Driving under the influence of alcohol has been recognized as a significant contributing factor to the occurrence of one out of four road traffic crashes. Young drivers are acknowledged as a particularly hazardous group of road users because of insufficient driving experience, but also because of unsafe behavior while behind the wheel, which encompasses driving under the influence of alcohol. The primary aim of this study was to examine the perception of a campaign about driving under the influence of alcohol, while the secondary goal is to present the self-reported behavior and attitudes of young drivers about driving under the influence of alcohol in the Republic of Serbia. Data were collected through a questionnaire created by a multidisciplinary team of experts in the fields of traffic engineering, psychology, and education. A total of 4,015 respondents participated in the study, aged from 16 to 30. The results show that younger respondents have a 1.89 times higher chance of remembering the road traffic safety campaign then older ones. In addition, respondents were 5.057 times more likely to perceive and remember campaign messages that have fewer words than campaign messages that have more words.
AlbalateD.FagedaX.On the Relationship Between Congestion and Road Safety in Cities. Transport Policy, Vol. 105, 2021, pp. 145–152.
2.
GoddardT.RalphK.ThigpenC. G.IacobucciE.Does News Coverage of Traffic Crashes Affect Perceived Blame and Preferred Solutions? Evidence From an Experiment. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 3, 2019, p. 100073.
3.
TrifunovićA.PešićD.ČičevićS.AntićB.The Importance of Spatial Orientation and Knowledge of Traffic Signs for Children’s Traffic Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 102, 2017, pp. 81–92.
4.
HezavehA. M.CherryC. R.NordfjærnT.A Home-Based Approach to Understanding the Effect of Spatial Autocorrelation on Seat Belt Non-Use. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 77, 2021, pp. 156–167.
5.
Čubranić-DobrodolacM.ŠvadlenkaL.ČičevićS.TrifunovićA.DobrodolacM.Using the Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference Systems to Compare the Impact of Speed and Space Perception on the Occurrence of Road Traffic Accidents. Mathematics, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2020, p. 1548.
6.
StephensA. N.BishopC. A.LiuS.FitzharrisM.Alcohol Consumption Patterns and Attitudes Toward Drink-Drive Behaviours and Road Safety Enforcement Strategies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 98, 2017, pp. 241–251.
7.
World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2019.
8.
ZiakopoulosA.TheofilatosA.LaiouA.MichelarakiE.YannisG.RosenbloomT.Examining the Relationship Between Impaired Driving and Past Crash Involvement in Europe: Insights from the ESRA Study. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2021, pp. 376–386.
9.
AntovD.BanetA.BarbierC.BelletT.BimpehY.BoulangerA.BrandstätterC., et al. European Road Users’ Risk Perception and Mobility: The SARTRE 4 Survey. IFSTTAR, Champs-sur-Marne, 2012.
10.
VranesA. J.MikanovicV. B.LazovicJ. M.KosanovicV.Road Traffic Safety as a Public Health Problem: Evidence from Serbia. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 8, 2018, pp. 55–62.
11.
Road Traffic Safety Agency of the Republic of Serbia. Statistical Report on the State of Traffic Safety in the Republic of Serbia in 2019. Road Traffic Safety Agency, Belgrade, 2020.
12.
Civil Aviation Directorate. Law on Road Traffic Safety, Official Gazette, Republic of Serbia, 41/2009, 53/2010, 101/2011, 32/2013, 2/2018, 87/2018, 23/2019 and 128/2020. Republic of Serbia, 2020.
13.
AlonsoF.PastorJ. C.MontoroL.EstebanC.Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol: Frequency, Reasons, Perceived Risk and Punishment. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–9.
14.
LiuL.ChuiW. H.DengY.Driving After Alcohol Consumption: A Qualitative Analysis Among Chinese Male Drunk Drivers. International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 90, 2021, p. 103058.
15.
Scott-ParkerB.WatsonB.KingM. J.HydeM. K.“I Drove After Drinking Alcohol” and Other Risky Driving Behaviours Reported by Young Novice Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 70, 2014, pp. 65–73.
16.
ValenA.BogstrandS. T.VindenesV.FrostJ.LarssonM.HoltanA.GjerdeH.Driver-Related Risk Factors of Fatal Road Traffic Crashes Associated With Alcohol or Drug Impairment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 131, 2019, pp. 191–199.
17.
RomanoE.FellJ. C.LiK.Simons-MortonB. G.VacaF. E.Alcohol-and Speeding-Related Fatal Crashes Among Novice Drivers Age 18–20 not Fully Licensed at the Time of the Crash. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 218, 2021, p. 108417.
18.
ZhaoX.ZhangX.RongJ.Study of the Effects of Alcohol on Drivers and Driving Performance on Straight Road. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2014, 2014, pp. 1–9.
19.
YadavA. K.KhanujaR. K.VelagaN. R.Gender Differences in Driving Control of Young Alcohol-Impaired Drivers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 213, 2020, p. 108075.
20.
LeungS.StarmerG.Gap Acceptance and Risk-Taking by Young and Mature Drivers, Both Sober and Alcohol-Intoxicated, in a Simulated Driving Task. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1056–1065.
21.
PešićD.PešićD.TrifunovićA.ČičevićS.Application of Logistic Regression Model to Assess the Impact of Smartwatch on Improving Road Traffic Safety: A Driving Simulator Study. Mathematics, Vol. 10, No. 9, 2022, p. 1403.
