In recent years, substantial global efforts have promoted walking as a mode of active transportation because of its health benefits, environmental friendliness, and ability to reduce traffic congestion, among other advantages. However, increased walking also raises the risk of pedestrian injuries through greater exposure to traffic. While numerous studies have investigated the factors influencing pedestrian crash severity in developed countries, comprehensive analyses focusing on low- and middle-income countries remain limited. This study investigated factors influencing pedestrian-injury severity in the Republic of Serbia, using multinomial logistic regression analysis on crash data from 2016 to 2020. Key findings revealed that injury severity is significantly influenced by pedestrian age and gender, crash location, vehicle type, weather and surface conditions, time of day, and land use. Pedestrians over 65, incidents during morning and night periods, crashes involving trucks or buses, collisions on national roads, female pedestrians, and midblock locations are notably associated with higher odds of fatal and serious injuries. To enhance pedestrian safety, the study suggests implementing educational measures targeting older adults and women, focusing on safe road-crossing practices and the use of fluorescent clothing. Engineering interventions should include protective barriers, speed limits, improved lighting, and marked pedestrian crossings at midblock locations. Increased enforcement is recommended during high-risk times and locations, alongside better regulation of truck movements in pedestrian-heavy areas. Emergency medical services improvements are essential for ensuring rapid response to pedestrian crashes. This study underscores the need for advanced models and comprehensive data to better understand pedestrian-injury factors.
World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World (Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
3.
World Health Organization. Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021–2030 (No. WPR/2022/VNM/001). WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, 2022.
4.
PljakićM.JovanovićD.MatovićB.The Influence of Traffic-Infrastructure Factors on Pedestrian Accidents at the Macro-Level: The Geographically Weighted Regression Approach. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 83, 2022, pp. 248–259.
5.
TiwariG.Progress in Pedestrian Safety Research. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2020, pp. 35–43.
6.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023 (Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
7.
ObinguarD. D.Iryo-AsanoM.Macroscopic Analysis on the Frequency and Severity of Pedestrian Crashes on National Roads in Metro Manila, Philippines. IATSS Research, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2021, pp. 521–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.06.003
8.
ChimbaD.MusinguziA.KidandoE.Associating Pedestrian Crashes with Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors. Case Study on Transport Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 11–16.
9.
ButtonK.HensherD. A.Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control. Emerald Publishing, Pergamon, 2001.
10.
The World Bank. Pedestrian Mobility for Urban Growth. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2019.
11.
TanRAP. Tanzania Road Assessment Program. International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP).
12.
ZegeerC. V.BushellM.Pedestrian Crash Trends and Potential Countermeasures from Around the World. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2012, pp. 3–11.
13.
PljakićM.JovanovićD.MatovićB.MićićS.Macro-Level Accident Modeling in Novi Sad: A Spatial Regression Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 132, 2019, p. 105259.
14.
ZhuM.SzeN. N.NewnamS.Effect of Urban Street Trees on Pedestrian Safety: A Micro-Level Pedestrian Casualty Model Using Multivariate Bayesian Spatial Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 176, 2022, p. 106818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106818
15.
SuJ.SzeN. N.Safety of Walking Trips Accessing to Public Transportation: A Bayesian Spatial Model in Hong Kong. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 29, 2022, pp. 125–135.
16.
RankavatS.TiwariG.Pedestrians Risk Perception of Traffic Crash and Built Environment Features—Delhi, India. Safety Science, Vol. 87, 2016, pp. 1–7.
17.
LiY.SongL.FanW. (David). Day-of-the-Week Variations and Temporal Instability of Factors Influencing Pedestrian Injury Severity in Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes: A Random Parameters Logit Approach with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 29, 2021, p. 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2020.100152
18.
MirhashemiA.AmirifarS.Tavakoli KashaniA.ZouX.Macro-Level Literature Analysis on Pedestrian Safety: Bibliometric Overview, Conceptual Frames, and Trends. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 174, 2022, p. 106720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106720
19.
