In previous studies, many travel-behavior-change strategies often relied on single behavior determinants or psychological theories, overlooking the incorporation of sociopsychological theories for guidance in their design. Integrating these theories could offer consistent guidance for program developers and enhance intervention effectiveness. This paper systematically reviews interventions targeting travel-behavior change, with a focus on self-determination theory and its principles of satisfying individuals’ competence, autonomy, and relatedness needs for enacting change. Additionally, experiment design methods, including randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, are reviewed and discussed. Key findings highlight the effectiveness of personalized interventions and integrating feedback with goal-setting strategies. Given the limited direct references to sociopsychological theories in existing studies, we explore relevant sociopsychological theories applicable to travel-behavior-change programs to provide examples of how strategies could be designed based on them. This review contributes valuable insights into the development of strategies for changing travel behavior, offering a theoretical framework for researchers and practitioners to guide intervention design, experimentation, and evaluation. Leveraging these theories not only facilitates reproducibility but also provides a standardized approach for transportation demand management program developers.
BorowskiE.ChenY.MahmassaniH.Social Media Effects on Sustainable Mobility Opinion Diffusion: Model Framework and Implications for Behavior Change. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 19, 2020, pp. 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.01.003.
2.
Pawluk De-ToledoK.O’HernS.KoppelS.Travel Behaviour Change Research: A Scientometric Review and Content Analysis. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 28, 2022, pp. 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.03.004.
3.
SivasubramaniyamR. D.CharltonS. G.SargissonR. J.Mode Choice and Mode Commitment in Commuters. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 19, 2020, pp. 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.10.007.
4.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R.Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2008.
5.
HuangZ. R.ChiuY.-C.Spatiotemporal Nonrecurring Traffic Spillback Pattern Prediction for Freeway Merging Bottleneck Using Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets with Simulation Accelerated Training. Presented at the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece, September20–23, 2020.
6.
ArianA.ErmagunA.ZhuX.ChiuY. C.An Empirical Investigation of the Reward Incentive and Trip Purposes on Departure Time Behavior Change. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Vol. 1, 2018, pp. 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2018.07.001.
7.
Federal Highway Administration. Expanding Traveler Choices Through the Use of Incentives: A Compendium of Examples - 4. Applying Incentives to Shift Mode of Travel - FHWA Office of Operations. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop18071/ch4.htm. Accessed January 23, 2022.
8.
HuX.ChiuY.-C.ZhuL.Behavior Insights for an Incentive-Based Active Demand Management Platform. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015, pp. 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1260/2046-0430.4.2.119.
9.
EttemaD.GärlingT.OlssonL. E.FrimanM.Out-of-Home Activities, Daily Travel, and Subjective Well-Being. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 9, 2010, pp. 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.005.
10.
de KruijfJ.EttemaD.KamphuisC. B. M.DijstM.Evaluation of an Incentive Program to Stimulate the Shift from Car Commuting to E-Cycling in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 10, 2018, pp. 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.06.003.
11.
ByerlyH.BalmfordA.FerraroP. J.WagnerC. H.PalchakE.PolaskyS.RickettsT. H., et al. Nudging Pro-Environmental Behavior: Evidence and Opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2018, pp. 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1777.
12.
FarrowK.GrolleauG.IbanezL.Social Norms and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecological Economics, Vol. 140, 2017, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017.
13.
MartinA.SuhrckeM.OgilvieD.Financial Incentives to Promote Active Travel: An Evidence Review and Economic Framework. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2012, pp. e45–e57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.001.
14.
RosenfieldA.AttanucciJ. P.ZhaoJ.A Randomized Controlled Trial in Travel Demand Management. Transportation, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2020, pp. 1907–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10023-9.
15.
BroegW.HeuwinkelD.NeumannK. H.Psychological Determinants of User Behaviour. Publication of: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Devel, Paris, France. https://trid.trb.org/View/59356.
