Water, ice, and snow on pavement surfaces significantly affect the frictional resistance of roads and airport runways, so accurately obtaining pavement surface condition information, particularly the detection of water/ice/snow depth, is crucial for evaluating anti-skid performance. Based on the current policy background and the global perspective, this study conducted a literature review of nearly 300 publications related to pavement water, ice, and snow depth detection, and classified, counted, and summarized 211 publications. This research explored both non-contact and contact detection methods in detail, among which non-contact methods include laser, infrared, ultrasonic, radar, and other remote technologies; contact methods encompass optical (fiber-optic, infrared type), electrical (capacitive, piezoelectric, impedance, resistive type), and other types of pavement sensors. For these technologies, this research detailed their detection principles, technological development status, and key technical parameters including depth accuracy and range, analyzing the factors affecting the reliability of these technologies. Through analyzing the application of commercial products, the practical performance of these technologies was further assessed. The techs’ advantages and limitations in range, accuracy, functionality, economy, and durability are compared. Furthermore, the pavement surface weather condition information system was introduced, accompanied by examples showcasing the functionalities of various digital systems and artificial intelligence applications. Lastly, a framework for the future application of pavement surface weather condition detection was outlooked.
Klein-PasteA.SinhaN. K.Comparison Between Rubber–Ice and Sand–Ice Friction and the Effect of Loose Snow Contamination. Tribology International, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1145–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.037.
2.
LiY.JinJ.ChenT.HanL.CongQ.Effect of an Elastic Surface on Snow and Ice Accumulation on Vehicles. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 180, 2020, p. 103154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103154.
3.
Klein-PasteA.Airplane Braking Friction on Dry Snow, Wet Snow or Slush Contaminated Runways. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 150, 2018, pp. 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.02.004.
JiaoZ.WangZ.SunD.LiX.ShangY.WuS.A Novel Aircraft Anti-Skid Brake Control Method Based on Runway Maximum Friction Tracking Algorithm. Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 110, 2021, p. 106482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106482.
7.
ZhuX.YangY.GilabertF. A.ZhaoH.GuarinA.Effects of Surface Texture Deterioration and Wet Surface Conditions on Asphalt Runway Skid Resistance. Tribology International, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106589.
8.
JiangB.WangH.An Integrated Analytical Model for Friction Characteristics of Aircraft Tire on Wet Runway Pavement. Tribology International, Vol. 185, 2023, p. 108501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108501.
9.
BrassardJ.-D.BeaulieuA.TremblayM. M.MomenG.Assessment of Runway Surface Conditions by British Pendulum Testing Under the Global Reporting Format Winter Conditions. Applied Science, Vol. 12, 2022, p. 9646. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199646.
10.
TanT.XingC.TanY.GongX.Safety Aspects on Icy Asphalt Pavement in Cold Region Through Field Investigations. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 161, 2019, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.02.010.
11.
Klein-PasteA.HusebyA. B.AndersonJ. D.GiesmanP.BuggeH. J.LangedahlT. B.Braking Performance of Commercial Airplanes During Operation on Winter Contaminated Runways. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 79–80, 2012, pp. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.04.001.
12.
JiangY.Review on Flight Performance Certification Standard for Wet and Contaminated Runway. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 17, 2011, pp. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.10.002.
13.
CluettC.GopalakrishnaD.KitchenerF.BalkeK.OsborneL.Weather Information Integration in Transportation Management Center (TMC) Operations. United States: Joint Program Office for Intelligent Transportation Systems, FHWA-JPO-11-058. 2011. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4142/dot_4142_DS1.pdf.
14.
ManfrediJ.WaltersT.WilkeG.OsborneL. F.HartR.IncrocciT.SchmittT.Road Weather Information System Environmental Sensor Station Siting Guidelines. United States: Federal Highway Administration. Office of Transportation Operations, FHWA-HOP-05-026. 2005. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64384/dot_64384_DS1.pdf.
15.
BylicaA.PashkevichA.Introduction of Global Reporting Format: Summary of the First Winter Season in Poland. Sustainability, Vol. 15, 2022, p. 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010167.
LantieriC.LampertiR.SimoneA.VignaliV.SangiorgiC.DondiG.Mobile Laser Scanning System for Assessment of the Rainwater Runoff and Drainage Conditions on Road Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2015.8(1).1.
19.
OzcanK.SharmaA.KnickerbockerS.MerickelJ.HawkinsN.RizzoM.Road Weather Condition Estimation Using Fixed and Mobile Based Cameras. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Proceedings of the 2019 Computer Vision Conference, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9_14.
20.
ZhangH. Y.AzouiguiS.SehabR.BoukhniferM.Near-Infrared LED System to Recognize Road Surface Conditions for Autonomous Vehicles. Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems, Vol. 11, 2022, pp. 187–199. https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-11-187-2022.
21.
