The incorporation of recycled asphalt material (RAM) into asphalt mixtures is a widely adopted technique in the asphalt paving industry. U.S. state agencies limit the quantity of reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycled asphalt shingles in asphalt mixtures owing, in part, to concerns about variability in performance. The variability of RAM stockpile properties within a state can lead to inconsistencies in the properties and performance of asphalt mixtures. This study aims to characterize the properties of RAM materials within stockpiles over time and across multiple asphalt plants in North Carolina, U.S. It also evaluates the variability in performance of plant-produced high recycled content mixtures in the state and investigates the potential causes for this variability. Asphalt mixtures and their constituent materials were acquired and characterized from four asphalt plants on two different dates. The results show that, while RAM properties were generally consistent within stockpiles over time, significant variations in binder properties and asphalt content were found across different plants within the state. The majority of the mixtures evaluated showed consistent rutting and cracking performance. Variability in cracking performance across plants could be linked to the properties of the recycled and virgin binders. The differences in cracking and rutting performance between the first and second samples acquired from a given plant closely mirrored asphalt content differences.
XiaoF.SuN.YaoS.AmirkhanianS.WangJ.Performance Grades, Environmental and Economic Investigations of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 211, 2019, pp. 1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.126
2.
CopelandA.Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixtures: State of the Practice. Report No. FHWA-HRT-11-021. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, 2011.
3.
HassanM. M.LodgeA.MohammadL. N.W. “Bill” King. Variability and Characteristics of Recycled Asphalt Shingles Sampled from Different Sources. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2014, pp. 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000876
4.
ZhouF.LiH.HuS.ButtonJ. W.EppsJ. A.Characterization and Best Use of Recycled Asphalt Shingles in Hot-Mix Asphalt. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6614-2. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, 2013.
5.
HandA. J. T.AschenbrenerT. B.Successful Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixtures. Report No. WRSC-TR-21-10. University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 2021.
6.
HandA. J. T.AschenbrenerT.CooperS.A Field Review: Successful Practices and Lessons Learned When Using Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles in Asphalt Mixtures. Report No. WRSC-TR-20-01. University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 2020.
7.
ZaumanisM.OgaJ.HaritonovsV.How to Reduce Reclaimed Asphalt Variability: A Full-Scale Study. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 188, 2018, pp. 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.137
8.
HajjE. Y.SebaalyP. E.ShresthaR.Laboratory Evaluation of Mixes Containing Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP). Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2009, pp. 495–517. https://doi.org/10.3166/rmpd.10.495-517
9.
BonaquistR.Effect of Recovered Binders from Recycled Shingles and Increased RAP Percentages on Resultant Binder PG. Report No. WHRP 11-13. Wisconsin Highway Research Program, Sterling, VA, 2011.
10.
AustermanA. J.MogawerW. S.StuartK. D.Variability of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Properties within a State and Its Effects on RAP Specifications. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674(6): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120917679
11.
KhoslaN. P.RamojuS. S.Characterization of Different RAP Sources. Report No. FHWA/NC/2014-05. Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2017.
12.
National Center for Asphalt Technology. Moving Towards Balanced Mix Design for Asphalt Mixtures. Asphalt Technology News, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2017, pp. 1–5.
13.
YazdipanahF.KhedmatiM.HaghshenasH. F.Nebraska Balanced Mix Design - Phase I. Report No. SPR-FY22(002). University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 2023.
14.
NewcombD.InvestigatorP.Balanced Design of Asphalt Mixtures. Report No. MN/RC 2018-22. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, 2018.
15.
WestR.YinF.RodeznoC.TaylorA.Balanced Mixture Design Implementation Support. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 2021.
16.
BowersB. F.LynnT.YinF.MooreN.DiefenderferS.BozI.Impact of Production Variability on Balanced Mix Designs in Virginia. Report No. FHWA/VTRC 23-R20. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, 2023.
17.
MogawerW. S.StuartK. D.AustermanA. J.ZhouF.RomeroP.Balanced Mix Design Sensitivity to Production Tolerance Limits and Binder Source. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 88, 2019, pp. 375–399.