16.
AmptE. S.Understanding Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change. Transport Engineering in Australia, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2004, pp. 53–66.
17.
BrögW.ErlE.MenseN.Individualised Marketing Changing Travel Behaviour for a Better Environment. Paper presented at OECD Workshop: Environmentally Sustainable Transport, Berlin, 2002.
18.
RoseG.AmptE.Travel Blending: An Australian Travel Awareness Initiative. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2001, pp. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(00)00015-8.
19.
BrögW.ErlE.KerI.RyleJ.WallR.Evaluation of Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change: Experiences from Three Continents. Transport Policy, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2009, pp. 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.003.
20.
RichterJ.FrimanM.GaerlingT.Soft Transport Policy Measures 1: Results of Implementations. Elektronisk resurs. Karlstad: Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT, SAMOT [The service and market oriented transport research group], Karlstads universitet, Karlstad, Sweden, 2009. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:219053/FULLTEXT02.
21.
RichterJ.FrimanM.GärlingT.Soft Transport Policy Measures: Gaps in Knowledge. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2011, pp. 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2010.490289.
22.
CairnsS.SlomanL.NewsonC.AnableJ.KirkbrideA.GoodwinP.Smarter Choices: Assessing the Potential to Achieve Traffic Reduction Using ‘Soft Measures.’Transport Reviews, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2008, pp. 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640801892504.
23.
ChillónP.EvensonK. R.VaughnA.WardD. S.A Systematic Review of Interventions for Promoting Active Transportation to School. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2011, p. 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-10.
24.
SchönbachD. M. I.AltenburgT. M.ChinapawM. J. M.MarquesA.DemetriouY.Strategies and Effects of Promising School-Based Interventions to Promote Active School Transportation by Bicycle Among Children and Adolescents: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, p. 296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1216-0.
25.
SussmanR.TanL. Q.KormosC. E.Chapter 14 - Behavioral Interventions for Sustainable Transportation: An Overview of Programs and Guide for Practitioners. In Transport and Energy Research (ZhangJ., ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 315–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815965-1.00014-4
26.
PanM.ChiuY.-C.Evaluating the Congestion Improvement Benefit of a Regional School Carpooling Program Using Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the XXI PANAM Lima 2021: XXI Pan American Conference of Transport and Logistics, Virtual, 2021.
27.
KitamuraR.YoshiiT.YamamotoT.Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK, 2009.
28.
Garcia-SierraM.van den BerghJ. C. J. M.Miralles-GuaschC.Behavioural Economics, Travel Behaviour and Environmental-Transport Policy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 41, 2015, pp. 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.023.
29.
GravertC.Olsson CollentineL.When Nudges Aren’t Enough: Norms, Incentives and Habit Formation in Public Transport Usage. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 190, 2021, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.012.
30.
JavaidA.KhannaT.FranzaM.CreutzigF.Behavioural Interventions Change Individual Transport Choices but Have a Limited Impact on Transport Mode Split. Evidence from a Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2084989/v1.
31.
KormosC.SussmanR.RosenbergB.How Cities Can Apply Behavioral Science to Promote Public Transportation Use. Behavioral Science & Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2021, pp. 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152100700108.
32.
WhillansA. V.SherlockJ.RobertsJ.O’FlahertyS.GavinL.DykstraH.DalyM.Nudging the Commute: Using Behaviorally-Informed Interventions to Promote Sustainable Transportation. Behavioral Science & Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2021, pp. 27–49.
33.
LaroucheR.MammenG.RoweD. A.FaulknerG.Effectiveness of Active School Transport Interventions: A Systematic Review and Update. BMC Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2018, p. 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-5005-1.
34.
FrimanM.HuckJ.OlssonL. E.Transtheoretical Model of Change During Travel Behavior Interventions: An Integrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2017, p. 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060581.
35.