YangW. C.TianB. J.FangY. W.WuD. F.ZhouL. Y.CaiJ. W.Evaluation of Highway Hydroplaning Risk Based on 3D Laser Scanning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, 2022, p. 7699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137699.
22.
LysyannikovA. V.EgorovA. V.LysyannikovaN. N.KovalevaM. A.ShramV. G.LynevA. S.SelihovaS. G.KaizerU. F.Conditions of Occurrence of Ice Formations and Dense Snow on the Road Surface. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1399, 2019, p. 055049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1399/5/055049.
23.
DiLorenzoT.YuX. B.Use of Ice Detection Sensors for Improving Winter Road Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 191, 2023, p. 107197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107197.
24.
MaY.WangM. Z.FengQ.HeZ. P.TianM.Current Non-Contact Road Surface Condition Detection Schemes and Technical Challenges. Sensors, Vol. 22, 2022, p. 9583. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249583.
25.
LiangC. J.YeL.GeJ. F.Research Progress of Non-Contact Road Surface Condition Detection Technology. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.13873/J.1000-9787(2019)02-0001-04.
26.
LingJ. M.YangF.ZhangJ. K.LiP. L.UddinM. L.CaoT.Water-Film Depth Assessment for Pavements of Roads and Airport Runways: A Review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 392, 2023, p. 132054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132054.
27.
GopalakrishnaD.CluettC.KleinR.KhaledaK.Road Weather Management Performance Measures: 2012 Update. United States: Department of Transportation. Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, FHWA-JPO-13-87. 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3409/dot_3409_DS1.pdf.
TroianoA.PaseroE.MesinL.In the Field Application of a New Sensor for Monitoring Road and Runway Surfaces. Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 10, 2011, pp. 71–83. http://www.sensorsportal.com.
32.
LiW.ZhangJ.YeL.LiC. X.Modelling and Experimental Study on the Fiber-Optic Ice Sensor. Proc., 2009 International Conference on Information and Automation, Zhuhai/Macau, China, IEEE, New York, 2009, pp. 1298–1301. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2009.5205117.
33.
CasselgrenJ.RosendahlS.SjödahlM.JonssonP.Road Condition Analysis Using NIR Illumination and Compensating for Surrounding Light. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 77, 2016, pp. 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.08.002.
34.
KwonT. J.FuL.MellesS. J.Location Optimization of Road Weather Information System (RWIS) Network Considering the Needs of Winter Road Maintenance and the Traveling Public. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 32, 2017, pp. 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12222.
35.
XiaoK.HuiB.QuX.WangH.DiabA.CaoM.Asphalt Pavement Water Film Thickness Detection and Prediction Model: A Review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 10, No. 3, 2023, pp. 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2023.05.001.
WuD.LiuP.LuoB.PuJ.LiuE.JiangS.TangB.SongT.ZhaoM.Methods for Non-Contact Road Surface Meteorological Sensing Based on Dual-Wavelength Laser. Acta Optica Sinica, Vol. 40, No. 23, 2020, p. 2312004. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS202040.2312004.
39.
DeemsJ. S.PainterT. H.FinneganD. C.Lidar Measurement of Snow Depth: A Review. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 59, No. 215, 2013, pp. 467–479. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J154.
40.
BeltránM. D.MolinaR. L.SatorreM. Á.MoltóC. S.VerdúC. M.Double Laser for Depth Measurement of Thin Films of Ice. Sensors, Vol. 15, 2015, pp. 25123–25138. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151025123.
41.
DanH.DaiqiangZ.LiangK.Research and Application of Non-Contact Detection Warning System of Remote Pavement State. Journal of Transportation Science and Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2015, pp. 85–91. https://doi.org/10.16544/j.cnki.cn43-1494/u.2015.01.015.
42.
ZhangY.LongJ.GuoY.WuD.LuoB.JiangS.ZhaoM.Research on the Measurement of Road Icing Thickness by Infrared Laser Detection Technology. Proc., 2021 19th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN), Qufu, China, IEEE, New York, 2021, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOCN53177.2021.9563635.
43.
YangS.Quantitative Calibration of Three-Wavelength Road-Condition Sensor Using a Dual-Wavelength Response Ratio. IEEE Access, Vol. 10, 2022, pp. 16512–16517. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3149778.
ChengY.LiuJ.GuiH.ZhangJ.WeiX.Characterization of Road Surfaces Using Three Near-Infrared Diode Lasers. Instrumentation Science & Technology, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2024, pp. 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2023.2276698.
46.
EspindolaA.RajamaniR.Development of an Autonomous Measurement System for Estimation of Snow Profile on Road Surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 72, No. 9, 2023, pp. 11169–11183. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2023.3263127.
47.
JaakkolaA.HyyppäJ.PuttonenE.Measurement of Snow Depth Using a Low-Cost Mobile Laser Scanner. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2014, pp. 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2013.2271861.
