In this experimental study, comprehensive laboratory tests were conducted to investigate the mechanical properties of tire-derived aggregate (TDA) Type A and TDA–soil mixtures applicable in the construction of drainage layer, embankment fill, and backfill materials for retaining walls, pipes, and bridge abutments. This study was an investigation of the mechanical properties of TDA, as a lightweight material, and TDA–fine-grained soil mixtures for different mix ratios of 15%, 20%, 35%, 40%, 50%, and 60% of TDA-A relative to the dry weight of the soil. Various composite samples were tested using triaxial and direct shear apparatus. Measured properties include specific gravity, Proctor maximum dry density and optimal water content, unconfined compressive strength, peak compressive strength, shear strength, and hydraulic conductivity. Test results revealed that the addition of TDA to the soil significantly improved the compressive strength under confinement and permeability of the composite specimens. Based on the test results and supporting data from intensive literature reviews, the TDA–soil mixture showed very encouraging results for use in civil engineering applications as a lightweight backfill material.
WayG. B.KaloushK. E.BiligiriK. P.Asphalt-Rubber Standard Practice Guide. Rubber Pavements Association, Tempe, 2012.
2.
PourhassanA.GheniA.ElGawadyM.Using Scrap Tires as an Aggregate in Chip SealPhase II. Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 2020.
3.
RobertsF. L.KandhalP. S.BrownE. R.DunningR. L.Investigation and Evaluation of Ground Tire Rubber in Hot Mix Asphalt. NCAT Report, 1989, pp. 83–89.
4.
ASTM D6270. Standard Practice for Use of Scrap Tires in Civil Engineering Applications. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
5.
CalRecycle. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, State of California, 2020.
6.
U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association. U.S. Scrap Tire Management Summary. U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association, Washington, D.C., 2020.
7.
EdinçlilerA.BaykalG.SaygılıA.Influence of Different Processing Techniques on the Mechanical Properties of Used Tires in Embankment Construction. Waste Management, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1073–1080.
8.
LeeJ. H.SalgadoR.BernalA.LovellC. W.Shredded Tires and Rubber-Sand as Lightweight Backfill. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 2, 1999, pp. 132–141.
9.
LiH.XuY.ChenP.GeJ.WuF.Impact Energy Consumption of High-Volume Rubber Concrete with Silica Fume. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 2019, p. 1728762.
10.
GeislerE.CodyW. K.NiemiM. K. Tires for Subgrade Support. Presented at the 12th Annual Council on Forest Engineering Meeting. Conference location: Coeur d'Alene, ID, August 27–30, 1989.
11.
AhmedI.LovellC. W.Rubber Soils as Lightweight Geomaterials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1993. 1422: 61–70.
12.
BosscherP. J.EdilT. B.KuraokaS.Design of Highway Embankments Using Tire Chips. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 4, 1997, pp. 295–304.
13.
BosscherP. J.EdilT. B.EldinN. N.Construction and Performance of a Shredded Waste Tire Test Embankment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1992. 1345: 44–52.
14.
HoppeE. J.Field Study of Shredded-Tire Embankment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998. 1619: 47–54.
15.
DicksonT. H.DwyerD. F.HumphreyD. N.Prototype Tire-Shred Embankment Construction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 1755: 160–167.
16.
TandonV.VelazcoD. A.NazarianS.PicornellM.Performance Monitoring of Embankments Containing Tire Chips: Case Study. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2007, pp. 207–214.
17.
FinneyB.MaedaR.Evaluation of Tire Derived Aggregate as Media for Stormwater Treatment. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, Sacramento, CA, 2016.
18.
MahgoubA.El NaggarH.Using TDA as an Engineered Stress-Reduction Fill over Preexisting Buried Pipes. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018034.
19.
MelesD.BayatA.ChanD.One-Dimensional Compression Model for Tire-Derived Aggregate Using Large-Scale Testing Apparatus. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2014, pp. 197–204.
20.