ScheepersC. E.Wendel-VosG. C. W.den BroederJ. M.van KempenE. E. M. M.van WesemaelP. J. V.SchuitA. J.Shifting from Car to Active Transport: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Interventions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 70, 2014, pp. 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.015.
36.
BonnesM.SecchiaroliG.Environmental Psychology: A Psycho-Social Introduction. London, UK, 1995.
37.
PronelloC.GaborieauJ.-B.Engaging in Pro-Environment Travel Behaviour Research from a Psycho-Social Perspective: A Review of Behavioural Variables and Theories. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2018, p. 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072412.
38.
AdjeiE.BehrensR.Travel Behaviour Change Theories and Experiments: A Review and Synthesis. Presented at the 31st Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2012), Pretoria, South Africa, 2012.
39.
ChngS.AbrahamC.WhiteM. P.HoffmannC.SkipponS.Psychological Theories of Car Use: An Integrative Review and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 55, 2018, pp. 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.009.
40.
FuX.JuanZ.Understanding Public Transit Use Behavior: Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Customer Satisfaction Theory. Transportation, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2017, pp. 1021–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9692-8.
41.
SeethalerR.RoseG.Application of Psychological Principles to Promote Travel Behaviour Change. Transport Engineering in Australia, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2004, pp. 67–84. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.464333050967509.
42.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. The American Psychologist, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2000, pp. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
43.
DibajS.HosseinzadehA.MladenovićM. N.KlugerR.Where Have Shared E-Scooters Taken Us So Far? A Review of Mobility Patterns, Usage Frequency, and Personas. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 21, 2021, p. 11792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111792.
44.
OkoliC.SchabramK.A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 2010.
45.
KahnE. B.RamseyL. T.BrownsonR. C.HeathG. W.HowzeE. H.PowellK. E.StoneE. J., et al. The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity. A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 4, Supplement 1, 2002, pp. 73–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00434-8.
46.
RoyerH.StehrM.SydnorJ.Incentives, Commitments, and Habit Formation in Exercise: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Workers at a Fortune-500 Company. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2015, pp. 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130327.
47.
KnezI.Is Climate Change a Moral Issue? Effects of Egoism and Altruism on Pro-Environmental Behavior. Current Urban Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, pp. 157–174. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2016.42012.
48.
ConveryS.WilliamsB.Determinants of Transport Mode Choice for Non-Commuting Trips: The Roles of Transport, Land Use and Socio-Demographic Characteristics. Urban Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2019, p. 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3030082.
49.
DingC.WangD.LiuC.ZhangY.YangJ.Exploring the Influence of Built Environment on Travel Mode Choice Considering the Mediating Effects of Car Ownership and Travel Distance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 100, 2017, pp. 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.008.
50.
DunningD.Chapter Five - The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One’s Own Ignorance. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P., eds.), Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 247–296. https://doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6.
51.
KahnemanD.Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY, 2011.
52.
WendelS.Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 2020.
53.
GhaderS.DarziA.ZhangL.Modeling Effects of Travel Time Reliability on Mode Choice Using Cumulative Prospect Theory. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 108, 2019, pp. 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.09.014.
54.
MarghetisT.AttariS. Z.LandyD.Simple Interventions Can Correct Misperceptions of Home Energy Use. Nature Energy, Vol. 4, No. 10, 2019, pp. 874–881. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0467-2.
55.
RuokamoE.MeriläinenT.KarhinenS.RäihäJ.Suur-UskiP.TimonenL.SventoR.The Effect of Information Nudges on Energy Saving: Observations from a Randomized Field Experiment in Finland. Energy Policy, Vol. 161, 2022, p. 112731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112731.
56.
WoodardR.RossouwA.An Evaluation of Interventions for Improving Pro-Environmental Waste Behaviour in Social Housing. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 13, 2021, p. 7272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137272.
57.
BagerS.MundacaL.Making ‘Smart Meters’ Smarter? Insights from a Behavioural Economics Pilot Field Experiment in Copenhagen, Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 28, 2017, pp. 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.008.
