Roadside and median barriers have proven effective in preventing crashes; however, a significant number of crashes still occur that involve road barriers across United States. This study focuses on analyzing the factors related to barrier crashes across Texas. The dataset includes 63,475 crashes involving road barriers and covering six years of crash data (2017–2022). Using cluster correspondence analysis (CCA) data mining approach, the study identifies six different clusters of crashes. Each cluster identifies factors contributing to barrier-related crashes. Before implying the CCA, variable importance analysis is also performed to identify the significance of the variables. The analysis highlighted that dry road surface conditions and clear weather are highly associated with high-speed crashes. Driver distraction and absence of traffic control devices can attribute to the crashes on roads with lower speed limits. Moreover, along with other factors, adverse weather conditions are also found to be a contributing factor that can influence the crash frequency and type of crashes. The analysis also implies that non-complex crash type related to a single vehicle are highly correlated with barrier crashes. The study concludes by making several policy-making implications to assist the transportation planners in reducing the frequency and severity of barrier-related crashes.
HosseinpourM.HaleemK.Examining Crash Injury Severity and Barrier-Hit Outcomes from Cable Barriers and Strong-Post Guardrails on Alabama’s Interstate Highways. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 78, 2021, pp. 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.009.
3.
ZouY.TarkoA. P.Barrier-Relevant Crash Modification Factors and Average Costs of Crashes on Arterial Roads in Indiana. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 111, 2018, pp. 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.020.
4.
MolanA. M.RezapourM.KsaibatiK.Investigating the Relationship Between Crash Severity, Traffic Barrier Type, and Vehicle Type in Crashes Involving Traffic Barrier. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020, pp. 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.03.004.
5.
HuW.DonnellE. T.Median Barrier Crash Severity: Some New Insights. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1697–1704.
6.
CandappaN. L.An Investigation of Fatal and Serious Injury Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Using Crash Data and Software Simulation. 2021. https://doi.org/10.26180/13728343.
7.
ChimbaD.EmaasitD.AllenS.HurstB.NelsonM.Factors Affecting Median Cable Barrier Crash Frequency: New Insights. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2014, pp. 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2013.812168.
8.
ChangF.XuP.ZhouH.ChanA. H. S.HuangH.Investigating Injury Severities of Motorcycle Riders: A Two-Step Method Integrating Latent Class Cluster Analysis and Random Parameters Logit Model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 131, 2019, pp. 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.012.
9.
LiZ.ChenC.CiY.ZhangG.WuQ.LiuC.QianZ.Examining Driver Injury Severity in Intersection-Related Crashes Using Cluster Analysis and Hierarchical Bayesian Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 120, 2018, pp. 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.009.
10.
NilssonD.LindmanM.VictorT.DozzaM.Definition of Run-off-Road Crash Clusters-for Safety Benefit Estimation and Driver Assistance Development. Accident; Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 113, 2018, pp. 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.011.
11.
GabauerD. J.LiX.Influence of Horizontally Curved Roadway Section Characteristics on Motorcycle-to-Barrier Crash Frequency. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.006.
12.
AtahanA. O.HiekmannJ. M.HimpeJ.MarraJ.Development of a Continuous Motorcycle Protection Barrier System Using Computer Simulation and Full-Scale Crash Testing. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 116, 2018, pp. 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.005.
13.
BambachM. R.GrzebietaR. H.McIntoshA. S.The Crash Mechanics of Fatal Motorcycle–Barrier Collisions in Australasia. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2013, pp. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2012.700389.
14.
ChaJ. G.Chul HonB.HanB. K., and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Experimental Study for the Possibility of Using of External Inversion Crash Box on Sloped Crash Barrier. Proc., 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Seoul, South Korea, 2013.
15.
ChellJ.BrandaniC. E.FraschettiS.ChakravertyJ.CamomillaV.Limitations of the European Barrier Crash Testing Regulation Relating to Occupant Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 133, 2019, p. 105239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.015.
16.
CrespoS.Perez-RapelaD.Román-MarínJ.Martin-VázquezF.Luzón-NarroJ.Arregui-DalmasesC., and International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI). Structural Optimisation in Vehicle Development for the Current Euro NCAP Side Crash Protocol: How to Minimise the Structural Changes due to the Current Barrier Stiffness and Geometry. Presented at the IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Malaga, Spain, 2016.
17.
CrowtherS.SwearsR.Longswamp to Rangiriri Wire Rope Barrier: Increased Crash Numbers but Improved Road Safety. Proc., ARRB Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2010.
18.
HammondsB. R.TroutbeckR.Crash Test Outcomes for Three Generic Barrier Types. Proc., ARRB Conference, Perth, Australia, 2012.
19.
HuH.LuW.-J.LuZ.Impact Crash Analyses of an Off-Road Utility Vehicle—Part II: Simulation of Frontal Pole, Pole Side, Rear Barrier and Rollover Impact Crashes. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012, pp. 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2011.632858.
