The rapid growth of e-commerce has heightened the importance for express delivery companies to ensure timely deliveries. Consequently, it is essential to explore ways to deliver more packages to customers while simultaneously reducing costs through the adoption of a joint distribution mode. This study presents a two-level delivery location selection model within the joint distribution mode, considering factors such as delivery station capacity and the number of transport vehicles, with the objective of minimizing the total cost associated with selecting delivery station locations. The proposed model is addressed using a combination of the k-means algorithm and the improved discrete firefly algorithm. In addition, to facilitate equitable cost allocation among enterprises, the Shapley value method is introduced in this study. A case study based on real data from an urban distribution network in the city of Hebei Province, China, is adopted to perform the experiments. The results of this study indicate that the improved algorithm not only improves solution accuracy but also reduces solution time when compared to both the particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony methods. Furthermore, the application of the Shapley value method demonstrates the efficacy of a rational allocation of costs.
PinosJ.HahladakisJ. N.ChenH.Why Is the Generation of Packaging Waste from Express Deliveries a Major Problem?Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 830, 2022, p. 154759.
2.
JiY.YangH.ZhangY.ZhongW.Location Optimization Model of Regional Express Distribution Center. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 96, 2013, pp. 1008–1013.
3.
HeY.WangX.LinY.ZhouF.ZhouL.Sustainable Decision Making for Joint Distribution Center Location Choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 55, 2017, pp. 202–216.
4.
YazdaniM.ChatterjeeP.PamucarD.ChakrabortyS.Development of an Integrated Decision Making Model for Location Selection of Logistics Centers in the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 148, 2020, p. 113208.
5.
UyanikC.TuzkayaG.KalenderZ. T.OguztimurS.An Integrated DEMATEL–IF-TOPSIS Methodology for Logistics Centers’ Location Selection Problem: An Application for Istanbul Metropolitan Area. Transport, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2020, pp. 548–556.
6.
PhamT. Y.MaH. M.YeoG. T.Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to Locate Logistics Centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ Perspective. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2017, pp. 211–219.
7.
EmeçŞ.AkkayaG.Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Approach for Warehouse Location Selection Problem. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2018, pp. 950–962.
8.
Naimi SadighA.FallahH.NahavandiN.A Multi-Objective Supply Chain Model Integrated with Location of Distribution Centers and Supplier Selection Decisions. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 69, No. 1–4, 2013, pp. 225–235.
9.
LiS.WeiZ.HuangA.Location Selection of Urban Distribution Center with a Mathematical Modeling Approach Based on the Total Cost. IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 2018, pp. 61833–61842.
10.
MengF.JiQ.ZhengH.WangH.ChuD.Modeling and Solution Algorithm for Optimization Integration of Express Terminal Nodes with a Joint Distribution Mode. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2021, pp. 142–166.
11.
WangZ.ShenC.LiuF.GaoF.Analytical Expressions for Joint Distributions in Probabilistic Load Flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2017, pp. 2473–2474.
12.
MrabtiN.HamaniN.BoulaksilY.GargouriM. A.DelahocheL.A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for the Problems of Sustainable Collaborative Hub Location and Cost Sharing. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 164, 2022, p. 102821.
13.
WangC. N.NhieuN. L.ChungY. C.PhamH. T.Multi-Objective Optimization Models for Sustainable Perishable Intermodal Multi-Product Networks with Delivery Time Window. Mathematics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2021, p. 379.
14.
AnQ.ChenH.Double-Type Player Games and Proportional Cross-Evaluation Allocation Method for Collaborative Logistics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 135, 2022, p. 103517.
15.
DrorM.Cost Allocation: The Traveling Salesman, Binpacking, and the Knapsack. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1990, pp. 191–207.
16.
SchmeidlerD.The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1969, pp. 1163–1170.
17.
LuoC.ZhouX.LevB.Core, Shapley Value, Nucleolus and Nash Bargaining Solution: A Survey of Recent Developments and Applications in Operations Management. Omega, Vol. 110, 2022, p. 102638.
18.
LozanoS.MorenoP.Adenso-DíazB.AlgabaE.Cooperative Game Theory Approach to Allocating Benefits of Horizontal Cooperation. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 229, No. 2, 2013, pp. 444–452.
19.
WangY.MaX.LiuM.GongK.LiuY.XuM.WangY.Cooperation and Profit Allocation in Two-Echelon Logistics Joint Distribution Network Optimization. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 56, 2017, pp. 143–157.
20.
AudyJ.-F.D’AmoursS.RousseauL.-M.Cost Allocation in the Establishment of a Collaborative Transportation Agreement—An Application in the Furniture Industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 62, No. 6, 2011, pp. 960–970.