58.
RauxC.ChevalierA.BougnaE.HiltonD.Mobility Choices and Climate Change: Assessing the Effects of Social Norms, Emissions Information and Economic Incentives. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 90, 2021, p. 101007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101007.
59.
ChokshiN. P.AdusumalliS.SmallD. S.MorrisA.FeingoldJ.HaY. P.LynchM. D., et al. Loss-Framed Financial Incentives and Personalized Goal-Setting to Increase Physical Activity Among Ischemic Heart Disease Patients Using Wearable Devices: The ACTIVE REWARD Randomized Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association, Vol. 7, No. 12, 2018, p. e009173. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009173.
60.
GheslaC.GriederM.SchmitzJ.StadelmannM.Pro-Environmental Incentives and Loss Aversion: A Field Experiment on Electricity Saving Behavior. Energy Policy, Vol. 137, 2020, p. 111131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111131.
61.
RomanowichP.LambR. J.The Effect of Framing Incentives as Either Losses or Gains with Contingency Management for Smoking Cessation. Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2013, pp. 2084–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.007.
62.
d’AddaG.GallieraA.TavoniM.Urgency and Engagement: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Intervention on Energy Use Awareness. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 81, 2020, p. 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102275.
63.
DellaValleN.ZubaryevaA.Can We Hope for a Collective Shift in Electric Vehicle Adoption? Testing Salience and Norm-Based Interventions in South Tyrol, Italy. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 55, 2019, pp. 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.005.
64.
AhmedS.AdnanM.JanssensD.WetsG.A Personalized Mobility Based Intervention to Promote Pro-Environmental Travel Behavior. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 62, 2020, p. 102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102397.
65.
AnagnostopoulouE.UrbančičJ.BothosE.MagoutasB.BradeskoL.SchrammelJ.MentzasG.From Mobility Patterns to Behavioural Change: Leveraging Travel Behaviour and Personality Profiles to Nudge for Sustainable Transportation. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2020, pp. 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-018-0528-1.
66.
BhattacharyyaA.JinW.FlochC.ChatmanD. G.WalkerJ. L.Nudging People Towards More Sustainable Residential Choice Decisions: An Intervention Based on Focalism and Visualization. Transportation, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2019, pp. 373–393.
67.
TsaiM. Smartphone App Aims to Help Drivers Switch to More Sustainable Transportation Modes. Center for Transportation Studies News (Catalyst), 2021. https://www.cts.umn.edu/news/2021/may/app. Accessed August 28, 2024.
68.
SiuhiS.MwakalongeJ.Opportunities and Challenges of Smart Mobile Applications in Transportation. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 3, No. 6, 2016, pp. 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2016.11.001.
69.
SunioV.SchmöckerJ.-D.KimJ.Understanding the Stages and Pathways of Travel Behavior Change Induced by Technology-Based Intervention Among University Students. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 59, 2018, pp. 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.017.
70.
DesrochersM. N.MosherH.Evaluation of an Informational and Behavior Change Program to Increase Students’ Self-Reported Energy Conservation. Behavioral Interventions, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2017, pp. 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1482.
71.
HinoK.TaniguchiA.HanazatoM.TakagiD.Modal Shift from Cars and Promotion of Walking by Providing Pedometers in Yokohama City, Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 12, 2019, p. 2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122144.
72.
StopherP. R.MoutouC. J.LiuW.Sustainability of Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change Initiatives: A 5-Year Study. Presented at the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum, ATRF 2013, Brisbane, Australia, 2013. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916918491&partnerID=8YFLogxK. Accessed August 28, 2024.
73.
LiuY.KuaH. W.LuY.Spillover Effects from Energy Conservation Goal-Setting: A Field Intervention Study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 170, 2021, p. 105570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105570.
74.
