Undrained shear strength serves as one of the crucial indicators for analyzing the strength and assessing the stability of clay. To enhance the predictive capability of undrained shear strength, we introduced a hybrid stacking model, the KSMRX, which leverages the Bayesian optimization algorithm. Comparative analyses against base models revealed that the KSMRX model significantly enhanced prediction accuracy, elevating it from 51.3% to 72.5%. This substantial improvement underscored the efficacy of our approach in predicting drained shear strength. Moreover, when compared with the prediction accuracies of 15 other hybrid models, the KSMRX hybrid stacking model consistently demonstrated superior performance. Therefore, this study not only presents a novel and more convenient computational approach, facilitating the acquisition of highly accurate geotechnical parameters, but also serves as a reference for the implementation of geotechnical engineering projects.
KrabbenhøftK.Galindo-TorresS. A.ZhangX.KrabbenhøftJ.AUS: Anisotropic Undrained Shear Strength Model for Clays. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 43, No. 17, 2019, pp. 2652–2666. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2990.
2.
BayatE.BayatM.Effect of Grading Characteristics on the Undrained Shear Strength of Sand: Review with New Evidences. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 6, No. 11, 2013, pp. 4409–4418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0670-y.
3.
LiX.ZhangL.XiaoT.ZhangS.ChenC.Learning Failure Modes of Soil Slopes Using Monitoring Data. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 56, 2019, pp. 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2019.04.002.
4.
ZhangW.WuC.ZhongH.LiY.WangL.Prediction of Undrained Shear Strength Using Extreme Gradient Boosting and Random Forest Based on Bayesian Optimization. Geoscience Frontiers, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2021, pp. 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.007.
5.
KangX.SunH.-M.LuoH.DaiT.ChenR.-P.A Portable Bender Element-Double Cone Penetration Testing Equipment for Measuring Stiffness and Shear Strength of In-Situ Soft Soil Deposits. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 12, 2020, pp. 3546–3560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1696-4.
6.
LowH. E.LunneT.AndersenK. H.SjursenM. A.LiX.RandolphM. F.Estimation of Intact and Remoulded Undrained Shear Strengths from Penetration Tests in Soft Clays. Geotechnique, Vol. 60, No. 11, 2010, pp. 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.017.
7.
ChingJ.PhoonK.-K.Constructing Site-Specific Multivariate Probability Distribution Model Using Bayesian Machine Learning. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 145, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001537.
8.
LarssonR.ÅhnbergH.On the Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength and Preconsolidation Pressure from Common Field Tests in Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2005, pp. 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-031.
9.
CaiG. J.LiuS. Y.TongL. Y.DuG. Y.Field Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength from Piezocone Penetration Tests in Soft Marine Clay. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2010, pp. 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641191003780906.
10.
RémaiZ.Correlation of Undrained Shear Strength and CPT Resistance. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2013, pp. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.2140.
11.
DuanW.CaiG.ZouH.LiuS.Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Saturated Sands Based on Resistivity Piezocone Penetration Testing—A Case Study. In Environmental Vibrations and Transportation Geodynamics (BianX.ChenY.YeX., eds.), Springer, Singapore, 2018, pp. 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4508-0.
12.
LiuS. Y.CaiG. J.TongL. Y.DuG. Y.Approach on the Engineering Properties of Lianyungang Marine Clay from Piezocone Penetration Tests. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2008, pp. 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641190802265994.
13.
CaiG.LiuS.TongL.DuG.Assessment of Direct CPT and CPTU Methods for Predicting the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Single Piles. Engineering Geology, Vol. 104, No. 3–4, 2009, pp. 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.010.
14.
WangT.ZhangK.ThéJ.YuH.Accurate Prediction of Band Gap of Materials Using Stacking Machine Learning Model. Computational Materials Science, Vol. 201, 2022, p. 110899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110899.
15.
LiJ.WangF.Study on the Forecasting Models of Slope Stability under Data Mining. Proc., 12th International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments - Earth and Space 2010, Honolulu, Hawaii, March 14, 2010, ASCE, New York, pp. 765–776.
