Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
The Attitude–Behavior Gap in Green Travel Behavior: A Comprehensive Perspective Based on Color-Coded Behavior and the Moderating Influence of Motivation
It is conceptually and empirically agreed that a positive attitude toward green travel does not necessarily turn into green travel behavior. This is referred as the “attitude–behavior gap.” This study proposes a five-step analysis method to provide a deeper insight into the attitude–behavior gap in the context of green travel, namely to identify and explain the (in)consistency between attitude and green travel behavior by integrating two distinctive yet interrelated approaches. By virtue of the color-coded behavioral perspective, the attitude–behavior gap in green travel is explicitly confirmed, with four types of attitude–behavior interactions being characterized. The moderating role of motivations is then examined and confirmed by exploring the attitude–behavior relationships across groups with differing motivational patterns in relation to travel. It is found that when people are particularly concerned about the benefits provided by transport modes, both negative attitudes toward cars and favorable attitudes toward various transport modes because of their environmental/social benefits would significantly influence their green travel behavior, with effective green travel attitude–behavior consistency achieved. The current results are expected to provide some insights for administrators and operators hoping to promote green transport modes in urban areas.
CaoJ.ErmagunA.Influences of LRT on Travel Behaviour: A Retrospective Study on Movers in Minneapolis. Urban Studies, Vol. 54, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2504–2520.
2.
PoortingaW.StegL.VlekC.Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior: A Study into Household Energy Use. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2004, pp. 70–93.
3.
ClaudyM. C.PetersonM.O’driscollA.Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory. Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2013, pp. 273–287.
4.
GadenneD.SharmaB.KerrD.SmithT.The Influence of Consumers’ Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes on Energy Saving Behaviours. Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2011, pp. 7684–7694.
5.
Van RaaijW. F.VerhallenT. M.A Behavioral Model of Residential Energy Use. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1983, pp. 39–63.
6.
FrederiksE. R.StennerK.HobmanE. V.Household Energy Use: Applying Behavioural Economics to Understand Consumer Decision-Making and Behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 41, 2015, pp. 1385–1394.
7.
ZhangY.BaiX.MillsF. P.PezzeyJ. C.Examining the Attitude-Behavior Gap in Residential Energy Use: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey in Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 295, 2021, p. 126510.
8.
ElderG. H.JohnsonM. K.CrosnoeR.The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory. In Handbook of the Life Course (MortimerJ. T.ShanahanM. J., eds.), Springer US, Boston, MA, 2003, pp. 3–19.
9.
van WissenL. J. G.DykstraP. A.Population Issues: An Interdisciplinary Focus. Springer Science Business Media, New York, NY, 2012.
10.
De VosJ.WitloxF.Transportation Policy as Spatial Planning Tool; Reducing Urban Sprawl by Increasing Travel Costs and Clustering Infrastructure and Public Transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 33, 2013, pp. 117–125.
11.
MoserA. K.Thinking Green, Buying Green? Drivers of Pro-environmental Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2015, pp. 167–175.
12.
HuangY.WarnierM., eds. Bridging the Attitude-Behaviour Gap in Household Energy Consumption. Proc., 2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe), Bucharest, Romania, IEEE, New York, 2019.
13.
BushD. M.SimmonsR. G.Socialization Processes over the Life Course. In Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives (TurnerR., ed.), Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ, 1990, pp. 133–164.
14.
VieiraJ.CastroS. L.SouzaA. S.Psychological Barriers Moderate the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Climate Change. PLoS One, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2023, p. e0287404.
15.
LacroixK.GiffordR.ChenA.Developing and Validating the Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers (DIPB) Scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 63, 2019, pp. 9–18.
16.
LindaS.Can Public Transport Compete with the Private Car?IATSS Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2003, pp. 27–35.
17.
LiaoY.GilJ.PereiraR. H.YehS.VerendelV.Disparities in Travel Times Between Car and Transit: Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cities. Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2020, p. 4056.
18.
CarringtonM. J.NevilleB. A.WhitwellG. J.Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 97, 2010, pp. 139–158.
19.
LundbladL.DaviesI. A.The Values and Motivations Behind Sustainable Fashion Consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2016, pp. 149–162.
20.
WiederholdM.MartinezL. F.Ethical Consumer Behaviour in Germany: The Attitude-Behaviour Gap in the Green Apparel Industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2018, pp. 419–429.
21.
KandtJ.RodeP.HoffmannC.GraffA.SmithD.Gauging Interventions for Sustainable Travel: A Comparative Study of Travel Attitudes in Berlin and London. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 80, 2015, pp. 35–48.
22.
AjzenI.FishbeinM.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
23.
AjzenI.The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1991, pp. 179–211.
24.
ArvolaA.VassalloM.DeanM.LampilaP.SabaA.LähteenmäkiL.ShepherdR.Predicting Intentions to Purchase Organic Food: The Role of Affective and Moral Attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, Vol. 50, No. 2–3, 2008, pp. 443–454.
25.