LoockC.-M.StaakeT.ThiesseF.Motivating Energy-Efficient Behavior with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.15
75.
BaileyR. R.Goal Setting and Action Planning for Health Behavior Change. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2019, pp. 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617729634.
76.
LokhorstA. M.StaatsH.van ItersonJ.Energy Saving in Office Buildings: Are Feedback and Commitment-Making Useful Instruments to Trigger Change?Human Ecology, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2015, pp. 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9783-8.
77.
MatthiesE.KlöcknerC. A.PreißnerC. L.. Applying a Modified Moral Decision Making Model to Change Habitual Car Use: How Can Commitment Be Effective?Applied Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2006, pp. 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00237.x.
78.
ProchaskaJ. O.MarcusB. H.The Transtheoretical Model: Applications to Exercise Behavior. In Advances in Exercise Adherence (DishmanR. K., ed.), Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, IL, 1994, pp. 161–180.
79.
AlMarshediA.WanickV.WillsG. B.RanchhodA.Gamification and Behaviour. In Gamification: Using Game Elements in Serious Contexts (StieglitzS.LattemannC.Robra-BissantzS.ZarnekowR.BrockmannT., eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017, pp. 19–29.
80.
HervasR.Ruiz-CarrascoD.MondejarT.BravoJ.Gamification Mechanics for Behavioral Change: A Systematic Review and Proposed Taxonomy. In Proc., 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, in PervasiveHealth '17. New York, NY, Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 395–404. doi: 10.1145/3154862.3154939.
81.
AntonacheA.-L.RosnerD.CociorbaA.A Gamification Based Approach for Users’ Behavior Change Towards Power Consumption Reduction. The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania: “Carol I” National Defence University, 2020, pp. 19–25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-20-002.
82.
KazhamiakinR.MarconiA.PerilloM.PistoreM.ValettoG.PirasL.AvesaniF.PerriN.Using Gamification to Incentivize Sustainable Urban Mobility. Presented at the 2015 IEEE First International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Guadalajara, Mexico, 2015.
83.
ShenM.LuY.KuaH. W.CuiQ.Eco-Feedback Delivering Methods and Psychological Attributes Shaping Household Energy Consumption: Evidence from Intervention Program in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 265, 2020, p. 121755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121755.
84.
BucherD.CellinaF.MangiliF.RaubalM.RudelR.RizzoliA. E.ElabedO.Exploiting Fitness Apps for Sustainable Mobility - Challenges Deploying the GoEco! App. Presented at the ICT for Sustainability, 2016, Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 89–98.
85.
DrakoulisR.BellottiF.BakasI.BertaR.ParanthamanP. K.DangeG. R.LytrivisP., et al. A Gamified Flexible Transportation Service for On-Demand Public Transport. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2018, pp. 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2791643.
86.
KazhamiakinR.LoriaE.MarconiA.ScanagattaM.A Gamification Platform to Analyze and Influence Citizens’ Daily Transportation Choices. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2021, pp. 2153–2167. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3049792.
87.
HafnerR. J.PahlS.JonesR. V.FuertesA.Energy Use in Social Housing Residents in the UK and Recommendations for Developing Energy Behaviour Change Interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 251, 2020, p. 119643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119643.
88.
ZichermannG.CunninghamC.Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 2011.
89.
PatelM. S.BenjaminE. J.VolppK. G.FoxC. S.SmallD. S.MassaroJ. M.LeeJ. J., et al. Effect of a Game-Based Intervention Designed to Enhance Social Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Families: The BE FIT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 177, No. 11, 2017, pp. 1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458.
90.
CellinaF.BucherD.MangiliF.Veiga SimãoJ.RudelR.RaubalM.A Large Scale, App-Based Behaviour Change Experiment Persuading Sustainable Mobility Patterns: Methods, Results and Lessons Learnt. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2019, p. 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092674.
91.