ProkopA.Assessing the Applicability of Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Spatial Snow Depth Measurements. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 54, 2008, pp. 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.07.002.
50.
AnttilaK.HakalaT.KaasalainenS.KaartinenH.NevalainenO.KrooksA.KukkoA.JaakkolaA.Calibrating Laser Scanner Data from Snow Surfaces: Correction of Intensity Effects. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 121, 2016, pp. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.10.005.
51.
XuS.RuanC.FengL.Road Surface Condition Sensor Based on Scanning Detection of Backward Power. Chinese Optics Letters, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2014, p. 050801. https://doi.org/10.3788/COL201412.050801.
52.
RuanC.WangY.MaX.KangH.Road Meteorological Condition Sensor Based on Multi-Wavelength Light Detection. In Proceedings Volume 11052, Third International Conference on Photonics and Optical Engineering, 2019, 110521F. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2522311.
53.
LiuJ.JiaY.XiN.Identification of Road Surface Conditions Based on Laser Scanning. Proc., 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Shenzhen, China, IEEE, New York, 2013, pp. 2476–2481. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2013.6739843.
54.
YangH.WeiW.SuM.ChenJ.CaiX.Measurement of Liquid Water Film Thickness on Opaque Surface with Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 60, 2018, pp. 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.02.005.
55.
LiX.ShangY.HuaB.YuR.HeY.LiDAR Intensity Correction for Road Marking Detection. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 160, 2023, p. 107240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107240.
56.
ZygmuntM.JakubaszekM.SędekB.DrozdT.Real-Time Measurement Technique of the Echo Signal Magnitude in ToF Laser Scanners. Measurement, Vol. 208, 2023, p. 112453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112453.
57.
SędekB.ZygmuntM.JakubaszekM.DrozdT.WojtanowskiJ.Real-Time Walk Error Compensation Method Using Echo Signal Magnitude Measurement in ToF Laser Scanners. Sensors, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2024, p. 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030733.
58.
ZhouL.HeH.SunJ.LinB.Phase-Shift Laser Ranging Technology Based on Multi-Frequency Carrier Phase Modulation. Photonics, Vol. 9, 2022, p. 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9090603.
59.
KingF.KellyR.FletcherC. G.Evaluation of LiDAR-Derived Snow Depth Estimates from the iPhone 12 Pro. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 19, 2022, p. 7003905. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2022.3166665.
60.
RiahiE.EdjeouW.BuissonS.GennesseauxM.DoM.-T.Estimation of Water Depth on Road Surfaces Using Accelerometric Signals. Sensors, Vol. 22, 2022, p. 8940. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228940.
61.
JonssonP.Remote Sensor for Winter Road Surface Status Detection. Proc., 2011 IEEE Sensors Conference, Limerick, Ireland, IEEE, New York, 2011, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2011.6127089.
ZhouS.XuH.ZhangG.MaT.YangY.DCOR: Dynamic Channel-Wise Outlier Removal to De-Noise LiDAR Data Corrupted by Snow. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2024, pp. 7017–7028. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3347150.
64.
MicleaR.-C.DughirC.AlexaF.SandruF.SileaI.Laser and LIDAR in a System for Visibility Distance Estimation in Fog Conditions. Sensors, Vol. 20, 2020, p. 6322. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216322.
65.
CasselgrenJ.SjödahlM.Polarization Resolved Classification of Winter Road Condition in the Near-Infrared Region. Applied Optics, Vol. 51, No. 15, 2012, pp. 3036–3045. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.003036.
66.
FlatscherM.NeumayerM.BretterklieberT.SchweighoferB.Measurement of Complex Dielectric Material Properties of Ice Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy. 2016 IEEE SENSORS, 2016, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2016.7808533.
67.
JonssonP.Classification of Road Conditions: From Camera Images and Weather Data. Proc., 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIMSA), Ottawa, ON, Canada, IEEE, New York, 2011, pp. 1616–1621. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMSA.2011.6059917.
68.
JonssonP.CasselgrenJ.ThörnbergB.Road Surface Status Classification Using Spectral Analysis of NIR Camera Images. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2015, pp. 1641–1656. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2364854.
69.
ColaceL.SantoniF.AssantoG.A Near-Infrared Optoelectronic Approach to Detection of Road Conditions. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 51, 2013, pp. 633–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.01.003.
70.
PiccardiA.ColaceL.Optical Detection of Dangerous Road Conditions. Sensors, Vol. 19, 2019, p. 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061360.
ZhangJ.WangP.GeJ.XingX.LiuY.Test Methods and Influencing Factors for Asphalt Pavement Hydrops and Icing Thickness Detection Based on Infrared Technology. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 49, No. 6, 2019, pp. 1187–1192. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2019.06.023.
74.
DaiH.ZhaoS.JiaZ.ChenT.Low-Cost Ultrasonic Distance Sensor Arrays with Networked Error Correction. Sensors, Vol. 13, 2013, pp. 11818–11841. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130911818.
