Transportation infrastructure in the United States faces a significant challenge with more than 40% of bridges surpassing the 50-year mark and 25% requiring rehabilitation, repair, or total replacement. This aging infrastructure, compounded by budget constraints, presents a critical issue that necessitates the prioritization of bridge rehabilitation projects. While traditional prioritization has focused on structural and traffic conditions, the pressing need to address social equity and environmental justice (SEEJ) concerns highlights the importance of a new approach. To address this need, this study aims to incorporate SEEJ considerations into the process of prioritizing bridge rehabilitation projects. To do so, a spatial multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was leveraged to integrate diverse criteria into a coherent bridge rehabilitation prioritization framework. This framework integrates spatial data, encompassing flood-related factors, social aspects, and environmental parameters, with datasets representing structural and traffic conditions of bridges. This amalgamation yields an integrated vulnerability map that assigns vulnerability levels (from very high to very low) to each bridge that can be used as a proxy for prioritization. The practicality of the framework is demonstrated through its application in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The results underscore the importance of SEEJ considerations in bridge rehabilitation to address vulnerabilities, especially within marginalized communities. The proposed framework is adjustable and leverages readily available data, rendering it applicable beyond the study area. The framework can be used as a practical tool by decision makers, such as state Departments of Transportation, to prioritize bridge rehabilitation projects equitably, enhance the resilience of critical infrastructure, and promote inclusive and sustainable communities.
FHWA. Engineering Design, Fabrication and Erection of Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (FHWA-HIF-17-019). Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2013.
RallsM. L.History of ABC Implementation in US. Proc., National ABC Conference, Miami, FL, 2014.
4.
CulmoM. P.LordB.HuieM.BeermanB.Accelerated Bridge Construction: Experience in Design, Fabrication and Erection of Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems: Final Manual. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Bridge Technology, 2011.
5.
BasuB.Accelerated Construction and Rehabilitation of Bridges. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2005.
6.
AlipourA.GransbergD. D.ZhangN.An Integrated Project to Enterprise-Level Decision-Making Framework for Prioritization of Accelerated Bridge Construction. Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC), Miami-FL, 2018.
KhanM. A.Accelerated Bridge Construction: Best Practices and Techniques. Elsevier, Waltham, MA, 2014.
9.
GilchristA.AlloucheE. N.Quantification of Social Costs Associated with Construction Projects: State-of-the-Art Review. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 89–104.
10.
CairnsS.GreigJ.WachsM.Environmental Justice & Transportation: A Citizen’s Handbook. Institute of Transportation Studies. University of California Berkeley, 2003.
11.
ForkenbrockD. J.SheeleyJ.Effective Methods for Environmental Justice Assessment. NCHRP Report 532. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
12.
ChakrabortyJ.Evaluating the Environmental Justice Impacts of Transportation Improvement Projects in the US. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2006, pp.315–323.
13.
MoreuF.WangC.YuanX.GhanbariL.GarridoC.Strategies for Prioritizing Needs for Accelerated Construction After Hazard Events. Transportation Consortium of South-Central States (Tran-SET) University Transportation Center for Region 6, Baton Rouge, LA, 2019.
14.
WhelanM. J.CavallineT. L.AlarA.LaneK.Guidelines for Prioritization of Bridge Replacement, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Projects. Technical Report No. FHWA/NC/2016-05, 2019.
15.
SanfordK. L.HerabatP.McNeilS.Bridge Management and Inspection Data: Leveraging the Data and Identifying the Gaps. Proceedings of the 8th International Bridge Management Conference, Denver, CO, Vol. 1, 1999, pp. 1–15.
16.
BrownM. C.GomezJ. P.HammerM. L.HooksJ. M.Long-Term Bridge Performance High Priority Bridge Performance Issues (FHWA-HRT-14-052). Federal Highway Administration, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, McLean, VA, 2014.
17.
JinW.HaidaryT. A.BausmanD. C.ChowdhuryM.Evaluation of Project Development Process at State Transportation Agencies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 326–337.
18.
Federal Highway Administration. National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS); 23 CFR Part 650. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2022.
19.
CDM Smith and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Risk Assessment on SIS Facilities. Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation Systems Implementation Office. Tallahassee, FL, 2018.
20.
JohnsonB. V.PurdyJ. E.LiuD. H.Long Term Bridge Performance Program Status and Preliminary Results. In Maintenance, Safety, Risk, Management and Life-Cycle Performance of Bridges, CRC Press, London, UK, 2018, pp. 112–129.
Florida Department of Transportation. FDOT Design Manual: 121-Bridge Project Development. Topic #625-000-002. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2018.
23.
OfiliM.State of Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) in the United States. Honors College Theses. Georgia Southern University, 2015.
24.
TateE.RahmanM. A.EmrichC. T.SampsonC. C.Flood Exposure and Social Vulnerability in the United States. Natural Hazards, Vol. 106, No. 1, 2021, pp.435–457.
25.