VansteenkisteM.RyanR. M.SoenensB.Basic Psychological Need Theory: Advancements, Critical Themes, and Future Directions. Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1.
92.
SkarinF.OlssonL. E.FrimanM.WästlundE.Importance of Motives, Self-Efficacy, Social Support and Satisfaction with Travel for Behavior Change During Travel Intervention Programs. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 62, 2019, pp. 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.002.
93.
JorgensenB. S.FumeiS.ByrneG.Reducing Peak Energy Demand Among Residents Who Are Not Billed for Their Electricity Consumption: Experimental Evaluation of Behaviour Change Interventions in a University Setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 16, 2021, p. 8406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168406.
94.
MiL.QiaoL.GanX.XuT.LvT.QiaoY.DingC.Assessing the Effect of Non-Financial Information Intervention on Promoting Group-Level Energy Savings. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 720, 2020, p. 137533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137533.
95.
Chabé-FerretS.Le CoentP.ReynaudA.SubervieJ.LepercqD.Can We Nudge Farmers into Saving Water? Evidence from a Randomised Experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2021, pp. 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz022.
96.
ChenH.QinB.Does the Nudge Effect Persist? Evidence from a Field Experiment Using Social Comparison Message in China. University Library of Munich, Germany, 2020.
97.
MyersE.SouzaM.Social Comparison Nudges Without Monetary Incentives: Evidence from Home Energy Reports. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 101, 2020, p. 102315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102315.
98.
RichterI.ThøgersenJ.KlöcknerC. A.A Social Norms Intervention Going Wrong: Boomerang Effects from Descriptive Norms Information. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2018, p. 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082848.
99.
KuangJ.DeleaM. G.ThulinE.BicchieriC.Do Descriptive Norms Messaging Interventions Backfire? Protocol for a Systematic Review of the Boomerang Effect. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, p. 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01533-0.
100.
OzakiT.NakayachiK.When Descriptive Norms Backfire: Attitudes Induce Undesirable Consequences During Disaster Preparation. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2020, pp. 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12195.
101.
SkarinF.OlssonL. E.RoosI.FrimanM.The Household as an Instrumental and Affective Trigger in Intervention Programs for Travel Behavior Change. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 6, 2017, pp. 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2016.08.001.
102.
CostaD. L.KahnM. E.Energy Conservation “Nudges” and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2013, pp. 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12011.
103.
De VosJ.SingletonP. A.Travel and Cognitive Dissonance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 138, 2020, pp. 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.014.
104.
KamruzzamanM.BakerD.WashingtonS.TurrellG.Determinants of Residential Dissonance: Implications for Transit-Oriented Development in Brisbane. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 10, 2016, pp. 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1191094.
105.
DouglasB. D.BrauerM.Gamification to Prevent Climate Change: A Review of Games and Apps for Sustainability. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 42, 2021, pp. 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.008.
106.
LieberothA.JensenN. H.BredahlT.Selective Psychological Effects of Nudging, Gamification and Rational Information in Converting Commuters from Cars to Buses: A Controlled Field Experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 55, 2018, pp. 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.016.
107.
MamedeA.NoordzijG.JongerlingJ.SnijdersM.Schop-EtmanA.DenktasS.Combining Web-Based Gamification and Physical Nudges With an App (MoveMore) to Promote Walking Breaks and Reduce Sedentary Behavior of Office Workers: Field Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2021, p. e19875. https://doi.org/10.2196/19875.
108.
WemyssD.CellinaF.Lobsiger-KägiE.de LucaV.CastriR.Does It Last? Long-Term Impacts of an App-Based Behavior Change Intervention on Household Electricity Savings in Switzerland. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 47, 2019, pp. 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.018.
109.
KawachiI.It’s All in the Game—The Uses of Gamification to Motivate Behavior Change. JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 177, No. 11, 2017, pp. 1593–1594. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4798.
110.