21.
DaiB.ChenH.Profit Allocation Mechanisms for Carrier Collaboration in Pickup and Delivery Service. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2012, pp. 633–643.
22.
SunL.RangarajanA.KarwanM. H.PintoJ. M.Transportation Cost Allocation on a Fixed Route. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 83, 2015, pp. 61–73.
23.
FriskM.Göthe-LundgrenM.JörnstenK.RönnqvistM.Cost Allocation in Collaborative Forest Transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 205, No. 2, 2010, pp. 448–458.
24.
MiyagawaM.Joint Distribution of Distances to the First and the Second Nearest Facilities. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2012, pp. 209–222.
25.
TaniguchiE.ShimamotoH.Intelligent Transportation System Based Dynamic Vehicle Routing and Scheduling with Variable Travel Times. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 12, No. 3–4, 2004, pp. 235–250.
26.
TangS.WeiG.ChenX.Location Selection of Express Distribution Centre with Probabilistic Linguistic MABAC Method Based on the Cumulative Prospect Theory. Informatica, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2022, pp. 131–150.
27.
UlutaşA.KarakuşC. B.TopalA.Location Selection for Logistics Center with Fuzzy SWARA and CoCoSo Methods. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2020, pp. 4693–4709.
28.
GocerF.SenerN.Spherical Fuzzy Extension of AHP-ARAS Methods Integrated with Modified K-Means Clustering for Logistics Hub Location Problem. Expert Systems, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2022, p. e12886.
29.
WangK.BaeK.-H.In-Depth Learning Layout and Path Optimization of Energy Service Urban Distribution Sites Under e-Commerce Environment. Complexity, Vol. 2021, 2021, pp. 1–11.
30.
LiuC.ZhouJ.GanJ.WuY.HuangY.ShaoJ.OuyangL.Optimizing the Ground Intra-City Express Delivery Network: An Integrated Multiple Centrality Assessment, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, and Multi-Objective Integer Programming Model. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, 2022, pp. 1–19.
31.
RavivT.The Service Points’ Location and Capacity Problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 176, 2023, p. 103216.
32.
MuraliP.OrdóñezF.DessoukyM. M.Facility Location Under Demand Uncertainty: Response to a Large-Scale Bio-Terror Attack. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2012, pp. 78–87.
33.
PunyimP.KaroonsoontawongA.UnnikrishnanA.XieC.Tabu Search Heuristic for Joint Location-Inventory Problem with Stochastic Inventory Capacity and Practicality Constraints. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2018, pp. 51–84.
34.
HuW.DongJ.HwangB.RenR.ChenZ.Hybrid Optimization Procedures Applying for Two-Echelon Urban Underground Logistics Network Planning: A Case Study of Beijing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 106452.
35.
JanjevicM.MerchánD.WinkenbachM.Designing Multi-Tier, Multi-Service-Level, and Multi-Modal Last-Mile Distribution Networks for Omni-Channel Operations. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 294, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1059–1077.
36.
GuajardoM.RönnqvistM.A Review on Cost Allocation Methods in Collaborative Transportation. International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2016, pp. 371–392.
37.
LiuN.ChengY.Allocating Cost to Freight Carriers in Horizontal Logistic Collaborative Transportation Planning on Leading Company Perspective. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, Vol. 2020, 4504086.
38.
NguyenC.DessoukyM.TorielloA.Consolidation Strategies for the Delivery of Perishable Products. Transportation Research Part E Logistics & Transportation Review, Vol. 69, 2014, pp. 108–121.
39.
SantosM. J.MartinsS.AmorimP.Almada-LoboB.A Green Lateral Collaborative Problem Under Different Transportation Strategies and Profit Allocation Methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 288, 2021, p. 125678.
40.
van ZonM.SplietR.van den HeuvelW.The Joint Network Vehicle Routing Game. Transportation Science, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2021, pp. 179–195.
41.
SuiQ.WeiF.ZhangR.LinX.TongN.WangZ.LiZ.Optimal Use of Electric Energy Oriented Water-Electricity Combined Supply System for the Building-Integrated-Photovoltaics Community. Applied Energy, Vol. 247, 2019, pp. 549–558.
42.
ChenY.ParkB.KouX.HuM.DongJ.LiF.AmasyaliK.OlamaM.A Comparison Study on Trading Behavior and Profit Distribution in Local Energy Transaction Games. Applied Energy, Vol. 280, 2020, p. 115941.
43.
ZhangJ.LiX.JiaD.ZhouY.A Bi-Level Programming for Union Battery Swapping Stations Location-Routing Problem Under Joint Distribution and Cost Allocation. Energy, Vol. 272, 2023, p. 127152.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