ÖlanderF.ThøgersenJ.Understanding of Consumer Behaviour as a Prerequisite for Environmental Protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 18, 1995, pp. 345–385.
26.
YangM.WuJ.RasouliS.CirilloC.LiD.Exploring the Impact of Residential Relocation on Modal Shift in Commute Trips: Evidence from a Quasi-Longitudinal Analysis. Transport Policy, Vol. 59, 2017, pp. 142–152.
27.
JoshiY.RahmanZ.Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 1–2, 2015, pp. 128–143.
28.
McKenzie-MohrD.New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Promoting Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2000, pp. 543–554.
29.
LoveldyZ. A. C.IsmailT. A. T.JubaedahS. S.Examining the Attitude-Behavior Gap and Adoption Intention of SHS Technology: The Role of Social Influence. International Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021, pp. 14–24.
30.
McCarthyB.KapetanakiA. B.WangP.Completing the Food Waste Management Loop: Is There Market Potential for Value-Added Surplus Products (VASP)?Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 256, 2020, p. 120435.
31.
GiffordR. D.ChenA. K.Why Aren’t We Taking Action? Psychological Barriers to Climate-Positive Food Choices. Climatic Change, Vol. 140, 2017, pp. 165–178.
32.
HaiderS. W.ZhuangG.AliS.Identifying and Bridging the Attitude-Behavior Gap in Sustainable Transportation Adoption. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Vol. 10, 2019, pp. 3723–3738.
33.
RedondoI.PuellesM.The Connection Between Environmental Attitude–Behavior Gap and Other Individual Inconsistencies: A Call for Strengthening Self-control. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2017, pp. 107–120.
34.
PrillwitzJ.BarrS.Moving Towards Sustainability? Mobility Styles, Attitudes and Individual Travel Behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1590–1600.
35.
ChakrabartiS.JohK.The Effect of Parenthood on Travel Behavior: Evidence from the California Household Travel Survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 120, 2019, pp. 101–115.
36.
WintschnigB. A.The Attitude-Behavior Gap–Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption. Junior Management Science (JUMS), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2021, pp. 324–346.
37.
Van DroogenbroeckE.Van HoveL.Adoption of Online Grocery Shopping: Personal or Household Characteristics?Journal of Internet Commerce, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2017, pp. 255–286.
38.
CelsiR. L.OlsonJ. C.The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1988, pp. 210–224.
39.
LiD.MenassaC. C.KaratasA.Energy Use Behaviors in Buildings: Towards an Integrated Conceptual Framework. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 23, 2017, pp. 97–112.
40.
BrophyJ.Motivating Students to Learn. Routledge, New York, NY, 2004.
41.
Olde KalterM.-J.La Paix PuelloL.GeursK. T.Do Changes in Travellers’ Attitudes Towards Car Use and Ownership over Time Affect Travel Mode Choice? A Latent Transition Approach in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 132, 2020, pp. 1–17.
42.
La Paix PuelloL.ChowdhuryS.GeursK.Using Panel Data for Modelling Duration Dynamics of Outdoor Leisure Activities. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 31, 2019, pp. 141–155.
43.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL.A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1999, pp. 81–97.
44.
MuromachiY.Experiences of Past School Travel Modes by University Students and Their Intention of Future Car Purchase. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 104, 2017, pp. 209–220.
45.
DwikesumasariP. R.MoslehpourM.SulistiawanJ.RizaldyH.Investigating Internal Motivation in Sustainable Fashion Consumption: Attitude Towards Recycled and Upcycled Products. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 2024, pp. 1–13.
46.
HendenE.What Is Self-control?Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2008, pp. 69–90.
47.
AjzenI.Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2002, pp. 665–683.
48.
KidwellB.JewellR. D.An Examination of Perceived Behavioral Control: Internal and External Influences on Intention. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 7, 2003, pp. 625–642.
49.
KidwellB.JewellR. D.The Moderated Influence of Internal Control: An Examination Across Health-Related Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2003, pp. 377–386.
50.
TangneyJ. P.BooneA. L.BaumeisterR. F.High Self-control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. In Self-regulation and Self-control (BaumeisterR., ed.), Routledge, London, 2018, pp. 173–212.
51.
SchroderK. E. E.OllisC. L.DaviesS.Habitual Self–control: A Brief Measure of Persistent Goal Pursuit. European Journal of Personality, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2013, pp. 82–95.
52.
ScheinerJ.Housing Mobility and Travel Behaviour: A Process-Oriented Approach to Spatial Mobility: Evidence from a New Research Field in Germany. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2006, pp. 287–298.
53.
NovacoR. W.StokolsD.MilanesiL.Objective and Subjective Dimensions of Travel Impedance as Determinants of Commuting Stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1990, pp. 231–257.
54.
HortonF. E.ReynoldsD. R., eds. An Investigation of Individual Action Spaces: A Progress Report. Proc., Association of American Geographers, Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C., 1969.
55.