MorschheuserB.HamariJ.MaedcheA.Cooperation or Competition—When Do People Contribute More? A Field Experiment on Gamification of Crowdsourcing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 127, 2019, pp. 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.001.
111.
PluntkeC.PrabhakarB.INSINC: A Platform for Managing Peak Demand in Public Transit. Sustainable Urban Transport, 2013, Vol. 0, p. 9.
112.
KimC.CostelloF. J.LeeK. C.The Unobserved Heterogeneneous Influence of Gamification and Novelty-Seeking Traits on Consumers’ Repurchase Intention in the Omnichannel Retailing. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, 2020, p. 1664. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01664.
113.
RodriguesL.TodaA. M.OliveiraW.PalominoP. T.VassilevaJ.IsotaniS.Automating Gamification Personalization: To the User and Beyond. arXiv:2101.05718 [cs], 2021.
114.
ElfP.IshamA.GaterslebenB.Above and Beyond? How Businesses Can Drive Sustainable Development by Promoting Lasting Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change: An Examination of the IKEA Live Lagom Project. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2021, pp. 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2668.
115.
HolladayS.LaRiviereJ.NovgorodskyD.PriceM.Prices Versus Nudges: What Matters for Search Versus Purchase of Energy Investments?Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 172, 2019, pp. 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.12.004.
116.
JennA.SpringelK.GopalA. R.Effectiveness of Electric Vehicle Incentives in the United States. Energy Policy, Vol. 119, 2018, pp. 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.065.
117.
BullO.MuñozJ. C.SilvaH. E.The Impact of Fare-Free Public Transport on Travel Behavior: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 86, 2021, p. 103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103616.
118.
FyhriA.HeinenE.FearnleyN.SundførH. B.A Push to Cycling—Exploring the e-Bike’s Role in Overcoming Barriers to Bicycle Use with a Survey and an Intervention Study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2017, pp. 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1302526
119.
MácaV.ŠčasnýM.ZvěřinováI.JakobM.HrnčířJ.Incentivizing Commuter Cycling by Financial and Non-Financial Rewards. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 17, 2020, p. 6033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176033
120.
ShenQ.WangY.GiffordC.Exploring Partnership Between Transit Agency and Shared Mobility Company: An Incentive Program for App-Based Carpooling. Transportation, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2021, pp. 2585–2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10140-w
121.
AradA.GneezyU.MograbiE.Intermittent Incentives to Encourage Exercising in the Long Run. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 205, 2023, pp. 560–573.
FanghellaV.PlonerM.TavoniM.Energy Saving in a Simulated Environment: An Online Experiment of the Interplay Between Nudges and Financial Incentives. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 93, 2021, p. 101709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101709.
124.
RiggsW.Painting the Fence: Social Norms as Economic Incentives to Non-Automotive Travel Behavior. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 7, 2017, pp. 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2016.11.004.
125.
SudarshanA.Nudges in the Marketplace: The Response of Household Electricity Consumption to Information and Monetary Incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 134, 2017, pp. 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.015.
126.
PelleranoJ. A.PriceM. K.PullerS. L.SánchezG. E.Do Extrinsic Incentives Undermine Social Norms? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Energy Conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 67, No. 3, 2017, pp. 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0094-3.
127.
PrombergerM.MarteauT. M.When Do Financial Incentives Reduce Intrinsic Motivation? Comparing Behaviors Studied in Psychological and Economic Literatures. Health Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 9, 2013, pp. 950–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032727.
128.
ProchaskaJ. O.VelicerW. F.The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change. American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1997, pp. 38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
InyimP.BatouliM.ReyesM. P.CarmenateT.BobadillaL.MostafaviA.A Smartphone Application for Personalized and Multi-Method Interventions Toward Energy Saving in Buildings. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2018, p. 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061744.
131.