75.
LiP.ChenS.CaiY.ChenJ.LiJ.Accurate TOF Measurement of Ultrasonic Signal Echo from the Liquid Level Based on a 2-D Image Processing Method. Neurocomputing, Vol. 175, 2016, pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.10.014.
76.
GudraT.NajwerL.Ultrasonic Investigation of Snow and Ice Parameters. Acta Physica Polonica A, Vol. 120, No. 4, 2011, pp. 625–629. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.120.625.
77.
LiuC.FangZ.HuL.LiuY.SuR.LiuW.A Method to Avoid the Cycle-Skip Phenomenon in Time-of-Flight Determination for Ultrasonic Flow Measurement. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), Vol. 22, No. 9, 2021, pp. 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000284.
78.
RyanW. A.DoeskenN. J.FassnachtS. R.Evaluation of Ultrasonic Snow Depth Sensors for U.S. Snow Measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2008, pp. 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA947.1.
79.
JiangJ.DangW.DuanF.WangX.FuX.LiC.SunZ.LiuH.BuL.An Accurate Ultrasonic Wind Speed and Direction Measuring Method by Combining Time-Difference and Phase-Difference Measurement Using Coded Pulses Combination. Applied Acoustics, Vol. 159, 2020, p. 107093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107093.
80.
Costa-JúniorJ. F. S.CortelaG. A.MaggiL. E.RochT. F. D.PereiraW. C. A.Costa-FelixR. P. B.AlvarengaA. V.Measuring Uncertainty of Ultrasonic Longitudinal Phase Velocity Estimation Using Different Time-Delay Estimation Methods Based on Cross-Correlation: Computational Simulation and Experiments. Measurement, Vol. 122, 2018, pp. 45–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.073.
81.
LiL.HuY.DongJ.WuQ.HuT.ZhuF.A Novel Differential Time-of-Flight Algorithm for High-Precision Ultrasonic Gas Flow Measurement. Journal of Instrumentation, Vol. 17, 2022, P. P05019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/05/P05019.
82.
LimZ. S.Development of High Resolution Snow Depth Sensor Using Ultrasonics. Proc., 2009 IEEE Sensors Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, IEEE, New York, 2009, pp. 1738–1741. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2009.5398483.
83.
LiP.CaiY.ChenJ.Ultrasonic TOF Estimation Method Using Ellipse Algorithm and Canny Operator Edge Detection. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2014, pp. 2385–2391.
84.
WangD.WangZ.LiP.ChenY.LiH.Dual Gaussian Attenuation Model of Ultrasonic Echo and Its Parameter Estimation. AIP Advances, Vol. 9, 2019, p. 055213. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5095994.
85.
GangG.Shu-xunW.Xiao-huiZ.Xiao-yingS.Double Exponential Model of Ultrasonic Signals. Proc., 2008 9th International Conference on Signal Processing, Beijing, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 2684–2687. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSP.2008.4697675.
86.
LuZ.YangC.QinD.LuoY.Estimating the Parameters of Ultrasonic Echo Signal in the Gabor Transform Domain and Its Resolution Analysis. Signal Processing, Vol. 120, 2016, pp. 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.10.006.
87.
BystrovA.HoareE.TranT.-Y.ClarkeN.GashinovaM.CherniakovM.Road Surface Classification Using Automotive Ultrasonic Sensor. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 168, 2016, pp. 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.119.
88.
BystrovA.HoareE.TranT.-Y.ClarkeN.GashinovaM.CherniakovM.Automotive System for Remote Surface Classification. Sensors, Vol. 17, 2017, p. 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040745.
89.
ViikariV.VarpulaT.KantanenM.Automotive Radar Technology for Detecting Road Conditions: Backscattering Properties of Dry, Wet, and Icy Asphalt. Proc., 2008 European Radar Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 276–279.
90.
NakashimaS.AramakiS.KitazonoY.MuS.TanakaK.SerikawaS.Application of Ultrasonic Sensors in Road Surface Condition Distinction Methods. Sensors, Vol. 16, 2016, p. 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101678.
91.
PasianM.Espín-LópezP. F.PremierV.NotarnicolaC.MarinC.Identification of Multi-Temporal Snow Melting Patterns with Microwave Radars. Proc., 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, IEEE, New York, 2020, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/EuCAP48036.2020.9135545.
92.
MagerlG.PritzlW.FröhlingP. W.Remote Sensing of Road Condition. Proc., IGARSS’91 Remote Sensing: Global Monitoring for Earth Management, Espoo, IEEE, New York, June 3–6, 1991, pp. 2137–2140. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1991.575462.
93.
BlancheJ.MitchellD.FlynnD.Run-time Analysis of Road Surface Conditions Using Non-Contact Microwave Sensing. Proc., 2020 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (GCAIoT), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, IEEE, New York, 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCAIoT51063.2020.9345917.