New Zealand Transport Agency. Crash Estimation Compendium – New Zealand Crash Risk Factors Guideline. New Zealand Transport Agency. Victoria Arcade, New Zealand.
20.
TarkoA.AzamM. S.Pedestrian Injury Analysis with Consideration of the Selectivity Bias in Linked Police-Hospital Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1689–1695.
21.
LipovacK.VujanicM.MaricB.NesicM.The Influence of a Pedestrian Countdown Display on Pedestrian Behavior at Signalized Pedestrian Crossings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 20, 2013, pp. 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.07.002
22.
StokerP.Garfinkel-CastroA.KhayesiM.OderoW.MwangiM. N.PedenM.EwingR.Pedestrian Safety and the Built Environment. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2015, pp. 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595438
23.
BehnoodA.ManneringF.Time-of-Day Variations and Temporal Instability of Factors Affecting Injury Severities in Large-Truck Crashes. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 23, 2019, p. 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2019.100102
24.
YagilD.Beliefs, Motives and Situational Factors Related to Pedestrians’ Self-Reported Behavior at Signal-Controlled Crossings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00004-8
25.
RenG.ZhouZ.WangW.ZhangY.WangW.Crossing Behaviors of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections: Observational Study and Survey in China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2264(1): 65–73.
26.
ForbesJ. J.HabibM. A.Pedestrian Injury Severity Levels in the Halifax Regional Municipality, Nova Scotia, Canada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2519(1): 172–178. https://doi.org/10.3141/2519-19
27.
ZamaniA.BehnoodA.DavoodiS. R.Temporal Stability of Pedestrian Injury Severity in Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes: New Insights from Random Parameter Logit Model with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 32, 2021, p. 100184.
28.
IhssianA.IsmailK.Modelling Pedestrian Safety at Urban Intersections Using User Perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 180, 2023, p. 106912.
29.
KimJ.-K.UlfarssonG. F.ShankarV. N.KimS.Age and Pedestrian Injury Severity in Motor-Vehicle Crashes: A Heteroskedastic Logit Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.005
30.
MaringW.van SchagenI.Age Dependence of Attitudes and Knowledge in Cyclists. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1990, pp. 127–136.
31.
DeLuciaP. R.Kathryn BleckleyM.MeyerL. E.BushJ. M.Judgments about Collision in Younger and Older Drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, pp. 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00047-5
32.
ZhaiX.HuangH.SzeN. N.SongZ.HonK. K.Diagnostic Analysis of the Effects of Weather Condition on Pedestrian Crash Severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 122, 2019, pp. 318–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.017
33.
JensenS.Pedestrian Safety in Denmark. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1674(1): 61–69.
34.
OxleyJ. A.IhsenE.FildesB. N.CharltonJ. L.DayR. H.Crossing Roads Safely: An Experimental Study of Age Differences in Gap Selection by Pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2005, pp. 962–971.
35.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Pedestrian Safety Prediction Methodology. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
36.
ZhuH.Iryo-AsanoM.AlhajyaseenW. K. M.NakamuraH.DiasC.Interactions Between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians at Unsignalized Mid-Block Crosswalks Considering Occlusions by Opposing Vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 163, 2021, p. 106468.
37.
Pour-RouholaminM.ZhouH.Investigating the Risk Factors Associated with Pedestrian Injury Severity in Illinois. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 57, 2016, pp. 9–17.
38.
XinC.GuoR.WangZ.LuQ.LinP.-S.The Effects of Neighborhood Characteristics and the Built Environment on Pedestrian Injury Severity: A Random Parameters Generalized Ordered Probability Model with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 16, 2017, pp. 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2017.10.001
39.
ZafriN. M.PrithulA. A.BaralI.RahmanM.Exploring the Factors Influencing Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Severity in Dhaka, Bangladesh. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2020, pp. 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2020.1774618
40.