AdritaU. W.MohiuddinM. F.Impact of Opportunity and Ability to Translate Environmental Attitude into Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2020, pp. 173–186.
56.
ThøgersenJ.Psychological Determinants of Paying Attention to Eco-labels in Purchase Decisions: Model Development and Multinational Validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2000, pp. 285–313.
57.
PlantR. W.RyanR. M.Intrinsic Motivation and the Effects of Self-Consciousness, Self-Awareness, and Ego-Involvement: An Investigation of Internally Controlling Styles. Journal of Personality, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1985, pp. 435–449.
58.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2000, pp. 54–67.
59.
WilsonM.When Creative Consumers Go Green: Understanding Consumer Upcycling. Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2016, pp. 394–399.
60.
StegL.BolderdijkJ. W.KeizerK.PerlaviciuteG.An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The Role of Values, Situational Factors and Goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 38, 2014, pp. 104–115.
61.
ShiT.HuangR.SarigöllüE.A Qualitative Study on Internal Motivations and Consequences of Consumer Upcycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 377, 2022, p. 134185.
62.
LewinW.-C.WeltersbachM. S.HaaseK.RiepeC.SkovC.GundelundC.StrehlowH. V.Comparing On-site and Off-site Survey Data to Investigate Survey Biases in Recreational Fisheries Data. ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 78, No. 7, 2021, pp. 2528–2546.
63.
LinD.SunY.YangY.HanY.XuC.Urban Park Use and Self-reported Physical, Mental, and Social Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An On-site Survey in Beijing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 79, 2023, p. 127804.
64.
YurievA.DahmenM.PailléP.BoiralO.GuillaumieL.Pro-environmental Behaviors Through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Scoping Review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 155, 2020, p. 104660.
65.
Bissing-OlsonM. J.IyerA.FieldingK. S.ZacherH.Relationships Between Daily Affect and Pro-environmental Behavior at Work: The Moderating Role of Pro-environmental Attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2013, pp. 156–175.
66.
BabbieE. R.The Practice of Social Research: Earl Babbie, 8th ed. Wadsworth Pub. Co, Belmont, CA, 1998.
67.
GengJ.LongR.ChenH.LiW.Exploring the Motivation-Behavior Gap in Urban Residents’ Green Travel Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 125, 2017, pp. 282–292.
68.
MartillaJ. A.JamesJ. C.Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1977, pp. 77–79.
69.
GengJ.LongR.ChenH.LiQ.Urban Residents’ Response to and Evaluation of Low-Carbon Travel Policies: Evidence from a Survey of Five Eastern Cities in China. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 217, 2018, pp. 47–55.
70.
ZhangY.DuJ.BoamahK. B.Green Climate and Pro-environmental Behavior: Addressing Attitude-Behavior Gaps Towards Promoting Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2023, pp. 2428–2445.
71.
HausmanJ.McFaddenD.Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1984, pp. 1219–1240.
72.
TrainK. E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2009.
73.
KlineR. B.Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2011.
74.
RasouliS.TimmermansH.Van der WaerdenP.Employment Status Transitions and Shifts in Daily Activity-Travel Behavior with Special Focus on Shopping Duration. Transportation, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2015, pp. 919–931.
75.
GieleJ. Z.ElderG. H.Methods of Life Course Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.
76.
HuneckeM.HausteinS.GrischkatS.BöhlerS.Psychological, Sociodemographic, and Infrastructural Factors as Determinants of Ecological Impact Caused by Mobility Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2007, pp. 277–292.
77.
LoisD.MorianoJ. A.RondinellaG.Cycle Commuting Intention: A Model Based on Theory of Planned Behaviour and Social Identity. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 32, 2015, pp. 101–113.
78.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ.Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?Environmental Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2002, pp. 239–260.
79.
FuX.A Novel Perspective to Enhance the Role of TPB in Predicting Green Travel: The Moderation of Affective-Cognitive Congruence of Attitudes. Transportation, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2021, pp. 3013–3035.
80.
LinB.WangX.Does Low-Carbon Travel Intention Really Lead to Actual Low-Carbon Travel? Evidence from Urban Residents in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 72, 2021, pp. 743–756.
81.
HowarthC.WatersonB.McDonaldM., eds. Public Understanding of Climate Change and the Gaps Between Knowledge, Attitudes and Travel Behavior. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., No. 09-2974, 2009.
82.
GehlertT.DziekanK.GärlingT.Psychology of Sustainable Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 48, 2013, pp. 19–24.
83.
GengJ.LongR.ChenH.Impact of Information Intervention on Travel Mode Choice of Urban Residents with Different Goal Frames: A Controlled Trial in Xuzhou, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 91, 2016, pp. 134–147.
84.
RuX.WangS.ChenQ.YanS.Exploring the Interaction Effects of Norms and Attitudes on Green Travel Intention: An Empirical Study in Eastern China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 197, 2018, pp. 1317–1327.
85.
FuX.Understanding the Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles: The Role of Hedonic-Utilitarian Values. Energy, Vol. 301, 2024, p. 131703.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