16.
ZhouH.HuangG.-B.LinZ.WangH.SohY. C.Stacked Extreme Learning Machines. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Vol. 45, No. 9, 2015, pp. 2013–2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2363492.
17.
KardaniN.ZhouA.NazemM.ShenS.-L.Improved Prediction of Slope Stability Using a Hybrid Stacking Ensemble Method Based on Finite Element Analysis and Field Data. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2021, pp. 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.011.
18.
PhamB. T.PrakashI.SinghS. K.ShirzadiA.ShahabiH.TranT.-T.-T.BuiD. T.Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and Different Ensemble Techniques: Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches. Catena, Vol. 175, 2019, pp. 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018.
19.
ZhangY.-g.ChenX.-q.LiaoR.-p.WanJ.-l.HeZ.-y.ZhaoZ.-x.ZhangY.SuZ.-y.Research on Displacement Prediction of Step-Type Landslide Under the Influence of Various Environmental Factors Based on Intelligent WCA-ELM in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Natural Hazards, Vol. 107, 2021, pp. 1709–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04655-3.
20.
SamuiP.KimD.Least Square Support Vector Machine and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline for Modeling Lateral Load Capacity of Piles. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 3–4, 2013, pp. 1123–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1043-x.
21.
AsghariV.LeungY. F.HsuS.-C.Deep Neural Network Based Framework for Complex Correlations in Engineering Metrics. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 44, 2020, p. 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101058.
22.
SankeyJ. E.BrabantK.MasseF.Stand Alone and Combined Technologies for MSE Walls: State of Practice for Compressible Soils. Proc., Geo-Frontiers Congress 2011, Dallas, TX, March 13, 2011, ASCE, New York, pp. 3419–3428.
23.
ZhangW.GohA. T. C.Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines and Neural Network Models for Prediction of Pile Drivability. Geoscience Frontiers, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2016, pp. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.003.
24.
MoayediH.HayatiS.Artificial Intelligence Design Charts for Predicting Friction Capacity of Driven Pile in Clay. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2019, pp. 7429–7445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3555-5.
25.
MbarakW. K.CiniciogluE. N.CiniciogluO.SPT Based Determination of Undrained Shear Strength: Regression Models and Machine Learning. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2020, pp. 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0591-x.
26.
CotecchiaF.ChandlerR. J.A General Framework for the Mechanical Behavior of Clays. Géotechnique, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2000, pp. 431–447.
27.
ZouH.LiuS.CaiG.PuppalaA. J.BheemasettiT. V.Multivariate Correlation Analysis of Seismic Piezocone Penetration (SCPTU) Parameters and Design Properties of Jiangsu Quaternary Cohesive Soils. Engineering Geology, Vol. 228, 2017, pp. 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.07.005.
28.
BotrosF. E.HarterT.OnsoyY. S.TuliA.HopmansJ. W.Spatial Variability of Hydraulic Properties and Sediment Characteristics in a Deep Alluvial Unsaturated Zone. Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2009, pp. 276–289. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2008.0087.
29.
HopmansJ. W.SchukkingH.TorfsP. J. J. F.Two-Dimensional Steady State Unsaturated Water Flow in Heterogeneous Soils with Autocorrelated Soil Hydraulic Properties. Water Resources Research, Vol. 24, No. 12, 1988, pp. 2005–2017. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i012p02005.
30.
ZarJ. H.Significance Testing of the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 67, No. 339, 1972, pp. 578–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481251.
31.
GarcíaS.DerracJ.CanoJ. R.HerreraF.Prototype Selection for Nearest Neighbor Classification: Taxonomy and Empirical Study. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2012, pp. 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.142.
32.
AltmanN. S.An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression. American Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 3, 1992, pp. 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879.
33.
BaghbanA.KardaniM. N.HabibzadehS.Prediction Viscosity of Ionic Liquids Using a Hybrid LSSVM and Group Contribution Method. Journal of Molecular Liquids, Vol. 236, 2017, pp. 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.019.