94.
LeeT.-Y.SkvortsovV.KimM.-S.HanS.-H.KaM.-H.Application of W-Band FMCW Radar for Road Curvature Estimation in Poor Visibility Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 18, No. 13, 2018, pp. 5300–5312. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2837875.
95.
TaylorD.YanS.O’NeillC.GogineniP.GurbuzS.AslanB.LarsonJ., et al. Airborne Dual-Band Microwave Radar System for Snow Thickness Measurement. Proc., 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Waikoloa, HI, IEEE, New York, 2020, pp. 2934–2937. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323958.
96.
KimJ.KimE.KimD.A Black Ice Detection Method Based on 1-Dimensional CNN Using mmWave Sensor Backscattering. Remote Sensing, Vol. 14, 2022, p. 5252. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205252.
97.
DyakovP.AndreevA.IvanovA.KalininA.Mud-Snow Layer Accumulation on Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) System Radar and Thickness Measurement of It. Proc., 2022 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, Moscow, Russian Federation, IEEE, New York, 2022, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF53456.2022.9744310.
98.
ViikariV. V.VarpulaT.KantanenM.Road-Condition Recognition Using 24-GHz Automotive Radar. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2009, pp. 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2009.2026307.
99.
MengX.LiP.HuY.SongF.MaJ.Theoretical Study on Recognition of Icy Road Surface Condition by Low-Terahertz Frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 60, 2022, p. 2001809.
100.
BabyC. K.GeorgeB.A Capacitive Ice Layer Detection System Suitable for Autonomous Inspection of Runways Using an ROV. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments Proceedings, Magdeburg, Germany, IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROSE.2012.6402627.
101.
YinkeD.XiaominC.Temperature Characteristics and Compensation Method of Capacitive Ice Layer Thickness Sensor. Proc., Web Information Systems and Mining (WISM 2011), Taiyuan, China, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23971-7_11.
102.
BabyC. K.GeorgeB.A Capacitive Sensing System for Non-Contact Detection of Ice. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2019-098.
ZhangC.XiaoC.LiS.GuoX.WangQ.HeY.LvH.YanH.LiuD.A Novel Fiber-Optic Ice Sensor to Identify Ice Types Based on Total Reflection. Sensors, Vol. 23, 2023, p. 3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083996.
105.
GeJ.YeL.ZouJ.A Novel Fiber-Optic Ice Sensor Capable of Identifying Ice Type Accurately. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 175, 2012, pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.12.016.
106.
GalletJ.-C.DomineF.ZenderC. S.PicardG.Measurement of the Specific Surface Area of Snow Using Infrared Reflectance in an Integrating Sphere at 1310 and 1550 nm. The Cryosphere, Vol. 3, 2009, pp. 167–182. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-3-167-2009.
107.
GuiK.YeL.GeJ.CheikhF. A.HuangL.Road Surface Condition Detection Utilizing Resonance Frequency and Optical Technologies. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 297, 2019, p. 111540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111540.
108.
LuK.ChenF.A Fiber-Optic Icing Sensor with Multi-Light Paths. Proc., International Conference on Electrical, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (ICEMIE 2016), Phuket, Atlantis Press, Hauge, 2016, pp. 63–66. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICEMIE-16.2016.16.
109.
XieQ.WangL.GeJ.ShiN.ZhangJ.Design of Polymer Optical Fiber Icing Sensor and Road Ice Layer Thickness Detection Method. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2023, pp. 59–67. https://doi.org/10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2023.04.010.
110.
GeJ.LiuJ.GuiK.YeL.Atmospheric Icing Measurement and Online Ice Type Recognition for Aircraft Utilizing Optical Fiber Sensor and Machine Learning Algorithms. Measurement, Vol. 205, 2022, p. 112215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112215.
111.
SieglA.NeumayerM.BretterklieberT.Fibre Optical Ice Sensing: Sensor Model and Icing Experiments for Different Ice Types. Proc., 2020 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Dubrovnik, Croatia, IEEE, New York, 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC43012.2020.9128617.
ZhaoX.HuZ.ZhangJ.PeiJ.ShiN.Research Progress in Intelligent Monitoring of Pavement Icing Based on Optical Fiber Sensing Technology. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), Vol. 55, No. 6, 2023, pp. 1566–1579. https://doi.org/10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20230037.
114.
BiY.PeiJ.GuoF.LiR.ZhangJ.Implementation of Polymer Optical Fibre Sensor System for Monitoring Water Membrane Thickness on Pavement Surface. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2021, pp. 872–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1652298.
115.
ZouJ.YeL.GeJ.Ice Type Detection Using an Oblique End-Face Fibre-Optic Technique. Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2013, p. 035201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/3/035201.
116.
TanS.GeJ.YeL.GuiK.Road Surface Icing Detecting System Based on Multiple Sensor. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2016, pp. 107–109. https://doi.org/10.13873/J.1000-9787(2016)01-0107-03.