KorolevaK.MelenhorstM.NovakJ.Herrera GonzalezS. L.FraternaliP.RizzoliA. E.Designing an Integrated Socio-Technical Behaviour Change System for Energy Saving. Energy Informatics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2019, p. 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-019-0088-9.
132.
LiT.ChenP.TianY.Personalized Incentive-Based Peak Avoidance and Drivers’ Travel Time-Savings. Transport Policy, Vol. 100, No. C, 2021, pp. 68–80.
133.
ArnottB.RehackovaL.ErringtonL.SniehottaF. F.RobertsJ.Araujo-SoaresV.Efficacy of Behavioural Interventions for Transport Behaviour Change: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Intervention Coding. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2014, p. 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0133-9.
134.
MöserG.BambergS.The Effectiveness of Soft Transport Policy Measures: A Critical Assessment and Meta-Analysis of Empirical Evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2008, pp. 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.001.
135.
AittasaloM.TiilikainenJ.TokolaK.SeimeläT.SarjalaS.-M.MetsäpuroP.HynynenA., et al. Socio-Ecological Intervention to Promote Active Commuting to Work: Protocol and Baseline Findings of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Finland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 14, No. 10, 2017, p. 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101257.
136.
BjørnaråH. B.BerntsenS.te VeldeS. J.FyhriA.DeforcheB.AndersenL. B.BereE.From Cars to Bikes – The Effect of an Intervention Providing Access to Different Bike Types: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2019, p. e0219304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219304.
BambergS.ReesJ.The Impact of Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Measures – A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Quasi-Experimental and Experimental Evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 100, 2017, pp. 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.004.
139.
GuzmanL. A.HesselP.The Effects of Public Transport Subsidies for Lower-Income Users on Public Transport Use: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Transport Policy, Vol. 126, 2022, pp. 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.016.
140.
StopherP.CliffordE.SwannN.ZhangY.Evaluating Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change: Suggested Guidelines and Case Studies. Transport Policy, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2009, pp. 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.007.
141.
MinnichA.Gamification in the Transport Sector: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from a Bicycle Navigation App. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 167, 2023, p. 103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.012.
142.
DavisR.CampbellR.HildonZ.HobbsL.MichieS.Theories of Behaviour and Behaviour Change Across the Social and Behavioural Sciences: A Scoping Review. Health Psychology Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, pp. 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722.
143.
(Melrose) PanM.RyanA.Investigating Confirmation Bias in Transportation: An Analysis of Perceived Health Risk on Public Transit During the Pandemic. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 26, 2022, p. 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101485.
144.
WestinK.NordlundA.JanssonJ.NilssonJ.Goal Framing as a Tool for Changing People’s Car Travel Behavior in Sweden. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2020, p. 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093695.
145.
HolmesD. C.RichardsonL. M.Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2020.
146.
AnS.HuX.WangJ.A Cumulative Prospect Theory Approach to Car Owner Mode Choice Behaviour Prediction. Transport, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2014, pp. 386–394. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2014.983161.
147.
HeathY.GiffordR.Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting the Use of Public Transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 10, 2002, pp. 2154–2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x.
148.
SchwartzS. H.Normative Influences on Altruism. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (BerkowitzL., ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 221–279.
149.
FisherW. A.FisherJ. D.HarmanJ.The Information-Motivation-BehavioraI Skills Model: A General Social Psychological Approach to Understanding and Promoting Health Behavior. In Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness (J. Suls and K. A. Wallston, eds.), Blackwell Publishing, Malden, 2003, pp. 82–106.
150.
RosenstockI. M.The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior. Health Education Monographs, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1974, pp. 354–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200405.
KahnemanD.TverskyA.Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, pp. 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
153.
BanduraA.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
154.
SchwarzerR.Self-Efficacy in the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors: Theoretical Approaches and a New Model. In Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action (R. Schwarzer, ed.), Hemisphere Publishing Corp, Washington, D.C., pp. 217–243.
155.
RogersE. M.Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, NY, 1962.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
