Evaluation of Run-off-Road Crashes Involving Battery-Electric Vehicles

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are increasing in popularity and are among the fastest-growing segments in new vehicle sales. Battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) are the highest-selling class of EV. BEVs use a unique frame construction (i.e., a “skateboard” chassis) with a heavy battery pack located below the occupant’s floorpan, and are heavier and have lower centers-of-gravity than internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs)—factors that could affect their crashworthiness with roadside features. A crash study was performed to compare the crash conditions for BEVs to ICEVs and hybrid-electric vehicles (HEVs) covering the numbers of vehicles, posted speed limits, crash locations, time of day, weather conditions, crash severities, and roadside fixed objects struck. Eight state departments of transportation provided crash data spanning 5 years that included vehicle identification numbers or make, model, and year combinations, which were used to isolate BEVs from ICEVs. Crash results were reviewed and EV crash conditions were found to be similar to those of ICEV and HEV crash conditions. Moreover, the frequency of run-off-road crashes was similar for BEVs and ICEVs. Because no substantial differences were observed between the two datasets, it is recommended that impact conditions described in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware be utilized during preliminary evaluation of roadside hardware using electric vehicles.

Keywords

safety safety performance and analysis crash analysis crash data crash frequency crash severity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ronspies

Stolle

C. S.

Faller

R. K.

Bielenberg

R. W.

Recommended Test Vehicle Update for Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2675: 1–14.

Boone

J. D.

Record-Shattering EV Sales Continue in Q1 2023 as California Reaches the 1.5 Million EVs Sold Milestone Two Years Ahead of Schedule. Veloz, April 21, 2023. https://www.veloz.org/record-shattering-ev-sales-continue-california-reaches-1-5-million-evs-sold/. Accessed August 29, 2023.

Tucker

EV Sales Broke Records in First Quarter of 2023. Kelly Blue Book, April 12, 2023. https://www.kbb.com/car-news/ev-sales-broke-records-in-first-quarter-of-2023/. Accessed August 29, 2023.

IEA. Global EV Data Explorer. International Energy Agency, 2024. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/global-ev-data-explorer.

Battery Electric Vehicle Registration in the United States in 2021, by State. Statista, December, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1284378/us-battery-electric-registrations-by-state/. Accessed August 29, 2023.

MarkLines Automotive Industry Portal. Vehicle Sales Data. MarkLines Co., LTD. https://www.marklines.com/en/statistics/sales/about_sales_db. Accessed September 5, 2023.

MarkLines Information Platform Division. Electric Vehicle (BEV/PHV/FCV) Sales Monthly Report (August 2023). Research Department, MarkLines.com, September 26, 2023. https://www.marklines.com/en/report_all/statistics_evsales_202308. Accessed September 27, 2023.

Deliso

States Banning the Sale of New Gas-Powered Vehicles. ABC News, August 26, 2022. https://abcnews.go.com/Business/states-banning-sale-gas-powered-vehicles/story?id=88895372.

Automotive Industry Portal MarkLines. FAW: NEV Sales to Reach 1.45 Million Units in 2025. Marklines.com, September 13, 2023. https://www.marklines.com/en/report_all/rep2525_202308. Accessed September 27, 2023.

10.

Arbalaez

As Heavy EVs Proliferate, Their Weight May be a Drag on Safety. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, March 9, 2023. https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/as-heavy-evs-proliferate-their-weight-may-be-a-drag-on-safety.

11.

Van Cleave

As Electric Vehicles Become More Common, Experts Worry They Could Pose a Safety Risk for Other Drivers. CBS News Report, June 13, 2023. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/electric-vehicle-safety-heavy-battery/. Accessed September 28, 2023.

12.

2018 Tesla Model Y, Caresoft Global. https://iceberg3.caresoftglobal.com/dashboard/analysis Reproduced with permission.

13.

Cui

Liu

Research Progress of Water Mist Fire Extinguishing Technology and Its Application in Battery Fires. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 149, 2021, pp. 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.003.

14.

Responding to Electric Vehicle Fires Caused by Salt Water Flooding. U.S. Fire Administration, 2022. https://www.usfa.fema.gov/blog/ig-102022.html. Accessed September 1, 2023.