BaumgartnerA.AmannS.WerzM.HerkommerA.DresselM.FellaS.Near-Infrared Optical Investigations of Snow, Ice, and Water Layers on Diffuse Reflecting Surfaces. Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 89, 2018, p. 123106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049652.
119.
HoshinoS.HashimotoK.TateyamaK.HaradaY.SatoY.IkedaY.UchikataI.OhmaeH.MiyakeT.KandaA.Snow and Ice Monitoring Technique for the Contaminated Runway. Proc., AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Orlando, FL, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., American Institution of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, 2020, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1685.
ArnaudL.PicardG.ChampollionN.DomineF.GalletJ. C.LefebvreE.FilyM.BarnolaJ. M.Measurement of Vertical Profiles of Snow Specific Surface Area with a 1 cm Resolution Using Infrared Reflectance: Instrument Description and Validation. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 57, No. 201, 2011, pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311795306664.
122.
HashimotoK.YamaguchiS.HoshinoS.KandaA.Light-Scattering Sensor for Monitoring Properties of Snow. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 178, 2020, p. 103131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103131.
123.
CaiY.ZhaoL.XieY.JinC.MaL.Research on Real Time Sensing Method for Water Film Thickness of Asphalt Pavement. China Municipal Engineering, No. 6, 2023, pp. 58–61. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4655.2023.06.015.
124.
LingJ.FangY.ZhangJ.WuZ.ZhaoH.ShiR.Framework and Key Technologies of Airport Smart Runway. China Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2022, pp. 120–128. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2022.02.005.
125.
LingJ.LiP.LiuS.TaoZ.HouT.The Connotation Expansion and Function System of Airport Smart Runway. China Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 57, No. 8, 2023, pp. 19–128. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.23050337.
126.
BretterklieberT.NeumayerM.ZangH.Thin Layer Effects in Capacitive Atmospheric Icing Detection. Proc., 2014 IEEE Sensors Conference, Valencia, Spain, IEEE, New York, 2014, pp. 2042–2045. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985436.
127.
FlatscherM.NeumayerM.BretterklieberT.Field Sensor Analysis for Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Based Ice Detection. Proc., 2017 IEEE Sensors Conference, Glasgow, UK, IEEE, New York, 2017, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2017.8234035.
128.
ChenB.GaoD.YangJ.LiZ.Design of an Active Detection System for Ice and Snow Pollutants and Freezing Temperature on Runway. Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 34, 2023, p. 105102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/acdff4.
129.
NeumayerM.BretterklieberT.FlatscherM.Signal Processing for Capacitive Ice Sensing: Electrode Topology and Algorithm Design. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 68, No. 5, 2019, pp. 1458–1466. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2882116.
130.
MesinL.TroianoA.PaseroE.In Field Application of an Innovative Sensor for Monitoring Road and Runway Surfaces. Proc., 2010 First International Conference on Sensor Device Technologies and Applications, Venice, IEEE, Piscataway, 2010, pp. 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORDEVICES.2010.27.
131.
TroianoA.RugianoF.PaseroE.Remote Monitoring of Ice Formation over a Runway Surface. Proc., International Road Weather Conference (SIRWEC), Helsinki, Union of International Associations (UIA), Brussels, 2012, pp. 1–6.
132.
TroianoA.PaseroE.MesinL.New System for Detecting Road Ice Formation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2011, pp. 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2010.2064910.
133.
TroianoA.PaseroE.A Runway Surface Monitor Using Internet of Things. Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2014, pp. 169–173. https://doi.org/10.2478/jee-2014-0026.
134.
TroianoA.PaseroE.MesinL.An Innovative Water and Ice Detection System for Monitoring Road and Runway Surfaces. Proc., 2010 6th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics & Electronics, Berlin, Germany, IEEE, New York, 2010, pp. 1–4.
135.
GuiK.GeJ.YeL.HuangL.The Piezoelectric Road Status Sensor Using the Frequency Scanning Method and Machine-Learning Algorithms. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 287, 2019, pp. 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.12.048.
136.
RoyS.IzadA.DeAnnaR. G.MehreganyM.Smart Ice Detection Systems Based on Resonant Piezoelectric Transducers. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol. 69, No. 3, 1998, pp. 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00101-0.
137.
BaiT.ZhuC. L.LiQ.ZhuC. X.Study of Bimorph Piezoelectric Cantilever Structure Used on Icing Detection. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2013, pp. 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0196.
LvY.ZhangZ.LiJ.TanY.ZhangC.LiS.HanM.Research on Automated Detecting Technology for Road Icing Conditions. Proc., International Conference on Road and Airfield Pavement Technology 2023, Beijing, China, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2023, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485255.079.
140.
LiJ.MaH.ShiW.TanY.XuH.ZhengB.LiuJ.Nondestructive Detection and Early Warning of Pavement Surface Icing Based on Meteorological Information. Materials, Vol. 16, 2023, p. 6539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196539.