ZhangC.ChenF.WeiY.Evaluation of Pedestrian Crossing Behavior and Safety at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Crosswalks with Different Numbers of Lanes in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 123, 2019, pp. 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.002
41.
AbayK. A.Examining Pedestrian-Injury Severity Using Alternative Disaggregate Models. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2013, pp. 123–136.
42.
BehnoodA.ManneringF. L.An Empirical Assessment of the Effects of Economic Recessions on Pedestrian-Injury Crashes Using Mixed and Latent-Class Models. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 12, 2016, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.07.002
43.
LiuP.HuangJ.WangW.XuC.Effects of Transverse Rumble Strips on Safety of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Rural Roads in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1947–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.012
44.
WierM.WeintraubJ.HumphreysE. H.SetoE.BhatiaR.An Area-Level Model of Vehicle-Pedestrian Injury Collisions with Implications for Land Use and Transportation Planning. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 137–145.
45.
LiuJ.HainenA.LiX.NieQ.NambisanS.Pedestrian Injury Severity in Motor Vehicle Crashes: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Modeling Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 132, 2019, p. 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105272
46.
EluruN.BhatC. R.HensherD. A.A Mixed Generalized Ordered Response Model for Examining Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injury Severity Level in Traffic Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1033–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.11.010
47.
StipancicJ.St-AubinP. G.Ledezma-NavarroB.LabbeA.SaunierN.Miranda-MorenoL.Evaluating Safety-Influencing Factors at Stop-Controlled Intersections Using Automated Video Analysis. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 77, 2021, pp. 311–323.
48.
SiddiquiN. A.ChuX.GuttenplanM.Crossing Locations, Light Conditions, and Pedestrian Injury Severity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1982(1): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198200118
49.
KohP. P.WongY. D.ChandrasekarP.Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Behaviour and Violations at Signalised Pedestrian Crossings. Safety Science, Vol. 70, 2014, pp. 143–152.
50.
ZhaoJ.MalenjeJ. O.WuJ.MaR.Modeling the Interaction Between Vehicle Yielding and Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Midblock Crosswalks. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 73, 2020, pp. 222–235.
51.
MukherjeeD.MitraS.Comprehensive Study of Risk Factors for Fatal Pedestrian Crashes in Urban Setup in a Developing Country. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674(8): 100–118.
52.
KimD.The Transportation Safety of Elderly Pedestrians: Modeling Contributing Factors to Elderly Pedestrian Collisions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 131, 2019, pp. 268–274.
53.
GyllencreutzL.BjörnstigJ.RolfsmanE.SavemanB.Outdoor Pedestrian Fall-Related Injuries Among Swedish Senior Citizens—Injuries and Preventive Strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2015, pp. 225–233.
54.
SongL.LiY.FanW. (David)WuP.Modeling Pedestrian-Injury Severities in Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes Considering Spatiotemporal Patterns: Insights from Different Hierarchical Bayesian Random-Effects Models. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 28, 2020, p. 100137.
55.
TayR.ChoiJ.KattanL.KhanA.A Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian–Vehicle Crash Severity. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2011, pp. 233–249.
56.
MohamedM. G.SaunierN.Miranda-MorenoL. F.UkkusuriS. V.A Clustering Regression Approach: A Comprehensive Injury Severity Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Crashes in New York, US and Montreal, Canada. Safety Science, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 27–37.
57.
Vorko-JovićA.KernJ.BiloglavZ.Risk Factors in Urban Road Traffic Accidents. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006, pp. 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2005.08.009
58.
UlfarssonG. F.ManneringF. L.Differences in Male and Female Injury Severities in Sport-Utility Vehicle, Minivan, Pickup and Passenger Car Accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2004, pp. 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00135-5
59.
SalonD.McIntyreA.. Determinants of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Severity by Party at Fault in San Francisco, CA. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 110, 2018, pp. 149–160.
60.