22.
GrunigJ. E.IpesD. A.The Anatomy of a Campaign Against Drunk Driving. Public Relations Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1983, pp. 36–52.
23.
TengL.ZhaoG.LiF.LiuL.ShenL.Increasing the Persuasiveness of Anti-Drunk Driving Appeals: The Effect of Negative and Positive Message Framing. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 103, 2019, pp. 240–249.
24.
BecheurI.DasA.From Elicitation to Persuasion: Assessing the Structure and Effectiveness of Differential Emotions in Anti-Drunk-Driving Campaigns. Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2018, pp. 83–102.
25.
KurtzS. P.ButtramM. E.Ride Hailing App Use and Drunk/Drugged Driving Among Young Adult Nightclub Patrons. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2021, pp. 20–25.
26.
ShawA.Promoting Social Change–Assessing How Twitter was Used to Reduce Drunk Driving Behaviours Over New Year’s Eve. Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2020, pp. 441–463.
27.
YadavR. P.KobayashiM.A Systematic Review: Effectiveness of Mass Media Campaigns for Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving and Alcohol-Related Crashes. BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–7.
28.
NegiN. S.SchmidtK.MorozovaI.AddisT.KidaneS.NigusA.KumarN.MullinS.MurukutlaN.Effectiveness of a Drinking and Driving Campaign on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Among Drivers in Addis Ababa. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2020, p. 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.563350.
29.
PešićD.TrifunovićA.IvkovićI.ČičevićS.ŽunjićA.Evaluation of the Effects of Daytime Running Lights for Passenger Cars. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 66, 2019, pp. 252–261.
30.
TrifunovićA.ČičevićS.PešićD.SamčovićA.MarkovićV.Surveying Disadvantaged Children’s Traffic Safety Education in a Comparison Between Paper and Electronic Methods: A Case Example for the Expanded Use of Educational Technology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221106477.
31.
BorodovskyJ. T.MarschL. A.SchererE. A.GruczaR. A.HasinD. S.BudneyA. J.Perceived Safety of Cannabis Intoxication Predicts Frequency of Driving While Intoxicated. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 131, 2020, p. 105956.
32.
CaldeiraK. M.ArriaA. M.AllenH. K.BugbeeB. A.VincentK. B.O’GradyK. E.Continuity of Drunk and Drugged Driving Behaviors Four Years Post-College. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 180, 2017, p. 332–339.
33.
González-IglesiasB.Gómez-FraguelaJ. A.LuengoM. Á.Sensation Seeking and Drunk Driving: The Mediational Role of Social Norms and Self-Efficacy. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 71, 2014, pp. 22–28.
34.
NaudéG. P.JohnsonM. W.StricklandJ. C.BerryM. S.ReedD. D.At-Risk Drinking, Operant Demand, and Cross-Commodity Discounting as Predictors of Drunk Driving in Underage College Women. Behavioural Processes, Vol. 195, 2022, p. 104548.
35.
NiškanovićJ.ŠiljakS.StanićS.Mentalno zdravlje I saobraćajno ponašanje vozača u Republici Srpskoj/Mental Health and Traffic Behavior Among Drivers in Republic of Srpska. Biomedical Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2018, pp. 178–186.
36.
PešićD.AntićB.SmailovićE.MarkovićN.Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and the Effects of Alcohol Prohibition—Case Study in Serbia. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2019, pp. 467–471.
37.
AryantoC. B.Do you Remember the Words? Dual-Coding Method on Long-Term Memory. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2020, pp. 314–322.
38.
AlfonsoP.MenorJ.ERP and Behavioural Measures of Cognitive Effort Associated to Forget Negative and Neutral Words. Brain and Cognition, Vol. 148, 2021, p. 105672.
39.
TrifunovićA.ČičevićS.LazarevićD.MitrovićS.DragovićM.Comparing Tablets (Touchscreen Devices) and PCs in Preschool Children’ Education: Testing Spatial Relationship Using Geometric Symbols on Traffic Signs. IETI Transactions on Ergonomics and Safety, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2018, pp. 35–41.
40.
TrifunovićA.ČičevićS.ZunjicA.DragovićM.YueX. G.An Experimental Study on the Certain Effects of Colors on the Perception of Preschool and Primary School Children-Implications to Design. IETI Transactions on Ergonomics and Safety, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019, pp. 38–43.
41.
YousifS. R.RosenbergM. D.KeilF. C.Using Space to Remember: Short-Term Spatial Structure Spontaneously Improves Working Memory. Cognition, Vol. 214, 2021, p. 104748.
42.
AlarifiS. A.Abdel-AtyM. A.LeeJ.ParkJ.Crash Modeling for Intersections and Segments Along Corridors: A Bayesian Multilevel Joint Model With Random Parameters. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 16, 2017, pp. 48–59.
43.
HuangH.Abdel-AtyM.Multilevel Data and Bayesian Analysis in Traffic Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, p. 1556–1565.
44.
WangK.QinX.Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Measure Severity of Single-Vehicle Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2432: 17–25.
45.
YangD.XieK.OzbayK.YangH.Fusing Crash Data and Surrogate Safety Measures for Safety Assessment: Development of a Structural Equation Model With Conditional Autoregressive Spatial Effect and Random Parameters. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 152, 2021, p. 105971.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
