Characteristics of household vehicles can influence daily travel behavior and can vary greatly by vehicle type. Vehicle type is defined here as a combination of body type, fuel type, and age. Using data compiled primarily from the National Household Travel Survey, a multinomial logit model was developed to predict vehicle type based on characteristics of the household that owns the vehicle. The model was then implemented for the San Francisco Bay Area in the ActivitySim activity-based modeling framework and validated against observed data. The ActivitySim project’s goal is to create and maintain advanced, open-source, activity-based travel behavior modeling software, based on best software development practices, for distribution to the public, free of charge. A naïve 2030 scenario was analyzed to show model response to changes in the vehicle fleet.
AngueiraJ.KonduriK. C.ChakourV.EluruN.Exploring the Relationship between Vehicle Type Choice and Distance Traveled: A Latent Segmentation Approach. Transportation Letters, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2019, pp. 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1299346
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Research Foundation. ActivitySim. GitHub, https://activitysim.github.io/. Accessed August 1, 2022.
4.
ChenN.AkarG.GordonS. I.ChenS.Where Do You Live and What Do You Drive: Built-Environmental and Spatial Effects on Vehicle Type Choice and Vehicle Use. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2020, pp. 444–455.
5.
KhanN. A.HabibM. A.Development of Households’ Vehicle Choice Models for Travel Accompanying Arrangements. Transportation Engineering, Vol. 4, 2021, p. 100071.
6.
AngueiraJ.KonduriK. C.ChakourV.EluruN.Exploring the Relationship Between Vehicle Type Choice and Distance Traveled: A Latent Segmentation Approach. Transportation Letters, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2017, pp. 146–157.
7.
MillerE. J.RoordaM. J.CarrascoJ. A.A Tour-Based Model of Travel Mode Choice. Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2005, pp. 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3
8.
RezvaniZ.JanssonJ.BodinJ.Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 34, 2015, pp. 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010
9.
HaT. V.AsadaT.ArimuraM.Determination of the Influence Factors on Household Vehicle Ownership Patterns in Phnom Penh Using Statistical and Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Transport GeographyVol. 78, 2019, pp. 70–86.
10.
NarassimhanE.JohnsonC.The Role of Demand-Side Incentives and Charging Infrastructure on Plug-in Electric Vehicle Adoption: Analysis of US States. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2018, p. 074032.
11.
JiaW.ChenT. D.Are Individuals’ Stated Preferences for Electric Vehicles (EVS) Consistent With Real-World EV Ownership Patterns?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 93, 2021, p. 102728.
12.
TsourosI.PolydoropoulouA.Who Will Buy Alternative Fueled or Automated Vehicles: A Modular, Behavioral Modeling Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 132, 2019, pp. 214–225.
13.
NieY. M.GhamamiM.ZockaieA.XiaoF.Optimization of Incentive Policies for Plug-in Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 84, 2016, pp. 103–123.
14.
CoffmanM.BernsteinP.WeeS.Electric Vehicles Revisited: A Review of Factors that Affect Adoption. Transport Reviews, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2016, pp. 79–93.
15.
FarkasZ. A.ShinH. -S.DadvarS.MolinaJ.Electric Vehicle Ownership Factors, Preferred Safety Technologies and Commuting Behavior in the United. Mid-Atlantic Transportation Sustainability University Transportation Center, February2017.
16.
LeeJ. H.HardmanS. J.TalG.Investigating the Buyers of Electric Vehicles in California: Are We Moving Beyond Early Adopters?. Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting, 2019.
17.
ChenN.AkarG.GordonS. I.ChenS.Where Do You Live and What Do You Drive: Built-Environmental and Spatial Effects on Vehicle Type Choice and Vehicle Use. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2021, pp. 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1762950
18.
BrückmannG.WillibaldF.BlancoV.Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in Regions without Strong Policies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 90, 2021, p. 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102615
19.
SovacoolB. K.KesterJ.NoelL.de RubensG. Z.Income, Political Affiliation, Urbanism and Geography in Stated Preferences for Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Technologies in Northern Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 78, 2019, pp. 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.06.006
20.
TsourosI.PolydoropoulouA.Who Will Buy Alternative Fueled or Automated Vehicles: A Modular, Behavioral Modeling Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 132, 2020, pp. 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.013
21.
MohamedM.HigginsC. D.FergusonM.RéquiaW. J.The Influence of Vehicle Body Type in Shaping Behavioural Intention to Acquire Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 116, 2018, pp. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.011
22.
BhatC. R.A Multiple Discrete–Continuous Extreme Value Model: Formulation and Application to Discretionary Time-Use Decisions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2005, pp. 679–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.08.003
23.
KonduriK. C.YeX.SanaB.PendyalaR. M.Joint Model of Vehicle Type Choice and Tour Length. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2255, No. 1, 2011, pp. 28–37. https://doi.org/10.3141/2255-04
24.
Faghih-ImaniA.GhafghaziG.EluruN.PinjariA. R.A Multiple-Discrete Approach for Examining Vehicle Type Use for Daily Activity Participation Decisions. Transportation Letters, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1179/1942787513Y.0000000001
25.
AnowarS.EluruN.Miranda-MorenoL. F.Lee-GosselinM.. Joint Econometric Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Flexibility of Activities, Vehicle Type Choice, and Primary Driver Selection. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2495, No. 1, 2015, pp. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.3141/2495-04
26.
KoppelmanF. S.LaurieA. Garrow. Efficiently Estimating Nested Logit Models with Choice-Based Samples: Example Applications. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1921, No. 1, 2005, pp. 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192100108
California Energy Commission CONSULTANT REPORT 2015–2017 California Vehicle Survey California Energy Commission Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor May 2018 | CEC-200-2018-006-AP Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: RSG.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Electric Vehicles and Hybrids Surpass 16% of Total 2023 U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Sales. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61344. Accessed February 19, 2024.
