Evaluating the Sensitivity of Intermediate Temperature Performance Tests to Multiple Loose Mixture Aging Conditions Using the FHWA Accelerated Loading Facility’s RAP/RAS Experiment

Abstract

With the advancement of Balanced Mixture Design (BMD), laboratory performance tests for asphalt materials are being assessed for their relation to cracking performance in the field. However, most BMD applications do not account for long-term aging. This gap limits the appropriateness of thresholds and the potential of BMD to improve pavement performance as more amounts of the additives and reclaimed materials available can behave in drastically different fashions between early, intermediate, and late stages of service. In this study, five mixtures with documented field performance from the Federal Highway Administration’s Accelerated Loading Facility were subjected to long-term oven aging (LTOA) protocols. In addition to reheating loose mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and shingles, the two LTOA methods were 8 h at 135°C and 3 d at 95°C. The objective of this paper is to compare aging approaches, particularly whether equivalence between long-term aged procedures exists, and to highlight the sensitivity (or lack thereof) of common laboratory mixture performance tests. The Indirect Tensile Cracking (IDEAL-CT), Illinois Flexibility Index, Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester cyclic fatigue, and dynamic modulus tests were employed. The results show a collapse in mixture cracking indices when LTOA is incorporated, raising concerns over BMD implementation using criteria established exclusively with short-term oven aging. Use of $\frac{|E^{*}|}{\sin (\delta )}$ presented a universal and logic shift in response from the reheated to LTOA state, affirming utility as an aging index. Blending insights can possibly be gleaned from the data, although 95 and 135°C LTOA procedures yield mostly equivalent linear viscoelastic and cracking indices.