141.
DouY.ChangX.Mechanism Analysis and Simulation of Coplanar Multi Electrode Capacitive Ice Thickness Measuring Sensor. Sensors & Transducers, Vol. 158, No. 11, 2013, pp. 27–32.
142.
AbdelaalA.SaraylooM.NimsD. K.MohammadianB.HeilJ.SojoudiH.A Flexible Surface-Mountable Sensor for Ice Detection and Non-Destructive Measurement of Liquid Water Content in Snow. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 195, 2022, p. 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103469.
143.
TabatabaiH.AljubooriM.A Novel Concrete-Based Sensor for Detection of Ice and Water on Roads and Bridges. Sensors, Vol. 17, 2017, p. 2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122912.
144.
LuoW.LiL.WangK. C. P.WeC.ChenJ.Surface Drainage Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Using a New Analytical Water Film Depth Model. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 21, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1985–2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1590220.
145.
LuoW.WangK. C. P.LiL.Field Test Validation of Water Film Depth (WFD) Prediction Models for Pavement Surface Drainage. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1394099.
146.
IslamT.MittalU.NimalA. T.SharmaM. U.A Nanoporous Thin-Film Miniature Interdigitated Capacitive Impedance Sensor for Measuring Humidity. International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2014, pp. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2014.935833.
147.
SongQ.WeiX.SunW.LuZ.TaoT.Design of Capacitive Paddy Moisture Sensor Based on Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Analysis. Applied Science, Vol. 10, No. 11, 2020, p. 3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113968.
148.
FelsbergerR.SchweighoferB.FlatscherM.RathM.GrubmüllerM.WegleiterH.Low Power Ice Detection with Capacitive and Impedance Spectroscopy-Based Measurements. Proc., 2018 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Cairns, QLD, Australia, IEEE, New York, 2018, pp. 809–813. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2018.8433765.
149.
NeumayerM.BretterklieberT.Ice Sensing Using Combined Capacitive and Impedance Spectroscopic Measurements. 2023 IEEE SENSORS, Vienna, Austria, IEEE, New York, 2023, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS56945.2023.10325304.
150.
GuiK.GeJ.F.ChengX.YeL.Road Surface Condition Detection Utilizing Impedance Spectroscopy and Machine-Learning Algorithm. Life-Cycle Civil Engineering: Innovation, Theory and Practice, 2021, pp. 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429343292-192.
VellekoopM. J.JakobyB.BastemeijerJ.A Love-Wave Ice Detector. Proc., 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Tahoe, NV, IEEE, New York, 1999, pp. 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1999.849438.
154.
DuY.JiangC.XiaoH.LiH.Study of SAW Ice Sensor Application to Highway Airstrip. Proc., 2009 Symposium on Piezoelectricity, Acoustic Waves, and Device Applications (SPAWDA 2009), Wuhan, China, IEEE, New York, 2009, pp. 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPAWDA.2009.5428973.
155.
NakayamaT.YamadaT.IwahashiT.FujimotoA.OkudaH.Development of Buried Calorific Value Snow Depth Sensor That Can Be Used for Airport Runways. Proc., JSSI & JSSE Joint Conference on Snow and Ice Research - 2022, Sapporo, Japan Science and Technology Information Aggregator, Tokyo, 2022, p. 86. Tokyo: https://doi.org/10.14851/jcsir.2022.0_86.
156.
HaugA.GrosanicS.Usage of Road Weather Sensors for Automatic Traffic Control on Motorways. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 15, 2016, pp. 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.045.
157.
LovénL.KarsistoV.JarvinenH.SillanpaaM. J.LeppanenT.PeltonenE.PirttikangasS.RiekkiJ.Mobile Road Weather Sensor Calibration by Sensor Fusion and Linear Mixed Models. PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2019, p. e0211702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211702.
158.
EomT.KwonY.KoH.Compact Weather Sensor Node for Predicting Road Surface Temperature. Sensors and Materials, Vol. 33, No. 8, 2021, pp. 2763–2771. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2021.3361.
159.
EwanL.Al-KaisyA.VenezianoD.Remote Sensing of Weather and Road Surface Conditions, Is Technology Mature for Reliable Intelligent Transportation Systems Applications?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2329: 8–16.
160.
SaarikiviP. Development of Mobile Optical Remote Road Condition Monitoring in Finland. Proc., SIRWEC2012, Helsinki, Union of International Associations (UIO), Brussels, 2012, pp. 1–7.
161.
KociánováA.The Intelligent Winter Road Maintenance Management in Slovak Conditions. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 111, 2015, pp. 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.109.
162.
CaoC.KongF.ChuH.CaiJ.Construction and Application of Runway Safety Risk Warning Platform of Beijing Capital International Airport. Journal of Civil Aviation, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2022, pp. 23–28.
