The random regret minimization (RRM) approach has been widely used in transport literature, but its application in the Global South is still marginal. In this paper we discuss individual commuting mode choice in the city of São Paulo (Brazil) from the perspective of the RRM modeling approach and its variants found in the literature. We estimated several multinomial logit models (random utility maximization [RUM], classical RRM, RRM, and hybrid formulations of RUM-RRM models) and explored regret scale and decision rule heterogeneities using latent class models with specific parameters. The results showed that the RRM approach outperformed its RUM counterpart in relation to model fit and suggested that it better captured the mode choice behavior of individuals in the analyzed context. We also found that accounting for heterogeneity in scale and decision rules improved the results of the models, and the specific parameters indicated that individuals displayed different regret behavior for travel time and travel cost attributes.
McFaddenD. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: P. Zarembka, Ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, 1073, pp. 105–142.
2.
ChorusC. G.ArentzeT. A.TimmermansH. J. P.A Random Regret-Minimization Model of Travel Choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRB.2007.05.004.
3.
ChorusC. G.A New Model of Random Regret Minimization. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 10, No. 10, 2010, pp. 181–196. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.2.2881.
4.
LoomesG.SugdenR.Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty. The Economic Journal, Vol. 92, No. 368, 1982, p. 805. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669.
5.
van CranenburghS.GuevaraC. A.ChorusC. G.New Insights on Random Regret Minimization Models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 74, 2015, pp. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.008.
6.
JingP.ZhaoM.HeM.ChenL.Travel Mode and Travel Route Choice Behavior Based on Random Regret Minimization: A Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 4, 2018, p. 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041185.
7.
ChorusC. G.RoseJ. M.HensherD. A.Regret Minimization or Utility Maximization: It Depends on the Attribute. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2013, pp. 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38092.
8.
HessS.StathopoulosA.DalyA.HessS.Allowing for Heterogeneous Decision Rules in Discrete Choice Models: An Approach and Four Case Studies. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2012, pp. 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9365-6.
9.
HessS.StathopoulosA.A Mixed Random Utility - Random Regret Model Linking the Choice of Decision Rule to Latent Character Traits. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2013, pp. 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2013.12.005.
10.
BelgiawanP. F.DubernetI.SchmidB.AxhausenK. W.Context-Dependent Models (CRRM, MuRRM, PRRM, RAM) versus a Context-Free Model (MNL) in Transportation Studies: A Comprehensive Comparisons for Swiss and German SP and RP Data Sets. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1487–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2019.1612968.
11.
Ben-AkivaM. E.LermanS. R.Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, London, 1985.
12.
ChorusC. G.What About Behavior in Travel Demand Modelling? An Overview of Recent Progress. Transportation Letters, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2012, pp. 93–104. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2012.04.02.93-104.
13.
HancockT. O.HessS.ChoudhuryC. F.Decision Field Theory: Improvements to Current Methodology and Comparisons with Standard Choice Modelling Techniques. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 107, 2018, pp. 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.004.
14.
SwaitJ.A Non-Compensatory Choice Model Incorporating Attribute Cutoffs. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2001, pp. 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00030-8.
15.
ZhangJ.TimmermansH. J. P.BorgersA.WangD.Modeling Traveler Choice Behavior Using the Concepts of Relative Utility and Relative Interest. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00009-2.
16.
ChorusC. G.Random Regret Minimization: An Overview of Model Properties and Empirical Evidence. Transport Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2012, pp. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.609947.
17.
WongS. D.ChorusC. G.ShaheenS. A.WalkerJ. L.A Revealed Preference Methodology to Evaluate Regret Minimization with Challenging Choice Sets: A Wildfire Evacuation Case Study. Travel Behavior and Society, Vol. 20, 2020, pp. 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.003.
18.
HensherD. A.GreeneW. H.The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice. Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2003, pp. 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350.
19.
GreeneW. H.HensherD. A.A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2003, pp. 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00046-2.
20.
HessS.ChorusC. G.Utility Maximisation and Regret Minimisation: A Mixture of a Generalisation. In Bounded Rational Choice Behavior: Applications in Transport (S.RasouliTimmermansH., eds.), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, 2015, pp. 31–47.
21.
HensherD. A.GreeneW. H.ChorusC. G.Random Regret Minimization or Random Utility Maximization: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Automobile Fuel Choice. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 47, No. 7, 2013, pp. 667–678. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.188.
22.
LeongW.HensherD. A.Contrasts of Relative Advantage Maximisation with Random Utility Maximisation and Regret Minimisation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), Vol. 49, No. 1, 2015, pp. 167–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/jtranseconpoli.49.1.0167.
23.
LuanS.YangQ.JiangZ.WangW.Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Individual’s Travel Mode Choice in China. Transport Policy, Vol. 106, 2021, pp. 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.011.
24.
KaplanS.PratoC. G.The Application of the Random Regret Minimization Model to Drivers’ Choice of Crash Avoidance Maneuvers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2012, pp. 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.06.005.