ChengZ.LiM.LiJ.LinF.MaW.YanB.ChenG.Transformation of Nitrogen, Sulfur and Chlorine during Waste Tire Pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 104987.
21.
FinneyB.ChandlerZ. H.BruceJ. L.AppleB.Properties of Tire Derived Aggregate. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, Sacramento, CA, 2013.
22.
SheehanP. J.WarmerdamJ. M.OgleS.HumphreyD. N.PatenaudeS. M.Evaluating the Risk to Aquatic Ecosystems Posed by Leachate from Tire Shred Fill in Roads Using Toxicity Tests, Toxicity Identification Evaluations, and Groundwater Modeling. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2006, pp. 400–411.
23.
MaedaR.FinneyB.Water Quality Assessment of Submerged Tire-Derived Aggregate Fills. Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 144, No. 2, 2018, p. 04017105.
24.
HumphreyD. N.SwettM.Literature Review of the Water Quality Effects of Tire Derived Aggregate and Rubber Modified Asphalt Pavement. U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.2006.
25.
TweedieJ. J.HumphreyD. N.SandfordT. C.Full-Scale Field Trials of Tire Shreds as Lightweight Retaining Wall Backfill under at-Rest Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998. 1619: 64–71.
26.
TweedieJ. J.HumphreyD. N.SandfordT. C.Tire Shreds as Lightweight Retaining Wall Backfill: Active Conditions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998. 124: 1061–1070.
27.
HumphreyD. N.WhettenN.WeaverJ.ReckerK.CosgroveT. A.Tire Shreds as Lightweight Fill for Embankments and Retaining Walls. Recycled Materials in Geotechnical Applications. ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication, Vol. 79, 1998, pp. 51–65.
28.
FoxP. J.ThielmannS. S.SandersM. J.LathamC.GhaaowdI.McCartneyJ. S.Large-Scale Combination Direct Shear/Simple Shear Device for Tire-Derived Aggregate. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2018, pp. 340–353.
29.
GhaaowdI.McCartneyJ. S.ThielmannS. S.SandersM. J.FoxP. J.Shearing Behavior of Tire-Derived Aggregate with Large Particle Size. I: Internal and Concrete Interface Direct Shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 143, No. 10, 2017, p. 04017078.
30.
ASTM D4318. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
31.
ASTM D2488. Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
32.
ASTM D2216. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
33.
ASTM C127. Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. ASTMWest Conshohocken, PA, 2024.
34.
AASHTO T85. Standard Method of Test for the Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregates. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2022.
35.
AASHTO T99. Standard Method of Test for Moisture–Density Relations of Soils Using a 2.5-Kg (5.5-Lb) Rammer and a 305-Mm (12-in.) Drop. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.
36.
ASTM D5084. Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
37.
AASHTO T 215. Standard Method of Test for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2014.
38.
ASTM D2166. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010.
39.
ASTM D3080. Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils under Consolidated Drained Conditions. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
40.
ASTM D4767. Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
41.
AhmedI.Laboratory Study on Properties of Rubber-Soils. Purdue University, 1993.
42.
BressetteT.Used Tire Material as an Alternate Permeable Aggregate. FHWA-CA-TL-84-07 Final Report. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1984.
43.
HumphreyD. N.ManionW. P.Properties of Tire Chips for Lightweight Fill. Geotechnical Special Publication, Vol. 2, No. 30, 1992, pp. 1344–1355.
44.
EdilT. B.BosscherP. J.Engineering Properties of Tire Chips and Soil Mixtures. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, pp. 453–464.
45.
ZimmermanP. S.Compressibility, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Soil Infiltration Testing of Tire Shreds and Field Testing of a Shredded Tire Horizontal Drain, M.Sc. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA; 1997.
46.
ReddyK. R.SaichekR. E.Characterization and Performance Assessment of Shredded Scrap Tires as Leachate Drainage Material in Landfills. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, Chester, PA, 1998.
47.
DrescherA.NewcombD.HeimdahlT.Deformability of Shredded Tires. Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN, 1999.