163.
RasolM.SchmidtF.IentileS.Weather Condition Effect on the Road Surface Friction: A Preliminary Assessment Based on Sensor Data. In Life-Cycle of Structures and Infrastructure Systems (BiondiniF.FrangopolD. M., eds.), CRC Press, London, 2023, pp. 2187–2194. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003323020-267.
164.
BrustadT. F.PedersenA.BangB.A Field Study of Sensors for Winter Road Assessment. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 7, 2020, p. 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100206.
GargN.BrillD.TeubertC.WeinmannT.JohnsonK.Restoration of Data Collection System at Denver International Airport. Proc., T&DI Congress 2011: Integrated Transportation and Development for a Better Tomorrow, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2011, pp. 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1061/41167(398)83.
179.
DoyleJ. D.CoxB. C.TingleJ. S.HodoW. D.CarrH. T.DonovanP. R.Construction of Instrumented “Smart” Runway. Proc., Airfield and Highway Pavements 2021, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2021, pp. 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483527.
180.
MidtfjordA. D.De BinR.HusebyA. B.A Decision Support System for Safer Airplane Landings: Predicting Runway Conditions Using XGBoost and Explainable AI. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 199, 2022, p. 103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103556.
181.
Klein-PasteA.BuggeH.-J.HusebyA. B.A Decision Support Model to Assess the Braking Performance on Snow and Ice Contaminated Runways. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 117, 2015, pp. 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.06.002.
HongS. B.YunH. S.YumS. G.RyuS. Y.JeongI. S.KimJ.Development of Black Ice Prediction Model Using GIS-Based Multi-Sensor Model Validation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 22, 2022, pp. 3435–3459. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3435-2022.
187.
KimS.LeeJ.YoonT.Road Surface Conditions Forecasting in Rainy Weather Using Artificial Neural Networks. Safety Science, Vol. 140, 2021, p. 105302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105302.
188.
TongucxG.AkcxayI. H.GurbuzH.Improvement of the Visual Warning System for Various Driving and Road Conditions in Road Transportation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 232, No. 2, 2018, pp. 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407017690962.
189.
FinogeevA.FinogeevA.FionovaL.LyapinA.LychaginK. A.Intelligent Monitoring System for Smart Road Environment. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, Vol. 15, 2019, pp. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2019.05.003.
190.
Siems-AndersonA. R.WalkerC. L.WienerG.MahoneyW. P.HauptS. E.An Adaptive Big Data Weather System for Surface Transportation. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 3, 2019, p. 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100071.
191.
TahirM. N.KatzM.Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11p, LTE and 5G in Connected Vehicles for Cooperative Awareness. Engineering Reports, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2021, p. e12467. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12467.
192.
SukuvaaraT.MäenpääK.StepanovaD.KarsistoV.Vehicular Networking Road Weather Information System Tailored for Arctic Winter Conditions. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2020, pp. 281–288. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijcnis.v12i2.4595.
193.
LiuQ.TangA.WangZ.ZhaoB.Exploring the Road Icing Risk: Considering the Dependence of Icing-Inducing Factors. Natural Hazards, Vol. 115, 2023, pp. 2161–2178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05632-0.
194.
KarP.FengS.Intelligent Traffic Prediction by Combining Weather and Road Traffic Condition Information: A Deep Learning-Based Approach. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, Vol. 21, 2023, pp. 506–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-023-00362-4.
195.
WangS.WangT.PeiX.WangH.ZhuQ.TangT.HouT.Highway Icing Time Prediction with Deep Learning Approaches Based on Data from Road Sensors. Science China, Vol. 66, No. 7, 2023, pp. 1987–1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2230-8.
196.
PadarthyM.HeynsE.Identification and Classification of Slippery Winter Road Conditions Using Commonly Available Vehicle Variables. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 60–70.
197.
VaitkusA.GražulyteJ.SkrodenisE.KravcovasI.Design of Frost Resistant Pavement Structure Based on Road Weather Stations (RWSs) Data. Sustainability, Vol. 8, 2016, p. 1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121328.
198.
LiuZ.BlandJ.BaoT.BillmireM.BiniyazA.Real-Time Computing of Pavement Conditions in Cold Regions: A Large-Scale Application with Road Weather Information System. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 184, 2021, p. 103228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103228.
199.
NakamuraY.HagiwaraT.TakahashiS.NagataY.TsurumakiR.MatsuokaN.Investigation of Road Visibility Conditions Using Precipitation Intensity Measured by Weather Radar During Winter Seasons. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 15, 2024, pp. 2395–2412. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.15.2395.
200.
OjanperäT.ScholliersJ.SukuvaaraT.SalkariI.ZhangH.ElorantaP.5G-Enabled Road Safety and Cybersecurity Services for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Proc., 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring), Helsinki, Finland, IEEE, New York, 2021, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2021-Spring51267.2021.9448668.