15.

Teague

Flooded Teslas are Catching Fire in Hurricane Ian's Wake. AutoBlog, October 14, 2022. https://www.autoblog.com/2022/10/14/flooded-teslas-catch-fire-after-hurricane-ian/. Accessed September 1, 2023.

16.

Wright, I. Electric Cars Soaked by Saltwater from Hurricane Go Up in Flames, Florida Officials Say. Miami Herald, August 31, 2023. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article278835624.html. Accessed September 1, 2023.

17.

Emergency Response Guides for Electric Vehicles and Lithium-ion Batteries. U.S. Fire Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Association, June 23, 2022. https://www.usfa.fema.gov/blog/ig-062322.html. Accessed September 1, 2023.

18.

IIHS. About Our Tests. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2023. https://www.iihs.org/ratings/about-our-tests. Accessed August 29, 2023.

19.

O’Malley

Zuby

Moore

Paine

Crashworthiness Testing of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. Proc., 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Gothenburg, Sweden, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015.

20.

Egbue

Long

Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Consumer Attitudes and Perceptions. Energy Policy, Vol. 48, 2012, pp. 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009.

21.

Iceberg3.0. Caresoft Global, Inc. Reproduced with permission. https://iceberg3.caresoftglobal.com/dashboard/analysis. Accessed September 27, 2023.

22.

Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS). National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, 2017. https://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx.

23.

Federal Highway Administration. Roadway Departure Safety. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2017. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/.

24.

Telford

E. I.

Israel

R. J.

Median Study—1952. California Division of Highways, Sacramento, 1952.

25.

Moskowitz

Schaefer

W. E.

California Median Study: 1958. Highway Research Board Bulletin, Vol. 266, HRB, Washington, D.C., 1960, pp. 34–62.

26.

Lampela

A. A.

Yang

A. H.

Analyses of Guardrail Accidents in Michigan. Final Report. Michigan Department of State Highways and Transport, Highway Safety Research Institute, Lansing, 1947.

27.

Perchonok

Ranney

T. A.

Baum

A. S.

Morris

D. F.

Eppich

J. D.

Hazardous Effects of Highway Features and Roadside Objects: Volumes 1 and 2. Final Report No. FHWA/RD-78-201+2. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1978.

28.

Mak

K. K.

DeLucia

B. H.

Chira-Chavala

Brackett

R. Q.

Accident Analysis for Urban Freeways, Volume 1: Technical Report. Final Report. Federal Highway Administration, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1988.

29.

Cooper

Analysis of Roadside Encroachments - Single Vehicle Run-Off-the-Road Accident Data Analysis for Five Provinces. British Columbia Research Council, Vancouver, Canada, 1980.

30.

Hutchinson

J. W.

Kennedy

T. W.

Medians of Divided Highways—Frequency and Nature of Vehicle Encroachments. Bulletin 487, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Illinois, Champaign, 1966.

31.

Wolford

Sicking

D. L.

Guardrail Runout Lengths Revisited. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1996. 1528: 78–86.

32.

Mak

K. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Coon

B. A.

Identification of Vehicular Impact Conditions Associated with Serious Ran-off-Road Crashes. NCHRP Report No. 665. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.

33.

Albuquerque

F. B. D.

Sicking

D. L.

Stolle

C. S.

Roadway Departure and Impact Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2195: 106–114.

34.

Johnson

N. S.

Gabler

H. C.

Injury Risk due to Side Impact of Non-Tracking Vehicles into Guardrail. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2377: 21–28.

35.

Sicking

D. L.

Albuquerque

F. D. B.

Lechtenberg

K. A.

Stolle

C. S.

Guidelines for Implementation of Cable Median Barrier. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2120: 82–90.

36.

Stolle

C. S.

Sicking

D. L.

Faller

R. K.

Reid

J. D.

Cable Median Barrier Failure Analysis and Remediation Phase II. MwRSF Research Report No. TRP-03-319-13, Final Report. MwRSF Pooled Fund States, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2013.

37.