ZhangG.YauK. K. W.ZhangX.Analyzing Fault and Severity in Pedestrian–Motor Vehicle Accidents in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 141–150.
61.
SarkarS.TayR.HuntJ. D.Logistic Regression Model of Risk of Fatality in Vehicle–Pedestrian Crashes on National Highways in Bangladesh. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2264(1): 128–137.
62.
ChenZ.FanW. (David). A Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Severity in North Carolina. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.10.001
63.
NohY.KimM.YoonY.Elderly Pedestrian Safety in a Rapidly Aging Society—Commonality and Diversity Between the Younger-Old and Older-Old. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, No. 8, 2018, pp. 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1509209
64.
XiaoD.ŠarićŽ.XuX.YuanQ.Investigating Injury Severity of Pedestrian–Vehicle Crashes by Integrating Latent Class Cluster Analysis and Unbalanced Panel Mixed Ordered Probit Model. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2023, pp. 83–102.
65.
ChungY.Injury Severity Analysis in Taxi-Pedestrian Crashes: An Application of Reconstructed Crash Data Using a Vehicle Black Box. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 111, 2018, pp. 345–353.
66.
ZajacS. S.IvanJ. N.Factors Influencing Injury Severity of Motor Vehicle-Crossing Pedestrian Crashes in Rural Connecticut. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2003, pp. 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00013-1
67.
AzizH. M. A.UkkusuriS. V.HasanS.Exploring the Determinants of Pedestrian–Vehicle Crash Severity in New York City. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 1298–1309.
68.
HaleemK.AlluriP.GanA.Analyzing Pedestrian Crash Injury Severity at Signalized and Non-Signalized Locations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 81, 2015, pp. 14–23.
69.
ChangL.-Y.ManneringF.Analysis of Injury Severity and Vehicle Occupancy in Truck-and Non-Truck-Involved Accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1999, pp. 579–592.
70.
Dornier Consulting International & SeConS Development Initiative Group. Gender Equality in Transport in Serbia (Project ID: P108005). Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. Belgrade, Serbia., 2019.
71.
AlogailiA.ManneringF.Differences Between Day and Night Pedestrian-Injury Severities: Accounting for Temporal and Unobserved Effects in Prediction. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 33, 2022, p. 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2021.100201
EvansJ. D.Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, Belmont, CA, 1996.
74.
SavolainenP.ManneringF.Probabilistic Models of Motorcyclists’ Injury Severities in Single- and Multi-Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2007, pp. 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.016
75.
HausmanJ.McFaddenD.. Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model. Econometrica, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1984, pp. 1219–1240.
76.
SalumJ. H.KitaliA. E.BwireH.SandoT.AlluriP.Severity of Motorcycle Crashes in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2019, pp. 189–195.
77.
YannisG.PapadimitriouE.TheofilatosA.Pedestrian Gap Acceptance for Mid-Block Street Crossing. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2013, pp. 450–462.
78.
LamW. W. Y.YaoS.LooB. P. Y.Pedestrian Exposure Measures: A Time-Space Framework. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2014, pp. 22–30.
79.
SongL.LiY.FanW. (David)LiuP.Mixed Logit Approach to Analyzing Pedestrian Injury Severity in Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes in North Carolina: Considering Time-of-Day and Day-of-Week. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2021, pp. 524–529.
80.
WangK.ZhangW.JinL.FengZ.ZhuD.CongH.YuH.Diagnostic Analysis of Environmental Factors Affecting the Severity of Traffic Crashes: From the Perspective of Pedestrian–Vehicle and Vehicle–Vehicle Collisions. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2022, pp. 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.1995602
81.
ChenY.MaJ.ChenN.Analyzing Pedestrian Fatality Risk in Accidents at Mid-Blocks. Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2019, pp. 171–192.
82.
SunM.SunX.ShanD.Pedestrian Crash Analysis with Latent Class Clustering Method. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 124, 2019, pp. 50–57.