DengL.WangW.YuY.State-of-the-Art Review on the Causes and Mechanisms of Bridge Collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2016, p. 04015005.
26.
MontalvoC.CookW.KeeneyT.Retrospective Analysis of Hydraulic Bridge Collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2020, p. 04019111.
27.
WardhanaK.HadiprionoF. C.Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2003, pp.144–150.
28.
KimY. J.MarshallW.PalI.Assessment of Infrastructure Devastated by Extreme Floods: A Case Study from Colorado, USA. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering, Vol. 167, No. 4, 2014, pp. 186–191.
29.
BrowneT. M.CollinsT. J.GarlichM. J.O’LearyJ. E.StrombergD. G.HeringhausK. C.Underwater Bridge Inspection (FHWA-NHI-10-027). Federal Highway Administration, Office of Bridge Technology, Washington, D.C., 2010.
MohamadiazarN.EbrahimianA.Integrated Flood Risk and Social Equity Assessment for the Prioritization of Bridge Rehabilitation Activities Using Spatial, Data-Driven, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, American Geophisycal Union, Washington, D.C., Vol. 2022, 2022, pp. GC44F-05.
32.
Chapter 7. Capital Investment Scenarios – Highways, in Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit. Conditions & Performance Report. 23rd ed., U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration, 2006.
33.
GandyC. A.ArmaniosD. E.SamarasC.Social Equity of Bridge Management. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2023, p. 04023027.
34.
KhalifeF. G.ArnesonE. E.AtaderoR. A.OzbekM. E.Assessing Social Equity Considerations Within Transportation Asset Management. Transport Economics and Management, Vol. 1, 2023, pp. 160–167.
35.
BergR.HinzeJ.Theft and Vandalism on Construction Sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 7, 2005, pp. 826–833.
36.
TwaddellH.ZgodaB.AimenD.MorrisA.Environmental Justice Analysis in Transportation Planning and Programming: State of the Practice (FHWA-HEP-19-022). Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2019.
37.
SezerA. A.FredrikssonA.Environmental Impact of Construction Transport and the Effects of Building Certification Schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 172, 2021, p. 105688.
38.
KjellstromT.CroweJ.Climate Change, Workplace Heat Exposure, and Occupational Health and Productivity in Central America. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2011, pp. 270–281.
39.
KarthickS.KermanshachiS.RouhanizadehB.NamianM.Short- and Long-Term Health Challenges of Transportation Workforce Due to Extreme Weather Conditions. Proc., Tran-SET 2021American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2021, pp. 39–51.
40.
HsuD. J. Y. M.SunK. H.ChuangY.JuangJ.ChangF. L.Effect of Elevation Change on Work Fatigue and Physiological Symptoms for High-Rise Building Construction Workers. Safety Science, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2008, pp. 833–843.
41.
DongX. S.WestG. H.Holloway-BethA.WangX.SokasR. K.Heat-Related Deaths Among Construction Workers in the United States. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 62, No. 12, 2019, pp. 1047–1057.
42.
KaiserN.BarstowC. K.Rural Transportation Infrastructure in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Impacts, Implications, and Interventions. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2022, p. 2149.
43.
SampsonN. R.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.IsraelB. A.Improving Public Participation to Achieve Environmental Justice: Applying Lessons from Freight’s Frontline Communities. Environmental Justice, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, pp. 45–54.
44.
EJScreen. Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2023. https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen.
GuoY.ChenZ.StuartA.LiX.ZhangY.A Systematic Overview of Transportation Equity in Terms of Accessibility, Traffic Emissions, and Safety Outcomes: From Conventional to Emerging Technologies. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 4, 2020, p. 100091.
47.
MuhaiminA. M.ZhangL.DhakalS.LvX.PradhanangaN.KalasapudiV. S.AzizinaminiA.Identification and Analysis of Factors Affecting the Future of Bridge Design, Construction, and Operation. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2021, p. 04021049.
48.
GilchristA.AlloucheE. N.Quantification of Social Costs Associated with Construction Projects: State-of-the-Art Review. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 89–104.
49.
France-MensahJ.KothariC.O’BrienW. J.JiaoJ.Integrating Social Equity in Highway Maintenance and Rehabilitation Programming: A Quantitative Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 48, 2019, p. 101526.
50.
Federal Highway Administration. Florida, Bridges of Miami. National Bridge Inventory. BridgeReports.com, 2018.
51.
KeeneyR. L.RaiffaH.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Wiley, New York, NY, 1976.
EbrahimianA.WadzukB.Multicriteria Prioritization of Research Needs in Urban Green Stormwater Infrastructure. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2022, p. 05022005.
56.
EbrahimianA.ArdeshirA.RadI. Z.GhodsypourS. H.Urban Stormwater Construction Method Selection Using a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Approach. Automation in Construction, Vol. 58, 2015, pp. 118–128.
57.
ShariatR.RoozbahaniA.EbrahimianA.Risk Analysis of Urban Stormwater Infrastructure Systems Using Fuzzy Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 647, 2019, pp. 1468–1477.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