Dowler

N. T.

Stolle

C. S.

Kumar

G. S.

Nguyen

Wiley

Flores

Evaluation of Roadway Departure and Cross-Median Crashes in Kansas. MwRSF Research Report No. TRP-03-447-21, Final Report. Kansas Department of Transportation, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2021.

38.

Wood

J. S.

Donnell

E. T.

Fariss

C. J.

A Method to Account for and Estimate Underreporting in Crash Frequency Research. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 95, Part A, 2016, pp. 57–66.

39.

Chimba

Emaasit

Allen

Hurst

Nelson

Factors Affecting Median Cable Barrier Crash Frequency: New Insights. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2014, pp. 62–77.

40.

National Automotive Sampling System. Collecting Relevant Data and Information. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-data-systems/national-automotive-sampling-system.

41.

Mak

K. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Ross

H. E.

Jr.

Real-World Impact Conditions for Run-Off-the-Road Accidents. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1986. 1065: 45–55.

42.

Reixinger

L. E.

Gabler

H. C.

Johnson

Kusano

Daniello

Thomson

Long-Term Roadside Crash Data Collection Program. NCHRP Report No. 1033. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, D.C., 2023. https://doi.org/10.17226/27128.

43.

NCHRP 17-88 [Completed]: Roadside Encroachment Database Development and Analysis. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, D.C.https://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=4374. Accessed September 30, 2023.

44.

McLaughlin

S. B.

Hankey

J. M.

Klauer

S. G.

Dingus

T. A.

Contributing Factors to Run-Off-Road Crashes and Near-Crashes. Report No. DOT HS 811 079. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, 2009.

45.

Al Bdairi

N. S. S.

Hernandez

Anderson

Contributing Factors to Run-Off-Road Crashes Involving Large Trucks Under Lighted and Dark Conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 144, No. 1, 2017, p. 04017066. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000104.

46.

Peng

Boyle

L. N.

Commercial Driver Factors in Run-Off-Road Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2281: 128–132.

47.

Troxel

L. A.

Ray

M. H.

Carney

J. F.

III . Side Impact Collisions with Roadside Obstacles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1991. 1302: 32–42.

48.

Ray

M. H.

Carney

J. F.

III . Test and Evaluation Criteria for Side-Impact Roadside Appurtenance Collisions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 4, 1994, pp. 633–651.

49.

Stolle

C. S.

Bolken

J. C.

Lechtenberg

K. A.

Sicking

D. L.

, Side-Impact and Non-Tracking Crash Conditions. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011. https://trid.trb.org/view/1093249

50.

AASHTO. Roadside Design Guide, 4th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2011.

51.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Performance Evaluation of the Modified G4(1S) Guardrail System - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-11 (2214WB-1). Final Report No. TRP 03 168 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

52.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Performance Evaluation of the Modified G4(1S) Guardrail System - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-11 with 28" C.G. Height (2214WB-2). Final Report No. TRP 03 169 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

53.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Performance Evaluation of the Midwest Guardrail System - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-11 (2214MG-1). Final Report No. TRP 03 170 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

54.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Performance Evaluation of the Midwest Guardrail System - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-11 with 28" C.G. Height (2214MG-2). Final Report No. TRP 03 171 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

55.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Performance Evaluation of the Midwest Guardrail System - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-10 (2214MG-3). Final Report No. TRP 03 172 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

56.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Coon

B. A.

Performance Evaluation of the Guardrail to Concrete Barrier Transition - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-21 with 28" C.G. Height (2214T-1). Final Report No. TRP 03 175 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

57.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Coon

B. A.

Performance Evaluation of the Free-Standing Temporary Barrier - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-11 (2214TB-1). Final Report No. TRP 03 173 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

58.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Coon

B. A.

Performance Evaluation of the Free-Standing Temporary Barrier - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-11 with 28" C.G. Height (2214TB-2). Final Report No. TRP 03 174 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

59.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Coon

B. A.

Performance Evaluation of the Permanent New Jersey Safety Shape Barrier - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-10 (2214NJ-1). Final Report No. TRP 03 177 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

60.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Coon

B. A.

Performance Evaluation of the Permanent New Jersey Safety Shape Barrier - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 4-12 (2214NJ-2). Final Report No. TRP 03 178 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

61.