25.
BoeriM.MasieroL.Regret Minimisation and Utility Maximisation in a Freight Transport Context. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2014, pp. 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2013.809818.
26.
KeyaN.AnowarS.EluruN.Joint Model of Freight Mode Choice and Shipment Size: A Copula-Based Random Regret Minimization Framework. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 125, 2019, pp. 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.007.
27.
KeyaN.AnowarS.EluruN.Freight Mode Choice: A Regret Minimization and Utility Maximization Based Hybrid Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 107–119.
Van CranenburghS.PratoC. G.On the Robustness of Random Regret Minimization Modelling Outcomes Towards Omitted Attributes. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 18, 2016, pp. 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2016.04.004.
XuY.ZhouJ.XuW.Regret-Based Multi-Objective Route Choice Models and Stochastic User Equilibrium: A Non-Compensatory Approach. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2020, pp. 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2020.1719550.
32.
BoeriM.LongoA.DohertyE.HynesS.Site Choices in Recreational Demand: A Matter of Utility Maximization or Regret Minimization?Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp. 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2011.640844.
33.
BoeriM.ScarpaR.ChorusC. G.Stated Choices and Benefit Estimates in the Context of Traffic Calming Schemes: Utility Maximization, Regret Minimization, or Both?Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 61, 2014, pp. 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.003.
34.
HensherD. A.GreeneW. H.HoC. Q.Random Regret Minimization and Random Utility Maximization in the Presence of Preference Heterogeneity: An Empirical Contrast. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 142, No. 4, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000827.
35.
PratoC. G.Expanding the Applicability of Random Regret Minimization for Route Choice Analysis. Transportation, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9489-y.
36.
ChorusC. G.van CranenburghS.DekkerT.Random Regret Minimization for Consumer Choice Modeling: Assessment of Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, No. 11, 2014, pp. 2428–2436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.010.
37.
BelgiawanP. F.IlahiA.AxhausenK. W.Influence of Pricing on Mode Choice Decision in Jakarta: A Random Regret Minimization Model. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.12.002.
38.
ParthanK.SrinivasanK. K.Investigation of Alternate Behavioral Frameworks for Mode Choice Decisions of Workers in Chennai City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 104, 2013, pp. 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.151.
39.
MasieroL.YangY.QiuR. T. R.Understanding Hotel Location Preference of Customers: Comparing Random Utility and Random Regret Decision Rules. Tourism Management, Vol. 73, 2019, pp. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.002.
40.
Fernandez PernettS.AmayaJ.ArellanaJ.CantilloV.Questioning the Implication of the Utility-Maximization Assumption for the Estimation of Deprivation Cost Functions After Disasters. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 247, 2022, p. 108435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2022.108435.
41.
IslerC. A.BlumenfeldM.CaldeiraG. P.RobertsC.Stimulus Perception in Long-Distance Railway Mode Choice. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2023, 2023, p. 17.
42.
MauadS. V. S.IslerC. A.Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice Approaches for Modeling Destination Choices of Urban Home-Based Trips to Work. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231203226
43.
JangS.RasouliS.TimmermansH.Incorporating Psycho-Physical Mapping into Random Regret Choice Models: Model Specifications and Empirical Performance Assessments. Transportation, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2017, pp. 999–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9691-9.
44.
JangS.RasouliS.TimmermansH. J. P.Accounting for Cognitive Effort in Random Regret-Only Models: Effect of Attribute Variation and Choice Set Size. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2018, pp. 842–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516688687.
45.
JangS.RasouliS.TimmermansH. J. P.Bias in Random Regret Models due to Measurement Error: Formal and Empirical Comparison with Random Utility Model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2017, pp. 405–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2017.1285366.
46.
JangS.RasouliS.TimmermansH. J. P.Error by Omitted Variables in Regret-Based Choice Models: Formal and Empirical Comparison with Utility-Based Models Using Orthogonal Design Data. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2020, pp. 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2020.1719548.
47.
DekkerT.Indifference Based Value of Time Measures for Random Regret Minimisation Models. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 12, 2014, pp. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2014.09.001.
48.
SharmaB.HickmanM.NassirN.Park-and-Ride Lot Choice Model Using Random Utility Maximization and Random Regret Minimization. Transportation, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2019, pp. 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9804-0.
GomideA. D. Á.MoratoR.Instrumentos de Desestímulo Ao Uso Do Transporte Individual Motorizado: Lições e Recomendações IEMA. Instituto de Energia e Meio Ambiente, 2011, pp. 1–64.
GreeneW. H.Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2012.
57.
Ben-AkivaM. E.SwaitJ.Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index. Transportation Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1986, pp. 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.20.2.133.
58.
HessS.PalmaD.Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 32, 2019, p. 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170.
R Core Team. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed July 17, 2020.
61.
AtasoyB.GlerumA.BierlaireM.Attitudes Towards Mode Choice in Switzerland. disP - The Planning Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2013, pp. 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2013.827518.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
