CataldoR.GalassoR.GrassiaM. G.LauroC. N.MarinoM.Higher-Order PLS-PM Approach for Different Types of Constructs. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 154, 2021, pp. 725–754.
111.
BaigF.TalpurA.DasG.TalpurM. A. H.LeeJ.Willingness to Shift Towards Biogas-Fueled Bus Rapid Transit in Karachi, Pakistan. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2024, pp. 1501–1512.
112.
SarkarA.WangH.RahmanA.AzimJ. A.MemonW. H.QianL.Structural Equation Model of Young Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Sustainable Agriculture: A Case Study in Bangladesh. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2022, pp. 142–154.
113.
SunH.SamadS.RehmanS. U.UsmanM.Clean and Green: The Relevance of Hotels’ Website Quality and Environmental Management Initiatives for Green Customer Loyalty. British Food Journal, Vol. 124, No. 12, 2022, pp. 4266–4285.
114.
OseiC. D.ZhuangJ.AduD.Impact of Regulatory, Normative and Cognitive Institutional Pressures on Rural Agribusiness Entrepreneurial Opportunities and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Ghana. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 1, No. aop, 2024, pp. 1–20.
115.
HairJ. F.HultT. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM.DanksN. P.RayS.Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature, 2021.
116.
WaqasM.YahyaF.AhmedA.RasoolY.HongboL.Unlocking Employee’s Green Behavior in Fertilizer Industry: The Role of Green HRM Practices and Psychological Ownership. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2021, pp. 827–844.
117.
FornellC.LarckerD. F.Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 39–50.
118.
MullerK.Review. Technometrics, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1989, pp. 499–500.
119.
TenenhausM.VinziV. E.ChatelinY.-M.LauroC.PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2005, pp. 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
120.
PattusamyM.JacobJ.A Test of Greenhaus and Allen (2011) Model on Work-Family Balance. Current Psychology, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2017, pp. 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9400-4
121.
MuthénB. O.Beyond SEM: General Latent Variable Modeling. Behaviormetrika, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2002, pp. 81–117. https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.81
122.
JohanZ. J.HussainM. Z.MohdR.KamaruddinB. H.Muslims and Non-Muslims Intention to Hold Shariah-Compliant Credit Cards: A SmartPLS Approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2020, pp. 1751–1785. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2019-0270
123.
KingC.MurilloE.LeeH.The Effects of Generational Work Values on Employee Brand Attitude and Behavior: A Multi-Group Analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 66, 2017, pp. 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.07.006
124.
RenF.KwanM.-P.The Impact of Geographic Context on E-Shopping Behavior. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2009, pp. 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34014t
125.
HenselerJ.HubonaG.RayP. A.Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 116, 2016, pp. 2–20.
126.
Valero-MoraP. M.ShinarD.LedesmaR. D.Tormo LanceroM. T.Sánchez-GarcíaM.HaworthN.SanmartínJ., et al. Abiding by the Law When It Does Not Exist: The Case of the Helmet Bicycle Law. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 72, 2020, pp. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.010
127.
United Nations Congress. Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. United Nations Office at Vienna, Salvador, Brazil, 2014.
128.
ZhouH.RomeroS. B.QinX.An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Pedestrians’ Violating Crossing Behavior Using Structural Equation Modeling. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 95, 2016, pp. 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.009
129.
AghamolaeiT.TavafianS. S.MadaniA.Prediction of Helmet Use Among Iranian Motorcycle Drivers: An Application of the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2011, pp. 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2011.557757
130.
LajunenT.RäsänenM.Why Teenagers Owning a Bicycle Helmet Do Not Use Their Helmets. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2001, pp. 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(01)00056-1
131.
FinnoffJ. T.LaskowskiE. R.AltmanK. L.DiehlN. N.Barriers to Bicycle Helmet Use. Pediatrics, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2001, p. e4. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.1.e4
132.
QuineL.RutterD. R.ArnoldL.Predicting and Understanding Safety Helmet Use Among Schoolboy Cyclists: A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Health Belief Model. Psychology & Health, Vol. 13, 1998, pp. 251–269.
133.
SecginliS.CosansuG.NahcivanN. O.Factors Associated with Bicycle-Helmet Use Among 8–16 Years Aged Turkish Children: A Questionnaire Survey. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2014, pp. 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2013.835323
134.
RakhmawatiT.SumaediS.Yuda BaktiI. G. M.WidiantiT.DamayantiS.Intention to Use Helmet with Quality Standard Label: An Integration Model of the Hierarchy of Effect Theory and the Information Signaling Theory. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 48, 2020, pp. 3324–3341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.120
AnshuK.GaurL.SinghG.Impact of Customer Experience on Attitude and Repurchase Intention in Online Grocery Retailing: A Moderation Mechanism of Value Co-Creation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 64, 2022, p. 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102798
138.
CarranzaR.DíazE.Martín-ConsuegraD.Fernández-FerrínP.PLS–SEM in Business Promotion Strategies. A Multigroup Analysis of Mobile Coupon Users Using MICOM. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 120, No. 12, 2020, pp. 2349–2374. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0726
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