Polivka

K. A.

Faller

R. K.

Sicking

D. L.

Rohde

J. R.

Bielenberg

B. W.

Reid

J. D.

Coon

B. A.

Performance Evaluation of the SKT-MGS Tangent End Terminal - Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-34 (2214TT-1). Final Report No. TRP 03 176 06. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006.

62.

Bullard

D. L.

Bligh

R. P.

Menges

W. L.

Haug

R. R.

Volume I: Evaluation of Existing Roadside Safety Hardware Using Updated Criteria, Technical Report (2010). Final Report NCHRP Project 22-14(03), Web Only Document 157. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, 2010.

63.

Albuquerque

F. D. B.

Evaluation of the In-Service Safety Performance of Safety-Shape and Vertical Concrete Barriers. Dissertation. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2011.

64.

Gabauer

Gabler

H. C.

Differential Rollover Risk in Vehicle-to-Traffic Barrier Collisions. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, Vol. 53, 2009, pp. 131–140.

65.

Liu

T. J.

Run-Off-Road Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective. Report No. DOT HS 811 500. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011.

66.

Montella

Mauriello

Pernetti

Riccardi

M. R.

Rule Discovery to Identify Patterns Contributing to Overrepresentation and Severity of Run-Off-the-Road Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 155, 2021, pp. 106–119.

67.

Molan

A. M.

Moomen

Ksaibati

Estimating the Effect of Geometric Features of Side Traffic Barriers on Crash Severity of Interstate Roads in Wyoming. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105639.

68.

Hou

Tarko

A. P.

Meng

Investigating Factors of Crash Frequency with Random Effects and Random Parameters Models: New Insights from Chinese Freeway Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 120, 2018, pp. 1–12.

69.

Islam

Hosseini

Jalayer

An Analysis of Single-Vehicle Truck Crashes on Rural Curved Segments Accounting for Unobserved Heterogeneity. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 80, 2022, pp. 148–159.

70.

Yan

Zhang

Wang

Differences of Overturned and Hit-Fixed-Object Crashes on Rural Roads Accompanied by Speeding Driving: Accommodating Potential Temporal Shifts. Analytical Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 35, 2022, p. 100220.

71.

Eustace

Almutairi

O. E.

Hovey

P. W.

Modeling Factors Contributing to Injury and Fatality of Run-Off-Road Crashes in Ohio. Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Faculty Publications, University of Dayton, OH, 2016. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cee_fac_pub/30.

72.

Okafor

Adanu

E. K.

Lidbe

Jones

Severity Analysis of Single-Vehicle Left and Right Run-Off-Road Crashes Using a Random Parameter Ordered Logit Model. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2023, pp. 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2023.2174376.

73.

Esmaeili

Hallowell

M. R.

Rajagopalan

Attribute-Based Safety Risk Assessment II: Predicting Safety Outcomes Using Generalized Linear Models. ASCE, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 141, No. 8, 2015, p. 04015022.

74.

Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-safety/electric-and-hybrid-vehicles. Accessed August 1, 2023.

75.

MapChart. Create Your Own Custom Map. https://www.mapchart.net/.

76.

VIN Decoder. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://www.nhtsa.gov/vin-decoder. Accessed May 30, 2023.

77.

Chen

Hua

Liu

Wang

Song

Liu

Planning and Tracking Control of Full Drive-by-Wire Electric Vehicles in Unstructured Scenario. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Automobile Engineering, Vol. 0, No. 0, 2023, p. 09544070231195233. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070231195233.

78.

Compendium of HLDI Collision Avoidance Research. HLDI Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 4, April 2023. https://www.iihs.org/media/d391f0fa-2c92-4308-a27f-c93d60757e55/3VeIsw/HLDI%20Research/Collisions%20avoidance%20features/40-04-compendium.pdf.

79.

Stolle

C. S.

Faller

R. K.

Lechtenberg

K. A.

Bielenberg

R. W.

In-Service Performance Evaluation of KDOT’s Cable Median Barrier. MwRSF Research Report No. TRP-03-436-20, Final Report. Kansas Department of Transportation, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2020.