34.
HoangN.-D.PhamA.-D.Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach Based on Metaheuristic and Machine Learning for Slope Stability Assessment: A Multinational Data Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 46, 2016, pp. 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.020.
35.
KardaniM. N.BaghbanA.Utilization of LSSVM Strategy to Predict Water Content of Sweet Natural Gas. Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol. 35, No. 8, 2017, pp. 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2016.1274758.
36.
DruckerH.BurgesC. J.KaufmanL.SmolaA.VapnikV.Support Vector Regression Machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 9, 1997, pp. 155–161.
37.
RumelhartD. E.HintonG. E.WilliamsR. J.Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors. Nature, Vol. 323, No. 6088, 1986, pp. 533–536.
38.
XiaY.LiuC.LiY.LiuN.A Boosted Decision Tree Approach Using Bayesian Hyper-Parameter Optimization for Credit Scoring. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 78, 2017, pp. 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.017.
39.
JinZ.ShangJ.ZhuQ.LingC.XieW.QiangB.RFRSF: Employee Turnover Prediction Based on Random Forests and Survival Analysis. Web Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 12343, 2020, pp. 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_35.
40.
YoussefA. M.PourghasemiH. R.PourtaghiZ. S.Al-KatheeriM. M.Erratum to: Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Random Forest, Boosted Regression Tree, Classification and Regression Tree, and General Linear Models and Comparison of Their Performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia (Landslides, 10.1007/S10346-015-0614-1). Landslides, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016, pp. 1315–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0667-1.
ChenT.GuestrinC.XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2016, pp. 13–17.
43.
DingH.LiG.DongX.LinY.Prediction of Pillar Stability for Underground Mines Using the Stochastic Gradient Boosting Technique. IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 2018, pp. 69253–69264. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2880466.
44.
ChenT.GuestrinC.XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proc., 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, August 13–17, 2016, ACM, New York, pp. 785–794.
45.
HuangG.-B.ChenL.Enhanced Random Search Based Incremental Extreme Learning Machine. Neurocomputing, Vol. 71, No. 16–18, 2008, pp. 3460–3468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2007.10.008.
46.
Erdogan ErtenG.KeserS. B.YavuzM.Grid Search Optimised Artificial Neural Network for Open Stope Stability Prediction. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, Vol. 35, No. 8, 2021, pp. 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2021.1899404.
47.
YangL.ShamiA.On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Neurocomputing, Vol. 415, 2020, pp. 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061.
48.
ZhangQ.HuW.LiuZ.TanJ.TBM Performance Prediction with Bayesian Optimization and Automated Machine Learning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 103, 2020, p. 103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103493.
49.
DouJ.YunusA. P.BuiD. T.MerghadiA.SahanaM.ZhuZ.ChenC.-W.HanZ.PhamB. T.Improved Landslide Assessment Using Support Vector Machine with Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Framework in a Mountainous Watershed, Japan. Landslides, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2020, pp. 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5.
50.
RibeiroM. H. D. M.dos Santos CoelhoL.Ensemble Approach Based on Bagging, Boosting and Stacking for Short-Term Prediction in Agribusiness Time Series. Applied Soft Computing Journal, Vol. 86, 2020, p. 105837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105837.
51.
JamiolkowskiMLaddC. C.GermaineJ. T.LancellottaR.New Developments in Field and Laboratory Testing of Soils. Proc., Eleventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, August 12–16, 1985.
52.
SennesetK.JanbuN.Shear Strength Parameters Obtained from Static Cone Penetration Tests. In: Symposium on Shear Strength of Marine Sediments. ASTM Special Technical Publication, San Diego, CA,Vol. STP 883, 1985, pp. 41–54.
53.
RobertsonP. K.CampanellaR. G.GillespieD.GreigJ.Use of Piezometer Cone Data. Proc., In-Situ 86 Specialty Conference, Blacksburg, June 23–25, 1986, ASCE, New York, pp. 1263–1280.