20.
JohnsonN. S.GablerH. C.Reduction in Fatal Longitudinal Barrier Crash Rate due to Electronic Stability Control. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2521: 79–85.
21.
MolanA. M.MoomenM.KsaibatiK.The Impact of Traffic Barrier Geometric Features on Crash Frequency and Injury Severity of Non-Interstate Highways. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 75, 2020, pp. 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.005.
22.
MolanA. M.RezapourM.KsaibatiK.Modeling Traffic Barriers Crash Severity by Considering the Effect of Traffic Barrier Dimensions. Journal of Modern Transportation, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2019, pp. 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-019-0186-1.
23.
RezapourM.KsaibatiK.Application of Multi-Group Structural Equation Modelling for Investigation of Traffic Barrier Crash Severity. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2020, pp. 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2020.1734943.
24.
RezapourM.KsaibatiK.Application of Machine Learning Technique for Optimizing Roadside Design to Decrease Barrier Crash Costs, a Quantile Regression Model Approach. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 78, 2021, pp. 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.002.
25.
RezapourM.KsaibatiK.MoomenM.Application of Quantile Mixed Model for Modeling Traffic Barrier Crash Cost. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 148, 2020, p. 105795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105795.
26.
RezapourM.WulffS. S.KsaibatiK.Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling of Traffic Barrier Crash Severity. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2020, pp. 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2020.1849312.
27.
ZulkiffliN. S.RoslanA.HarunN. Z.Effect of Median Barrier Types on Crash Severity at Rural Expressway. Publication 9789675967924. Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research, Kuala Lumpur, 2016, 53p.
28.
DasS.HossainM. M.RahmanM. A.KongX.SunX.MamunG. M. A.Understanding Patterns of Moped and Seated Motor Scooter (50 Cc or Less) Involved Fatal Crashes Using Cluster Correspondence Analysis. Transportmetrica A Transport Science, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2023, p. 2029613. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2022.2029613.
29.
Ashifur RahmanM.DasS.SunX.Using Cluster Correspondence Analysis to Explore Rainy Weather Crashes in Louisiana. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 159–173.
30.
DasS.TabeshM.DadashovaB.DobrovolnyC.Diagnosis of Encroachment-Related Work-Zone Crashes by Applying Pattern Recognition. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677: 222–236.
31.
GreenwellB. M.BoehmkeB. C.Variable Importance Plots—An Introduction to the Vip Package. The R Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2020, pp. 343–366. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2020-013.
SourialN.WolfsonC.ZhuB.QuailJ.FletcherJ.KarunananthanS.Bandeen-RocheK.BélandF.BergmanH.Correspondence Analysis Is a Useful Tool to Uncover the Relationships Among Categorical Variables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2010, pp. 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008.
ZhouY.ZhangX.WangJ.GongY.Research on Speaker Feature Dimension Reduction Based on CCA and PCA. Presented at the 2010 International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing (WCSP), Suzhou, China, October 21–23, 2010.
37.
HsuL. L.CulhaneA. C.Correspondence Analysis for Dimension Reduction, Batch Integration, and Visualization of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data. Scientific Reports, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2023, p. 1197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26434-1.
38.
WarnerJ.ChawlaH.ZhouC.SavolainenP. T.Analysis of Rural Interstate Fatality Rates in Consideration of Recent Increases in Maximum Statutory Speed Limits. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 48–58.
39.
JazayeriA.MartinezJ. R. B.LoebH. S.YangC. C.The Impact of Driver Distraction and Secondary Tasks With and Without Other Co-Occurring Driving Behaviors on the Level of Road Traffic Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 106010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106010.
40.
HasanA. S.JalayerM.HeitmannE.WeissJ.Distracted Driving Crashes: A Review on Data Collection, Analysis, and Crash Prevention Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 423–434.
41.
BrydenJ. E.Work Zone Crashes Involving Traffic Control Devices, Safety Features, and Work Vehicles and Equipment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2015: 64–70.
42.
PisanoP. A.GoodwinL. C.RossettiM. A.U.S. Highway Crashes in Adverse Road Weather Conditions. Proc., 88th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2008.
43.
PathivadaB. K.BanerjeeA.HaleemK.Impact of Real-Time Weather Conditions on Crash Injury Severity in Kentucky Using the Correlated Random Parameters Logit Model with Heterogeneity in Means. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 196, 2024, p. 107453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107453.
44.
BahouthG.Real World Crash Evaluation of Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) Technology. Annual Proceedings / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Vol. 49, 2005, pp. 19–34.
45.
WangX.Abdel-AtyM.Modeling Left-Turn Crash Occurrence at Signalized Intersections by Conflicting Patterns. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.006.
46.
GallowayA. J.BareissM.HasegawaT.SheronyR.RiexingerL. E.Evaluation of Intersection Crashes Using Naturalistic Driving Data Through the Lens of Future I-ADAS. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2023, pp. 577–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2023.2237621.