18.
AustermanA. J.MogawerW. S.StuartK. D.Influence of Production Considerations on Balanced Mixture Designs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672(28): 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118786826
19.
RahmanM.HarveyJ.BuscheckJ.BrotschiJ.MateosA.JonesD.PourtahmasbS.Laboratory Performance and Construction Challenges for Plant Produced Asphalt Mixes Containing RAP and RAS. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 403, 2023, p. 133082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133082
20.
NCDOT. Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC, 2024.
21.
NCDOT. Asphalt Quality Management System. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC, 2024.
22.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 308-21. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Asphalt Mixtures by the Ignition Method. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2021.
23.
ASTM. Designation: D6857/D6857M - 23. Standard Test Method for Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Asphalt Mixtures Using Automatic Vacuum Sealing Method. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023.
24.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 164-22. Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
25.
ASTM. Designation: D5404. Standard Practice for Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Solution Using the Rotary Evaporator. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
26.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 240. Standard Method of Test for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt Binder (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2023.
27.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: M 323-22. Standard Specification for Superpave Volumetric Mix Design. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
28.
CastorenaC.FriedA.PreciadoJ.GulzarS.AlvisM. C. A.XueL. G.Screening of Asphalt Extenders and Recycling Agents. Report No. FHWA/NC/2020-16. North Carolina Department of Transportation. Research and Development Unit, Raleigh, NC, 2023.
29.
FriedA.XueL. G.GulzarS.PreciadoJ.UnderwoodB. S.CastorenaC.Evaluation of Recycling Agent and Extender Dosage Selection Procedures to Restore the High-Temperature Climatic Performance Grade. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676(6): 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221074361
30.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: R 28-22. Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
31.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 315-22. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
32.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: M 320-23. Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2023.
33.
ASTM. Designation: D7643 − 16. Standard Practice for Determining the Continuous Grading Temperatures and Continuous Grades for PG Graded Asphalt Binders. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
34.
AlvisM. A.PapeS.XueL. G.CastorenaC.Effects of Asphalt Mixture Constituents on the Recycled Binder Contribution. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677(11): 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231165021
35.
FriedA.CastorenaC.Practical Methods to Construct Asphalt Binder Master Curves and Calculate Christensen – Anderson Model Parameters. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677(12): 647–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231169274
36.
AndersonR. M.KingG. N.HansonD. I.BlankenshipP. B.Evaluation of the Relationship Between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Prepared Discussion, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 615–664.
37.
AndersonR. M.KingG. N.HansonD. I.BlankenshipP. B.Evaluation of the Relationship between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 615–664.
38.
GloverC. J.DavisonR. R.DomkeC. H.RuanY.JuristyariniP.KnorrD. B.JungS. H.Development of a New Method for Assessing Asphalt Binder Durability with Field Validation. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/1872-2. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, 2005.
39.
ElkashefM.HungS. S.HarveyJ. T.JonesD.Assessing the Use of Blending Charts to Estimate the Allowable Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Binder Content for Mixes Containing Rap from Different Sources. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2020, pp. 3132–3147. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20200106
40.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 30-21. Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2021.
41.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 209-20. Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2020.
42.
AASHTO. AASHTO Designation: T 340-23. Standard Method of Test for Determining Rutting Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2023.
43.
ASTM. Designation: D8225 - 19. Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test at Intermediate Temperature. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
44.
LaCroixA. T.Performance Prediction of the NCAT Test Track Pavements Using Mechanistic Models. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2013.
45.
CastorenaC.PapeS.XueG. L.MocelinD.AlvisM. C. A.RavichandranM.Improving the Design of RAP and RAS Mixtures. Report No. FHWA/NC/2019-21. Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2022.
46.
DuarteG. M.FaxinaA. L.Low-Temperature and Fatigue Properties of Asphalt Binders Modified with Crumb Rubber from Discarded Tires and Recycled Low-Density Polyethylene. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 9, 2022, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004365
47.
ZhouF.Development of an IDEAL Cracking Test for Asphalt Mix Design, Quality Control and Quality Assurance. NCHRP IDEA Project 195. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2019.
